All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Paul Menage <menage@google.com>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"David Rientjes" <rientjes@google.com>,
	"缪 勰" <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] cpuset: Remove unneeded NODEMASK_ALLOC() in cpuset_attch()
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 10:37:43 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D5DDB77.8090807@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimRH=LVRLnajbtL3a8FwKkbEfLspAHXXeQLUY8=@mail.gmail.com>

Paul Menage wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>> oldcs->mems_allowed is not modified during cpuset_attch(), so
>> we don't have to copy it to a buffer allocated by NODEMASK_ALLOC().
>> Just pass it to cpuset_migrate_mm().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
> 
> I'd be inclined to skip this one - we're already allocating one
> nodemask, so one more isn't really any extra complexity, and we're
> doing horrendously complicated stuff in cpuset_migrate_mm() that's
> much more likely to fail in low-memory situations.

That's true, but it's not a reason to add more cases that can fail.

> 
> It's true that mems_allowed can't change during the call to

Sorry to lead you to mistake what I meant. I meant 'from' is not modified
after it's copied from oldcs->mems_allowed, so the two are exactly the
same and thus we only need one.

> cpuset_attach(), but that's due to the fact that both cgroup_attach()
> and the cpuset.mems write paths take cgroup_mutex. I might prefer to
> leave the allocated nodemask here and wrap callback_mutex around the
> places in cpuset_attach() where we're reading from a cpuset's
> mems_allowed - that would remove the implicit synchronization via
> cgroup_mutex and leave the code a little more understandable.

It's not an implicit synchronization, but instead the lock rule for
reading/writing a cpuset's mems/cpus is described in the comment.

> 
>> ---
>>  kernel/cpuset.c |    7 ++-----
>>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/cpuset.c b/kernel/cpuset.c
>> index f13ff2e..70c9ca2 100644
>> --- a/kernel/cpuset.c
>> +++ b/kernel/cpuset.c
>> @@ -1438,10 +1438,9 @@ static void cpuset_attach(struct cgroup_subsys *ss, struct cgroup *cont,
>>        struct mm_struct *mm;
>>        struct cpuset *cs = cgroup_cs(cont);
>>        struct cpuset *oldcs = cgroup_cs(oldcont);
>> -       NODEMASK_ALLOC(nodemask_t, from, GFP_KERNEL);
>>        NODEMASK_ALLOC(nodemask_t, to, GFP_KERNEL);
>>
>> -       if (from == NULL || to == NULL)
>> +       if (to == NULL)
>>                goto alloc_fail;
>>
>>        if (cs == &top_cpuset) {
>> @@ -1463,18 +1462,16 @@ static void cpuset_attach(struct cgroup_subsys *ss, struct cgroup *cont,
>>        }
>>
>>        /* change mm; only needs to be done once even if threadgroup */
>> -       *from = oldcs->mems_allowed;
>>        *to = cs->mems_allowed;
>>        mm = get_task_mm(tsk);
>>        if (mm) {
>>                mpol_rebind_mm(mm, to);
>>                if (is_memory_migrate(cs))
>> -                       cpuset_migrate_mm(mm, from, to);
>> +                       cpuset_migrate_mm(mm, &oldcs->mems_allowed, to);
>>                mmput(mm);
>>        }
>>
>>  alloc_fail:
>> -       NODEMASK_FREE(from);
>>        NODEMASK_FREE(to);
>>  }
>>
>> --
>> 1.7.3.1
>>
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Paul Menage <menage@google.com>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"David Rientjes" <rientjes@google.com>,
	"缪 勰" <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] cpuset: Remove unneeded NODEMASK_ALLOC() in cpuset_attch()
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 10:37:43 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D5DDB77.8090807@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimRH=LVRLnajbtL3a8FwKkbEfLspAHXXeQLUY8=@mail.gmail.com>

Paul Menage wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>> oldcs->mems_allowed is not modified during cpuset_attch(), so
>> we don't have to copy it to a buffer allocated by NODEMASK_ALLOC().
>> Just pass it to cpuset_migrate_mm().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
> 
> I'd be inclined to skip this one - we're already allocating one
> nodemask, so one more isn't really any extra complexity, and we're
> doing horrendously complicated stuff in cpuset_migrate_mm() that's
> much more likely to fail in low-memory situations.

That's true, but it's not a reason to add more cases that can fail.

> 
> It's true that mems_allowed can't change during the call to

Sorry to lead you to mistake what I meant. I meant 'from' is not modified
after it's copied from oldcs->mems_allowed, so the two are exactly the
same and thus we only need one.

> cpuset_attach(), but that's due to the fact that both cgroup_attach()
> and the cpuset.mems write paths take cgroup_mutex. I might prefer to
> leave the allocated nodemask here and wrap callback_mutex around the
> places in cpuset_attach() where we're reading from a cpuset's
> mems_allowed - that would remove the implicit synchronization via
> cgroup_mutex and leave the code a little more understandable.

It's not an implicit synchronization, but instead the lock rule for
reading/writing a cpuset's mems/cpus is described in the comment.

> 
>> ---
>>  kernel/cpuset.c |    7 ++-----
>>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/cpuset.c b/kernel/cpuset.c
>> index f13ff2e..70c9ca2 100644
>> --- a/kernel/cpuset.c
>> +++ b/kernel/cpuset.c
>> @@ -1438,10 +1438,9 @@ static void cpuset_attach(struct cgroup_subsys *ss, struct cgroup *cont,
>>        struct mm_struct *mm;
>>        struct cpuset *cs = cgroup_cs(cont);
>>        struct cpuset *oldcs = cgroup_cs(oldcont);
>> -       NODEMASK_ALLOC(nodemask_t, from, GFP_KERNEL);
>>        NODEMASK_ALLOC(nodemask_t, to, GFP_KERNEL);
>>
>> -       if (from == NULL || to == NULL)
>> +       if (to == NULL)
>>                goto alloc_fail;
>>
>>        if (cs == &top_cpuset) {
>> @@ -1463,18 +1462,16 @@ static void cpuset_attach(struct cgroup_subsys *ss, struct cgroup *cont,
>>        }
>>
>>        /* change mm; only needs to be done once even if threadgroup */
>> -       *from = oldcs->mems_allowed;
>>        *to = cs->mems_allowed;
>>        mm = get_task_mm(tsk);
>>        if (mm) {
>>                mpol_rebind_mm(mm, to);
>>                if (is_memory_migrate(cs))
>> -                       cpuset_migrate_mm(mm, from, to);
>> +                       cpuset_migrate_mm(mm, &oldcs->mems_allowed, to);
>>                mmput(mm);
>>        }
>>
>>  alloc_fail:
>> -       NODEMASK_FREE(from);
>>        NODEMASK_FREE(to);
>>  }
>>
>> --
>> 1.7.3.1
>>
> 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2011-02-18  2:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-17  1:49 [PATCH 1/4] cpuset: Remove unneeded NODEMASK_ALLOC() in cpuset_sprintf_memlist() Li Zefan
2011-02-17  1:49 ` Li Zefan
2011-02-17  1:49 ` [PATCH 2/4] cpuset: Remove unneeded NODEMASK_ALLOC() in cpuset_attch() Li Zefan
2011-02-17  1:49   ` Li Zefan
2011-02-17 23:46   ` Paul Menage
2011-02-17 23:46     ` Paul Menage
2011-02-18  2:37     ` Li Zefan [this message]
2011-02-18  2:37       ` Li Zefan
2011-02-20  1:51   ` David Rientjes
2011-02-20  1:51     ` David Rientjes
2011-02-17  1:50 ` [PATCH 3/4] cpuset: Fix unchecked calls to NODEMASK_ALLOC() Li Zefan
2011-02-17  1:50   ` Li Zefan
2011-02-17 22:46   ` Andrew Morton
2011-02-17 22:46     ` Andrew Morton
2011-02-17 23:50     ` Paul Menage
2011-02-17 23:50       ` Paul Menage
2011-02-18  2:47       ` Li Zefan
2011-02-18  2:47         ` Li Zefan
2011-02-19  2:28         ` Paul Menage
2011-02-19  2:28           ` Paul Menage
2011-02-20  1:51   ` David Rientjes
2011-02-20  1:51     ` David Rientjes
2011-02-21  3:20     ` Li Zefan
2011-02-21  3:20       ` Li Zefan
2011-02-21  5:30       ` Li Zefan
2011-02-22  0:25       ` David Rientjes
2011-02-22  0:25         ` David Rientjes
2011-02-22  2:15         ` Li Zefan
2011-02-22  2:15           ` Li Zefan
2011-02-22 20:30           ` David Rientjes
2011-02-22 20:30             ` David Rientjes
2011-02-17  1:50 ` [PATCH 4/4] cpuset: Hold callback_mutex in cpuset_clone() Li Zefan
2011-02-17  1:50   ` Li Zefan
2011-02-17 23:51   ` Paul Menage
2011-02-17 23:51     ` Paul Menage
2011-02-20  1:51   ` David Rientjes
2011-02-20  1:51     ` David Rientjes
2011-02-17 23:35 ` [PATCH 1/4] cpuset: Remove unneeded NODEMASK_ALLOC() in cpuset_sprintf_memlist() Paul Menage
2011-02-17 23:35   ` Paul Menage
2011-02-18  2:22   ` Li Zefan
2011-02-18  2:22     ` Li Zefan
2011-02-20  1:51 ` David Rientjes
2011-02-20  1:51   ` David Rientjes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D5DDB77.8090807@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=menage@google.com \
    --cc=miaox@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.