All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com>
To: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
Cc: hongxu.cn@gmail.com, nicolas.ferre@atmel.com,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, ivan.djelic@parrot.com,
	plagnioj@jcrosoft.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/3] MTD: at91: extract hw ecc initialization to one function and use relaxed read/write
Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 16:50:50 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FC33C6A.4070104@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1338122668.19389.4.camel@koala>

On 5/27/2012 8:44 PM, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-05-26 at 21:24 +0800, Josh Wu wrote:
>> use _relaxed read/write in most place. And use writel in operations of Control Register since it needs memory barrier.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hong Xu<hong.xu@atmel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Josh Wu<josh.wu@atmel.com>
> This should be split on 2 or even 3 parts:
>
> 1. You move definitions and things around.
> 2. You separate out the init stuff into a function
> 3. You start using _relaxed helpers.
>
> And you should provide better commit messages. You should explain why
> you do things - just cleanup? improvement? fix? preparation for
> something?

My goal here is to prepare for the PMECC support.
    Point 1 is consistent for the later PMECC patch.
    Point 2 is prepare for PMECC support.

So I think I will not add the _relaxed helpers for HW ECC operation in 
this patch series. Since that is out of the goal of this patch series.

>
> I think this patch is too big, commit message is poor, patch does more
> things than documented in the commit message.
>

Indeed the commit message is poor. I will fix it.

Best Regards,
Josh Wu

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: josh.wu@atmel.com (Josh Wu)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v9 1/3] MTD: at91: extract hw ecc initialization to one function and use relaxed read/write
Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 16:50:50 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FC33C6A.4070104@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1338122668.19389.4.camel@koala>

On 5/27/2012 8:44 PM, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-05-26 at 21:24 +0800, Josh Wu wrote:
>> use _relaxed read/write in most place. And use writel in operations of Control Register since it needs memory barrier.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hong Xu<hong.xu@atmel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Josh Wu<josh.wu@atmel.com>
> This should be split on 2 or even 3 parts:
>
> 1. You move definitions and things around.
> 2. You separate out the init stuff into a function
> 3. You start using _relaxed helpers.
>
> And you should provide better commit messages. You should explain why
> you do things - just cleanup? improvement? fix? preparation for
> something?

My goal here is to prepare for the PMECC support.
    Point 1 is consistent for the later PMECC patch.
    Point 2 is prepare for PMECC support.

So I think I will not add the _relaxed helpers for HW ECC operation in 
this patch series. Since that is out of the goal of this patch series.

>
> I think this patch is too big, commit message is poor, patch does more
> things than documented in the commit message.
>

Indeed the commit message is poor. I will fix it.

Best Regards,
Josh Wu

  reply	other threads:[~2012-05-28  8:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-26 13:24 [PATCH v9 0/3] MTD: at91: Add PMECC support for at91 nand flash driver Josh Wu
2012-05-26 13:24 ` Josh Wu
2012-05-26 13:24 ` [PATCH v9 1/3] MTD: at91: extract hw ecc initialization to one function and use relaxed read/write Josh Wu
2012-05-26 13:24   ` Josh Wu
2012-05-27 12:44   ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-05-27 12:44     ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-05-28  8:50     ` Josh Wu [this message]
2012-05-28  8:50       ` Josh Wu
2012-05-26 13:24 ` [PATCH v9 2/3] MTD: at91: add dt parameters for PMECC Josh Wu
2012-05-26 13:24   ` Josh Wu
2012-05-26 13:24 ` [PATCH v9 3/3] MTD: at91: atmel_nand: Update driver to support Programmable Multibit ECC controller Josh Wu
2012-05-26 13:24   ` Josh Wu
2012-05-27 12:50   ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-05-27 12:50     ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-05-28  8:43     ` Josh Wu
2012-05-28  8:43       ` Josh Wu
2012-05-28  6:58   ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-05-28  6:58     ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-05-28  8:34     ` Josh Wu
2012-05-28  8:34       ` Josh Wu
2012-05-29 16:01       ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-05-29 16:01         ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-05-28  6:39 ` [PATCH v9 0/3] MTD: at91: Add PMECC support for at91 nand flash driver Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-05-28  6:39   ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FC33C6A.4070104@atmel.com \
    --to=josh.wu@atmel.com \
    --cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
    --cc=hongxu.cn@gmail.com \
    --cc=ivan.djelic@parrot.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
    --cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.