From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM: Windows 64-bit troubles with user space irqchip
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 15:52:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D496FA6.8070301@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D496D77.2010405@siemens.com>
On 2011-02-02 15:43, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-02-02 15:35, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> On 02/02/2011 04:30 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> On 2011-02-02 14:05, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>>> On 02/02/2011 02:50 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Opps, -smp 1. With -smp 2 it boot almost completely and then hangs.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ah, good (or not good). With Windows 2003 Server, I actually get a Blue
>>>>> Screen (Stop 0x000000b8).
>>>>
>>>> Userspace APIC is broken since it may run with an outdated cr8, does
>>>> reverting 27a4f7976d5 help?
>>>
>>> Can you elaborate on what is broken? The way hw/apic.c maintains the
>>> tpr? Would it make sense to compare this against the in-kernel model? Or
>>> do you mean something else?
>>
>> The problem, IIRC, was that we look up the TPR but it may already have
>> been changed by the running vcpu. Not 100% sure.
>>
>> If that is indeed the problem then the fix would be to process the APIC
>> in vcpu context (which is what the kernel does - we set a bit in the IRR
>> and all further processing is synchronous).
>
> You mean: user space changes the tpr value while the vcpu is in KVM_RUN,
> then we return from the kernel and overwrite the tpr in the apic with
> the vcpu's view, right?
Hmm, probably rather that there is a discrepancy between tpr and irr.
The latter is changed asynchronously /wrt to the vcpu, the former /wrt
the user space device model.
Run apic_set_irq on the vcpu?
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM: Windows 64-bit troubles with user space irqchip
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 15:52:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D496FA6.8070301@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D496D77.2010405@siemens.com>
On 2011-02-02 15:43, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-02-02 15:35, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> On 02/02/2011 04:30 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> On 2011-02-02 14:05, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>>> On 02/02/2011 02:50 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Opps, -smp 1. With -smp 2 it boot almost completely and then hangs.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ah, good (or not good). With Windows 2003 Server, I actually get a Blue
>>>>> Screen (Stop 0x000000b8).
>>>>
>>>> Userspace APIC is broken since it may run with an outdated cr8, does
>>>> reverting 27a4f7976d5 help?
>>>
>>> Can you elaborate on what is broken? The way hw/apic.c maintains the
>>> tpr? Would it make sense to compare this against the in-kernel model? Or
>>> do you mean something else?
>>
>> The problem, IIRC, was that we look up the TPR but it may already have
>> been changed by the running vcpu. Not 100% sure.
>>
>> If that is indeed the problem then the fix would be to process the APIC
>> in vcpu context (which is what the kernel does - we set a bit in the IRR
>> and all further processing is synchronous).
>
> You mean: user space changes the tpr value while the vcpu is in KVM_RUN,
> then we return from the kernel and overwrite the tpr in the apic with
> the vcpu's view, right?
Hmm, probably rather that there is a discrepancy between tpr and irr.
The latter is changed asynchronously /wrt to the vcpu, the former /wrt
the user space device model.
Run apic_set_irq on the vcpu?
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-02 14:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-01 18:02 KVM: Windows 64-bit troubles with user space irqchip Jan Kiszka
2011-02-01 18:02 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
2011-02-02 11:55 ` Gleb Natapov
2011-02-02 11:55 ` Gleb Natapov
2011-02-02 11:58 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-02 11:58 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-02 12:35 ` Gleb Natapov
2011-02-02 12:35 ` Gleb Natapov
2011-02-02 12:50 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-02 12:50 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-02 13:05 ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-02 13:05 ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-02 13:09 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-02 13:09 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-02 13:11 ` Gleb Natapov
2011-02-02 13:14 ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-02 13:14 ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-02 13:18 ` Gleb Natapov
2011-02-02 13:18 ` Gleb Natapov
2011-02-02 14:30 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-02 14:30 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-02 14:35 ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-02 14:35 ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-02 14:43 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-02 14:43 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-02 14:52 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2011-02-02 14:52 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-02 15:09 ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-02 15:09 ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-02 15:35 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-02 15:35 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-02 15:44 ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-02 15:44 ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-02 15:46 ` Gleb Natapov
2011-02-02 15:52 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-02 16:29 ` Gleb Natapov
2011-02-02 16:36 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-02 16:39 ` Gleb Natapov
2011-02-02 16:51 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-03 7:42 ` Gleb Natapov
2011-02-03 9:31 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-03 8:18 ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-03 8:18 ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-03 9:32 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-03 9:32 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-03 10:01 ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-03 10:01 ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-03 10:14 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-03 10:14 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-03 10:04 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-02-03 10:04 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-02-03 10:11 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-03 10:11 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-03 14:15 ` Gleb Natapov
2011-02-03 14:27 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-06 10:26 ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-06 10:26 ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-06 10:28 ` Gleb Natapov
2011-02-06 10:28 ` Gleb Natapov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D496FA6.8070301@siemens.com \
--to=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.