Re: [PATCH 0/5] Add vhost-blk support

[Asias He <asias@redhat.com>]

On 07/17/2012 07:11 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Asias He <asias@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On 07/17/2012 04:52 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>
>>> Il 17/07/2012 10:29, Asias He ha scritto:
>>>>
>>>> So, vhost-blk at least saves ~6 syscalls for us in each request.
>>>
>>>
>>> Are they really 6?  If I/O is coalesced by a factor of 3, for example
>>> (i.e. each exit processes 3 requests), it's really 2 syscalls per request.
>>
>>
>> Well. I am counting the number of syscalls in one notify and response
>> process. Sure the IO can be coalesced.
>
> Linux AIO also supports batching in io_submit() and io_getevents().
> Depending on the request pattern in the vring when you process it, you
> should be able to do better than 1 set of syscalls per host I/O
> request.
>
> Are you taking advantage of that at the moment in your userspace benchmark?

OK. I know that batching in io_submit() and io_getevetns(). There was a 
patch for kvm tool long time ago. Now, both vhost-blk and kvm tool are 
not taking advantage of that atm. There are issues: e.g. How many number 
of request we want to batch? Does this batching hurt latency?

-- 
Asias


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-aio' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux AIO,
see: http://www.kvack.org/aio/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org">aart@kvack.org</a>