All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leonid Yegoshin <yegoshin@mips.com>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@mvista.com>
Cc: "Steven J. Hill" <sjhill@mips.com>, <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>,
	<ralf@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add MIPS64R2 core support.
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:55:03 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F849017.1020706@mips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F848957.6000400@mvista.com>

On 04/10/2012 12:26 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Leonid Yegoshin wrote:
>
>>>> +config 64BIT_PHYS_ADDR
>>>> +    bool "Kernel supports 64 bit physical addresses" if EXPERIMENTAL
>>>> +    depends on 64BIT
>
>>>    This option is selected on 32-bit CPUs like Alchemy, which has 
>>> 36-bit physical address. It will cause a warning about unmet
>
>> Just verified - selected Alchemy and DB1000 board and got
>
>> # CONFIG_64BIT is not set
>> CONFIG_64BIT_PHYS_ADDR=y
>> CONFIG_ARCH_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT=y
>> CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT=y
>
>> ???
>
>    And you didn't get a warning on "select 64BIT_PHYS_ADDR"? Strange, 
> modern Kconfig should spit out one...
>

OK, you right, I missed it in bunch of another. It has sense to add a 
missed dependency.


- Leonid.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Leonid Yegoshin <yegoshin@mips.com>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@mvista.com>
Cc: "Steven J. Hill" <sjhill@mips.com>,
	linux-mips@linux-mips.org, ralf@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add MIPS64R2 core support.
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:55:03 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F849017.1020706@mips.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20120410195503.jGmQ5hPgKWxEw8ts9pfo3Gk3_MAY3S9obRsPPsipZJQ@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F848957.6000400@mvista.com>

On 04/10/2012 12:26 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Leonid Yegoshin wrote:
>
>>>> +config 64BIT_PHYS_ADDR
>>>> +    bool "Kernel supports 64 bit physical addresses" if EXPERIMENTAL
>>>> +    depends on 64BIT
>
>>>    This option is selected on 32-bit CPUs like Alchemy, which has 
>>> 36-bit physical address. It will cause a warning about unmet
>
>> Just verified - selected Alchemy and DB1000 board and got
>
>> # CONFIG_64BIT is not set
>> CONFIG_64BIT_PHYS_ADDR=y
>> CONFIG_ARCH_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT=y
>> CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT=y
>
>> ???
>
>    And you didn't get a warning on "select 64BIT_PHYS_ADDR"? Strange, 
> modern Kconfig should spit out one...
>

OK, you right, I missed it in bunch of another. It has sense to add a 
missed dependency.


- Leonid.

  reply	other threads:[~2012-04-10 19:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-09 16:04 [PATCH] Add MIPS64R2 core support Steven J. Hill
2012-04-10 11:49 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2012-04-10 19:09   ` Leonid Yegoshin
2012-04-10 19:09     ` Leonid Yegoshin
2012-04-10 19:26     ` Sergei Shtylyov
2012-04-10 19:55       ` Leonid Yegoshin [this message]
2012-04-10 19:55         ` Leonid Yegoshin
2012-04-11 11:53         ` Sergei Shtylyov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F849017.1020706@mips.com \
    --to=yegoshin@mips.com \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=sjhill@mips.com \
    --cc=sshtylyov@mvista.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.