All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: stigge@antcom.de (Roland Stigge)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH RFC 1/2] gpio: Add a block GPIO API to gpiolib
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 11:23:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50656C99.50204@antcom.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120928090848.GX17667@game.jcrosoft.org>

On 09/28/2012 11:08 AM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
>> Good idea! Talking about the public API (your above gpio_set_block()):
>> *gpios is a list of GPIOs, but set is still bitmapped (mapped onto the
>> list specified in *gpios)? To prevent confusion about what the size
>> argument means (number of gpios in *gpios _or_ number of bytes in the
>> bitmap *set) - wouldn't it be clearer to have a "bool *set" and "bool
>> *values" list?
> public API list of gpio as example
> 
> gpios = {1, 33, 34, 55};
> set = {1, 0, 0 ,1};
> 
> gpio_set_blocks(gpios, set, 4);
> 
> private you do just provide the array related to the gpio_chip
> lets assume 4 bank with 32 gpio each
> 
> gpio0 = {1};
> set0 = {1};
> 
> gpio1 = {33, 34};
> set1 = {0, 0};
> 
> gpio2 = {55};
> set2 = {1};
> 
> set_blocks(gpio_chip0, gpio0, set0, 1);
> set_blocks(gpio_chip1, gpio1, set1, 2);
> set_blocks(gpio_chip2, gpio2, set2, 1);

Good.

For the internal driver API (gpio_chip), we even don't really need the
first argument (gpio_chip) since we can infer it from the gpios.

Will provide an update.

Roland

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Roland Stigge <stigge@antcom.de>
To: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
Cc: grant.likely@secretlab.ca, linus.walleij@linaro.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, w.sang@pengutronix.de,
	jbe@pengutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] gpio: Add a block GPIO API to gpiolib
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 11:23:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50656C99.50204@antcom.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120928090848.GX17667@game.jcrosoft.org>

On 09/28/2012 11:08 AM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
>> Good idea! Talking about the public API (your above gpio_set_block()):
>> *gpios is a list of GPIOs, but set is still bitmapped (mapped onto the
>> list specified in *gpios)? To prevent confusion about what the size
>> argument means (number of gpios in *gpios _or_ number of bytes in the
>> bitmap *set) - wouldn't it be clearer to have a "bool *set" and "bool
>> *values" list?
> public API list of gpio as example
> 
> gpios = {1, 33, 34, 55};
> set = {1, 0, 0 ,1};
> 
> gpio_set_blocks(gpios, set, 4);
> 
> private you do just provide the array related to the gpio_chip
> lets assume 4 bank with 32 gpio each
> 
> gpio0 = {1};
> set0 = {1};
> 
> gpio1 = {33, 34};
> set1 = {0, 0};
> 
> gpio2 = {55};
> set2 = {1};
> 
> set_blocks(gpio_chip0, gpio0, set0, 1);
> set_blocks(gpio_chip1, gpio1, set1, 2);
> set_blocks(gpio_chip2, gpio2, set2, 1);

Good.

For the internal driver API (gpio_chip), we even don't really need the
first argument (gpio_chip) since we can infer it from the gpios.

Will provide an update.

Roland

  reply	other threads:[~2012-09-28  9:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-27 21:22 [PATCH RFC 1/2] gpio: Add a block GPIO API to gpiolib Roland Stigge
2012-09-27 21:22 ` Roland Stigge
2012-09-27 21:22 ` [PATCH RFC 2/2] gpio-max730x: Add block GPIO API Roland Stigge
2012-09-27 21:22   ` Roland Stigge
2012-09-28  2:47 ` [PATCH RFC 1/2] gpio: Add a block GPIO API to gpiolib Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-09-28  2:47   ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-09-28  7:14   ` Roland Stigge
2012-09-28  7:14     ` Roland Stigge
2012-09-28  7:51     ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-09-28  7:51       ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-09-28  8:51       ` Roland Stigge
2012-09-28  8:51         ` Roland Stigge
2012-09-28  9:08         ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-09-28  9:08           ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-09-28  9:23           ` Roland Stigge [this message]
2012-09-28  9:23             ` Roland Stigge
2012-09-28 10:28           ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-09-28 10:28             ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-09-28 11:32             ` Roland Stigge
2012-09-28 11:32               ` Roland Stigge
2012-09-28 16:01               ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-09-28 16:01                 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-09-28 18:32                 ` Roland Stigge
2012-09-28 18:32                   ` Roland Stigge
2012-09-29 19:57                   ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-09-29 19:57                     ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-09-30 10:34                     ` Roland Stigge
2012-09-30 10:34                       ` Roland Stigge
2012-09-30 15:11                       ` Stijn Devriendt
2012-09-30 15:11                         ` Stijn Devriendt
2012-09-28  9:14 ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-28  9:14   ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-28  9:52   ` Roland Stigge
2012-09-28  9:52     ` Roland Stigge
2012-09-28 11:34     ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-28 11:34       ` Linus Walleij
2012-09-28 12:35       ` Roland Stigge
2012-09-28 12:35         ` Roland Stigge
2012-09-30  9:35 ` Stijn Devriendt
2012-09-30  9:39   ` Stijn Devriendt
2012-09-30 10:50   ` Roland Stigge
2012-09-30 10:50     ` Roland Stigge
2012-09-30 14:52     ` Stijn Devriendt
2012-09-30 14:52       ` Stijn Devriendt
2012-09-30 15:09       ` Roland Stigge
2012-09-30 15:09         ` Roland Stigge
2012-09-30 15:19         ` Stijn Devriendt
2012-09-30 15:19           ` Stijn Devriendt
2012-09-30 15:46           ` Roland Stigge
2012-09-30 15:46             ` Roland Stigge
2012-10-03 23:11             ` Linus Walleij
2012-10-03 23:11               ` Linus Walleij
2012-10-03 23:07     ` Linus Walleij
2012-10-03 23:07       ` Linus Walleij
2012-10-04 20:25       ` Roland Stigge
2012-10-04 20:25         ` Roland Stigge
2012-10-03 19:08 ` Mark Brown
2012-10-03 19:08   ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50656C99.50204@antcom.de \
    --to=stigge@antcom.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.