From: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: Xen 4.3 development update, and stock-taking
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 16:49:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50F82BA0.306@eu.citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50F8318C02000078000B6ED6@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
On 17/01/13 16:14, Jan Beulich wrote:
> And to be clear - unless someone manages to eliminate the
> "conceptually wrong" argument above, I'm intending to veto any changes
> that violate the model set by the specification. Jan
Just for my information, could you describe what you think is
"conceptually wrong" about leaving boot services for dom0? I would
consider Xen+dom0 to be two halves of the "Xen system", and so leaving
boot services on until dom0 gets a chance to fix up quirks doesn't seem
to me any different than leaving it on when booting to Linux directly.
If the spec doesn't explicitly say "hypervisor", then I would think
"kernel" in a Xen system would conceptually include both Xen and dom0.
-George
(And sorry for responding 3 times to the same mail!)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-17 16:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-16 17:55 Xen 4.3 development update, and stock-taking George Dunlap
2013-01-16 18:03 ` Matthew Fioravante
2013-01-18 15:19 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-01-18 21:17 ` Fioravante, Matthew E.
2013-01-16 18:15 ` Wei Liu
2013-01-17 10:50 ` George Dunlap
2013-01-17 9:09 ` Jan Beulich
2013-01-17 11:12 ` George Dunlap
2013-01-17 12:51 ` Jan Beulich
2013-01-17 13:58 ` George Dunlap
2013-01-17 14:15 ` Jan Beulich
2013-01-17 14:32 ` George Dunlap
2013-01-17 15:26 ` Jan Beulich
2013-01-17 15:30 ` Jan Beulich
2013-01-17 15:48 ` George Dunlap
2013-01-17 16:04 ` George Dunlap
2013-01-17 16:20 ` Jan Beulich
2013-01-17 17:22 ` George Dunlap
2013-01-17 16:14 ` Jan Beulich
2013-01-17 16:29 ` George Dunlap
2013-01-17 16:49 ` Jan Beulich
2013-01-17 17:11 ` George Dunlap
2013-01-18 9:35 ` Jan Beulich
2013-01-17 16:43 ` George Dunlap
2013-01-17 17:06 ` Jan Beulich
2013-01-17 16:49 ` George Dunlap [this message]
2013-01-18 9:30 ` Jan Beulich
2013-01-18 15:24 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-01-18 11:20 ` Daniel Kiper
2013-01-21 14:12 ` George Dunlap
2013-01-22 13:53 ` Daniel Kiper
2013-01-22 14:10 ` Jan Beulich
2013-01-18 15:22 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-01-17 10:00 ` Roger Pau Monné
2013-01-17 11:22 ` George Dunlap
2013-01-18 9:50 ` Roger Pau Monné
2013-01-18 15:21 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-01-18 15:33 ` Roger Pau Monné
2013-01-21 15:06 ` George Dunlap
2013-01-17 10:20 ` Olaf Hering
2013-01-17 17:23 ` George Dunlap
2013-01-17 15:54 ` Daniel De Graaf
2013-01-17 15:49 ` George Dunlap
2013-01-18 15:41 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-01-21 15:04 ` George Dunlap
2013-01-22 17:42 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
[not found] <mailman.21508.1358358967.1399.xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
2013-01-17 16:07 ` Andres Lagar-Cavilla
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-01-22 14:32 Daniel Kiper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50F82BA0.306@eu.citrix.com \
--to=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.