All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson@ti.com>
To: sameo@linux.intel.com
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>,
	tony@atomide.com, grant.likely@secretlab.ca,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] mfd: twl-core: don't depend on pdata->irq_base/end
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 15:23:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F674152.5040008@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87k42metna.fsf@ti.com>

Samuel,

On 3/14/2012 10:53 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Kevin Hilman<khilman@ti.com>  writes:
>
>> Benoit Cousson<b-cousson@ti.com>  writes:
>>
>>> From: Felipe Balbi<balbi@ti.com>
>>>
>>> With sparse IRQs the driver shouldn't depend at all on
>>> any IRQ values coming from board-file.
>>>
>>> Remove every occurences of pdata->irq_base/end.
>>
>> Well, not quite *every*. :)
>>
>> If the driver isn't going to use those fields anymore, they should also
>> be removed from the pdata struct too[1].  Also, the remaining board/init
>> code that is initializing those fields should be removed as well[2], since
>> it obviously has no effect.
>>
>> The first patch below should probably be folded into this one, and then
>> the 2nd patch removes all the users.
>
> Below is a correct version of the 2nd patch which removes all the users.
>
> The previous version wouldn't apply cleanly because I generated it on
> top of a local branch that also included some other changes to
> twl-common.c from the SMPS regulator series (which seems to have missed
> the window for v3.4.)
>
> This one applies cleanly on your for_3.4/twl_irq_gpio_mmc_fix branch.

After discussing with Kevin, we think it might be better to wait 3.5 for 
this further cleanup patches.
These patches will need some patches already queued by Tony to avoid 
breaking OMAP build.
In order to reduce dependency, let's push them for 3.5.

You can the pull the current branch.

Thanks,
Benoit

>
> Kevin
>
>  From b59a4754fb66f6f729ebbd0563c4cd2bd2cda56e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Kevin Hilman<khilman@ti.com>
> Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 13:56:01 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: TWL: remove usage of pdata->irq_base/_end
>
> The driver has been converted to use SPARSE_IRQ and no longer needs to
> be passed IRQ base/end.  The driver no longer uses these fields, so
> remove them from the reamaining users.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman<khilman@ti.com>
> ---
>   arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-2430sdp.c    |    3 ---
>   arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3logic.c |    3 ---
>   arch/arm/mach-omap2/twl-common.c       |   10 ----------
>   3 files changed, 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-2430sdp.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-2430sdp.c
> index 7370983..7dfcb96 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-2430sdp.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-2430sdp.c
> @@ -218,9 +218,6 @@ static struct twl4030_gpio_platform_data sdp2430_gpio_data = {
>   };
>
>   static struct twl4030_platform_data sdp2430_twldata = {
> -	.irq_base	= TWL4030_IRQ_BASE,
> -	.irq_end	= TWL4030_IRQ_END,
> -
>   	/* platform_data for children goes here */
>   	.gpio		=&sdp2430_gpio_data,
>   	.vmmc1		=&sdp2430_vmmc1,
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3logic.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3logic.c
> index 4198dd0..0b053b4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3logic.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3logic.c
> @@ -85,9 +85,6 @@ static struct twl4030_gpio_platform_data omap3logic_gpio_data = {
>   };
>
>   static struct twl4030_platform_data omap3logic_twldata = {
> -	.irq_base	= TWL4030_IRQ_BASE,
> -	.irq_end	= TWL4030_IRQ_END,
> -
>   	/* platform_data for children goes here */
>   	.gpio		=&omap3logic_gpio_data,
>   	.vmmc1		=&omap3logic_vmmc1,
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/twl-common.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/twl-common.c
> index 10b20c6..ce349ac 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/twl-common.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/twl-common.c
> @@ -129,11 +129,6 @@ static struct regulator_init_data omap3_vpll2_idata = {
>   void __init omap3_pmic_get_config(struct twl4030_platform_data *pmic_data,
>   				  u32 pdata_flags, u32 regulators_flags)
>   {
> -	if (!pmic_data->irq_base)
> -		pmic_data->irq_base = TWL4030_IRQ_BASE;
> -	if (!pmic_data->irq_end)
> -		pmic_data->irq_end = TWL4030_IRQ_END;
> -
>   	/* Common platform data configurations */
>   	if (pdata_flags&  TWL_COMMON_PDATA_USB&&  !pmic_data->usb)
>   		pmic_data->usb =&omap3_usb_pdata;
> @@ -287,11 +282,6 @@ static struct regulator_init_data omap4_clk32kg_idata = {
>   void __init omap4_pmic_get_config(struct twl4030_platform_data *pmic_data,
>   				  u32 pdata_flags, u32 regulators_flags)
>   {
> -	if (!pmic_data->irq_base)
> -		pmic_data->irq_base = TWL6030_IRQ_BASE;
> -	if (!pmic_data->irq_end)
> -		pmic_data->irq_end = TWL6030_IRQ_END;
> -
>   	/* Common platform data configurations */
>   	if (pdata_flags&  TWL_COMMON_PDATA_USB&&  !pmic_data->usb)
>   		pmic_data->usb =&omap4_usb_pdata;


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: b-cousson@ti.com (Cousson, Benoit)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 01/12] mfd: twl-core: don't depend on pdata->irq_base/end
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 15:23:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F674152.5040008@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87k42metna.fsf@ti.com>

Samuel,

On 3/14/2012 10:53 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Kevin Hilman<khilman@ti.com>  writes:
>
>> Benoit Cousson<b-cousson@ti.com>  writes:
>>
>>> From: Felipe Balbi<balbi@ti.com>
>>>
>>> With sparse IRQs the driver shouldn't depend at all on
>>> any IRQ values coming from board-file.
>>>
>>> Remove every occurences of pdata->irq_base/end.
>>
>> Well, not quite *every*. :)
>>
>> If the driver isn't going to use those fields anymore, they should also
>> be removed from the pdata struct too[1].  Also, the remaining board/init
>> code that is initializing those fields should be removed as well[2], since
>> it obviously has no effect.
>>
>> The first patch below should probably be folded into this one, and then
>> the 2nd patch removes all the users.
>
> Below is a correct version of the 2nd patch which removes all the users.
>
> The previous version wouldn't apply cleanly because I generated it on
> top of a local branch that also included some other changes to
> twl-common.c from the SMPS regulator series (which seems to have missed
> the window for v3.4.)
>
> This one applies cleanly on your for_3.4/twl_irq_gpio_mmc_fix branch.

After discussing with Kevin, we think it might be better to wait 3.5 for 
this further cleanup patches.
These patches will need some patches already queued by Tony to avoid 
breaking OMAP build.
In order to reduce dependency, let's push them for 3.5.

You can the pull the current branch.

Thanks,
Benoit

>
> Kevin
>
>  From b59a4754fb66f6f729ebbd0563c4cd2bd2cda56e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Kevin Hilman<khilman@ti.com>
> Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 13:56:01 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: TWL: remove usage of pdata->irq_base/_end
>
> The driver has been converted to use SPARSE_IRQ and no longer needs to
> be passed IRQ base/end.  The driver no longer uses these fields, so
> remove them from the reamaining users.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman<khilman@ti.com>
> ---
>   arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-2430sdp.c    |    3 ---
>   arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3logic.c |    3 ---
>   arch/arm/mach-omap2/twl-common.c       |   10 ----------
>   3 files changed, 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-2430sdp.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-2430sdp.c
> index 7370983..7dfcb96 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-2430sdp.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-2430sdp.c
> @@ -218,9 +218,6 @@ static struct twl4030_gpio_platform_data sdp2430_gpio_data = {
>   };
>
>   static struct twl4030_platform_data sdp2430_twldata = {
> -	.irq_base	= TWL4030_IRQ_BASE,
> -	.irq_end	= TWL4030_IRQ_END,
> -
>   	/* platform_data for children goes here */
>   	.gpio		=&sdp2430_gpio_data,
>   	.vmmc1		=&sdp2430_vmmc1,
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3logic.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3logic.c
> index 4198dd0..0b053b4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3logic.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3logic.c
> @@ -85,9 +85,6 @@ static struct twl4030_gpio_platform_data omap3logic_gpio_data = {
>   };
>
>   static struct twl4030_platform_data omap3logic_twldata = {
> -	.irq_base	= TWL4030_IRQ_BASE,
> -	.irq_end	= TWL4030_IRQ_END,
> -
>   	/* platform_data for children goes here */
>   	.gpio		=&omap3logic_gpio_data,
>   	.vmmc1		=&omap3logic_vmmc1,
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/twl-common.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/twl-common.c
> index 10b20c6..ce349ac 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/twl-common.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/twl-common.c
> @@ -129,11 +129,6 @@ static struct regulator_init_data omap3_vpll2_idata = {
>   void __init omap3_pmic_get_config(struct twl4030_platform_data *pmic_data,
>   				  u32 pdata_flags, u32 regulators_flags)
>   {
> -	if (!pmic_data->irq_base)
> -		pmic_data->irq_base = TWL4030_IRQ_BASE;
> -	if (!pmic_data->irq_end)
> -		pmic_data->irq_end = TWL4030_IRQ_END;
> -
>   	/* Common platform data configurations */
>   	if (pdata_flags&  TWL_COMMON_PDATA_USB&&  !pmic_data->usb)
>   		pmic_data->usb =&omap3_usb_pdata;
> @@ -287,11 +282,6 @@ static struct regulator_init_data omap4_clk32kg_idata = {
>   void __init omap4_pmic_get_config(struct twl4030_platform_data *pmic_data,
>   				  u32 pdata_flags, u32 regulators_flags)
>   {
> -	if (!pmic_data->irq_base)
> -		pmic_data->irq_base = TWL6030_IRQ_BASE;
> -	if (!pmic_data->irq_end)
> -		pmic_data->irq_end = TWL6030_IRQ_END;
> -
>   	/* Common platform data configurations */
>   	if (pdata_flags&  TWL_COMMON_PDATA_USB&&  !pmic_data->usb)
>   		pmic_data->usb =&omap4_usb_pdata;

  reply	other threads:[~2012-03-19 14:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-02 16:50 [PATCH 00/12] mfd: twl: Fix for irqdomain/next + SPARSE_IRQ + MMC card detect Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 16:50 ` Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 16:50 ` [PATCH 01/12] mfd: twl-core: don't depend on pdata->irq_base/end Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 16:50   ` Benoit Cousson
2012-03-14 20:59   ` Kevin Hilman
2012-03-14 20:59     ` Kevin Hilman
2012-03-14 21:08     ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-03-14 21:08       ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-03-14 21:17       ` Kevin Hilman
2012-03-14 21:17         ` Kevin Hilman
2012-03-14 21:53     ` Kevin Hilman
2012-03-14 21:53       ` Kevin Hilman
2012-03-19 14:23       ` Cousson, Benoit [this message]
2012-03-19 14:23         ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-03-14 22:14     ` Tony Lindgren
2012-03-14 22:14       ` Tony Lindgren
2012-03-19 15:07     ` Felipe Balbi
2012-03-19 15:07       ` Felipe Balbi
2012-03-02 16:50 ` [PATCH 02/12] mfd: twl-core: remove unneeded header Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 16:50   ` Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 16:50 ` [PATCH 03/12] mfd: twl-core: Remove references already defined in header file Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 16:50   ` Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 16:50 ` [PATCH 04/12] mfd: twl-core: Move IRQ allocation into twl[4030|6030]-irq files Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 16:50   ` Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 16:50 ` [PATCH 05/12] mfd: twl4030-irq: Make SIH SPARSE_IRQ capable Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 16:50   ` Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 16:50 ` [PATCH 06/12] mfd: twl4030-irq: micro-optimization on IRQ handler Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 16:50   ` Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 16:50 ` [PATCH 07/12] mfd: twl-*: Change from pr_XXX to dev_XXX macros and various cleanups Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 16:50   ` Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 16:50 ` [PATCH 08/12] gpio/twl: Allocate irq_desc dynamically for SPARSE_IRQ support Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 16:50   ` Benoit Cousson
2012-03-07 12:57   ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-03-07 12:57     ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-03-09 16:39     ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-03-09 16:39       ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-03-12 17:46     ` Grant Likely
2012-03-12 17:46       ` Grant Likely
2012-03-02 16:50 ` [PATCH 09/12] gpio/twl: Add DT support to gpio-twl4030 driver Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 16:50   ` Benoit Cousson
2012-03-12 17:48   ` Grant Likely
2012-03-12 17:48     ` Grant Likely
2012-03-02 16:50 ` [PATCH 10/12] arm/dts: twl4030: Add twl4030-gpio node Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 16:50   ` Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 16:50 ` [PATCH 11/12] mfd: twl4030-irq: Return twl6030_mmc_card_detect IRQ for board setup Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 16:50   ` Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 18:15   ` Felipe Balbi
2012-03-02 18:15     ` Felipe Balbi
2012-03-02 19:20     ` Tony Lindgren
2012-03-02 19:20       ` Tony Lindgren
2012-03-02 20:28       ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-03-02 20:28         ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-03-02 21:38         ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-03-02 21:38           ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-03-02 21:44           ` Tony Lindgren
2012-03-02 21:44             ` Tony Lindgren
2012-03-05  8:19     ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-03-05  8:19       ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-03-05  8:58       ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-03-05  8:58         ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-03-03 15:09   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2012-03-03 15:09     ` Sergei Shtylyov
2012-03-05  8:29     ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-03-05  8:29       ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-03-02 16:50 ` [PATCH 12/12] ARM: OMAP2+: board-omap4-*: Do not use anymore TWL6030_IRQ_BASE in board files Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 16:50   ` Benoit Cousson
2012-03-13 17:07   ` Tony Lindgren
2012-03-13 17:07     ` Tony Lindgren
2012-03-13 21:35     ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-03-13 21:35       ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-03-02 20:33 ` [PATCH 07/12] mfd: twl-*: Replace pr_ macros by the dev_ equivalent and do various cleanups Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 20:33   ` Benoit Cousson
2012-03-02 20:49   ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-03-02 20:49     ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-03-14 20:50 ` [PATCH 00/12] mfd: twl: Fix for irqdomain/next + SPARSE_IRQ + MMC card detect Kevin Hilman
2012-03-14 20:50   ` Kevin Hilman
2012-03-14 21:01   ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-03-14 21:01     ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-03-14 21:24     ` Kevin Hilman
2012-03-14 21:24       ` Kevin Hilman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F674152.5040008@ti.com \
    --to=b-cousson@ti.com \
    --cc=balbi@ti.com \
    --cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=khilman@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.