Re: [PATCH 0/5] Add vhost-blk support

[Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>]

Il 17/07/2012 10:29, Asias He ha scritto:
> So, vhost-blk at least saves ~6 syscalls for us in each request. 

Are they really 6?  If I/O is coalesced by a factor of 3, for example
(i.e. each exit processes 3 requests), it's really 2 syscalls per request.

Also, is there anything we can improve?  Perhaps we can modify epoll and
ask it to clear the eventfd for us (would save 2 reads)?  Or
io_getevents (would save 1)?

> I guess you mean qemu here. Yes, in theory, qemu's block layer can be
> improved to achieve similar performance as vhost-blk or kvm tool's
> userspace virito-blk has. But I think it makes no sense to prevent one
> solution becase there is another in theory solution called: we can do
> similar in qemu.

It depends.  Like vhost-scsi, vhost-blk has the problem of a crippled
feature set: no support for block device formats, non-raw protocols,
etc.  This makes it different from vhost-net.

So it begs the question, is it going to be used in production, or just a
useful reference tool?

Paolo

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-aio' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux AIO,
see: http://www.kvack.org/aio/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org">aart@kvack.org</a>