* RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay @ 2011-08-31 23:49 Bodke, Kishore K 2011-09-01 4:19 ` Tom Zanussi 2011-09-01 18:26 ` Saul Wold 0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Bodke, Kishore K @ 2011-08-31 23:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: yocto@yoctoproject.org; +Cc: Hart, Darren, Darren Hart [-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 205 bytes --] Hi, I am trying to build core-image-sato with rt kernel for sugarbay and it fails for the do_rootfs . Attached is the build log. Could you please let me know what went wrong? Thanks Kishore. [-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 4719 bytes --] [-- Attachment #2: error.log --] [-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 4284 bytes --] NOTE: package core-image-sato-1.0-r0: task do_rootfs: Started ERROR: Function 'do_rootfs' failed (see /usr/local/src/crf/test/buildsugarbay/tmp/work/sugarbay-poky-linux/core-image-sato-1.0-r0/temp/log.do_rootfs.26992 for further information) ERROR: Logfile of failure stored in: /usr/local/src/crf/test/buildsugarbay/tmp/work/sugarbay-poky-linux/core-image-sato-1.0-r0/temp/log.do_rootfs.26992 Log data follows: | Generating solve db for /usr/local/src/crf/test/buildsugarbay/tmp/deploy/rpm/sugarbay... | total: 1 0.000000 MB 8.597422 secs | fingerprint: 1074 0.007924 MB 0.339992 secs | install: 358 0.000000 MB 0.451351 secs | dbadd: 358 0.000000 MB 0.440230 secs | dbget: 2327 0.000000 MB 0.005507 secs | dbput: 358 1.827316 MB 0.377056 secs | readhdr: 3581 3.586464 MB 6.142026 secs | hdrload: 1790 5.333492 MB 0.008990 secs | hdrget: 64334 0.000000 MB 0.050334 secs | Generating solve db for /usr/local/src/crf/test/buildsugarbay/tmp/deploy/rpm/x86_64... | total: 1 0.000000 MB 381.438528 secs | fingerprint: 16827 0.194594 MB 4.648608 secs | install: 5609 0.000000 MB 30.151955 secs | dbadd: 5609 0.000000 MB 28.033123 secs | dbget: 61733 0.000000 MB 1.799366 secs | dbput: 5609 28.255580 MB 26.221293 secs | readhdr: 56091 56.232770 MB 311.803147 secs | hdrload: 31161 99.368286 MB 0.289955 secs | hdrget: 1011289 0.000000 MB 1.271091 secs | Generating solve db for /usr/local/src/crf/test/buildsugarbay/tmp/deploy/rpm/all... | total: 1 0.000000 MB 0.655311 secs | fingerprint: 96 0.003258 MB 0.096159 secs | install: 32 0.000000 MB 0.055071 secs | dbadd: 32 0.000000 MB 0.052210 secs | dbget: 585 0.000000 MB 0.000629 secs | dbput: 32 0.261540 MB 0.030861 secs | readhdr: 321 0.520504 MB 0.438779 secs | hdrload: 163 0.783276 MB 0.000949 secs | hdrget: 5278 0.000000 MB 0.004932 secs | Generating solve db for /usr/local/src/crf/test/buildsugarbay/tmp/deploy/rpm/all... | total: 1 0.000000 MB 0.123757 secs | fingerprint: 96 0.003258 MB 0.004319 secs | install: 32 0.000000 MB 0.067616 secs | dbadd: 32 0.000000 MB 0.064679 secs | dbget: 585 0.000000 MB 0.000679 secs | dbput: 32 0.261540 MB 0.036774 secs | readhdr: 321 0.520504 MB 0.000821 secs | hdrload: 163 0.783276 MB 0.000910 secs | hdrget: 5278 0.000000 MB 0.005332 secs | Processing locale-base-en-us... | Processing locale-base-en-gb... | Processing task-core-apps-console... | Processing task-core-ssh-dropbear... | Processing task-core-apps-x11-pimlico... | Processing task-core-x11-sato... | Processing zypper... | Processing rt-tests... | Processing task-core-x11-base... | Processing task-core-apps-x11-games... | Processing task-core-apps-x11-core... | Processing rpm... | error: Failed dependencies: | bluez4 is needed by connman-plugin-bluetooth-0.75-r1.x86_64 | ofono is needed by connman-plugin-ofono-0.75-r1.x86_64 | wpa-supplicant is needed by connman-plugin-wifi-0.75-r1.x86_64 | ERROR: Function 'do_rootfs' failed (see /usr/local/src/crf/test/buildsugarbay/tmp/work/sugarbay-poky-linux/core-image-sato-1.0-r0/temp/log.do_rootfs.26992 for further information) NOTE: package core-image-sato-1.0-r0: task do_rootfs: Failed ERROR: Task 8 (/usr/local/src/crf/test/meta/recipes-sato/images/core-image-sato.bb, do_rootfs) failed with exit code '1' ERROR: '/usr/local/src/crf/test/meta/recipes-sato/images/core-image-sato.bb' failed kishore@kishore-desktop:/usr/local/src/crf/test/buildsugarbay$ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay 2011-08-31 23:49 RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay Bodke, Kishore K @ 2011-09-01 4:19 ` Tom Zanussi 2011-09-01 20:57 ` Darren Hart 2011-09-01 18:26 ` Saul Wold 1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Tom Zanussi @ 2011-09-01 4:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bodke, Kishore K; +Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org, Darren Hart, Hart, Darren On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 16:49 -0700, Bodke, Kishore K wrote: > Hi, > > > > I am trying to build core-image-sato with rt kernel for sugarbay and > it fails for the do_rootfs . > FWIW, I was able to build and boot core-image-sato with the rt kernel: Linux sugarbay 3.0.3-rt8-yocto-preempt-rt+ #1 SMP PREEMPT RT Wed Aug 31 21:33:27 CDT 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux using the following commits: poky/master 705ec50edda7f7fb8c132238fe3f1477384a470e meta/intel 902d2f3c919cd1d870dc8d35a7521cbba42e53ea Actually, meta/intel was that commit with Darren's grub patch on top (meta-intel/dvhart/grub-freetype). Tom > > > Attached is the build log. > > > > Could you please let me know what went wrong? > > > > Thanks > > Kishore. > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay 2011-09-01 4:19 ` Tom Zanussi @ 2011-09-01 20:57 ` Darren Hart 2011-09-01 21:01 ` Bodke, Kishore K 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Darren Hart @ 2011-09-01 20:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tom Zanussi; +Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org, Hart, Darren On 08/31/2011 09:19 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 16:49 -0700, Bodke, Kishore K wrote: >> Hi, >> >> >> >> I am trying to build core-image-sato with rt kernel for sugarbay and >> it fails for the do_rootfs . >> > > FWIW, I was able to build and boot core-image-sato with the rt kernel: > > Linux sugarbay 3.0.3-rt8-yocto-preempt-rt+ #1 SMP PREEMPT RT Wed Aug 31 > 21:33:27 CDT 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux > > using the following commits: > > poky/master 705ec50edda7f7fb8c132238fe3f1477384a470e > meta/intel 902d2f3c919cd1d870dc8d35a7521cbba42e53ea > > Actually, meta/intel was that commit with Darren's grub patch on top > (meta-intel/dvhart/grub-freetype). > Kishore, would you try with a clean build and see if this works for you? I'm going to try and build first without -rt and then with rt and see if I can reproduce the issue. Thanks, Darren > Tom > >> >> >> Attached is the build log. >> >> >> >> Could you please let me know what went wrong? >> >> >> >> Thanks >> >> Kishore. >> >> > > -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center Yocto Project - Linux Kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay 2011-09-01 20:57 ` Darren Hart @ 2011-09-01 21:01 ` Bodke, Kishore K 2011-09-01 21:07 ` Darren Hart 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Bodke, Kishore K @ 2011-09-01 21:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Darren Hart, Zanussi, Tom; +Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org, Hart, Darren Clean build with the below TOM's two commit IDs worked for me, if I do not add IMAGE_INSTALL += "rttests" for sugarbay. It failed if I add the IMAGE_INSTALL += "rttests" Thanks Kishore. -----Original Message----- From: Darren Hart [mailto:dvhart@linux.intel.com] Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 1:57 PM To: Zanussi, Tom Cc: Bodke, Kishore K; yocto@yoctoproject.org; Hart, Darren; Saxena, Rahul Subject: Re: RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay On 08/31/2011 09:19 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 16:49 -0700, Bodke, Kishore K wrote: >> Hi, >> >> >> >> I am trying to build core-image-sato with rt kernel for sugarbay and >> it fails for the do_rootfs . >> > > FWIW, I was able to build and boot core-image-sato with the rt kernel: > > Linux sugarbay 3.0.3-rt8-yocto-preempt-rt+ #1 SMP PREEMPT RT Wed Aug 31 > 21:33:27 CDT 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux > > using the following commits: > > poky/master 705ec50edda7f7fb8c132238fe3f1477384a470e > meta/intel 902d2f3c919cd1d870dc8d35a7521cbba42e53ea > > Actually, meta/intel was that commit with Darren's grub patch on top > (meta-intel/dvhart/grub-freetype). > Kishore, would you try with a clean build and see if this works for you? I'm going to try and build first without -rt and then with rt and see if I can reproduce the issue. Thanks, Darren > Tom > >> >> >> Attached is the build log. >> >> >> >> Could you please let me know what went wrong? >> >> >> >> Thanks >> >> Kishore. >> >> > > -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center Yocto Project - Linux Kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay 2011-09-01 21:01 ` Bodke, Kishore K @ 2011-09-01 21:07 ` Darren Hart 2011-09-01 21:14 ` Bodke, Kishore K 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Darren Hart @ 2011-09-01 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bodke, Kishore K; +Cc: Hart, Darren, yocto@yoctoproject.org On 09/01/2011 02:01 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote: > Clean build with the below TOM's two commit IDs worked for me, if I > do not add IMAGE_INSTALL += "rttests" for sugarbay. > > It failed if I add the IMAGE_INSTALL += "rttests" Do you get the same error? If so, it's starting to sound like the second build is what fails since neither of your failure scenarios include a change that's related to the failure. Perhaps an issue with sstate... -- Darren > > Thanks Kishore. -----Original Message----- From: Darren Hart > [mailto:dvhart@linux.intel.com] Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 > 1:57 PM To: Zanussi, Tom Cc: Bodke, Kishore K; > yocto@yoctoproject.org; Hart, Darren; Saxena, Rahul Subject: Re: RT > kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay > > > > On 08/31/2011 09:19 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote: >> >> On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 16:49 -0700, Bodke, Kishore K wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> >>> >>> I am trying to build core-image-sato with rt kernel for sugarbay >>> and it fails for the do_rootfs . >>> >> >> FWIW, I was able to build and boot core-image-sato with the rt >> kernel: >> >> Linux sugarbay 3.0.3-rt8-yocto-preempt-rt+ #1 SMP PREEMPT RT Wed >> Aug 31 21:33:27 CDT 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux >> >> using the following commits: >> >> poky/master 705ec50edda7f7fb8c132238fe3f1477384a470e meta/intel >> 902d2f3c919cd1d870dc8d35a7521cbba42e53ea >> >> Actually, meta/intel was that commit with Darren's grub patch on >> top (meta-intel/dvhart/grub-freetype). >> > > Kishore, would you try with a clean build and see if this works for > you? > > I'm going to try and build first without -rt and then with rt and see > if I can reproduce the issue. > > Thanks, > > Darren > >> Tom >> >>> >>> >>> Attached is the build log. >>> >>> >>> >>> Could you please let me know what went wrong? >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Kishore. >>> >>> >> >> > -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center Yocto Project - Linux Kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay 2011-09-01 21:07 ` Darren Hart @ 2011-09-01 21:14 ` Bodke, Kishore K 2011-09-01 21:52 ` Darren Hart 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Bodke, Kishore K @ 2011-09-01 21:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Darren Hart; +Cc: Hart, Darren, yocto@yoctoproject.org Yeah, it is the same do_rootfs failure I get for both the builds. Thanks Kishore. -----Original Message----- From: Darren Hart [mailto:dvhart@linux.intel.com] Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 2:08 PM To: Bodke, Kishore K Cc: Zanussi, Tom; yocto@yoctoproject.org; Hart, Darren; Saxena, Rahul Subject: Re: RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay On 09/01/2011 02:01 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote: > Clean build with the below TOM's two commit IDs worked for me, if I > do not add IMAGE_INSTALL += "rttests" for sugarbay. > > It failed if I add the IMAGE_INSTALL += "rttests" Do you get the same error? If so, it's starting to sound like the second build is what fails since neither of your failure scenarios include a change that's related to the failure. Perhaps an issue with sstate... -- Darren > > Thanks Kishore. -----Original Message----- From: Darren Hart > [mailto:dvhart@linux.intel.com] Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 > 1:57 PM To: Zanussi, Tom Cc: Bodke, Kishore K; > yocto@yoctoproject.org; Hart, Darren; Saxena, Rahul Subject: Re: RT > kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay > > > > On 08/31/2011 09:19 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote: >> >> On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 16:49 -0700, Bodke, Kishore K wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> >>> >>> I am trying to build core-image-sato with rt kernel for sugarbay >>> and it fails for the do_rootfs . >>> >> >> FWIW, I was able to build and boot core-image-sato with the rt >> kernel: >> >> Linux sugarbay 3.0.3-rt8-yocto-preempt-rt+ #1 SMP PREEMPT RT Wed >> Aug 31 21:33:27 CDT 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux >> >> using the following commits: >> >> poky/master 705ec50edda7f7fb8c132238fe3f1477384a470e meta/intel >> 902d2f3c919cd1d870dc8d35a7521cbba42e53ea >> >> Actually, meta/intel was that commit with Darren's grub patch on >> top (meta-intel/dvhart/grub-freetype). >> > > Kishore, would you try with a clean build and see if this works for > you? > > I'm going to try and build first without -rt and then with rt and see > if I can reproduce the issue. > > Thanks, > > Darren > >> Tom >> >>> >>> >>> Attached is the build log. >>> >>> >>> >>> Could you please let me know what went wrong? >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Kishore. >>> >>> >> >> > -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center Yocto Project - Linux Kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay 2011-09-01 21:14 ` Bodke, Kishore K @ 2011-09-01 21:52 ` Darren Hart 2011-09-01 22:05 ` Bodke, Kishore K 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Darren Hart @ 2011-09-01 21:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bodke, Kishore K; +Cc: Hart, Darren, yocto@yoctoproject.org Can you report the output of: $ bitbake -e core-image-sato | egrep "^IMAGE_INSTALL=" Thanks, Darren On 09/01/2011 02:14 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote: > Yeah, it is the same do_rootfs failure I get for both the builds. > Thanks > Kishore. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Darren Hart [mailto:dvhart@linux.intel.com] > Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 2:08 PM > To: Bodke, Kishore K > Cc: Zanussi, Tom; yocto@yoctoproject.org; Hart, Darren; Saxena, Rahul > Subject: Re: RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay > > On 09/01/2011 02:01 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote: >> Clean build with the below TOM's two commit IDs worked for me, if I >> do not add IMAGE_INSTALL += "rttests" for sugarbay. >> >> It failed if I add the IMAGE_INSTALL += "rttests" > > Do you get the same error? If so, it's starting to sound like the second > build is what fails since neither of your failure scenarios include > a change that's related to the failure. Perhaps an issue with sstate... > > -- > Darren > >> >> Thanks Kishore. -----Original Message----- From: Darren Hart >> [mailto:dvhart@linux.intel.com] Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 >> 1:57 PM To: Zanussi, Tom Cc: Bodke, Kishore K; >> yocto@yoctoproject.org; Hart, Darren; Saxena, Rahul Subject: Re: RT >> kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay >> >> >> >> On 08/31/2011 09:19 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 16:49 -0700, Bodke, Kishore K wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I am trying to build core-image-sato with rt kernel for sugarbay >>>> and it fails for the do_rootfs . >>>> >>> >>> FWIW, I was able to build and boot core-image-sato with the rt >>> kernel: >>> >>> Linux sugarbay 3.0.3-rt8-yocto-preempt-rt+ #1 SMP PREEMPT RT Wed >>> Aug 31 21:33:27 CDT 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux >>> >>> using the following commits: >>> >>> poky/master 705ec50edda7f7fb8c132238fe3f1477384a470e meta/intel >>> 902d2f3c919cd1d870dc8d35a7521cbba42e53ea >>> >>> Actually, meta/intel was that commit with Darren's grub patch on >>> top (meta-intel/dvhart/grub-freetype). >>> >> >> Kishore, would you try with a clean build and see if this works for >> you? >> >> I'm going to try and build first without -rt and then with rt and see >> if I can reproduce the issue. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Darren >> >>> Tom >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Attached is the build log. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Could you please let me know what went wrong? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> Kishore. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> > -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center Yocto Project - Linux Kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay 2011-09-01 21:52 ` Darren Hart @ 2011-09-01 22:05 ` Bodke, Kishore K 2011-09-06 17:42 ` Darren Hart 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Bodke, Kishore K @ 2011-09-01 22:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Darren Hart; +Cc: Hart, Darren, yocto@yoctoproject.org For the build I removed the rttests in the IMAGE_INSTALL , so it is not showing up here. bitbake -e core-image-sato | egrep "IMAGE_INSTALL=" # MULTILIB_IMAGE_INSTALL= # IMAGE_INSTALL=${POKY_BASE_INSTALL} IMAGE_INSTALL="task-core-boot task-base-extended" I will rebuild with rttests and send the output. Thanks Kishore. -----Original Message----- From: Darren Hart [mailto:dvhart@linux.intel.com] Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 2:52 PM To: Bodke, Kishore K Cc: Zanussi, Tom; yocto@yoctoproject.org; Hart, Darren; Saxena, Rahul Subject: Re: RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay Can you report the output of: $ bitbake -e core-image-sato | egrep "^IMAGE_INSTALL=" Thanks, Darren On 09/01/2011 02:14 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote: > Yeah, it is the same do_rootfs failure I get for both the builds. > Thanks > Kishore. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Darren Hart [mailto:dvhart@linux.intel.com] > Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 2:08 PM > To: Bodke, Kishore K > Cc: Zanussi, Tom; yocto@yoctoproject.org; Hart, Darren; Saxena, Rahul > Subject: Re: RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay > > On 09/01/2011 02:01 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote: >> Clean build with the below TOM's two commit IDs worked for me, if I >> do not add IMAGE_INSTALL += "rttests" for sugarbay. >> >> It failed if I add the IMAGE_INSTALL += "rttests" > > Do you get the same error? If so, it's starting to sound like the second > build is what fails since neither of your failure scenarios include > a change that's related to the failure. Perhaps an issue with sstate... > > -- > Darren > >> >> Thanks Kishore. -----Original Message----- From: Darren Hart >> [mailto:dvhart@linux.intel.com] Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 >> 1:57 PM To: Zanussi, Tom Cc: Bodke, Kishore K; >> yocto@yoctoproject.org; Hart, Darren; Saxena, Rahul Subject: Re: RT >> kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay >> >> >> >> On 08/31/2011 09:19 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 16:49 -0700, Bodke, Kishore K wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I am trying to build core-image-sato with rt kernel for sugarbay >>>> and it fails for the do_rootfs . >>>> >>> >>> FWIW, I was able to build and boot core-image-sato with the rt >>> kernel: >>> >>> Linux sugarbay 3.0.3-rt8-yocto-preempt-rt+ #1 SMP PREEMPT RT Wed >>> Aug 31 21:33:27 CDT 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux >>> >>> using the following commits: >>> >>> poky/master 705ec50edda7f7fb8c132238fe3f1477384a470e meta/intel >>> 902d2f3c919cd1d870dc8d35a7521cbba42e53ea >>> >>> Actually, meta/intel was that commit with Darren's grub patch on >>> top (meta-intel/dvhart/grub-freetype). >>> >> >> Kishore, would you try with a clean build and see if this works for >> you? >> >> I'm going to try and build first without -rt and then with rt and see >> if I can reproduce the issue. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Darren >> >>> Tom >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Attached is the build log. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Could you please let me know what went wrong? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> Kishore. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> > -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center Yocto Project - Linux Kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay 2011-09-01 22:05 ` Bodke, Kishore K @ 2011-09-06 17:42 ` Darren Hart 2011-09-06 18:03 ` Bodke, Kishore K 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Darren Hart @ 2011-09-06 17:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bodke, Kishore K; +Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org On 09/01/2011 03:05 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote: > For the build I removed the rttests in the IMAGE_INSTALL , so it is not showing up here. > > bitbake -e core-image-sato | egrep "IMAGE_INSTALL=" > # MULTILIB_IMAGE_INSTALL= > # IMAGE_INSTALL=${POKY_BASE_INSTALL} > IMAGE_INSTALL="task-core-boot task-base-extended" > > I will rebuild with rttests and send the output. Hi Kishore, Where are you with this? Are you unblocked and moving ahead? Thanks, Darren > > Thanks > Kishore. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Darren Hart [mailto:dvhart@linux.intel.com] > Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 2:52 PM > To: Bodke, Kishore K > Cc: Zanussi, Tom; yocto@yoctoproject.org; Hart, Darren; Saxena, Rahul > Subject: Re: RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay > > Can you report the output of: > > $ bitbake -e core-image-sato | egrep "^IMAGE_INSTALL=" > > Thanks, > > Darren > > On 09/01/2011 02:14 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote: >> Yeah, it is the same do_rootfs failure I get for both the builds. >> Thanks >> Kishore. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Darren Hart [mailto:dvhart@linux.intel.com] >> Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 2:08 PM >> To: Bodke, Kishore K >> Cc: Zanussi, Tom; yocto@yoctoproject.org; Hart, Darren; Saxena, Rahul >> Subject: Re: RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay >> >> On 09/01/2011 02:01 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote: >>> Clean build with the below TOM's two commit IDs worked for me, if I >>> do not add IMAGE_INSTALL += "rttests" for sugarbay. >>> >>> It failed if I add the IMAGE_INSTALL += "rttests" >> >> Do you get the same error? If so, it's starting to sound like the second >> build is what fails since neither of your failure scenarios include >> a change that's related to the failure. Perhaps an issue with sstate... >> >> -- >> Darren >> >>> >>> Thanks Kishore. -----Original Message----- From: Darren Hart >>> [mailto:dvhart@linux.intel.com] Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 >>> 1:57 PM To: Zanussi, Tom Cc: Bodke, Kishore K; >>> yocto@yoctoproject.org; Hart, Darren; Saxena, Rahul Subject: Re: RT >>> kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay >>> >>> >>> >>> On 08/31/2011 09:19 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote: >>>> >>>> On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 16:49 -0700, Bodke, Kishore K wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I am trying to build core-image-sato with rt kernel for sugarbay >>>>> and it fails for the do_rootfs . >>>>> >>>> >>>> FWIW, I was able to build and boot core-image-sato with the rt >>>> kernel: >>>> >>>> Linux sugarbay 3.0.3-rt8-yocto-preempt-rt+ #1 SMP PREEMPT RT Wed >>>> Aug 31 21:33:27 CDT 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux >>>> >>>> using the following commits: >>>> >>>> poky/master 705ec50edda7f7fb8c132238fe3f1477384a470e meta/intel >>>> 902d2f3c919cd1d870dc8d35a7521cbba42e53ea >>>> >>>> Actually, meta/intel was that commit with Darren's grub patch on >>>> top (meta-intel/dvhart/grub-freetype). >>>> >>> >>> Kishore, would you try with a clean build and see if this works for >>> you? >>> >>> I'm going to try and build first without -rt and then with rt and see >>> if I can reproduce the issue. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Darren >>> >>>> Tom >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Attached is the build log. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Could you please let me know what went wrong? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> >>>>> Kishore. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> > -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center Yocto Project - Linux Kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay 2011-09-06 17:42 ` Darren Hart @ 2011-09-06 18:03 ` Bodke, Kishore K 0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Bodke, Kishore K @ 2011-09-06 18:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Darren Hart; +Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org Hi Darren, With the below Tom's commit IDs, the build was success and I am moving ahead with this. I am not blocked. I was also able to build and boot the Crystalforest BSP. Thanks Kishore. -----Original Message----- From: Darren Hart [mailto:dvhart@linux.intel.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 10:42 AM To: Bodke, Kishore K Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [yocto] RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay On 09/01/2011 03:05 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote: > For the build I removed the rttests in the IMAGE_INSTALL , so it is not showing up here. > > bitbake -e core-image-sato | egrep "IMAGE_INSTALL=" > # MULTILIB_IMAGE_INSTALL= > # IMAGE_INSTALL=${POKY_BASE_INSTALL} > IMAGE_INSTALL="task-core-boot task-base-extended" > > I will rebuild with rttests and send the output. Hi Kishore, Where are you with this? Are you unblocked and moving ahead? Thanks, Darren > > Thanks > Kishore. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Darren Hart [mailto:dvhart@linux.intel.com] > Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 2:52 PM > To: Bodke, Kishore K > Cc: Zanussi, Tom; yocto@yoctoproject.org; Hart, Darren; Saxena, Rahul > Subject: Re: RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay > > Can you report the output of: > > $ bitbake -e core-image-sato | egrep "^IMAGE_INSTALL=" > > Thanks, > > Darren > > On 09/01/2011 02:14 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote: >> Yeah, it is the same do_rootfs failure I get for both the builds. >> Thanks >> Kishore. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Darren Hart [mailto:dvhart@linux.intel.com] >> Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 2:08 PM >> To: Bodke, Kishore K >> Cc: Zanussi, Tom; yocto@yoctoproject.org; Hart, Darren; Saxena, Rahul >> Subject: Re: RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay >> >> On 09/01/2011 02:01 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote: >>> Clean build with the below TOM's two commit IDs worked for me, if I >>> do not add IMAGE_INSTALL += "rttests" for sugarbay. >>> >>> It failed if I add the IMAGE_INSTALL += "rttests" >> >> Do you get the same error? If so, it's starting to sound like the second >> build is what fails since neither of your failure scenarios include >> a change that's related to the failure. Perhaps an issue with sstate... >> >> -- >> Darren >> >>> >>> Thanks Kishore. -----Original Message----- From: Darren Hart >>> [mailto:dvhart@linux.intel.com] Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 >>> 1:57 PM To: Zanussi, Tom Cc: Bodke, Kishore K; >>> yocto@yoctoproject.org; Hart, Darren; Saxena, Rahul Subject: Re: RT >>> kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay >>> >>> >>> >>> On 08/31/2011 09:19 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote: >>>> >>>> On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 16:49 -0700, Bodke, Kishore K wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I am trying to build core-image-sato with rt kernel for sugarbay >>>>> and it fails for the do_rootfs . >>>>> >>>> >>>> FWIW, I was able to build and boot core-image-sato with the rt >>>> kernel: >>>> >>>> Linux sugarbay 3.0.3-rt8-yocto-preempt-rt+ #1 SMP PREEMPT RT Wed >>>> Aug 31 21:33:27 CDT 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux >>>> >>>> using the following commits: >>>> >>>> poky/master 705ec50edda7f7fb8c132238fe3f1477384a470e meta/intel >>>> 902d2f3c919cd1d870dc8d35a7521cbba42e53ea >>>> >>>> Actually, meta/intel was that commit with Darren's grub patch on >>>> top (meta-intel/dvhart/grub-freetype). >>>> >>> >>> Kishore, would you try with a clean build and see if this works for >>> you? >>> >>> I'm going to try and build first without -rt and then with rt and see >>> if I can reproduce the issue. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Darren >>> >>>> Tom >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Attached is the build log. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Could you please let me know what went wrong? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> >>>>> Kishore. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> > -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center Yocto Project - Linux Kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay 2011-08-31 23:49 RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay Bodke, Kishore K 2011-09-01 4:19 ` Tom Zanussi @ 2011-09-01 18:26 ` Saul Wold 1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Saul Wold @ 2011-09-01 18:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bodke, Kishore K; +Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org On 08/31/2011 04:49 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to build core-image-sato with rt kernel for sugarbay and it > fails for the do_rootfs . > > Attached is the build log. > > Could you please let me know what went wrong? > Did you save a log of the build itself by any chance? It seems strange that you would have this dependencies are not being met. Sau! > Thanks > > Kishore. > > > > _______________________________________________ > yocto mailing list > yocto@yoctoproject.org > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-09-06 18:03 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2011-08-31 23:49 RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay Bodke, Kishore K 2011-09-01 4:19 ` Tom Zanussi 2011-09-01 20:57 ` Darren Hart 2011-09-01 21:01 ` Bodke, Kishore K 2011-09-01 21:07 ` Darren Hart 2011-09-01 21:14 ` Bodke, Kishore K 2011-09-01 21:52 ` Darren Hart 2011-09-01 22:05 ` Bodke, Kishore K 2011-09-06 17:42 ` Darren Hart 2011-09-06 18:03 ` Bodke, Kishore K 2011-09-01 18:26 ` Saul Wold
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.