All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] ARM: smp: Fix the CPU hotplug race with scheduler.
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:47:04 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E006FA0.7050508@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110621100057.GB23802@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>

On 6/21/2011 3:30 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 02:38:34PM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>> Russell,
>>
>> On 6/20/2011 8:24 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>>> On 6/20/2011 7:53 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>>>> So, as loops_per_jiffy is not local to this function, the compiler has
>>>> to write out that zero value, before calling calibrate_delay_converge(),
>>>> and loops_per_jiffy only becomes non-zero _after_
>>>> calibrate_delay_converge()
>>>> has returned. This opens the window and allows the spinlock debugging
>>>> code to explode.
>>>>
>>>> This patch closes the window completely, by only writing to
>>>> loops_per_jiffy
>>>> only when we have a real value for it.
>>>>
>>>> This allows me to boot 3.0.0-rc3 on Versatile Express (4 CPU) whereas
>>>> without this it fails with spinlock lockup and rcu problems.
>>>>
>>>> init/calibrate.c | 14 ++++++++------
>>>> 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>> I am away from my board now. Will test this change.
>> Have tested your change and it seems to fix the crash I
>> was observing. Are you planning to send this fix for rc5?
>
> Yes.  I think sending CPUs into infinite loops in the spinlock code is
> definitely sufficiently serious that it needs to go to Linus ASAP.
> It'd be nice to have a tested-by line though.
>
Sure.

>>> btw, the online-active race is still open even with this patch close
>>> and should be fixed.
>>>
>> The only problem remains is waiting for active mask before
>> marking CPU online. Shall I refresh my patch with only
>> this change then ?
>
> I already have that as a separate change.
Can you point me to both of these commits so that I have
them in my tree for testing.

Thanks for help.

Regards
Santosh

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: santosh.shilimkar@ti.com (Santosh Shilimkar)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH] ARM: smp: Fix the CPU hotplug race with scheduler.
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:47:04 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E006FA0.7050508@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110621100057.GB23802@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>

On 6/21/2011 3:30 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 02:38:34PM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>> Russell,
>>
>> On 6/20/2011 8:24 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>>> On 6/20/2011 7:53 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>>>> So, as loops_per_jiffy is not local to this function, the compiler has
>>>> to write out that zero value, before calling calibrate_delay_converge(),
>>>> and loops_per_jiffy only becomes non-zero _after_
>>>> calibrate_delay_converge()
>>>> has returned. This opens the window and allows the spinlock debugging
>>>> code to explode.
>>>>
>>>> This patch closes the window completely, by only writing to
>>>> loops_per_jiffy
>>>> only when we have a real value for it.
>>>>
>>>> This allows me to boot 3.0.0-rc3 on Versatile Express (4 CPU) whereas
>>>> without this it fails with spinlock lockup and rcu problems.
>>>>
>>>> init/calibrate.c | 14 ++++++++------
>>>> 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>> I am away from my board now. Will test this change.
>> Have tested your change and it seems to fix the crash I
>> was observing. Are you planning to send this fix for rc5?
>
> Yes.  I think sending CPUs into infinite loops in the spinlock code is
> definitely sufficiently serious that it needs to go to Linus ASAP.
> It'd be nice to have a tested-by line though.
>
Sure.

>>> btw, the online-active race is still open even with this patch close
>>> and should be fixed.
>>>
>> The only problem remains is waiting for active mask before
>> marking CPU online. Shall I refresh my patch with only
>> this change then ?
>
> I already have that as a separate change.
Can you point me to both of these commits so that I have
them in my tree for testing.

Thanks for help.

Regards
Santosh

  reply	other threads:[~2011-06-21 10:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-20  9:23 [RFC PATCH] ARM: smp: Fix the CPU hotplug race with scheduler Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20  9:23 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20  9:23 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20  9:50 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20  9:50   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20  9:50   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 10:14   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 10:14     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 10:28     ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20 10:28       ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20 10:35       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 10:35         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 10:45         ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20 10:45           ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20 11:42           ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20 11:42             ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20 10:44       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 10:44         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 10:47         ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20 10:47           ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20 11:13           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 11:13             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 11:25             ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20 11:25               ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20 11:40               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 11:40                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 11:51                 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20 11:51                   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20 12:19                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 12:19                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 12:27                     ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20 12:27                       ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20 12:57                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 12:57                         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 14:23                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 14:23                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 14:54                   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20 14:54                     ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20 15:01                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 15:01                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 15:10                       ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20 15:10                         ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-21  9:08                     ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-21  9:08                       ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-21 10:00                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-21 10:00                         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-21 10:17                         ` Santosh Shilimkar [this message]
2011-06-21 10:17                           ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-21 10:19                           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-21 10:19                             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-21 10:21                             ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-21 10:21                               ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-21 10:26                               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-21 10:26                                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-21 20:16                                 ` Stephen Boyd
2011-06-21 20:16                                   ` Stephen Boyd
2011-06-21 20:16                                   ` Stephen Boyd
2011-06-21 23:10                                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-21 23:10                                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-22  0:06                                     ` Stephen Boyd
2011-06-22  0:06                                       ` Stephen Boyd
2011-06-22  0:06                                       ` Stephen Boyd
2011-06-22 10:06                                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-22 10:06                                         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 10:19   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20 10:19     ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20 10:19     ` Santosh Shilimkar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E006FA0.7050508@ti.com \
    --to=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.