All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 3/4] mx5: Optimize lowlevel_init for TO 3
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 10:20:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5031F354.5030307@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1179733873.2404125.1344957583298.JavaMail.root@advansee.com>

On 14/08/2012 17:19, Beno?t Th?baudeau wrote:
> The mx5 lowlevel_init.S contains code that detects the silicon revision at
> runtime, and that behaves differently if a silicon revision older than TO 3 is
> detected. This code is useless for recently designed boards that may not be
> fitted with older silicon revisions. Hence, this patch adds an option to
> optimize away this revision-specific code from lowlevel_init.S.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Beno?t Th?baudeau <benoit.thebaudeau@advansee.com>
> Cc: Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de>
> ---

Hi Beno?t,

> Changes for v2:
>  - Make patch description more detailed.
> 
>  .../arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx5/lowlevel_init.S         |    4 ++--
>  .../doc/README.imx5                                |    7 ++++++-
>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 

The ROM revision is currently detected at run time - because this does
not fix an evident bug, your patch intends to reduce the footprint.

Then I chacked on a mx51evk, a board thet was shipped by Freescale with
TO 2 (and maybe TO 1 ?), and there are surely samples with TO2 or TO3 in
the world.

Without the poatch:

Configuring for mx51evk - Board: mx51evk, Options:
IMX_CONFIG=board/freescale/mx51evk/imximage.cfg
   text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
 258168	  15872	 268464	 542504	  84728	./u-boot

With the patch:

Configuring for mx51evk - Board: mx51evk, Options:
IMX_CONFIG=board/freescale/mx51evk/imximage.cfg
   text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
 258140	  15872	 268492	 542504	  84728	./u-boot

We win only 28 bytes - on the other side, we had a CONFIG_ that is not
so clear how to be used, mainly if a board as the mx51evk was shipped
with both versions.

I think the advantages are negligible here.

Best regards,
Stefano

-- 
=====================================================================
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: +49-8142-66989-53 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: sbabic at denx.de
=====================================================================

  reply	other threads:[~2012-08-20  8:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-14 14:43 [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] mx5: cosmetic: Clean up lowlevel_init Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-08-14 14:44 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/4] mx5: Optimize lowlevel_init code size Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-08-14 14:52   ` Otavio Salvador
2012-08-14 15:19     ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 " Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-09-30 12:47       ` Stefano Babic
2012-09-30 12:49       ` Stefano Babic
2012-08-14 14:44 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/4] mx5: Optimize lowlevel_init for TO 3 Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-08-14 14:56   ` Otavio Salvador
2012-08-14 15:19     ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 " Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-08-20  8:20       ` Stefano Babic [this message]
2012-08-20 10:12         ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-08-14 14:44 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/4] mx5: Mark lowlevel_init board-specific code Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-08-15 14:34   ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-11-05 20:07   ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] " Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-11-07 14:29     ` Stefano Babic
2012-11-16 22:42       ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-11-19  7:42         ` Stefano Babic
2012-11-19  7:57     ` Stefano Babic
2012-08-14 14:51 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] mx5: cosmetic: Clean up lowlevel_init Otavio Salvador
2012-08-14 15:18   ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 " Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-08-17 11:41     ` Stefano Babic
2012-08-20  7:56     ` Stefano Babic

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5031F354.5030307@denx.de \
    --to=sbabic@denx.de \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.