* meta-oe branch for edison? @ 2011-12-08 20:01 McClintock Matthew-B29882 2011-12-09 11:51 ` Richard Purdie 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: McClintock Matthew-B29882 @ 2011-12-08 20:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: yocto@yoctoproject.org Hi all, Can we create a meta-oe repo in git.yoctoproject.org? I'd like to also create a branh within the repo that tracks a valid version of the repo for specific Yocto releases. (I can add that in my investigation so far - f78f3f31c06c669006fcb567c8f503d4dbec68da looks like a good starting commit for edison) -M ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: meta-oe branch for edison? 2011-12-08 20:01 meta-oe branch for edison? McClintock Matthew-B29882 @ 2011-12-09 11:51 ` Richard Purdie 2011-12-09 15:46 ` McClintock Matthew-B29882 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Richard Purdie @ 2011-12-09 11:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: McClintock Matthew-B29882; +Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 20:01 +0000, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote: > Hi all, > > Can we create a meta-oe repo in git.yoctoproject.org? This might create a little friction with the OE community. What would be the reason for the repository? > I'd like to also > create a branh within the repo that tracks a valid version of the repo > for specific Yocto releases. > > (I can add that in my investigation so far - > f78f3f31c06c669006fcb567c8f503d4dbec68da looks like a good starting > commit for edison) I'd certainly be happy to see such a branch. It might be more appropriate to call it 2011-1 which corresponds to the OE-Core branch name that is edison in the poky repo. Cheers, Richard ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: meta-oe branch for edison? 2011-12-09 11:51 ` Richard Purdie @ 2011-12-09 15:46 ` McClintock Matthew-B29882 2011-12-09 16:20 ` Richard Purdie 2011-12-09 19:55 ` Khem Raj 0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: McClintock Matthew-B29882 @ 2011-12-09 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Richard Purdie; +Cc: McClintock Matthew-B29882, yocto@yoctoproject.org On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 5:51 AM, Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 20:01 +0000, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Can we create a meta-oe repo in git.yoctoproject.org? > > This might create a little friction with the OE community. What would be > the reason for the repository? > >> I'd like to also >> create a branh within the repo that tracks a valid version of the repo >> for specific Yocto releases. >> >> (I can add that in my investigation so far - >> f78f3f31c06c669006fcb567c8f503d4dbec68da looks like a good starting >> commit for edison) > > I'd certainly be happy to see such a branch. It might be more > appropriate to call it 2011-1 which corresponds to the OE-Core branch > name that is edison in the poky repo. Well I don't particularly care if we create a repo or not. I just want a place to go for a working meta-oe for all future releases of Yocto. I had to figure this out on my own, but I'm can imagine others will attempt similar things. -M ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: meta-oe branch for edison? 2011-12-09 15:46 ` McClintock Matthew-B29882 @ 2011-12-09 16:20 ` Richard Purdie 2011-12-09 16:36 ` Philip Balister 2011-12-09 19:55 ` Khem Raj 1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Richard Purdie @ 2011-12-09 16:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: McClintock Matthew-B29882; +Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 15:46 +0000, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote: > On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 5:51 AM, Richard Purdie > <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 20:01 +0000, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> Can we create a meta-oe repo in git.yoctoproject.org? > > > > This might create a little friction with the OE community. What would be > > the reason for the repository? > > > >> I'd like to also > >> create a branh within the repo that tracks a valid version of the repo > >> for specific Yocto releases. > >> > >> (I can add that in my investigation so far - > >> f78f3f31c06c669006fcb567c8f503d4dbec68da looks like a good starting > >> commit for edison) > > > > I'd certainly be happy to see such a branch. It might be more > > appropriate to call it 2011-1 which corresponds to the OE-Core branch > > name that is edison in the poky repo. > > Well I don't particularly care if we create a repo or not. I just want > a place to go for a working meta-oe for all future releases of Yocto. > I had to figure this out on my own, but I'm can imagine others will > attempt similar things. I think it should be fine to add an appropriate branch to the meta-oe repository itself. Cheers, Richard ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: meta-oe branch for edison? 2011-12-09 16:20 ` Richard Purdie @ 2011-12-09 16:36 ` Philip Balister 2011-12-10 0:10 ` Richard Purdie 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Philip Balister @ 2011-12-09 16:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Richard Purdie; +Cc: McClintock Matthew-B29882, yocto@yoctoproject.org On 12/09/2011 11:20 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 15:46 +0000, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 5:51 AM, Richard Purdie >> <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: >>> On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 20:01 +0000, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote: >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> Can we create a meta-oe repo in git.yoctoproject.org? >>> >>> This might create a little friction with the OE community. What would be >>> the reason for the repository? >>> >>>> I'd like to also >>>> create a branh within the repo that tracks a valid version of the repo >>>> for specific Yocto releases. >>>> >>>> (I can add that in my investigation so far - >>>> f78f3f31c06c669006fcb567c8f503d4dbec68da looks like a good starting >>>> commit for edison) >>> >>> I'd certainly be happy to see such a branch. It might be more >>> appropriate to call it 2011-1 which corresponds to the OE-Core branch >>> name that is edison in the poky repo. >> >> Well I don't particularly care if we create a repo or not. I just want >> a place to go for a working meta-oe for all future releases of Yocto. >> I had to figure this out on my own, but I'm can imagine others will >> attempt similar things. > > I think it should be fine to add an appropriate branch to the meta-oe > repository itself. We should probably have this discussion on the oe list. Basically, we should have a way to create a "stable" branch for oe-core and meta-oe. There also needs to be some "policy" in place for commits. The primary concern is making sure the development branches get all needed fixes that go into the branches. Philip ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: meta-oe branch for edison? 2011-12-09 16:36 ` Philip Balister @ 2011-12-10 0:10 ` Richard Purdie 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Richard Purdie @ 2011-12-10 0:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Philip Balister; +Cc: McClintock Matthew-B29882, yocto@yoctoproject.org On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 11:36 -0500, Philip Balister wrote: > On 12/09/2011 11:20 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 15:46 +0000, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote: > >> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 5:51 AM, Richard Purdie > >> <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > >>> On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 20:01 +0000, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote: > >>>> Hi all, > >>>> > >>>> Can we create a meta-oe repo in git.yoctoproject.org? > >>> > >>> This might create a little friction with the OE community. What would be > >>> the reason for the repository? > >>> > >>>> I'd like to also > >>>> create a branh within the repo that tracks a valid version of the repo > >>>> for specific Yocto releases. > >>>> > >>>> (I can add that in my investigation so far - > >>>> f78f3f31c06c669006fcb567c8f503d4dbec68da looks like a good starting > >>>> commit for edison) > >>> > >>> I'd certainly be happy to see such a branch. It might be more > >>> appropriate to call it 2011-1 which corresponds to the OE-Core branch > >>> name that is edison in the poky repo. > >> > >> Well I don't particularly care if we create a repo or not. I just want > >> a place to go for a working meta-oe for all future releases of Yocto. > >> I had to figure this out on my own, but I'm can imagine others will > >> attempt similar things. > > > > I think it should be fine to add an appropriate branch to the meta-oe > > repository itself. > > We should probably have this discussion on the oe list. > > Basically, we should have a way to create a "stable" branch for oe-core > and meta-oe. There also needs to be some "policy" in place for commits. > The primary concern is making sure the development branches get all > needed fixes that go into the branches. There is a 2011-1 branch in oe-core and there is going to be an update policy of bugfixes but not upgrades or new features for that. Cheers, Richard ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: meta-oe branch for edison? 2011-12-09 15:46 ` McClintock Matthew-B29882 2011-12-09 16:20 ` Richard Purdie @ 2011-12-09 19:55 ` Khem Raj 2011-12-10 5:44 ` McClintock Matthew-B29882 1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Khem Raj @ 2011-12-09 19:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: McClintock Matthew-B29882; +Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 7:46 AM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 <B29882@freescale.com> wrote: >> I'd certainly be happy to see such a branch. It might be more >> appropriate to call it 2011-1 which corresponds to the OE-Core branch >> name that is edison in the poky repo. > > Well I don't particularly care if we create a repo or not. I just want > a place to go for a working meta-oe for all future releases of Yocto. > I had to figure this out on my own, but I'm can imagine others will > attempt similar things. essentially you are asking for meta-oe release. I think layers dont release in conjunction with oe-core but it would be beneficial if they had similar time frames. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: meta-oe branch for edison? 2011-12-09 19:55 ` Khem Raj @ 2011-12-10 5:44 ` McClintock Matthew-B29882 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: McClintock Matthew-B29882 @ 2011-12-10 5:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Khem Raj; +Cc: McClintock Matthew-B29882, yocto@yoctoproject.org On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 7:46 AM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 > <B29882@freescale.com> wrote: >>> I'd certainly be happy to see such a branch. It might be more >>> appropriate to call it 2011-1 which corresponds to the OE-Core branch >>> name that is edison in the poky repo. >> >> Well I don't particularly care if we create a repo or not. I just want >> a place to go for a working meta-oe for all future releases of Yocto. >> I had to figure this out on my own, but I'm can imagine others will >> attempt similar things. > > essentially you are asking for meta-oe release. I think layers dont > release in conjunction with oe-core but it would be beneficial if they > had similar time frames. A release is one thing, just a simple tag or branch so people know where to go to get started with specific releases. -M ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-12-10 5:45 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2011-12-08 20:01 meta-oe branch for edison? McClintock Matthew-B29882 2011-12-09 11:51 ` Richard Purdie 2011-12-09 15:46 ` McClintock Matthew-B29882 2011-12-09 16:20 ` Richard Purdie 2011-12-09 16:36 ` Philip Balister 2011-12-10 0:10 ` Richard Purdie 2011-12-09 19:55 ` Khem Raj 2011-12-10 5:44 ` McClintock Matthew-B29882
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.