All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: david@fromorbit.com
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] vmscan: add shrink_slab tracepoints
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 09:44:33 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DFE97F1.2030206@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1306998067-27659-2-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>

(2011/06/02 16:00), Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> 
> Іt is impossible to understand what the shrinkers are actually doing
> without instrumenting the code, so add a some tracepoints to allow
> insight to be gained.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> ---
>  include/trace/events/vmscan.h |   67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  mm/vmscan.c                   |    6 +++-
>  2 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

This look good to me. I have two minor request. 1) please change patch order,
move this patch after shrinker changes. iow, now both this and [2/12] have
tracepoint change. I don't like it. 2) please avoid cryptic abbreviated variable
names. Instead, please just use the same variable name with vmscan.c source code.


_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: david@fromorbit.com
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] vmscan: add shrink_slab tracepoints
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 09:44:33 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DFE97F1.2030206@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1306998067-27659-2-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>

(2011/06/02 16:00), Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> 
> Іt is impossible to understand what the shrinkers are actually doing
> without instrumenting the code, so add a some tracepoints to allow
> insight to be gained.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> ---
>  include/trace/events/vmscan.h |   67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  mm/vmscan.c                   |    6 +++-
>  2 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

This look good to me. I have two minor request. 1) please change patch order,
move this patch after shrinker changes. iow, now both this and [2/12] have
tracepoint change. I don't like it. 2) please avoid cryptic abbreviated variable
names. Instead, please just use the same variable name with vmscan.c source code.



WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: david@fromorbit.com
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] vmscan: add shrink_slab tracepoints
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 09:44:33 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DFE97F1.2030206@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1306998067-27659-2-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>

(2011/06/02 16:00), Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> 
> Іt is impossible to understand what the shrinkers are actually doing
> without instrumenting the code, so add a some tracepoints to allow
> insight to be gained.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> ---
>  include/trace/events/vmscan.h |   67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  mm/vmscan.c                   |    6 +++-
>  2 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

This look good to me. I have two minor request. 1) please change patch order,
move this patch after shrinker changes. iow, now both this and [2/12] have
tracepoint change. I don't like it. 2) please avoid cryptic abbreviated variable
names. Instead, please just use the same variable name with vmscan.c source code.


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: david@fromorbit.com
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] vmscan: add shrink_slab tracepoints
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 09:44:33 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DFE97F1.2030206@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1306998067-27659-2-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>

(2011/06/02 16:00), Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> 
> D?t is impossible to understand what the shrinkers are actually doing
> without instrumenting the code, so add a some tracepoints to allow
> insight to be gained.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> ---
>  include/trace/events/vmscan.h |   67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  mm/vmscan.c                   |    6 +++-
>  2 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

This look good to me. I have two minor request. 1) please change patch order,
move this patch after shrinker changes. iow, now both this and [2/12] have
tracepoint change. I don't like it. 2) please avoid cryptic abbreviated variable
names. Instead, please just use the same variable name with vmscan.c source code.


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2011-06-20  0:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 102+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-02  7:00 [PATCH 0/12] Per superblock cache reclaim Dave Chinner
2011-06-02  7:00 ` Dave Chinner
2011-06-02  7:00 ` Dave Chinner
2011-06-02  7:00 ` Dave Chinner
2011-06-02  7:00 ` [PATCH 01/12] vmscan: add shrink_slab tracepoints Dave Chinner
2011-06-02  7:00   ` Dave Chinner
2011-06-02  7:00   ` Dave Chinner
2011-06-02  7:00   ` Dave Chinner
2011-06-20  0:44   ` KOSAKI Motohiro [this message]
2011-06-20  0:44     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-06-20  0:44     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-06-20  0:44     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-06-20  0:53     ` Dave Chinner
2011-06-20  0:53       ` Dave Chinner
2011-06-20  0:53       ` Dave Chinner
2011-06-20  0:53       ` Dave Chinner
2011-06-02  7:00 ` [PATCH 02/12] vmscan: shrinker->nr updates race and go wrong Dave Chinner
2011-06-02  7:00   ` Dave Chinner
2011-06-02  7:00   ` Dave Chinner
2011-06-20  0:46   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-06-20  0:46     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-06-20  0:46     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-06-20  1:25     ` Dave Chinner
2011-06-20  1:25       ` Dave Chinner
2011-06-20  1:25       ` Dave Chinner
2011-06-20  4:30       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-06-20  4:30         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-06-20  4:30         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-06-02  7:00 ` [PATCH 03/12] vmscan: reduce wind up shrinker->nr when shrinker can't do work Dave Chinner
2011-06-02  7:00   ` Dave Chinner
2011-06-02  7:00   ` Dave Chinner
2011-06-02  7:00   ` Dave Chinner
2011-06-20  0:51   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-06-20  0:51     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-06-20  0:51     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-06-20  0:51     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-06-21  5:09     ` Dave Chinner
2011-06-21  5:09       ` Dave Chinner
2011-06-21  5:09       ` Dave Chinner
2011-06-21  5:09       ` Dave Chinner
2011-06-21  5:27       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-06-21  5:27         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-06-21  5:27         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-06-02  7:00 ` [PATCH 04/12] vmscan: add customisable shrinker batch size Dave Chinner
2011-06-02  7:00   ` Dave Chinner
2011-06-02  7:00   ` Dave Chinner
2011-06-02  7:01 ` [PATCH 05/12] inode: convert inode_stat.nr_unused to per-cpu counters Dave Chinner
2011-06-02  7:01   ` Dave Chinner
2011-06-02  7:01   ` Dave Chinner
2011-06-02  7:01 ` [PATCH 06/12] inode: Make unused inode LRU per superblock Dave Chinner
2011-06-02  7:01   ` Dave Chinner
2011-06-02  7:01   ` Dave Chinner
2011-06-04  0:25   ` Al Viro
2011-06-04  0:25     ` Al Viro
2011-06-04  0:25     ` Al Viro
2011-06-04  1:40     ` Dave Chinner
2011-06-04  1:40       ` Dave Chinner
2011-06-04  1:40       ` Dave Chinner
2011-06-02  7:01 ` [PATCH 07/12] inode: move to per-sb LRU locks Dave Chinner
2011-06-02  7:01   ` Dave Chinner
2011-06-02  7:01   ` Dave Chinner
2011-06-02  7:01 ` [PATCH 08/12] superblock: introduce per-sb cache shrinker infrastructure Dave Chinner
2011-06-02  7:01   ` Dave Chinner
2011-06-02  7:01   ` Dave Chinner
2011-06-02  7:01   ` Dave Chinner
2011-06-04  0:42   ` Al Viro
2011-06-04  0:42     ` Al Viro
2011-06-04  0:42     ` Al Viro
2011-06-04  1:52     ` Dave Chinner
2011-06-04  1:52       ` Dave Chinner
2011-06-04  1:52       ` Dave Chinner
2011-06-04 14:08       ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-04 14:08         ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-04 14:08         ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-04 14:19         ` Al Viro
2011-06-04 14:19           ` Al Viro
2011-06-04 14:19           ` Al Viro
2011-06-04 14:24           ` Al Viro
2011-06-04 14:24             ` Al Viro
2011-06-04 14:24             ` Al Viro
2011-06-02  7:01 ` [PATCH 09/12] inode: remove iprune_sem Dave Chinner
2011-06-02  7:01   ` Dave Chinner
2011-06-02  7:01   ` Dave Chinner
2011-06-02  7:01 ` [PATCH 10/12] superblock: add filesystem shrinker operations Dave Chinner
2011-06-02  7:01   ` Dave Chinner
2011-06-02  7:01   ` Dave Chinner
2011-06-02  7:01   ` Dave Chinner
2011-06-02  7:01 ` [PATCH 11/12] vfs: increase shrinker batch size Dave Chinner
2011-06-02  7:01   ` Dave Chinner
2011-06-02  7:01   ` Dave Chinner
2011-06-02  9:30   ` Nicolas Kaiser
2011-06-02  9:30     ` Nicolas Kaiser
2011-06-02  9:30     ` Nicolas Kaiser
2011-06-02  7:01 ` [PATCH 12/12] xfs: make use of new shrinker callout for the inode cache Dave Chinner
2011-06-02  7:01   ` Dave Chinner
2011-06-02  7:01   ` Dave Chinner
2011-06-16 11:33 ` [PATCH 0/12] Per superblock cache reclaim Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-16 11:33   ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-16 11:33   ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-17  3:35   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-06-17  3:35     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-06-17  3:35     ` KOSAKI Motohiro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4DFE97F1.2030206@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.