From: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Matthew Fioravante <matthew.fioravante@jhuapl.edu>,
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>, Wei Liu <liuw@liuw.name>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>,
Jim Fehlig <JFEHLIG@suse.com>,
Anthony Perard <anthony.perard@citrix.com>,
Daniel De Graaf <dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov>,
Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: Xen 4.3 development update, and stock-taking
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 11:12:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50F7DCA2.1070405@eu.citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50F7CDBF02000078000B6A95@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
On 17/01/13 09:09, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 16.01.13 at 18:55, George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
>> * Persistent grants for blk (external)
>> owner: roger.pau@citrix
>> status: Initial implementation posted
>> prognosis: ?
> I think this went into 3.8-rc.
Ah, great.
>
>> * Scalability: 16TiB of RAM
>> owner: jan@suse
>> status: Not started
> Patches almost ready to be posted (working fine for "normal"
> mode, but working on simulating the mode we'd be in when
> having this much of memory).
>
> Prognosis: Good.
Good, I'll update that.
>
>> * Remove hardcoded mobprobe's in xencommons
>> owner: ?
>> status: ?
>> prognosis: Poor.
> This was actually _promised_ to be a temporary hack, so I'd
> consider it a release blocker if nothing at all was done here.
I agree. But I thought it would be useful *first* to have a clear list
of where everything is. Then when we know what's at-risk, we can decide
which things are critical / blockers and have a call to action.
>
>> * Xen EFI boot
>> - Signature checking for dom0 kernel / initrd?
>> status: No owner.
>> prognosis: Probably not for 4.4
> This is already in the tree (c/s 26262:b62bd62b2683). Nothing else
> should be necessary on the hypervisor side if the shim is to be used.
>
> But of course pv-ops Linux continues to lack EFI support altogether.
OK, so I think the description needs an update, then. For Xen to be
fully featured, I think it would need all of the following:
* An EFI-bootable dom0 (this should be done, right?)
* dom0 able to make use of EFI run-time services
* Xen able to use EFI boot-time services (?)
* Xen able to detect the existence of a signed Linux binary, and leave
EFI boot-time services enabled for dom0 to use when appropriate
* dom0 able to use boot-time EFI services and disable them when done
Are any of these that should be blockers for 4.3?
-George
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-17 11:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-16 17:55 Xen 4.3 development update, and stock-taking George Dunlap
2013-01-16 18:03 ` Matthew Fioravante
2013-01-18 15:19 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-01-18 21:17 ` Fioravante, Matthew E.
2013-01-16 18:15 ` Wei Liu
2013-01-17 10:50 ` George Dunlap
2013-01-17 9:09 ` Jan Beulich
2013-01-17 11:12 ` George Dunlap [this message]
2013-01-17 12:51 ` Jan Beulich
2013-01-17 13:58 ` George Dunlap
2013-01-17 14:15 ` Jan Beulich
2013-01-17 14:32 ` George Dunlap
2013-01-17 15:26 ` Jan Beulich
2013-01-17 15:30 ` Jan Beulich
2013-01-17 15:48 ` George Dunlap
2013-01-17 16:04 ` George Dunlap
2013-01-17 16:20 ` Jan Beulich
2013-01-17 17:22 ` George Dunlap
2013-01-17 16:14 ` Jan Beulich
2013-01-17 16:29 ` George Dunlap
2013-01-17 16:49 ` Jan Beulich
2013-01-17 17:11 ` George Dunlap
2013-01-18 9:35 ` Jan Beulich
2013-01-17 16:43 ` George Dunlap
2013-01-17 17:06 ` Jan Beulich
2013-01-17 16:49 ` George Dunlap
2013-01-18 9:30 ` Jan Beulich
2013-01-18 15:24 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-01-18 11:20 ` Daniel Kiper
2013-01-21 14:12 ` George Dunlap
2013-01-22 13:53 ` Daniel Kiper
2013-01-22 14:10 ` Jan Beulich
2013-01-18 15:22 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-01-17 10:00 ` Roger Pau Monné
2013-01-17 11:22 ` George Dunlap
2013-01-18 9:50 ` Roger Pau Monné
2013-01-18 15:21 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-01-18 15:33 ` Roger Pau Monné
2013-01-21 15:06 ` George Dunlap
2013-01-17 10:20 ` Olaf Hering
2013-01-17 17:23 ` George Dunlap
2013-01-17 15:54 ` Daniel De Graaf
2013-01-17 15:49 ` George Dunlap
2013-01-18 15:41 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-01-21 15:04 ` George Dunlap
2013-01-22 17:42 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
[not found] <mailman.21508.1358358967.1399.xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
2013-01-17 16:07 ` Andres Lagar-Cavilla
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-01-22 14:32 Daniel Kiper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50F7DCA2.1070405@eu.citrix.com \
--to=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=JFEHLIG@suse.com \
--cc=anthony.perard@citrix.com \
--cc=dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=liuw@liuw.name \
--cc=matthew.fioravante@jhuapl.edu \
--cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.