* RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay
@ 2011-08-31 23:49 Bodke, Kishore K
2011-09-01 4:19 ` Tom Zanussi
2011-09-01 18:26 ` Saul Wold
0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Bodke, Kishore K @ 2011-08-31 23:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: yocto@yoctoproject.org; +Cc: Hart, Darren, Darren Hart
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 205 bytes --]
Hi,
I am trying to build core-image-sato with rt kernel for sugarbay and it fails for the do_rootfs .
Attached is the build log.
Could you please let me know what went wrong?
Thanks
Kishore.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 4719 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: error.log --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 4284 bytes --]
NOTE: package core-image-sato-1.0-r0: task do_rootfs: Started
ERROR: Function 'do_rootfs' failed (see /usr/local/src/crf/test/buildsugarbay/tmp/work/sugarbay-poky-linux/core-image-sato-1.0-r0/temp/log.do_rootfs.26992 for further information)
ERROR: Logfile of failure stored in: /usr/local/src/crf/test/buildsugarbay/tmp/work/sugarbay-poky-linux/core-image-sato-1.0-r0/temp/log.do_rootfs.26992
Log data follows:
| Generating solve db for /usr/local/src/crf/test/buildsugarbay/tmp/deploy/rpm/sugarbay...
| total: 1 0.000000 MB 8.597422 secs
| fingerprint: 1074 0.007924 MB 0.339992 secs
| install: 358 0.000000 MB 0.451351 secs
| dbadd: 358 0.000000 MB 0.440230 secs
| dbget: 2327 0.000000 MB 0.005507 secs
| dbput: 358 1.827316 MB 0.377056 secs
| readhdr: 3581 3.586464 MB 6.142026 secs
| hdrload: 1790 5.333492 MB 0.008990 secs
| hdrget: 64334 0.000000 MB 0.050334 secs
| Generating solve db for /usr/local/src/crf/test/buildsugarbay/tmp/deploy/rpm/x86_64...
| total: 1 0.000000 MB 381.438528 secs
| fingerprint: 16827 0.194594 MB 4.648608 secs
| install: 5609 0.000000 MB 30.151955 secs
| dbadd: 5609 0.000000 MB 28.033123 secs
| dbget: 61733 0.000000 MB 1.799366 secs
| dbput: 5609 28.255580 MB 26.221293 secs
| readhdr: 56091 56.232770 MB 311.803147 secs
| hdrload: 31161 99.368286 MB 0.289955 secs
| hdrget: 1011289 0.000000 MB 1.271091 secs
| Generating solve db for /usr/local/src/crf/test/buildsugarbay/tmp/deploy/rpm/all...
| total: 1 0.000000 MB 0.655311 secs
| fingerprint: 96 0.003258 MB 0.096159 secs
| install: 32 0.000000 MB 0.055071 secs
| dbadd: 32 0.000000 MB 0.052210 secs
| dbget: 585 0.000000 MB 0.000629 secs
| dbput: 32 0.261540 MB 0.030861 secs
| readhdr: 321 0.520504 MB 0.438779 secs
| hdrload: 163 0.783276 MB 0.000949 secs
| hdrget: 5278 0.000000 MB 0.004932 secs
| Generating solve db for /usr/local/src/crf/test/buildsugarbay/tmp/deploy/rpm/all...
| total: 1 0.000000 MB 0.123757 secs
| fingerprint: 96 0.003258 MB 0.004319 secs
| install: 32 0.000000 MB 0.067616 secs
| dbadd: 32 0.000000 MB 0.064679 secs
| dbget: 585 0.000000 MB 0.000679 secs
| dbput: 32 0.261540 MB 0.036774 secs
| readhdr: 321 0.520504 MB 0.000821 secs
| hdrload: 163 0.783276 MB 0.000910 secs
| hdrget: 5278 0.000000 MB 0.005332 secs
| Processing locale-base-en-us...
| Processing locale-base-en-gb...
| Processing task-core-apps-console...
| Processing task-core-ssh-dropbear...
| Processing task-core-apps-x11-pimlico...
| Processing task-core-x11-sato...
| Processing zypper...
| Processing rt-tests...
| Processing task-core-x11-base...
| Processing task-core-apps-x11-games...
| Processing task-core-apps-x11-core...
| Processing rpm...
| error: Failed dependencies:
| bluez4 is needed by connman-plugin-bluetooth-0.75-r1.x86_64
| ofono is needed by connman-plugin-ofono-0.75-r1.x86_64
| wpa-supplicant is needed by connman-plugin-wifi-0.75-r1.x86_64
| ERROR: Function 'do_rootfs' failed (see /usr/local/src/crf/test/buildsugarbay/tmp/work/sugarbay-poky-linux/core-image-sato-1.0-r0/temp/log.do_rootfs.26992 for further information)
NOTE: package core-image-sato-1.0-r0: task do_rootfs: Failed
ERROR: Task 8 (/usr/local/src/crf/test/meta/recipes-sato/images/core-image-sato.bb, do_rootfs) failed with exit code '1'
ERROR: '/usr/local/src/crf/test/meta/recipes-sato/images/core-image-sato.bb' failed
kishore@kishore-desktop:/usr/local/src/crf/test/buildsugarbay$
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay
2011-08-31 23:49 RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay Bodke, Kishore K
@ 2011-09-01 4:19 ` Tom Zanussi
2011-09-01 20:57 ` Darren Hart
2011-09-01 18:26 ` Saul Wold
1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Tom Zanussi @ 2011-09-01 4:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bodke, Kishore K; +Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org, Darren Hart, Hart, Darren
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 16:49 -0700, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I am trying to build core-image-sato with rt kernel for sugarbay and
> it fails for the do_rootfs .
>
FWIW, I was able to build and boot core-image-sato with the rt kernel:
Linux sugarbay 3.0.3-rt8-yocto-preempt-rt+ #1 SMP PREEMPT RT Wed Aug 31
21:33:27 CDT 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux
using the following commits:
poky/master 705ec50edda7f7fb8c132238fe3f1477384a470e
meta/intel 902d2f3c919cd1d870dc8d35a7521cbba42e53ea
Actually, meta/intel was that commit with Darren's grub patch on top
(meta-intel/dvhart/grub-freetype).
Tom
>
>
> Attached is the build log.
>
>
>
> Could you please let me know what went wrong?
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Kishore.
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay
2011-08-31 23:49 RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay Bodke, Kishore K
2011-09-01 4:19 ` Tom Zanussi
@ 2011-09-01 18:26 ` Saul Wold
1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Saul Wold @ 2011-09-01 18:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bodke, Kishore K; +Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org
On 08/31/2011 04:49 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to build core-image-sato with rt kernel for sugarbay and it
> fails for the do_rootfs .
>
> Attached is the build log.
>
> Could you please let me know what went wrong?
>
Did you save a log of the build itself by any chance? It seems strange
that you would have this dependencies are not being met.
Sau!
> Thanks
>
> Kishore.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> yocto mailing list
> yocto@yoctoproject.org
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay
2011-09-01 4:19 ` Tom Zanussi
@ 2011-09-01 20:57 ` Darren Hart
2011-09-01 21:01 ` Bodke, Kishore K
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Darren Hart @ 2011-09-01 20:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tom Zanussi; +Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org, Hart, Darren
On 08/31/2011 09:19 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 16:49 -0700, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> I am trying to build core-image-sato with rt kernel for sugarbay and
>> it fails for the do_rootfs .
>>
>
> FWIW, I was able to build and boot core-image-sato with the rt kernel:
>
> Linux sugarbay 3.0.3-rt8-yocto-preempt-rt+ #1 SMP PREEMPT RT Wed Aug 31
> 21:33:27 CDT 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>
> using the following commits:
>
> poky/master 705ec50edda7f7fb8c132238fe3f1477384a470e
> meta/intel 902d2f3c919cd1d870dc8d35a7521cbba42e53ea
>
> Actually, meta/intel was that commit with Darren's grub patch on top
> (meta-intel/dvhart/grub-freetype).
>
Kishore, would you try with a clean build and see if this works for you?
I'm going to try and build first without -rt and then with rt and see if
I can reproduce the issue.
Thanks,
Darren
> Tom
>
>>
>>
>> Attached is the build log.
>>
>>
>>
>> Could you please let me know what went wrong?
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Kishore.
>>
>>
>
>
--
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Linux Kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay
2011-09-01 20:57 ` Darren Hart
@ 2011-09-01 21:01 ` Bodke, Kishore K
2011-09-01 21:07 ` Darren Hart
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Bodke, Kishore K @ 2011-09-01 21:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Darren Hart, Zanussi, Tom; +Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org, Hart, Darren
Clean build with the below TOM's two commit IDs worked for me, if I do not add IMAGE_INSTALL += "rttests" for sugarbay.
It failed if I add the IMAGE_INSTALL += "rttests"
Thanks
Kishore.
-----Original Message-----
From: Darren Hart [mailto:dvhart@linux.intel.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 1:57 PM
To: Zanussi, Tom
Cc: Bodke, Kishore K; yocto@yoctoproject.org; Hart, Darren; Saxena, Rahul
Subject: Re: RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay
On 08/31/2011 09:19 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 16:49 -0700, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> I am trying to build core-image-sato with rt kernel for sugarbay and
>> it fails for the do_rootfs .
>>
>
> FWIW, I was able to build and boot core-image-sato with the rt kernel:
>
> Linux sugarbay 3.0.3-rt8-yocto-preempt-rt+ #1 SMP PREEMPT RT Wed Aug 31
> 21:33:27 CDT 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>
> using the following commits:
>
> poky/master 705ec50edda7f7fb8c132238fe3f1477384a470e
> meta/intel 902d2f3c919cd1d870dc8d35a7521cbba42e53ea
>
> Actually, meta/intel was that commit with Darren's grub patch on top
> (meta-intel/dvhart/grub-freetype).
>
Kishore, would you try with a clean build and see if this works for you?
I'm going to try and build first without -rt and then with rt and see if
I can reproduce the issue.
Thanks,
Darren
> Tom
>
>>
>>
>> Attached is the build log.
>>
>>
>>
>> Could you please let me know what went wrong?
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Kishore.
>>
>>
>
>
--
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Linux Kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay
2011-09-01 21:01 ` Bodke, Kishore K
@ 2011-09-01 21:07 ` Darren Hart
2011-09-01 21:14 ` Bodke, Kishore K
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Darren Hart @ 2011-09-01 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bodke, Kishore K; +Cc: Hart, Darren, yocto@yoctoproject.org
On 09/01/2011 02:01 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
> Clean build with the below TOM's two commit IDs worked for me, if I
> do not add IMAGE_INSTALL += "rttests" for sugarbay.
>
> It failed if I add the IMAGE_INSTALL += "rttests"
Do you get the same error? If so, it's starting to sound like the second
build is what fails since neither of your failure scenarios include
a change that's related to the failure. Perhaps an issue with sstate...
--
Darren
>
> Thanks Kishore. -----Original Message----- From: Darren Hart
> [mailto:dvhart@linux.intel.com] Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011
> 1:57 PM To: Zanussi, Tom Cc: Bodke, Kishore K;
> yocto@yoctoproject.org; Hart, Darren; Saxena, Rahul Subject: Re: RT
> kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay
>
>
>
> On 08/31/2011 09:19 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 16:49 -0700, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I am trying to build core-image-sato with rt kernel for sugarbay
>>> and it fails for the do_rootfs .
>>>
>>
>> FWIW, I was able to build and boot core-image-sato with the rt
>> kernel:
>>
>> Linux sugarbay 3.0.3-rt8-yocto-preempt-rt+ #1 SMP PREEMPT RT Wed
>> Aug 31 21:33:27 CDT 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>>
>> using the following commits:
>>
>> poky/master 705ec50edda7f7fb8c132238fe3f1477384a470e meta/intel
>> 902d2f3c919cd1d870dc8d35a7521cbba42e53ea
>>
>> Actually, meta/intel was that commit with Darren's grub patch on
>> top (meta-intel/dvhart/grub-freetype).
>>
>
> Kishore, would you try with a clean build and see if this works for
> you?
>
> I'm going to try and build first without -rt and then with rt and see
> if I can reproduce the issue.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Darren
>
>> Tom
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Attached is the build log.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Could you please let me know what went wrong?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Kishore.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
--
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Linux Kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay
2011-09-01 21:07 ` Darren Hart
@ 2011-09-01 21:14 ` Bodke, Kishore K
2011-09-01 21:52 ` Darren Hart
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Bodke, Kishore K @ 2011-09-01 21:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Darren Hart; +Cc: Hart, Darren, yocto@yoctoproject.org
Yeah, it is the same do_rootfs failure I get for both the builds.
Thanks
Kishore.
-----Original Message-----
From: Darren Hart [mailto:dvhart@linux.intel.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 2:08 PM
To: Bodke, Kishore K
Cc: Zanussi, Tom; yocto@yoctoproject.org; Hart, Darren; Saxena, Rahul
Subject: Re: RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay
On 09/01/2011 02:01 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
> Clean build with the below TOM's two commit IDs worked for me, if I
> do not add IMAGE_INSTALL += "rttests" for sugarbay.
>
> It failed if I add the IMAGE_INSTALL += "rttests"
Do you get the same error? If so, it's starting to sound like the second
build is what fails since neither of your failure scenarios include
a change that's related to the failure. Perhaps an issue with sstate...
--
Darren
>
> Thanks Kishore. -----Original Message----- From: Darren Hart
> [mailto:dvhart@linux.intel.com] Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011
> 1:57 PM To: Zanussi, Tom Cc: Bodke, Kishore K;
> yocto@yoctoproject.org; Hart, Darren; Saxena, Rahul Subject: Re: RT
> kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay
>
>
>
> On 08/31/2011 09:19 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 16:49 -0700, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I am trying to build core-image-sato with rt kernel for sugarbay
>>> and it fails for the do_rootfs .
>>>
>>
>> FWIW, I was able to build and boot core-image-sato with the rt
>> kernel:
>>
>> Linux sugarbay 3.0.3-rt8-yocto-preempt-rt+ #1 SMP PREEMPT RT Wed
>> Aug 31 21:33:27 CDT 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>>
>> using the following commits:
>>
>> poky/master 705ec50edda7f7fb8c132238fe3f1477384a470e meta/intel
>> 902d2f3c919cd1d870dc8d35a7521cbba42e53ea
>>
>> Actually, meta/intel was that commit with Darren's grub patch on
>> top (meta-intel/dvhart/grub-freetype).
>>
>
> Kishore, would you try with a clean build and see if this works for
> you?
>
> I'm going to try and build first without -rt and then with rt and see
> if I can reproduce the issue.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Darren
>
>> Tom
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Attached is the build log.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Could you please let me know what went wrong?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Kishore.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
--
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Linux Kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay
2011-09-01 21:14 ` Bodke, Kishore K
@ 2011-09-01 21:52 ` Darren Hart
2011-09-01 22:05 ` Bodke, Kishore K
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Darren Hart @ 2011-09-01 21:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bodke, Kishore K; +Cc: Hart, Darren, yocto@yoctoproject.org
Can you report the output of:
$ bitbake -e core-image-sato | egrep "^IMAGE_INSTALL="
Thanks,
Darren
On 09/01/2011 02:14 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
> Yeah, it is the same do_rootfs failure I get for both the builds.
> Thanks
> Kishore.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Darren Hart [mailto:dvhart@linux.intel.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 2:08 PM
> To: Bodke, Kishore K
> Cc: Zanussi, Tom; yocto@yoctoproject.org; Hart, Darren; Saxena, Rahul
> Subject: Re: RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay
>
> On 09/01/2011 02:01 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
>> Clean build with the below TOM's two commit IDs worked for me, if I
>> do not add IMAGE_INSTALL += "rttests" for sugarbay.
>>
>> It failed if I add the IMAGE_INSTALL += "rttests"
>
> Do you get the same error? If so, it's starting to sound like the second
> build is what fails since neither of your failure scenarios include
> a change that's related to the failure. Perhaps an issue with sstate...
>
> --
> Darren
>
>>
>> Thanks Kishore. -----Original Message----- From: Darren Hart
>> [mailto:dvhart@linux.intel.com] Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011
>> 1:57 PM To: Zanussi, Tom Cc: Bodke, Kishore K;
>> yocto@yoctoproject.org; Hart, Darren; Saxena, Rahul Subject: Re: RT
>> kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay
>>
>>
>>
>> On 08/31/2011 09:19 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 16:49 -0700, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I am trying to build core-image-sato with rt kernel for sugarbay
>>>> and it fails for the do_rootfs .
>>>>
>>>
>>> FWIW, I was able to build and boot core-image-sato with the rt
>>> kernel:
>>>
>>> Linux sugarbay 3.0.3-rt8-yocto-preempt-rt+ #1 SMP PREEMPT RT Wed
>>> Aug 31 21:33:27 CDT 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>>>
>>> using the following commits:
>>>
>>> poky/master 705ec50edda7f7fb8c132238fe3f1477384a470e meta/intel
>>> 902d2f3c919cd1d870dc8d35a7521cbba42e53ea
>>>
>>> Actually, meta/intel was that commit with Darren's grub patch on
>>> top (meta-intel/dvhart/grub-freetype).
>>>
>>
>> Kishore, would you try with a clean build and see if this works for
>> you?
>>
>> I'm going to try and build first without -rt and then with rt and see
>> if I can reproduce the issue.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Darren
>>
>>> Tom
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Attached is the build log.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Could you please let me know what went wrong?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> Kishore.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
--
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Linux Kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay
2011-09-01 21:52 ` Darren Hart
@ 2011-09-01 22:05 ` Bodke, Kishore K
2011-09-06 17:42 ` Darren Hart
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Bodke, Kishore K @ 2011-09-01 22:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Darren Hart; +Cc: Hart, Darren, yocto@yoctoproject.org
For the build I removed the rttests in the IMAGE_INSTALL , so it is not showing up here.
bitbake -e core-image-sato | egrep "IMAGE_INSTALL="
# MULTILIB_IMAGE_INSTALL=
# IMAGE_INSTALL=${POKY_BASE_INSTALL}
IMAGE_INSTALL="task-core-boot task-base-extended"
I will rebuild with rttests and send the output.
Thanks
Kishore.
-----Original Message-----
From: Darren Hart [mailto:dvhart@linux.intel.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 2:52 PM
To: Bodke, Kishore K
Cc: Zanussi, Tom; yocto@yoctoproject.org; Hart, Darren; Saxena, Rahul
Subject: Re: RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay
Can you report the output of:
$ bitbake -e core-image-sato | egrep "^IMAGE_INSTALL="
Thanks,
Darren
On 09/01/2011 02:14 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
> Yeah, it is the same do_rootfs failure I get for both the builds.
> Thanks
> Kishore.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Darren Hart [mailto:dvhart@linux.intel.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 2:08 PM
> To: Bodke, Kishore K
> Cc: Zanussi, Tom; yocto@yoctoproject.org; Hart, Darren; Saxena, Rahul
> Subject: Re: RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay
>
> On 09/01/2011 02:01 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
>> Clean build with the below TOM's two commit IDs worked for me, if I
>> do not add IMAGE_INSTALL += "rttests" for sugarbay.
>>
>> It failed if I add the IMAGE_INSTALL += "rttests"
>
> Do you get the same error? If so, it's starting to sound like the second
> build is what fails since neither of your failure scenarios include
> a change that's related to the failure. Perhaps an issue with sstate...
>
> --
> Darren
>
>>
>> Thanks Kishore. -----Original Message----- From: Darren Hart
>> [mailto:dvhart@linux.intel.com] Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011
>> 1:57 PM To: Zanussi, Tom Cc: Bodke, Kishore K;
>> yocto@yoctoproject.org; Hart, Darren; Saxena, Rahul Subject: Re: RT
>> kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay
>>
>>
>>
>> On 08/31/2011 09:19 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 16:49 -0700, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I am trying to build core-image-sato with rt kernel for sugarbay
>>>> and it fails for the do_rootfs .
>>>>
>>>
>>> FWIW, I was able to build and boot core-image-sato with the rt
>>> kernel:
>>>
>>> Linux sugarbay 3.0.3-rt8-yocto-preempt-rt+ #1 SMP PREEMPT RT Wed
>>> Aug 31 21:33:27 CDT 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>>>
>>> using the following commits:
>>>
>>> poky/master 705ec50edda7f7fb8c132238fe3f1477384a470e meta/intel
>>> 902d2f3c919cd1d870dc8d35a7521cbba42e53ea
>>>
>>> Actually, meta/intel was that commit with Darren's grub patch on
>>> top (meta-intel/dvhart/grub-freetype).
>>>
>>
>> Kishore, would you try with a clean build and see if this works for
>> you?
>>
>> I'm going to try and build first without -rt and then with rt and see
>> if I can reproduce the issue.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Darren
>>
>>> Tom
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Attached is the build log.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Could you please let me know what went wrong?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> Kishore.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
--
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Linux Kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay
2011-09-01 22:05 ` Bodke, Kishore K
@ 2011-09-06 17:42 ` Darren Hart
2011-09-06 18:03 ` Bodke, Kishore K
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Darren Hart @ 2011-09-06 17:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bodke, Kishore K; +Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org
On 09/01/2011 03:05 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
> For the build I removed the rttests in the IMAGE_INSTALL , so it is not showing up here.
>
> bitbake -e core-image-sato | egrep "IMAGE_INSTALL="
> # MULTILIB_IMAGE_INSTALL=
> # IMAGE_INSTALL=${POKY_BASE_INSTALL}
> IMAGE_INSTALL="task-core-boot task-base-extended"
>
> I will rebuild with rttests and send the output.
Hi Kishore,
Where are you with this? Are you unblocked and moving ahead?
Thanks,
Darren
>
> Thanks
> Kishore.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Darren Hart [mailto:dvhart@linux.intel.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 2:52 PM
> To: Bodke, Kishore K
> Cc: Zanussi, Tom; yocto@yoctoproject.org; Hart, Darren; Saxena, Rahul
> Subject: Re: RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay
>
> Can you report the output of:
>
> $ bitbake -e core-image-sato | egrep "^IMAGE_INSTALL="
>
> Thanks,
>
> Darren
>
> On 09/01/2011 02:14 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
>> Yeah, it is the same do_rootfs failure I get for both the builds.
>> Thanks
>> Kishore.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Darren Hart [mailto:dvhart@linux.intel.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 2:08 PM
>> To: Bodke, Kishore K
>> Cc: Zanussi, Tom; yocto@yoctoproject.org; Hart, Darren; Saxena, Rahul
>> Subject: Re: RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay
>>
>> On 09/01/2011 02:01 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
>>> Clean build with the below TOM's two commit IDs worked for me, if I
>>> do not add IMAGE_INSTALL += "rttests" for sugarbay.
>>>
>>> It failed if I add the IMAGE_INSTALL += "rttests"
>>
>> Do you get the same error? If so, it's starting to sound like the second
>> build is what fails since neither of your failure scenarios include
>> a change that's related to the failure. Perhaps an issue with sstate...
>>
>> --
>> Darren
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks Kishore. -----Original Message----- From: Darren Hart
>>> [mailto:dvhart@linux.intel.com] Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011
>>> 1:57 PM To: Zanussi, Tom Cc: Bodke, Kishore K;
>>> yocto@yoctoproject.org; Hart, Darren; Saxena, Rahul Subject: Re: RT
>>> kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 08/31/2011 09:19 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 16:49 -0700, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I am trying to build core-image-sato with rt kernel for sugarbay
>>>>> and it fails for the do_rootfs .
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> FWIW, I was able to build and boot core-image-sato with the rt
>>>> kernel:
>>>>
>>>> Linux sugarbay 3.0.3-rt8-yocto-preempt-rt+ #1 SMP PREEMPT RT Wed
>>>> Aug 31 21:33:27 CDT 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>>>>
>>>> using the following commits:
>>>>
>>>> poky/master 705ec50edda7f7fb8c132238fe3f1477384a470e meta/intel
>>>> 902d2f3c919cd1d870dc8d35a7521cbba42e53ea
>>>>
>>>> Actually, meta/intel was that commit with Darren's grub patch on
>>>> top (meta-intel/dvhart/grub-freetype).
>>>>
>>>
>>> Kishore, would you try with a clean build and see if this works for
>>> you?
>>>
>>> I'm going to try and build first without -rt and then with rt and see
>>> if I can reproduce the issue.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Darren
>>>
>>>> Tom
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Attached is the build log.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Could you please let me know what went wrong?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>> Kishore.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
--
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Linux Kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay
2011-09-06 17:42 ` Darren Hart
@ 2011-09-06 18:03 ` Bodke, Kishore K
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Bodke, Kishore K @ 2011-09-06 18:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Darren Hart; +Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org
Hi Darren,
With the below Tom's commit IDs, the build was success and I am moving ahead with this.
I am not blocked. I was also able to build and boot the Crystalforest BSP.
Thanks
Kishore.
-----Original Message-----
From: Darren Hart [mailto:dvhart@linux.intel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 10:42 AM
To: Bodke, Kishore K
Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: [yocto] RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay
On 09/01/2011 03:05 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
> For the build I removed the rttests in the IMAGE_INSTALL , so it is not showing up here.
>
> bitbake -e core-image-sato | egrep "IMAGE_INSTALL="
> # MULTILIB_IMAGE_INSTALL=
> # IMAGE_INSTALL=${POKY_BASE_INSTALL}
> IMAGE_INSTALL="task-core-boot task-base-extended"
>
> I will rebuild with rttests and send the output.
Hi Kishore,
Where are you with this? Are you unblocked and moving ahead?
Thanks,
Darren
>
> Thanks
> Kishore.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Darren Hart [mailto:dvhart@linux.intel.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 2:52 PM
> To: Bodke, Kishore K
> Cc: Zanussi, Tom; yocto@yoctoproject.org; Hart, Darren; Saxena, Rahul
> Subject: Re: RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay
>
> Can you report the output of:
>
> $ bitbake -e core-image-sato | egrep "^IMAGE_INSTALL="
>
> Thanks,
>
> Darren
>
> On 09/01/2011 02:14 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
>> Yeah, it is the same do_rootfs failure I get for both the builds.
>> Thanks
>> Kishore.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Darren Hart [mailto:dvhart@linux.intel.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 2:08 PM
>> To: Bodke, Kishore K
>> Cc: Zanussi, Tom; yocto@yoctoproject.org; Hart, Darren; Saxena, Rahul
>> Subject: Re: RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay
>>
>> On 09/01/2011 02:01 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
>>> Clean build with the below TOM's two commit IDs worked for me, if I
>>> do not add IMAGE_INSTALL += "rttests" for sugarbay.
>>>
>>> It failed if I add the IMAGE_INSTALL += "rttests"
>>
>> Do you get the same error? If so, it's starting to sound like the second
>> build is what fails since neither of your failure scenarios include
>> a change that's related to the failure. Perhaps an issue with sstate...
>>
>> --
>> Darren
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks Kishore. -----Original Message----- From: Darren Hart
>>> [mailto:dvhart@linux.intel.com] Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011
>>> 1:57 PM To: Zanussi, Tom Cc: Bodke, Kishore K;
>>> yocto@yoctoproject.org; Hart, Darren; Saxena, Rahul Subject: Re: RT
>>> kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 08/31/2011 09:19 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 16:49 -0700, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I am trying to build core-image-sato with rt kernel for sugarbay
>>>>> and it fails for the do_rootfs .
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> FWIW, I was able to build and boot core-image-sato with the rt
>>>> kernel:
>>>>
>>>> Linux sugarbay 3.0.3-rt8-yocto-preempt-rt+ #1 SMP PREEMPT RT Wed
>>>> Aug 31 21:33:27 CDT 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>>>>
>>>> using the following commits:
>>>>
>>>> poky/master 705ec50edda7f7fb8c132238fe3f1477384a470e meta/intel
>>>> 902d2f3c919cd1d870dc8d35a7521cbba42e53ea
>>>>
>>>> Actually, meta/intel was that commit with Darren's grub patch on
>>>> top (meta-intel/dvhart/grub-freetype).
>>>>
>>>
>>> Kishore, would you try with a clean build and see if this works for
>>> you?
>>>
>>> I'm going to try and build first without -rt and then with rt and see
>>> if I can reproduce the issue.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Darren
>>>
>>>> Tom
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Attached is the build log.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Could you please let me know what went wrong?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>> Kishore.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
--
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Linux Kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-09-06 18:03 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-08-31 23:49 RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay Bodke, Kishore K
2011-09-01 4:19 ` Tom Zanussi
2011-09-01 20:57 ` Darren Hart
2011-09-01 21:01 ` Bodke, Kishore K
2011-09-01 21:07 ` Darren Hart
2011-09-01 21:14 ` Bodke, Kishore K
2011-09-01 21:52 ` Darren Hart
2011-09-01 22:05 ` Bodke, Kishore K
2011-09-06 17:42 ` Darren Hart
2011-09-06 18:03 ` Bodke, Kishore K
2011-09-01 18:26 ` Saul Wold
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.