All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] ARM: smp: Fix the CPU hotplug race with scheduler.
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 20:40:45 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DFF62F5.2080802@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110620150140.GM2082@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>

On 6/20/2011 8:31 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 08:24:33PM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>> I am away from my board now. Will test this change.
>> btw, the online-active race is still open even with this patch close
>> and should be fixed.
>
> I have yet to see any evidence of that race - I've been running your
> test loop for about an hour so far on Versatile Express and nothing
> yet.
>
In that case my script was just exposing the calibrate() code race
condition.

> That's not to say that we shouldn't wait for the active mask to become
> true before calling schedule(), but I don't think its as big a deal as
> you're suggesting it is.
I am not expert to really trigger that exact race online-to-active but
am sure the race needs to be fixed.

May be Thomas can suggest a test-case to expose that race. From
his fix for x86, it appeared that the race was indeed hit in some
sequence.

Regards,
Santosh


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: santosh.shilimkar@ti.com (Santosh Shilimkar)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH] ARM: smp: Fix the CPU hotplug race with scheduler.
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 20:40:45 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DFF62F5.2080802@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110620150140.GM2082@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>

On 6/20/2011 8:31 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 08:24:33PM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>> I am away from my board now. Will test this change.
>> btw, the online-active race is still open even with this patch close
>> and should be fixed.
>
> I have yet to see any evidence of that race - I've been running your
> test loop for about an hour so far on Versatile Express and nothing
> yet.
>
In that case my script was just exposing the calibrate() code race
condition.

> That's not to say that we shouldn't wait for the active mask to become
> true before calling schedule(), but I don't think its as big a deal as
> you're suggesting it is.
I am not expert to really trigger that exact race online-to-active but
am sure the race needs to be fixed.

May be Thomas can suggest a test-case to expose that race. From
his fix for x86, it appeared that the race was indeed hit in some
sequence.

Regards,
Santosh

  reply	other threads:[~2011-06-20 15:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-20  9:23 [RFC PATCH] ARM: smp: Fix the CPU hotplug race with scheduler Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20  9:23 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20  9:23 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20  9:50 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20  9:50   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20  9:50   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 10:14   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 10:14     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 10:28     ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20 10:28       ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20 10:35       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 10:35         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 10:45         ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20 10:45           ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20 11:42           ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20 11:42             ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20 10:44       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 10:44         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 10:47         ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20 10:47           ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20 11:13           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 11:13             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 11:25             ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20 11:25               ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20 11:40               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 11:40                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 11:51                 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20 11:51                   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20 12:19                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 12:19                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 12:27                     ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20 12:27                       ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20 12:57                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 12:57                         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 14:23                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 14:23                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 14:54                   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20 14:54                     ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20 15:01                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 15:01                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 15:10                       ` Santosh Shilimkar [this message]
2011-06-20 15:10                         ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-21  9:08                     ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-21  9:08                       ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-21 10:00                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-21 10:00                         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-21 10:17                         ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-21 10:17                           ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-21 10:19                           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-21 10:19                             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-21 10:21                             ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-21 10:21                               ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-21 10:26                               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-21 10:26                                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-21 20:16                                 ` Stephen Boyd
2011-06-21 20:16                                   ` Stephen Boyd
2011-06-21 20:16                                   ` Stephen Boyd
2011-06-21 23:10                                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-21 23:10                                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-22  0:06                                     ` Stephen Boyd
2011-06-22  0:06                                       ` Stephen Boyd
2011-06-22  0:06                                       ` Stephen Boyd
2011-06-22 10:06                                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-22 10:06                                         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-20 10:19   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20 10:19     ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-06-20 10:19     ` Santosh Shilimkar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4DFF62F5.2080802@ti.com \
    --to=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.