From: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com>
To: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
tony@atomide.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] ARM: OMAP2+: timer: Update the OMAP5 clocksource name as per clock data
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 11:42:22 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51095B7E.6020800@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1358523141-12295-3-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
On 01/18/2013 09:32 AM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> OMAP5 clockdata has different sys clock clock node name. Fix the timer code
> to take care of it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/timer.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/timer.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/timer.c
> index 691aa67..a0a1b14 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/timer.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/timer.c
> @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@
> #define OMAP2_MPU_SOURCE "sys_ck"
> #define OMAP3_MPU_SOURCE OMAP2_MPU_SOURCE
> #define OMAP4_MPU_SOURCE "sys_clkin_ck"
> +#define OMAP5_MPU_SOURCE "sys_clkin"
I would like to remove this definitions and in fact posted a patch today
to do that [1] ;-)
> #define OMAP2_32K_SOURCE "func_32k_ck"
> #define OMAP3_32K_SOURCE "omap_32k_fck"
> #define OMAP4_32K_SOURCE "sys_32k_ck"
> @@ -498,7 +499,7 @@ static void __init realtime_counter_init(void)
> pr_err("%s: ioremap failed\n", __func__);
> return;
> }
> - sys_clk = clk_get(NULL, "sys_clkin_ck");
> + sys_clk = clk_get(NULL, OMAP5_MPU_SOURCE);
> if (IS_ERR(sys_clk)) {
> pr_err("%s: failed to get system clock handle\n", __func__);
> iounmap(base);
> @@ -638,7 +639,7 @@ OMAP_SYS_TIMER(4, local);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SOC_OMAP5
> OMAP_SYS_32K_TIMER_INIT(5, 1, OMAP4_32K_SOURCE, "ti,timer-alwon",
> - 2, OMAP4_MPU_SOURCE);
> + 2, OMAP5_MPU_SOURCE);
I am hoping we can remove this completely for omap5 and use the same
function defined for omap2 [2].
Care to try your series on top of mine [3] on omap5?
Cheers
Jon
[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg221263.html
[2] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg221264.html
[3] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg221260.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: jon-hunter@ti.com (Jon Hunter)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] ARM: OMAP2+: timer: Update the OMAP5 clocksource name as per clock data
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 11:42:22 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51095B7E.6020800@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1358523141-12295-3-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
On 01/18/2013 09:32 AM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> OMAP5 clockdata has different sys clock clock node name. Fix the timer code
> to take care of it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/timer.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/timer.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/timer.c
> index 691aa67..a0a1b14 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/timer.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/timer.c
> @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@
> #define OMAP2_MPU_SOURCE "sys_ck"
> #define OMAP3_MPU_SOURCE OMAP2_MPU_SOURCE
> #define OMAP4_MPU_SOURCE "sys_clkin_ck"
> +#define OMAP5_MPU_SOURCE "sys_clkin"
I would like to remove this definitions and in fact posted a patch today
to do that [1] ;-)
> #define OMAP2_32K_SOURCE "func_32k_ck"
> #define OMAP3_32K_SOURCE "omap_32k_fck"
> #define OMAP4_32K_SOURCE "sys_32k_ck"
> @@ -498,7 +499,7 @@ static void __init realtime_counter_init(void)
> pr_err("%s: ioremap failed\n", __func__);
> return;
> }
> - sys_clk = clk_get(NULL, "sys_clkin_ck");
> + sys_clk = clk_get(NULL, OMAP5_MPU_SOURCE);
> if (IS_ERR(sys_clk)) {
> pr_err("%s: failed to get system clock handle\n", __func__);
> iounmap(base);
> @@ -638,7 +639,7 @@ OMAP_SYS_TIMER(4, local);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SOC_OMAP5
> OMAP_SYS_32K_TIMER_INIT(5, 1, OMAP4_32K_SOURCE, "ti,timer-alwon",
> - 2, OMAP4_MPU_SOURCE);
> + 2, OMAP5_MPU_SOURCE);
I am hoping we can remove this completely for omap5 and use the same
function defined for omap2 [2].
Care to try your series on top of mine [3] on omap5?
Cheers
Jon
[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg221263.html
[2] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg221264.html
[3] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg221260.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-30 17:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-18 15:32 [PATCH 0/5] ARM: OMAP5: Misc fixes Santosh Shilimkar
2013-01-18 15:32 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-01-18 15:32 ` [PATCH 1/5] ARM: OMAP5: Update SOC id detection code for ES2 Santosh Shilimkar
2013-01-18 15:32 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-01-18 15:32 ` [PATCH 2/5] ARM: OMAP2+: timer: Update the OMAP5 clocksource name as per clock data Santosh Shilimkar
2013-01-18 15:32 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-01-30 17:42 ` Jon Hunter [this message]
2013-01-30 17:42 ` Jon Hunter
2013-01-18 15:32 ` [PATCH 3/5] ARM: OMAP: prm: Allow prm init to success on OMAP5 SOCs Santosh Shilimkar
2013-01-18 15:32 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-01-18 15:32 ` [PATCH 4/5] ARM: dts: omap5-evm: Update available memory to 2032 MB Santosh Shilimkar
2013-01-18 15:32 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-01-18 15:32 ` [PATCH 5/5] ARM: dts: OMAP5: Specify nonsecure PPI IRQ for arch timer Santosh Shilimkar
2013-01-18 15:32 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-01-18 16:02 ` Marc Zyngier
2013-01-18 16:02 ` Marc Zyngier
2013-01-18 17:00 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-01-18 17:00 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-01-18 17:08 ` Marc Zyngier
2013-01-18 17:08 ` Marc Zyngier
2013-01-18 18:51 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-01-18 18:51 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-01-19 14:46 ` Marc Zyngier
2013-01-19 14:46 ` Marc Zyngier
2013-01-19 17:26 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-01-19 17:26 ` Santosh Shilimkar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51095B7E.6020800@ti.com \
--to=jon-hunter@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.