From: Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net>,
David Brown <davidb@codeaurora.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] msm: scm: Fix improper register assignment
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 13:29:14 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D6D652A.5050502@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1298975837.7828.9.camel@e102144-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
On 03/01/2011 02:37 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> On Sat, 2011-02-26 at 20:04 +0000, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>> Right. A minimal test case may look like this if someone feels like
>> filling a gcc bug report:
>>
>> extern int foo(int x);
>>
>> int bar(int x)
>> {
>> register int a asm("r0") = 1;
>> x = foo(x);
>> asm ("add %0, %1, %2" : "=r" (x) : "r" (a), "r" (x));
>> return x;
>> }
>>
>> And the produced code is:
>>
>> bar:
>> stmfd sp!, {r3, lr}
>> bl foo
>> #APP
>> add r0, r0, r0
>> ldmfd sp!, {r3, pc}
>>
>> So this is clearly bogus.
>>
>
> I agree that this is wrong, but the compiler people may try and argue
> the other way. I'll ask some of the compiler guys at ARM and see what
> they think.
Nicolas and Will,
Thanks for the sample bug code and thanks for checking with the compiler
guys and validating (in another thread) that this is indeed a bug in
GCC. Glad to know we weren't doing something stupid.
>>> In any case, fortunately it works with the fix.
>>
>> Please add a comment in your patch to explain the issue.
>>
>
> Perhaps a more robust fix would be to remove the register int
> declarations and handle the parameter marshalling in the same asm block
> that contains the smc?
I was thinking the same, but the opposing idea I heard was that not
doing it inside the asm block would allow GCC to be make better use of
the registers. Didn't have a strong opinion either way, so we went with
the implementation that was sent out.
Thanks,
Saravana
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: skannan@codeaurora.org (Saravana Kannan)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] msm: scm: Fix improper register assignment
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 13:29:14 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D6D652A.5050502@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1298975837.7828.9.camel@e102144-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
On 03/01/2011 02:37 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> On Sat, 2011-02-26 at 20:04 +0000, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>> Right. A minimal test case may look like this if someone feels like
>> filling a gcc bug report:
>>
>> extern int foo(int x);
>>
>> int bar(int x)
>> {
>> register int a asm("r0") = 1;
>> x = foo(x);
>> asm ("add %0, %1, %2" : "=r" (x) : "r" (a), "r" (x));
>> return x;
>> }
>>
>> And the produced code is:
>>
>> bar:
>> stmfd sp!, {r3, lr}
>> bl foo
>> #APP
>> add r0, r0, r0
>> ldmfd sp!, {r3, pc}
>>
>> So this is clearly bogus.
>>
>
> I agree that this is wrong, but the compiler people may try and argue
> the other way. I'll ask some of the compiler guys at ARM and see what
> they think.
Nicolas and Will,
Thanks for the sample bug code and thanks for checking with the compiler
guys and validating (in another thread) that this is indeed a bug in
GCC. Glad to know we weren't doing something stupid.
>>> In any case, fortunately it works with the fix.
>>
>> Please add a comment in your patch to explain the issue.
>>
>
> Perhaps a more robust fix would be to remove the register int
> declarations and handle the parameter marshalling in the same asm block
> that contains the smc?
I was thinking the same, but the opposing idea I heard was that not
doing it inside the asm block would allow GCC to be make better use of
the registers. Didn't have a strong opinion either way, so we went with
the implementation that was sent out.
Thanks,
Saravana
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-01 21:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-24 18:44 [PATCH 0/4] SCM fixes and updates Stephen Boyd
2011-02-24 18:44 ` Stephen Boyd
2011-02-24 18:44 ` [PATCH 1/4] msm: scm: Mark inline asm as volatile Stephen Boyd
2011-02-24 18:44 ` Stephen Boyd
2011-02-25 11:56 ` Will Deacon
2011-02-25 11:56 ` Will Deacon
2011-02-25 11:56 ` Will Deacon
2011-02-25 19:05 ` Stephen Boyd
2011-02-25 19:05 ` Stephen Boyd
2011-02-26 18:12 ` David Brown
2011-02-26 18:12 ` David Brown
2011-02-26 19:43 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-02-26 19:43 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-02-27 17:41 ` David Brown
2011-02-27 17:41 ` David Brown
2011-02-28 2:21 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-02-28 2:21 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-02-27 11:10 ` Will Deacon
2011-02-27 11:10 ` Will Deacon
2011-02-27 17:38 ` David Brown
2011-02-27 17:38 ` David Brown
2011-03-01 10:30 ` Will Deacon
2011-03-01 10:30 ` Will Deacon
2011-02-24 18:44 ` [PATCH 2/4] msm: scm: Fix improper register assignment Stephen Boyd
2011-02-24 18:44 ` Stephen Boyd
2011-02-25 13:23 ` Will Deacon
2011-02-25 13:23 ` Will Deacon
2011-02-25 19:22 ` Stephen Boyd
2011-02-25 19:22 ` Stephen Boyd
2011-02-26 5:09 ` Saravana Kannan
2011-02-26 5:09 ` Saravana Kannan
2011-02-26 8:47 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-26 8:47 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-26 17:58 ` David Brown
2011-02-26 17:58 ` David Brown
2011-02-26 20:04 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-02-26 20:04 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-03-01 10:37 ` Will Deacon
2011-03-01 10:37 ` Will Deacon
2011-03-01 21:29 ` Saravana Kannan [this message]
2011-03-01 21:29 ` Saravana Kannan
2011-03-02 0:02 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-03-02 0:02 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-03-01 13:54 ` Will Deacon
2011-03-01 13:54 ` Will Deacon
2011-02-24 18:44 ` [PATCH 3/4] msm: scm: Check for interruption immediately Stephen Boyd
2011-02-24 18:44 ` Stephen Boyd
2011-02-24 18:44 ` [PATCH 4/4] msm: scm: Get cacheline size from CTR Stephen Boyd
2011-02-24 18:44 ` Stephen Boyd
2011-02-24 19:01 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-02-24 19:01 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-02-24 19:44 ` Stephen Boyd
2011-02-24 19:44 ` Stephen Boyd
2011-02-24 19:56 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-02-24 19:56 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-03-01 4:21 ` Stephen Boyd
2011-03-01 4:21 ` Stephen Boyd
2011-02-24 19:32 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2011-02-24 19:32 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2011-02-24 19:50 ` Stephen Boyd
2011-02-24 19:50 ` Stephen Boyd
2011-02-24 19:55 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-24 19:55 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-03-09 19:29 ` [PATCH 0/4] SCM fixes and updates Stephen Boyd
2011-03-09 19:29 ` Stephen Boyd
2011-03-10 20:06 ` David Brown
2011-03-10 20:06 ` David Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D6D652A.5050502@codeaurora.org \
--to=skannan@codeaurora.org \
--cc=davidb@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=nico@fluxnic.net \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.