All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] ARM: smp: Fix the CPU hotplug race with scheduler.
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 15:49:57 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DFF1ECD.8080305@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110620095053.GA2082@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>

On 6/20/2011 3:20 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 02:53:59PM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>> The current ARM CPU hotplug code suffers from couple of race conditions
>> in CPU online path with scheduler.
>> The ARM CPU hotplug code doesn't wait for hot-plugged CPU to be marked
>> active as part of cpu_notify() by the CPU which brought it up before
>> enabling interrupts.
>
> Hmm, why not just move the set_cpu_online() call before notify_cpu_starting()
> and add the wait after the set_cpu_online() ?
I think that's what patch is doing. Do you mean, calling hotplug
notifier chain immediately after CPU marked as online. Something
like below.

	set_cpu_online(cpu, true);
	notify_cpu_starting(cpu);
         while (!cpumask_test_cpu(smp_processor_id(), cpu_active_mask))
                 cpu_relax();

         /*
          * Enable local interrupts.
          */
                 local_irq_enable();
         local_fiq_enable();


Regards
Santosh

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: santosh.shilimkar@ti.com (Santosh Shilimkar)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH] ARM: smp: Fix the CPU hotplug race with scheduler.
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 15:49:57 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DFF1ECD.8080305@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110620095053.GA2082@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>

On 6/20/2011 3:20 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 02:53:59PM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>> The current ARM CPU hotplug code suffers from couple of race conditions
>> in CPU online path with scheduler.
>> The ARM CPU hotplug code doesn't wait for hot-plugged CPU to be marked
>> active as part of cpu_notify() by the CPU which brought it up before
>> enabling interrupts.
>
> Hmm, why not just move the set_cpu_online() call before notify_cpu_starting()
> and add the wait after the set_cpu_online() ?
I think that's what patch is doing. Do you mean, calling hotplug
notifier chain immediately after CPU marked as online. Something
like below.

	set_cpu_online(cpu, true);
	notify_cpu_starting(cpu);
         while (!cpumask_test_cpu(smp_processor_id(), cpu_active_mask))
                 cpu_relax();

         /*
          * Enable local interrupts.
          */
                 local_irq_enable();
         local_fiq_enable();


Regards
Santosh

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] ARM: smp: Fix the CPU hotplug race with scheduler.
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 15:49:57 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DFF1ECD.8080305@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110620095053.GA2082@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>

On 6/20/2011 3:20 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 02:53:59PM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>> The current ARM CPU hotplug code suffers from couple of race conditions
>> in CPU online path with scheduler.
>> The ARM CPU hotplug code doesn't wait for hot-plugged CPU to be marked
>> active as part of cpu_notify() by the CPU which brought it up before
>> enabling interrupts.
>
> Hmm, why not just move the set_cpu_online() call before notify_cpu_starting()
> and add the wait after the set_cpu_online() ?
I think that's what patch is doing. Do you mean, calling hotplug
notifier chain immediately after CPU marked as online. Something
like below.

	set_cpu_online(cpu, true);
	notify_cpu_starting(cpu);
         while (!cpumask_test_cpu(smp_processor_id(), cpu_active_mask))
                 cpu_relax();

         /*
          * Enable local interrupts.
          */
                 local_irq_enable();
         local_fiq_enable();


Regards
Santosh


  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-06-20 10:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-20  9:23 [RFC PATCH] ARM: smp: Fix the CPU hotplug race with scheduler Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20  9:23 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20  9:23 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20  9:50 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20  9:50   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20  9:50   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 10:14   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 10:14     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 10:28     ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20 10:28       ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20 10:35       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 10:35         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 10:45         ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20 10:45           ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20 11:42           ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20 11:42             ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20 10:44       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 10:44         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 10:47         ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20 10:47           ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20 11:13           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 11:13             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 11:25             ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20 11:25               ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20 11:40               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 11:40                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 11:51                 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20 11:51                   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20 12:19                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 12:19                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 12:27                     ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20 12:27                       ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20 12:57                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 12:57                         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 14:23                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 14:23                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 14:54                   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20 14:54                     ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20 15:01                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 15:01                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 15:10                       ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20 15:10                         ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-21  9:08                     ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-21  9:08                       ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-21 10:00                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-21 10:00                         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-21 10:17                         ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-21 10:17                           ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-21 10:19                           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-21 10:19                             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-21 10:21                             ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-21 10:21                               ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-21 10:26                               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-21 10:26                                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-21 20:16                                 ` Stephen Boyd
2011-06-21 20:16                                   ` Stephen Boyd
2011-06-21 20:16                                   ` Stephen Boyd
2011-06-21 23:10                                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-21 23:10                                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-22  0:06                                     ` Stephen Boyd
2011-06-22  0:06                                       ` Stephen Boyd
2011-06-22  0:06                                       ` Stephen Boyd
2011-06-22 10:06                                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-22 10:06                                         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 10:19   ` Santosh Shilimkar [this message]
2011-06-20 10:19     ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20 10:19     ` Santosh Shilimkar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4DFF1ECD.8080305@ti.com \
    --to=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.