All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
To: "Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson@ti.com>
Cc: sameo@linux.intel.com, tony@atomide.com,
	grant.likely@secretlab.ca, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] mfd: twl-core: don't depend on pdata->irq_base/end
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:17:54 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y5r2evb1.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F6108C1.2060004@ti.com> (Benoit Cousson's message of "Wed, 14 Mar 2012 22:08:17 +0100")

"Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson@ti.com> writes:

> On 3/14/2012 9:59 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> Benoit Cousson<b-cousson@ti.com>  writes:
>>
>>> From: Felipe Balbi<balbi@ti.com>
>>>
>>> With sparse IRQs the driver shouldn't depend at all on
>>> any IRQ values coming from board-file.
>>>
>>> Remove every occurences of pdata->irq_base/end.
>>
>> Well, not quite *every*. :)
>
> Hehe, good catch, thanks.
>
>> If the driver isn't going to use those fields anymore, they should also
>> be removed from the pdata struct too[1].  Also, the remaining board/init
>> code that is initializing those fields should be removed as well[2], since
>> it obviously has no effect.
>>
>> The first patch below should probably be folded into this one, and then
>> the 2nd patch removes all the users.
>
> We should probably remove all the users before removing the attribute?
> It looks like your patches are ordered in the opposite way.

Agreed.

> I'll add that in the series and repost the pull request.

Great, thanks.

Kevin

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: khilman@ti.com (Kevin Hilman)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 01/12] mfd: twl-core: don't depend on pdata->irq_base/end
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:17:54 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y5r2evb1.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F6108C1.2060004@ti.com> (Benoit Cousson's message of "Wed, 14 Mar 2012 22:08:17 +0100")

"Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson@ti.com> writes:

> On 3/14/2012 9:59 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> Benoit Cousson<b-cousson@ti.com>  writes:
>>
>>> From: Felipe Balbi<balbi@ti.com>
>>>
>>> With sparse IRQs the driver shouldn't depend at all on
>>> any IRQ values coming from board-file.
>>>
>>> Remove every occurences of pdata->irq_base/end.
>>
>> Well, not quite *every*. :)
>
> Hehe, good catch, thanks.
>
>> If the driver isn't going to use those fields anymore, they should also
>> be removed from the pdata struct too[1].  Also, the remaining board/init
>> code that is initializing those fields should be removed as well[2], since
>> it obviously has no effect.
>>
>> The first patch below should probably be folded into this one, and then
>> the 2nd patch removes all the users.
>
> We should probably remove all the users before removing the attribute?
> It looks like your patches are ordered in the opposite way.

Agreed.

> I'll add that in the series and repost the pull request.

Great, thanks.

Kevin

  reply	other threads:[~2012-03-14 21:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-02 16:50 [PATCH 00/12] mfd: twl: Fix for irqdomain/next + SPARSE_IRQ + MMC card detect Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 16:50 ` Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 16:50 ` [PATCH 01/12] mfd: twl-core: don't depend on pdata->irq_base/end Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 16:50   ` Benoit Cousson
2012-03-14 20:59   ` Kevin Hilman
2012-03-14 20:59     ` Kevin Hilman
2012-03-14 21:08     ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-03-14 21:08       ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-03-14 21:17       ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2012-03-14 21:17         ` Kevin Hilman
2012-03-14 21:53     ` Kevin Hilman
2012-03-14 21:53       ` Kevin Hilman
2012-03-19 14:23       ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-03-19 14:23         ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-03-14 22:14     ` Tony Lindgren
2012-03-14 22:14       ` Tony Lindgren
2012-03-19 15:07     ` Felipe Balbi
2012-03-19 15:07       ` Felipe Balbi
2012-03-02 16:50 ` [PATCH 02/12] mfd: twl-core: remove unneeded header Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 16:50   ` Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 16:50 ` [PATCH 03/12] mfd: twl-core: Remove references already defined in header file Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 16:50   ` Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 16:50 ` [PATCH 04/12] mfd: twl-core: Move IRQ allocation into twl[4030|6030]-irq files Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 16:50   ` Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 16:50 ` [PATCH 05/12] mfd: twl4030-irq: Make SIH SPARSE_IRQ capable Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 16:50   ` Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 16:50 ` [PATCH 06/12] mfd: twl4030-irq: micro-optimization on IRQ handler Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 16:50   ` Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 16:50 ` [PATCH 07/12] mfd: twl-*: Change from pr_XXX to dev_XXX macros and various cleanups Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 16:50   ` Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 16:50 ` [PATCH 08/12] gpio/twl: Allocate irq_desc dynamically for SPARSE_IRQ support Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 16:50   ` Benoit Cousson
2012-03-07 12:57   ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-03-07 12:57     ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-03-09 16:39     ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-03-09 16:39       ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-03-12 17:46     ` Grant Likely
2012-03-12 17:46       ` Grant Likely
2012-03-02 16:50 ` [PATCH 09/12] gpio/twl: Add DT support to gpio-twl4030 driver Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 16:50   ` Benoit Cousson
2012-03-12 17:48   ` Grant Likely
2012-03-12 17:48     ` Grant Likely
2012-03-02 16:50 ` [PATCH 10/12] arm/dts: twl4030: Add twl4030-gpio node Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 16:50   ` Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 16:50 ` [PATCH 11/12] mfd: twl4030-irq: Return twl6030_mmc_card_detect IRQ for board setup Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 16:50   ` Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 18:15   ` Felipe Balbi
2012-03-02 18:15     ` Felipe Balbi
2012-03-02 19:20     ` Tony Lindgren
2012-03-02 19:20       ` Tony Lindgren
2012-03-02 20:28       ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-03-02 20:28         ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-03-02 21:38         ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-03-02 21:38           ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-03-02 21:44           ` Tony Lindgren
2012-03-02 21:44             ` Tony Lindgren
2012-03-05  8:19     ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-03-05  8:19       ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-03-05  8:58       ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-03-05  8:58         ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-03-03 15:09   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2012-03-03 15:09     ` Sergei Shtylyov
2012-03-05  8:29     ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-03-05  8:29       ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-03-02 16:50 ` [PATCH 12/12] ARM: OMAP2+: board-omap4-*: Do not use anymore TWL6030_IRQ_BASE in board files Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 16:50   ` Benoit Cousson
2012-03-13 17:07   ` Tony Lindgren
2012-03-13 17:07     ` Tony Lindgren
2012-03-13 21:35     ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-03-13 21:35       ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-03-02 20:33 ` [PATCH 07/12] mfd: twl-*: Replace pr_ macros by the dev_ equivalent and do various cleanups Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 20:33   ` Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 20:49   ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-03-02 20:49     ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-03-14 20:50 ` [PATCH 00/12] mfd: twl: Fix for irqdomain/next + SPARSE_IRQ + MMC card detect Kevin Hilman
2012-03-14 20:50   ` Kevin Hilman
2012-03-14 21:01   ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-03-14 21:01     ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-03-14 21:24     ` Kevin Hilman
2012-03-14 21:24       ` Kevin Hilman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87y5r2evb1.fsf@ti.com \
    --to=khilman@ti.com \
    --cc=b-cousson@ti.com \
    --cc=balbi@ti.com \
    --cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.