All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson@ti.com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>,
	sameo@linux.intel.com, grant.likely@secretlab.ca,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/12] mfd: twl4030-irq: Return twl6030_mmc_card_detect IRQ for board setup
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 22:38:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F513DCA.1070301@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F512D72.1090002@ti.com>

On 3/2/2012 9:28 PM, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
> Hi Tony,
>
> On 3/2/2012 8:20 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>> * Felipe Balbi<balbi@ti.com> [120302 09:43]:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 05:50:23PM +0100, Benoit Cousson wrote:
>>>> Card detect IRQ from the TWL6030 used to be provided to the MMC
>>>> controller code using a statically allocated IRQ scheme:
>>>>
>>>> card_detect_irq = TWL6030_IRQ_BASE + MMCDETECT_INTR_OFFSET;
>>>>
>>>> This is no longer valid in a SPARSE_IRQ context since there is no more
>>>> pre-defined TWL6030_IRQ_BASE.
>>>>
>>>> Return the proper card detect IRQ value in the
>>>> twl6030_mmc_card_detect_config
>>>> that will be called from the MMC controller.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Benoit Cousson<b-cousson@ti.com>
>>>> Cc: Felipe Balbi<balbi@ti.com>
>>>> Cc: Tony Lindgren<tony@atomide.com>
>>>> Cc: Rajendra Nayak<rnayak@ti.com>
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Felipe Balbi<balbi@ti.com>
>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/mfd/twl6030-irq.c | 3 ++-
>>>> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/twl6030-irq.c b/drivers/mfd/twl6030-irq.c
>>>> index a1c7183..4a63de2 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/mfd/twl6030-irq.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/mfd/twl6030-irq.c
>>>> @@ -308,7 +308,8 @@ int twl6030_mmc_card_detect_config(void)
>>>> ret);
>>>> return ret;
>>>> }
>>>> - return 0;
>>>> +
>>>> + return twl6030_irq_base + MMCDETECT_INTR_OFFSET;
>>>> }
>>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(twl6030_mmc_card_detect_config);
>>>
>>> At some point this twl6030_mmc_card_detect_config() needs to vanish in
>>> favor of a better mechanism. Maybe passing the GPIO number an requiring
>>> the driver to request the GPIO, set its direction and use it as IRQ
>>> line.
>>>
>>> the only problem would arise if we end up hooking the Card Detect pin to
>>> a real IRQ line, but then we can use a flag to differentiate.
>>
>> I'm trying to leave out the need for this callback to pdata..
>> See mmc: omap_hsmmc: Simplify init for twl6030 MMC card detect
>> that does pretty much the same as Benoit's patch plus removes
>> the need for the callback.
>
> That's cool. I did that patch to still have a working MMC after my TWL
> series because I missed your MMC series :-(.
>
> The patch #4 "mmc: omap_hsmmc: Simplify init for twl6030 MMC card
> detect" is indeed simplifying a lot that IRQ mess.
>
> I will check with that TWL series, but since you are already using the
> twl6030_irq_base it should work without any trouble.

I created a for_3.4/twl_irq_gpio_fix branch based on irqdomain/next with 
all the TWL + GPIO patches except the DTS and without the MMC hacks.

And I merged it into your hsmmc-gpio branch. There is a small conflict 
in gpio-twl4030 but otherwise it works on the SDP4430.

I cannot test remotely with Panda or Beagle, the animals are already 
sleeping.

The branch is there if you want to check for OMAP3 as well.
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bcousson/linux-omap-dt.git 
for_3.4/twl_irq_gpio_fix

Regards,
Benoit

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: b-cousson@ti.com (Cousson, Benoit)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 11/12] mfd: twl4030-irq: Return twl6030_mmc_card_detect IRQ for board setup
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 22:38:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F513DCA.1070301@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F512D72.1090002@ti.com>

On 3/2/2012 9:28 PM, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
> Hi Tony,
>
> On 3/2/2012 8:20 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>> * Felipe Balbi<balbi@ti.com> [120302 09:43]:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 05:50:23PM +0100, Benoit Cousson wrote:
>>>> Card detect IRQ from the TWL6030 used to be provided to the MMC
>>>> controller code using a statically allocated IRQ scheme:
>>>>
>>>> card_detect_irq = TWL6030_IRQ_BASE + MMCDETECT_INTR_OFFSET;
>>>>
>>>> This is no longer valid in a SPARSE_IRQ context since there is no more
>>>> pre-defined TWL6030_IRQ_BASE.
>>>>
>>>> Return the proper card detect IRQ value in the
>>>> twl6030_mmc_card_detect_config
>>>> that will be called from the MMC controller.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Benoit Cousson<b-cousson@ti.com>
>>>> Cc: Felipe Balbi<balbi@ti.com>
>>>> Cc: Tony Lindgren<tony@atomide.com>
>>>> Cc: Rajendra Nayak<rnayak@ti.com>
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Felipe Balbi<balbi@ti.com>
>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/mfd/twl6030-irq.c | 3 ++-
>>>> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/twl6030-irq.c b/drivers/mfd/twl6030-irq.c
>>>> index a1c7183..4a63de2 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/mfd/twl6030-irq.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/mfd/twl6030-irq.c
>>>> @@ -308,7 +308,8 @@ int twl6030_mmc_card_detect_config(void)
>>>> ret);
>>>> return ret;
>>>> }
>>>> - return 0;
>>>> +
>>>> + return twl6030_irq_base + MMCDETECT_INTR_OFFSET;
>>>> }
>>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(twl6030_mmc_card_detect_config);
>>>
>>> At some point this twl6030_mmc_card_detect_config() needs to vanish in
>>> favor of a better mechanism. Maybe passing the GPIO number an requiring
>>> the driver to request the GPIO, set its direction and use it as IRQ
>>> line.
>>>
>>> the only problem would arise if we end up hooking the Card Detect pin to
>>> a real IRQ line, but then we can use a flag to differentiate.
>>
>> I'm trying to leave out the need for this callback to pdata..
>> See mmc: omap_hsmmc: Simplify init for twl6030 MMC card detect
>> that does pretty much the same as Benoit's patch plus removes
>> the need for the callback.
>
> That's cool. I did that patch to still have a working MMC after my TWL
> series because I missed your MMC series :-(.
>
> The patch #4 "mmc: omap_hsmmc: Simplify init for twl6030 MMC card
> detect" is indeed simplifying a lot that IRQ mess.
>
> I will check with that TWL series, but since you are already using the
> twl6030_irq_base it should work without any trouble.

I created a for_3.4/twl_irq_gpio_fix branch based on irqdomain/next with 
all the TWL + GPIO patches except the DTS and without the MMC hacks.

And I merged it into your hsmmc-gpio branch. There is a small conflict 
in gpio-twl4030 but otherwise it works on the SDP4430.

I cannot test remotely with Panda or Beagle, the animals are already 
sleeping.

The branch is there if you want to check for OMAP3 as well.
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bcousson/linux-omap-dt.git 
for_3.4/twl_irq_gpio_fix

Regards,
Benoit

  reply	other threads:[~2012-03-02 21:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-02 16:50 [PATCH 00/12] mfd: twl: Fix for irqdomain/next + SPARSE_IRQ + MMC card detect Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 16:50 ` Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 16:50 ` [PATCH 01/12] mfd: twl-core: don't depend on pdata->irq_base/end Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 16:50   ` Benoit Cousson
2012-03-14 20:59   ` Kevin Hilman
2012-03-14 20:59     ` Kevin Hilman
2012-03-14 21:08     ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-03-14 21:08       ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-03-14 21:17       ` Kevin Hilman
2012-03-14 21:17         ` Kevin Hilman
2012-03-14 21:53     ` Kevin Hilman
2012-03-14 21:53       ` Kevin Hilman
2012-03-19 14:23       ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-03-19 14:23         ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-03-14 22:14     ` Tony Lindgren
2012-03-14 22:14       ` Tony Lindgren
2012-03-19 15:07     ` Felipe Balbi
2012-03-19 15:07       ` Felipe Balbi
2012-03-02 16:50 ` [PATCH 02/12] mfd: twl-core: remove unneeded header Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 16:50   ` Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 16:50 ` [PATCH 03/12] mfd: twl-core: Remove references already defined in header file Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 16:50   ` Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 16:50 ` [PATCH 04/12] mfd: twl-core: Move IRQ allocation into twl[4030|6030]-irq files Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 16:50   ` Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 16:50 ` [PATCH 05/12] mfd: twl4030-irq: Make SIH SPARSE_IRQ capable Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 16:50   ` Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 16:50 ` [PATCH 06/12] mfd: twl4030-irq: micro-optimization on IRQ handler Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 16:50   ` Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 16:50 ` [PATCH 07/12] mfd: twl-*: Change from pr_XXX to dev_XXX macros and various cleanups Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 16:50   ` Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 16:50 ` [PATCH 08/12] gpio/twl: Allocate irq_desc dynamically for SPARSE_IRQ support Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 16:50   ` Benoit Cousson
2012-03-07 12:57   ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-03-07 12:57     ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-03-09 16:39     ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-03-09 16:39       ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-03-12 17:46     ` Grant Likely
2012-03-12 17:46       ` Grant Likely
2012-03-02 16:50 ` [PATCH 09/12] gpio/twl: Add DT support to gpio-twl4030 driver Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 16:50   ` Benoit Cousson
2012-03-12 17:48   ` Grant Likely
2012-03-12 17:48     ` Grant Likely
2012-03-02 16:50 ` [PATCH 10/12] arm/dts: twl4030: Add twl4030-gpio node Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 16:50   ` Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 16:50 ` [PATCH 11/12] mfd: twl4030-irq: Return twl6030_mmc_card_detect IRQ for board setup Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 16:50   ` Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 18:15   ` Felipe Balbi
2012-03-02 18:15     ` Felipe Balbi
2012-03-02 19:20     ` Tony Lindgren
2012-03-02 19:20       ` Tony Lindgren
2012-03-02 20:28       ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-03-02 20:28         ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-03-02 21:38         ` Cousson, Benoit [this message]
2012-03-02 21:38           ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-03-02 21:44           ` Tony Lindgren
2012-03-02 21:44             ` Tony Lindgren
2012-03-05  8:19     ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-03-05  8:19       ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-03-05  8:58       ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-03-05  8:58         ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-03-03 15:09   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2012-03-03 15:09     ` Sergei Shtylyov
2012-03-05  8:29     ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-03-05  8:29       ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-03-02 16:50 ` [PATCH 12/12] ARM: OMAP2+: board-omap4-*: Do not use anymore TWL6030_IRQ_BASE in board files Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 16:50   ` Benoit Cousson
2012-03-13 17:07   ` Tony Lindgren
2012-03-13 17:07     ` Tony Lindgren
2012-03-13 21:35     ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-03-13 21:35       ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-03-02 20:33 ` [PATCH 07/12] mfd: twl-*: Replace pr_ macros by the dev_ equivalent and do various cleanups Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 20:33   ` Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 20:49   ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-03-02 20:49     ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-03-14 20:50 ` [PATCH 00/12] mfd: twl: Fix for irqdomain/next + SPARSE_IRQ + MMC card detect Kevin Hilman
2012-03-14 20:50   ` Kevin Hilman
2012-03-14 21:01   ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-03-14 21:01     ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-03-14 21:24     ` Kevin Hilman
2012-03-14 21:24       ` Kevin Hilman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F513DCA.1070301@ti.com \
    --to=b-cousson@ti.com \
    --cc=balbi@ti.com \
    --cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rnayak@ti.com \
    --cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.