From: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
Cc: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, imammedo@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-trivial] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qemu-common: Declare qemu_irq earlier
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 19:33:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5037BAD2.5060909@weilnetz.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJSP0QWSg9B2_H6QBtZHDsJQdeZL+oW=AK7aYZw_AzKnHZq9Vw@mail.gmail.com>
Am 24.08.2012 13:56, schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Peter Maydell
> <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote:
>> On 24 August 2012 11:54, Stefan Hajnoczi<stefanha@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 06:45:00AM +0200, Stefan Weil wrote:
>>>> This allows using qemu_irq in the target specific cpu.h.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil<sw@weilnetz.de>
>>>> ---
>>>> qemu-common.h | 3 ++-
>>>> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> I'm not sure if there's a reason why qemu_irq was previously hidden from
>>> cpu.h but the code change itself is fine and no one else has commented.
>>>
>>> Thanks, applied to the trivial patches tree:
>>> https://github.com/stefanha/qemu/commits/trivial-patches
>>
>> Consensus seemed to be that it was better to move qemu_irq
>> into hw/irq.h, as discussed in this mail thread:
>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2012-08/msg03463.html
>> rather than just doing a move of the typedef within this header.
>
> Fine by me. I won't send a pull request with this patch yet.
>
> Stefan Weil: Are you happy to use the hw/irq.h patch instead of this?
>
> Stefan
Stefan H., that's OK.
Cheers,
Stefan
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
Cc: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, imammedo@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH] qemu-common: Declare qemu_irq earlier
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 19:33:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5037BAD2.5060909@weilnetz.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJSP0QWSg9B2_H6QBtZHDsJQdeZL+oW=AK7aYZw_AzKnHZq9Vw@mail.gmail.com>
Am 24.08.2012 13:56, schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Peter Maydell
> <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote:
>> On 24 August 2012 11:54, Stefan Hajnoczi<stefanha@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 06:45:00AM +0200, Stefan Weil wrote:
>>>> This allows using qemu_irq in the target specific cpu.h.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil<sw@weilnetz.de>
>>>> ---
>>>> qemu-common.h | 3 ++-
>>>> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> I'm not sure if there's a reason why qemu_irq was previously hidden from
>>> cpu.h but the code change itself is fine and no one else has commented.
>>>
>>> Thanks, applied to the trivial patches tree:
>>> https://github.com/stefanha/qemu/commits/trivial-patches
>>
>> Consensus seemed to be that it was better to move qemu_irq
>> into hw/irq.h, as discussed in this mail thread:
>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2012-08/msg03463.html
>> rather than just doing a move of the typedef within this header.
>
> Fine by me. I won't send a pull request with this patch yet.
>
> Stefan Weil: Are you happy to use the hw/irq.h patch instead of this?
>
> Stefan
Stefan H., that's OK.
Cheers,
Stefan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-24 17:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-20 4:45 [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH] qemu-common: Declare qemu_irq earlier Stefan Weil
2012-08-20 4:45 ` [Qemu-devel] " Stefan Weil
2012-08-24 10:54 ` [Qemu-trivial] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-08-24 10:54 ` [Qemu-devel] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-08-24 11:06 ` [Qemu-trivial] [Qemu-devel] " Peter Maydell
2012-08-24 11:06 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-trivial] " Peter Maydell
2012-08-24 11:56 ` [Qemu-trivial] [Qemu-devel] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-08-24 11:56 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-trivial] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-08-24 17:33 ` Stefan Weil [this message]
2012-08-24 17:33 ` Stefan Weil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5037BAD2.5060909@weilnetz.de \
--to=sw@weilnetz.de \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-trivial@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.