All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM: Windows 64-bit troubles with user space irqchip
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 13:50:02 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D4952FA.8020300@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110202123532.GF14984@redhat.com>

On 2011-02-02 13:35, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 12:58:47PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2011-02-02 12:55, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 07:02:03PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> testing my KVM patches, I noticed that none of the 64-bit Windows
>>>> versions I have around (early Win7 & 2003 server) boot in KVM mode when
>>>> using 2 or more VCPUs and the user space irqchip. This applies to both
>>>> upstream KVM and qemu-kvm, with our without any of my current patches. A
>>>> subtle difference in the APIC/IOAPIC emulation?
>>>>
>>>> Can anyone confirm this?
>>>>
>>> Just booted windows7-64 on qemu-kvm -no-kvm-irqchip + latest kernel here.
>>
>> Strange. -smp 2?
>>
> Opps, -smp 1. With -smp 2 it boot almost completely and then hangs.

Ah, good (or not good). With Windows 2003 Server, I actually get a Blue
Screen (Stop 0x000000b8).

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM: Windows 64-bit troubles with user space irqchip
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 13:50:02 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D4952FA.8020300@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110202123532.GF14984@redhat.com>

On 2011-02-02 13:35, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 12:58:47PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2011-02-02 12:55, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 07:02:03PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> testing my KVM patches, I noticed that none of the 64-bit Windows
>>>> versions I have around (early Win7 & 2003 server) boot in KVM mode when
>>>> using 2 or more VCPUs and the user space irqchip. This applies to both
>>>> upstream KVM and qemu-kvm, with our without any of my current patches. A
>>>> subtle difference in the APIC/IOAPIC emulation?
>>>>
>>>> Can anyone confirm this?
>>>>
>>> Just booted windows7-64 on qemu-kvm -no-kvm-irqchip + latest kernel here.
>>
>> Strange. -smp 2?
>>
> Opps, -smp 1. With -smp 2 it boot almost completely and then hangs.

Ah, good (or not good). With Windows 2003 Server, I actually get a Blue
Screen (Stop 0x000000b8).

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux

  reply	other threads:[~2011-02-02 12:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-01 18:02 KVM: Windows 64-bit troubles with user space irqchip Jan Kiszka
2011-02-01 18:02 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
2011-02-02 11:55 ` Gleb Natapov
2011-02-02 11:55   ` Gleb Natapov
2011-02-02 11:58   ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-02 11:58     ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-02 12:35     ` Gleb Natapov
2011-02-02 12:35       ` Gleb Natapov
2011-02-02 12:50       ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2011-02-02 12:50         ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-02 13:05         ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-02 13:05           ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-02 13:09           ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-02 13:09             ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-02 13:11             ` Gleb Natapov
2011-02-02 13:14               ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-02 13:14                 ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-02 13:18                 ` Gleb Natapov
2011-02-02 13:18                   ` Gleb Natapov
2011-02-02 14:30           ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-02 14:30             ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-02 14:35             ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-02 14:35               ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-02 14:43               ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-02 14:43                 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-02 14:52                 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-02 14:52                   ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-02 15:09                   ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-02 15:09                     ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-02 15:35                     ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-02 15:35                       ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-02 15:44                       ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-02 15:44                         ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-02 15:46                       ` Gleb Natapov
2011-02-02 15:52                         ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-02 16:29                           ` Gleb Natapov
2011-02-02 16:36                             ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-02 16:39                               ` Gleb Natapov
2011-02-02 16:51                                 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-03  7:42                                   ` Gleb Natapov
2011-02-03  9:31                                     ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-03  8:18                           ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-03  8:18                             ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-03  9:32                             ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-03  9:32                               ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-03 10:01                               ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-03 10:01                                 ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-03 10:14                                 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-03 10:14                                   ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-03 10:04                               ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-02-03 10:04                                 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-02-03 10:11                                 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-03 10:11                                   ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-03 14:15                                   ` Gleb Natapov
2011-02-03 14:27                                     ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-06 10:26                                     ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-06 10:26                                       ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-06 10:28                                       ` Gleb Natapov
2011-02-06 10:28                                         ` Gleb Natapov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D4952FA.8020300@siemens.com \
    --to=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
    --cc=gleb@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.