From: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, cmetcalf@tilera.com,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, rientjes@google.com,
liuj97@gmail.com, len.brown@intel.com, cl@linux.com,
minchan.kim@gmail.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/10] memory-hotplug : remove page table of x86_64 architecture
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2012 13:23:32 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50726354.60803@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m2d30tvatv.fsf@firstfloor.org>
At 10/08/2012 12:37 PM, Andi Kleen Wrote:
> Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> writes:
>> + }
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * We use 2M page, but we need to remove part of them,
>> + * so split 2M page to 4K page.
>> + */
>> + pte = alloc_low_page(&pte_phys);
>
> What happens when the allocation fails?
>
> alloc_low_page seems to be buggy there too, it would __pa a NULL
> pointer.
Yes, it will cause kernek panicked in __pa() if CONFI_DEBUG_VIRTUAL is set.
Otherwise, it will return a NULL pointer. I will update this patch to deal
with NULL pointer.
>
>> + if (pud_large(*pud)) {
>> + if ((addr & ~PUD_MASK) == 0 && next <= end) {
>> + set_pud(pud, __pud(0));
>> + pages++;
>> + continue;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * We use 1G page, but we need to remove part of them,
>> + * so split 1G page to 2M page.
>> + */
>> + pmd = alloc_low_page(&pmd_phys);
>
> Same here
>
>> + __split_large_page((pte_t *)pud, addr, (pte_t *)pmd);
>> +
>> + spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
>> + pud_populate(&init_mm, pud, __va(pmd_phys));
>> + spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
>> + }
>> +
>> + pmd = map_low_page(pmd_offset(pud, 0));
>> + phys_pmd_remove(pmd, addr, end);
>> + unmap_low_page(pmd);
>> + __flush_tlb_all();
>> + }
>> + __flush_tlb_all();
>
> This doesn't flush the other CPUs doesn't it?
How to flush the other CPU's tlb? use on_each_cpu() to run __flush_tlb_all()
on each online cpu?
Thanks
Wen Congyang
>
> -Andi
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, cmetcalf@tilera.com,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, rientjes@google.com,
liuj97@gmail.com, len.brown@intel.com, cl@linux.com,
minchan.kim@gmail.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/10] memory-hotplug : remove page table of x86_64 architecture
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2012 05:23:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50726354.60803@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m2d30tvatv.fsf@firstfloor.org>
At 10/08/2012 12:37 PM, Andi Kleen Wrote:
> Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> writes:
>> + }
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * We use 2M page, but we need to remove part of them,
>> + * so split 2M page to 4K page.
>> + */
>> + pte = alloc_low_page(&pte_phys);
>
> What happens when the allocation fails?
>
> alloc_low_page seems to be buggy there too, it would __pa a NULL
> pointer.
Yes, it will cause kernek panicked in __pa() if CONFI_DEBUG_VIRTUAL is set.
Otherwise, it will return a NULL pointer. I will update this patch to deal
with NULL pointer.
>
>> + if (pud_large(*pud)) {
>> + if ((addr & ~PUD_MASK) = 0 && next <= end) {
>> + set_pud(pud, __pud(0));
>> + pages++;
>> + continue;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * We use 1G page, but we need to remove part of them,
>> + * so split 1G page to 2M page.
>> + */
>> + pmd = alloc_low_page(&pmd_phys);
>
> Same here
>
>> + __split_large_page((pte_t *)pud, addr, (pte_t *)pmd);
>> +
>> + spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
>> + pud_populate(&init_mm, pud, __va(pmd_phys));
>> + spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
>> + }
>> +
>> + pmd = map_low_page(pmd_offset(pud, 0));
>> + phys_pmd_remove(pmd, addr, end);
>> + unmap_low_page(pmd);
>> + __flush_tlb_all();
>> + }
>> + __flush_tlb_all();
>
> This doesn't flush the other CPUs doesn't it?
How to flush the other CPU's tlb? use on_each_cpu() to run __flush_tlb_all()
on each online cpu?
Thanks
Wen Congyang
>
> -Andi
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
len.brown@intel.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cmetcalf@tilera.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>,
minchan.kim@gmail.com, kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com,
rientjes@google.com, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, cl@linux.com,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
liuj97@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/10] memory-hotplug : remove page table of x86_64 architecture
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2012 13:23:32 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50726354.60803@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m2d30tvatv.fsf@firstfloor.org>
At 10/08/2012 12:37 PM, Andi Kleen Wrote:
> Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> writes:
>> + }
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * We use 2M page, but we need to remove part of them,
>> + * so split 2M page to 4K page.
>> + */
>> + pte = alloc_low_page(&pte_phys);
>
> What happens when the allocation fails?
>
> alloc_low_page seems to be buggy there too, it would __pa a NULL
> pointer.
Yes, it will cause kernek panicked in __pa() if CONFI_DEBUG_VIRTUAL is set.
Otherwise, it will return a NULL pointer. I will update this patch to deal
with NULL pointer.
>
>> + if (pud_large(*pud)) {
>> + if ((addr & ~PUD_MASK) == 0 && next <= end) {
>> + set_pud(pud, __pud(0));
>> + pages++;
>> + continue;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * We use 1G page, but we need to remove part of them,
>> + * so split 1G page to 2M page.
>> + */
>> + pmd = alloc_low_page(&pmd_phys);
>
> Same here
>
>> + __split_large_page((pte_t *)pud, addr, (pte_t *)pmd);
>> +
>> + spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
>> + pud_populate(&init_mm, pud, __va(pmd_phys));
>> + spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
>> + }
>> +
>> + pmd = map_low_page(pmd_offset(pud, 0));
>> + phys_pmd_remove(pmd, addr, end);
>> + unmap_low_page(pmd);
>> + __flush_tlb_all();
>> + }
>> + __flush_tlb_all();
>
> This doesn't flush the other CPUs doesn't it?
How to flush the other CPU's tlb? use on_each_cpu() to run __flush_tlb_all()
on each online cpu?
Thanks
Wen Congyang
>
> -Andi
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, cmetcalf@tilera.com,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, rientjes@google.com,
liuj97@gmail.com, len.brown@intel.com, cl@linux.com,
minchan.kim@gmail.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/10] memory-hotplug : remove page table of x86_64 architecture
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2012 13:23:32 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50726354.60803@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m2d30tvatv.fsf@firstfloor.org>
At 10/08/2012 12:37 PM, Andi Kleen Wrote:
> Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> writes:
>> + }
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * We use 2M page, but we need to remove part of them,
>> + * so split 2M page to 4K page.
>> + */
>> + pte = alloc_low_page(&pte_phys);
>
> What happens when the allocation fails?
>
> alloc_low_page seems to be buggy there too, it would __pa a NULL
> pointer.
Yes, it will cause kernek panicked in __pa() if CONFI_DEBUG_VIRTUAL is set.
Otherwise, it will return a NULL pointer. I will update this patch to deal
with NULL pointer.
>
>> + if (pud_large(*pud)) {
>> + if ((addr & ~PUD_MASK) == 0 && next <= end) {
>> + set_pud(pud, __pud(0));
>> + pages++;
>> + continue;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * We use 1G page, but we need to remove part of them,
>> + * so split 1G page to 2M page.
>> + */
>> + pmd = alloc_low_page(&pmd_phys);
>
> Same here
>
>> + __split_large_page((pte_t *)pud, addr, (pte_t *)pmd);
>> +
>> + spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
>> + pud_populate(&init_mm, pud, __va(pmd_phys));
>> + spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
>> + }
>> +
>> + pmd = map_low_page(pmd_offset(pud, 0));
>> + phys_pmd_remove(pmd, addr, end);
>> + unmap_low_page(pmd);
>> + __flush_tlb_all();
>> + }
>> + __flush_tlb_all();
>
> This doesn't flush the other CPUs doesn't it?
How to flush the other CPU's tlb? use on_each_cpu() to run __flush_tlb_all()
on each online cpu?
Thanks
Wen Congyang
>
> -Andi
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-08 5:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 129+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-05 2:20 [PATCH 0/10] memory-hotplug: hot-remove physical memory Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-05 2:20 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-05 2:20 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-05 2:20 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-05 2:20 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-05 2:25 ` [PATCH 1/10] memory-hotplug : check whether memory is offline or not when removing memory Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-05 2:25 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-05 2:25 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-05 2:25 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-05 19:27 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-05 19:27 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-05 19:27 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-05 19:27 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-19 10:44 ` Wen Congyang
2012-10-19 10:44 ` Wen Congyang
2012-10-19 10:44 ` Wen Congyang
2012-10-19 10:44 ` Wen Congyang
2012-10-19 14:15 ` Wen Congyang
2012-10-19 14:15 ` Wen Congyang
2012-10-19 14:15 ` Wen Congyang
2012-10-19 14:15 ` Wen Congyang
2012-10-19 18:33 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-19 18:33 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-19 18:33 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-19 18:33 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-20 0:50 ` Wen Congyang
2012-10-20 0:50 ` Wen Congyang
2012-10-20 0:50 ` Wen Congyang
2012-10-20 0:50 ` Wen Congyang
2012-10-05 2:26 ` [PATCH 2/10] memory-hotplug : remove /sys/firmware/memmap/X sysfs Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-05 2:26 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-05 2:26 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-05 2:26 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-05 2:26 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-05 19:36 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-05 19:36 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-05 19:36 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-05 19:36 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-11 7:06 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-11 7:06 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-11 7:06 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-11 7:06 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-11 7:06 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-05 2:29 ` [PATCH 3/10] memory-hotplug : introduce new function arch_remove_memory() for removing page table depends on architecture Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-05 2:29 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-05 2:29 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-05 2:29 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-05 2:29 ` [PATCH 3/10] memory-hotplug : introduce new function arch_remove_memory() for removing page table de Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-05 2:31 ` [PATCH 4/10] memory-hotplug : unregister memory section on SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-05 2:31 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-05 2:31 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-05 2:31 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-05 2:31 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-05 2:32 ` [PATCH 5/10] memory-hotplug : memory-hotplug: check page type in get_page_bootmem Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-05 2:32 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-05 2:32 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-05 2:32 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-05 2:32 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-12 19:28 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-12 19:28 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-12 19:28 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-12 19:28 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-19 0:49 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-19 0:49 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-19 0:49 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-19 0:49 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-19 0:49 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-19 1:55 ` Wen Congyang
2012-10-19 1:55 ` Wen Congyang
2012-10-19 1:55 ` Wen Congyang
2012-10-19 1:55 ` Wen Congyang
2012-10-05 2:33 ` [PATCH 6/10] memory-hotplug : implement register_page_bootmem_info_section of sparse-vmemmap Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-05 2:33 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-05 2:33 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-05 2:33 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-05 2:34 ` [PATCH 7/10] memory-hotplug : remove memmap " Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-05 2:34 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-05 2:34 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-05 2:34 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-05 2:34 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-05 2:36 ` [PATCH 8/10] memory-hotplug : remove page table of x86_64 architecture Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-05 2:36 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-05 2:36 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-05 2:36 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-08 4:37 ` Andi Kleen
2012-10-08 4:37 ` Andi Kleen
2012-10-08 4:37 ` Andi Kleen
2012-10-08 4:37 ` Andi Kleen
2012-10-08 5:23 ` Wen Congyang [this message]
2012-10-08 5:23 ` Wen Congyang
2012-10-08 5:23 ` Wen Congyang
2012-10-08 5:23 ` Wen Congyang
2012-10-11 0:35 ` Ni zhan Chen
2012-10-11 0:35 ` Ni zhan Chen
2012-10-11 0:35 ` Ni zhan Chen
2012-10-11 0:35 ` Ni zhan Chen
2012-10-09 8:26 ` wujianguo
2012-10-09 8:26 ` wujianguo
2012-10-09 8:26 ` wujianguo
2012-10-09 8:26 ` wujianguo
2012-10-22 7:11 ` Wen Congyang
2012-10-22 7:11 ` Wen Congyang
2012-10-22 7:11 ` Wen Congyang
2012-10-22 7:11 ` Wen Congyang
2012-10-23 7:09 ` wujianguo
2012-10-23 7:09 ` wujianguo
2012-10-23 7:09 ` wujianguo
2012-10-23 7:09 ` wujianguo
2012-10-23 7:41 ` Wen Congyang
2012-10-23 7:41 ` Wen Congyang
2012-10-23 7:41 ` Wen Congyang
2012-10-23 7:41 ` Wen Congyang
2012-10-05 2:37 ` [PATCH 9/10] memory-hotplug : memory_hotplug: clear zone when removing the memory Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-05 2:37 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-05 2:37 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-05 2:37 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-05 2:38 ` [PATCH 10/10] memory-hotplug : remove sysfs file of node Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-05 2:38 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-05 2:38 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-05 2:38 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-05 2:38 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-05 19:06 ` [PATCH 0/10] memory-hotplug: hot-remove physical memory KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-05 19:06 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-05 19:06 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-05 19:06 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-08 5:26 ` Wen Congyang
2012-10-08 5:26 ` Wen Congyang
2012-10-08 5:26 ` Wen Congyang
2012-10-08 5:26 ` Wen Congyang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50726354.60803@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=wency@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=cmetcalf@tilera.com \
--cc=isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=liuj97@gmail.com \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.