* [Xenomai-help] Arm support for 3.2 kernel? @ 2012-01-10 1:13 Mitchell Tasman 2012-01-10 20:14 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Mitchell Tasman @ 2012-01-10 1:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: xenomai Hi. I saw the recent discussion regarding ARM I-pipe and 3.x, and am wondering if anyone can hazard a guess as to a timetable for 3.2 support? For OMAP3, I've wondered what's considered the optimal kernel strategy: mainline, linux-omap, or an OMAPPSP branch of TI's linux-omap3 staging tree on Arago. My understanding based on previous discussions is that for anything but mainline, a Xenomai user is on his or her own as far as adapting an ARM I-pipe patchset to the selected kernel. And for mainline, one risks incomplete or incorrect OMAP3 support. I presume that newer mainline kernel versions contain more complete/correct OMAP3 support than do older ones; hence, my question about 3.2. Thanks. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [Xenomai-help] Arm support for 3.2 kernel? 2012-01-10 1:13 [Xenomai-help] Arm support for 3.2 kernel? Mitchell Tasman @ 2012-01-10 20:14 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix 2012-01-19 0:26 ` Mitchell Tasman 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Gilles Chanteperdrix @ 2012-01-10 20:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mitchell Tasman; +Cc: xenomai On 01/10/2012 02:13 AM, Mitchell Tasman wrote: > Hi. I saw the recent discussion regarding ARM I-pipe and 3.x, and am > wondering if anyone can hazard a guess as to a timetable for 3.2 support? 3.0 is on its way. 3.1 will be next because it is the first version to support a new I-pipe architecture, so I was hoping to be able to skip 3.2... > > For OMAP3, I've wondered what's considered the optimal kernel strategy: > mainline, linux-omap, or an OMAPPSP branch of TI's linux-omap3 staging > tree on Arago. My understanding based on previous discussions is that > for anything but mainline, a Xenomai user is on his or her own as far as > adapting an ARM I-pipe patchset to the selected kernel. It is true that we can not ship I-pipe patches for all the vendor specific branches around, so you have to adapt the patch to the vendor branch you want to use. But it is usually not a big deal. -- Gilles. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [Xenomai-help] Arm support for 3.2 kernel? 2012-01-10 20:14 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix @ 2012-01-19 0:26 ` Mitchell Tasman 2012-01-19 14:53 ` babbittner 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Mitchell Tasman @ 2012-01-19 0:26 UTC (permalink / raw) Cc: xenomai On 01/10/2012 03:14 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > On 01/10/2012 02:13 AM, Mitchell Tasman wrote (in part): >> Hi. I saw the recent discussion regarding ARM I-pipe and 3.x, and am >> wondering if anyone can hazard a guess as to a timetable for 3.2 support? > > 3.0 is on its way. 3.1 will be next because it is the first version to > support a new I-pipe architecture, so I was hoping to be able to skip 3.2... Thank you for your response to my question(s). I noticed that an arm I-pipe patchset for 3.0.13 recently landed in git. Might you consider making 3.2 the next target for arm I-pipe support rather than 3.1? It seems that 3.1 is already being end-of-lifed, and e.g., that the RT-Preempt community has jumped directly from 3.0 to 3.2. Thanks again and best regards. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [Xenomai-help] Arm support for 3.2 kernel? 2012-01-19 0:26 ` Mitchell Tasman @ 2012-01-19 14:53 ` babbittner 2012-01-19 16:43 ` Terry Fryar 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: babbittner @ 2012-01-19 14:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: xenomai [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1435 bytes --] I vote for 3.1 support. There is no 3.1 realtime alternative at this point. It would be nice to get some realtime support for the BeagleBone which is on 3.1, probably for several months. <I apologize for the aol email, some day I'll get some real email.> -----Original Message----- From: Mitchell Tasman <tasman@domain.hid> Cc: xenomai-help <xenomai@xenomai.org> Sent: Wed, Jan 18, 2012 6:28 pm Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] Arm support for 3.2 kernel? On 01/10/2012 03:14 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > On 01/10/2012 02:13 AM, Mitchell Tasman wrote (in part): >> Hi. I saw the recent discussion regarding ARM I-pipe and 3.x, and am >> wondering if anyone can hazard a guess as to a timetable for 3.2 support? > > 3.0 is on its way. 3.1 will be next because it is the first version to > support a new I-pipe architecture, so I was hoping to be able to skip 3.2... Thank you for your response to my question(s). I noticed that an arm I-pipe patchset for 3.0.13 recently landed in git. Might you consider making 3.2 the next target for arm I-pipe support rather than 3.1? It seems that 3.1 is already being end-of-lifed, and e.g., that the RT-Preempt community has jumped directly from 3.0 to 3.2. Thanks again and best regards. _______________________________________________ Xenomai-help mailing list Xenomai-help@domain.hid https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-help [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2318 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [Xenomai-help] Arm support for 3.2 kernel? 2012-01-19 14:53 ` babbittner @ 2012-01-19 16:43 ` Terry Fryar 2012-01-21 18:03 ` Josh Karch 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Terry Fryar @ 2012-01-19 16:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: babbittner, xenomai [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1739 bytes --] I second the vote for 3.1...in fact for beaglebone xenomai support as well..... _____ From: xenomai-help-bounces@domain.hid [mailto:xenomai-help-bounces@domain.hid] On Behalf Of babbittner@domain.hid Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 8:53 AM To: xenomai@xenomai.org Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] Arm support for 3.2 kernel? I vote for 3.1 support. There is no 3.1 realtime alternative at this point. It would be nice to get some realtime support for the BeagleBone which is on 3.1, probably for several months. <I apologize for the aol email, some day I'll get some real email.> -----Original Message----- From: Mitchell Tasman <tasman@domain.hid> Cc: xenomai-help <xenomai@xenomai.org> Sent: Wed, Jan 18, 2012 6:28 pm Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] Arm support for 3.2 kernel? On 01/10/2012 03:14 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > On 01/10/2012 02:13 AM, Mitchell Tasman wrote (in part): >> Hi. I saw the recent discussion regarding ARM I-pipe and 3.x, and am >> wondering if anyone can hazard a guess as to a timetable for 3.2 support? > > 3.0 is on its way. 3.1 will be next because it is the first version to > support a new I-pipe architecture, so I was hoping to be able to skip 3.2... Thank you for your response to my question(s). I noticed that an arm I-pipe patchset for 3.0.13 recently landed in git. Might you consider making 3.2 the next target for arm I-pipe support rather than 3.1? It seems that 3.1 is already being end-of-lifed, and e.g., that the RT-Preempt community has jumped directly from 3.0 to 3.2. Thanks again and best regards. _______________________________________________ Xenomai-help mailing list Xenomai-help@domain.hid https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-help [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3096 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [Xenomai-help] Arm support for 3.2 kernel? 2012-01-19 16:43 ` Terry Fryar @ 2012-01-21 18:03 ` Josh Karch 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Josh Karch @ 2012-01-21 18:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Terry Fryar, babbittner@domain.hid, xenomai@xenomai.org I just picked up a Beaglebone and third the vote for Xenomai. It would be great to get access to the PRUSS modules and generate hardware PWM as well from a real time perspective. ________________________________________ From: xenomai-help-bounces@domain.hid [xenomai-help-bounces@domain.hid] On Behalf Of Terry Fryar [terry.fryar@domain.hid] Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 8:43 AM To: babbittner@domain.hid; xenomai@xenomai.org Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] Arm support for 3.2 kernel? I second the vote for 3.1...in fact for beaglebone xenomai support as well..... ________________________________ From: xenomai-help-bounces@domain.hid [mailto:xenomai-help-bounces@domain.hid] On Behalf Of babbittner@domain.hid Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 8:53 AM To: xenomai@xenomai.org Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] Arm support for 3.2 kernel? I vote for 3.1 support. There is no 3.1 realtime alternative at this point. It would be nice to get some realtime support for the BeagleBone which is on 3.1, probably for several months. <I apologize for the aol email, some day I'll get some real email.> -----Original Message----- From: Mitchell Tasman <tasman@domain.hid> Cc: xenomai-help <xenomai@xenomai.org> Sent: Wed, Jan 18, 2012 6:28 pm Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] Arm support for 3.2 kernel? On 01/10/2012 03:14 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > On 01/10/2012 02:13 AM, Mitchell Tasman wrote (in part): >> Hi. I saw the recent discussion regarding ARM I-pipe and 3.x, and am >> wondering if anyone can hazard a guess as to a timetable for 3.2 support? > > 3.0 is on its way. 3.1 will be next because it is the first version to > support a new I-pipe architecture, so I was hoping to be able to skip 3.2... Thank you for your response to my question(s). I noticed that an arm I-pipe patchset for 3.0.13 recently landed in git. Might you consider making 3.2 the next target for arm I-pipe support rather than 3.1? It seems that 3.1 is already being end-of-lifed, and e.g., that the RT-Preempt community has jumped directly from 3.0 to 3.2. Thanks again and best regards. _______________________________________________ Xenomai-help mailing list Xenomai-help@domain.hid https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-help IMPORTANT/CONFIDENTIAL: This message contains information from Frontier Wind LLC which may be privileged, confidential, or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, retention, archiving, or copying the communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-01-21 18:03 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2012-01-10 1:13 [Xenomai-help] Arm support for 3.2 kernel? Mitchell Tasman 2012-01-10 20:14 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix 2012-01-19 0:26 ` Mitchell Tasman 2012-01-19 14:53 ` babbittner 2012-01-19 16:43 ` Terry Fryar 2012-01-21 18:03 ` Josh Karch
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.