All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: paulius.zaleckas@gmail.com (Paulius Zaleckas)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: Gemini: Add support for PCI BUS
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 21:57:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CF405A3.9030205@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101129193246.GB20761@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>

On 11/29/2010 09:32 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 06:05:07PM +0200, Paulius Zaleckas wrote:
>> No he really should NOT use readl/writel. The ONLY difference
>> between readl/writel and __raw_readl/__raw_writel is endianess
>> conversion. __raw_*l is not doing it. Which to use depend only
>> on HW.
>
> Wrong.  readl/writel have barriers too to guarantee ordering between
> device accesses and memory accesses.  (device accesses are already
> ordered with respect to themselves.)  __raw variants do not
> guarantee the relative ordering between memory accesses and device
> accesses.

#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_DMA_MEM_BUFFERABLE
#define __iormb()		rmb()
#define __iowmb()		wmb()
#else
#define __iormb()		do { } while (0)
#define __iowmb()		do { } while (0)
#endif

CONFIG_ARM_DMA_MEM_BUFFERABLE is NOT defined in this case.
I don't see any other barriers.
readl does endianess conversion. What to do if you don't need it?
Do it one more time?

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paulius Zaleckas <paulius.zaleckas@gmail.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Hans Ulli Kroll <ulli.kroll@googlemail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: Gemini: Add support for PCI BUS
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 21:57:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CF405A3.9030205@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101129193246.GB20761@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>

On 11/29/2010 09:32 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 06:05:07PM +0200, Paulius Zaleckas wrote:
>> No he really should NOT use readl/writel. The ONLY difference
>> between readl/writel and __raw_readl/__raw_writel is endianess
>> conversion. __raw_*l is not doing it. Which to use depend only
>> on HW.
>
> Wrong.  readl/writel have barriers too to guarantee ordering between
> device accesses and memory accesses.  (device accesses are already
> ordered with respect to themselves.)  __raw variants do not
> guarantee the relative ordering between memory accesses and device
> accesses.

#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_DMA_MEM_BUFFERABLE
#define __iormb()		rmb()
#define __iowmb()		wmb()
#else
#define __iormb()		do { } while (0)
#define __iowmb()		do { } while (0)
#endif

CONFIG_ARM_DMA_MEM_BUFFERABLE is NOT defined in this case.
I don't see any other barriers.
readl does endianess conversion. What to do if you don't need it?
Do it one more time?

  reply	other threads:[~2010-11-29 19:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-11-27 12:24 [PATCH] ARM: Gemini: Add support for PCI BUS Hans Ulli Kroll
2010-11-27 12:24 ` Hans Ulli Kroll
2010-11-28 19:56 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-11-28 19:56   ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-11-29 12:17   ` Hans Ulli Kroll
2010-11-29 12:17     ` Hans Ulli Kroll
2010-11-29 15:02     ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-11-29 15:02       ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-11-29 16:05   ` Paulius Zaleckas
2010-11-29 16:05     ` Paulius Zaleckas
2010-11-29 16:45     ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-11-29 16:45       ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-11-29 18:52       ` Paulius Zaleckas
2010-11-29 18:52         ` Paulius Zaleckas
2010-11-29 20:02         ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-11-29 20:02           ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-11-29 20:19           ` Paulius Zaleckas
2010-11-29 20:19             ` Paulius Zaleckas
2010-11-30  8:15             ` Hans Ulli Kroll
2010-11-30  8:15               ` Hans Ulli Kroll
2010-11-30  9:34               ` Paulius Zaleckas
2010-11-30  9:34                 ` Paulius Zaleckas
2010-12-01 11:52                 ` Hans Ulli Kroll
2010-12-01 11:52                   ` Hans Ulli Kroll
2010-12-01 13:08                   ` Paulius Zaleckas
2010-12-01 13:08                     ` Paulius Zaleckas
2010-12-01 15:02                     ` Hans Ulli Kroll
2010-12-01 15:02                       ` Hans Ulli Kroll
2010-12-06 10:51       ` Sergei Shtylyov
2010-12-06 10:51         ` Sergei Shtylyov
2010-12-06 12:18         ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-12-06 12:18           ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-11-29 19:32     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-11-29 19:32       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-11-29 19:57       ` Paulius Zaleckas [this message]
2010-11-29 19:57         ` Paulius Zaleckas
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-11-20 14:27 [PATCH] ARM: Gemini: Add support for PCI Bus Hans Ulli Kroll
2010-11-20 14:27 ` Hans Ulli Kroll
2010-11-20 19:30 ` Paulius Zaleckas
2010-11-20 19:30   ` Paulius Zaleckas
2010-11-26 11:18   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-11-26 11:18     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-11-26 11:57 ` Michał Mirosław
2010-11-26 11:57   ` Michał Mirosław
2010-11-27 12:16   ` Hans Ulli Kroll
2010-11-27 12:16     ` Hans Ulli Kroll
2010-11-27 13:01     ` Michał Mirosław
2010-11-27 13:01       ` Michał Mirosław
2010-11-27 15:39       ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-11-27 15:39         ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-11-29  8:12         ` Hans Ulli Kroll
2010-11-29  8:12           ` Hans Ulli Kroll
2010-11-29 14:22         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-11-29 14:22           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-11-29 14:50           ` Hans Ulli Kroll
2010-11-29 14:50             ` Hans Ulli Kroll
2010-11-29 15:57             ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-11-29 15:57               ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-11-30 15:38               ` Hans Ulli Kroll
2010-11-30 15:38                 ` Hans Ulli Kroll
2010-11-30 16:05               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-11-30 16:05                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-11-30 16:19                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-11-30 16:19                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-12-01 15:05                   ` Hans Ulli Kroll
2010-12-01 15:05                     ` Hans Ulli Kroll
2010-11-29 15:50           ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-11-29 15:50             ` Arnd Bergmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4CF405A3.9030205@gmail.com \
    --to=paulius.zaleckas@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.