Xen 4.3 related documents - these need review and improvement in the coming weeks

Xen 4.3 related documents - these need review and improvement in the coming weeks

[Lars Kurth]

Hi everybody,

as part of the document day, I created Xen 4.3 related documents and Ian 
& George covered a few others. Please have a look and start adding to them.

http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Category:Xen_4.3 - all Xen 4.3 related documents

http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Xen_Release_Features - has undegone major 
surgery and will need review. There are also still a few TODO's and in 
some cases we have to decide whether a feature is experimental or tech 
preview

http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Xen_4.3_Feature_List - needs detail and needs 
to be aligned with what is in and out

http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Xen_4.3_Man_Pages - links will be broken until 
http://xenbits.xen.org/docs/4.3-testing is created. If there are any new 
documents, I need to know

Feel free to add to these as needed (or reply to this thread).

Regards
Lars

Re: Xen 4.3 related documents - these need review and improvement in the coming weeks

[Jan Beulich]

>>> On 29.04.13 at 19:08, Lars Kurth <lars.kurth@xen.org> wrote:
> http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Xen_Release_Features - has undegone major 
> surgery and will need review. There are also still a few TODO's and in 
> some cases we have to decide whether a feature is experimental or tech 
> preview

I fixed what was obvious, but I wonder where the OVMF/Tianocore
line originates from: This was disabled in 4.2 (as it didn't build except
with one specific gcc version iirc), and I didn't see its state change
in -unstable. And in any event - afaict - this is at best experimental.

Jan

Re: Xen 4.3 related documents - these need review and improvement in the coming weeks

[Lars Kurth]

On 30/04/2013 08:00, Jan Beulich wrote:
> I fixed what was obvious, but I wonder where the OVMF/Tianocore
> line originates from: This was disabled in 4.2 (as it didn't build except
> with one specific gcc version iirc), and I didn't see its state change
> in -unstable. And in any event - afaict - this is at best experimental.
>
> Jan
Thank you Jan. Looking at the logs this line came from Ian Campbell 
(added this to 4.2 on Sept 10 2012).
I am happy to mark this as disabled (footnote [4]) and/or experimental. 
Any views?

On 30/04/2013 09:02, Dietmar Hahn wrote:
> The description for vPMU is stated with "Virtual Power Management Unit 
> for HVM guests". On xen-devel vPMU is normally meant to be "Virtual 
> Performance Monitoring Unit"
> So what is meant here?
> Dietmar. 
That is a good question. Again, looking at the logs, Ian Campbell added 
these in the same batch as the item above. Probably just a typo. Please 
somebody make a call and advise. I guess if it is Virtual Performance 
Monitoring Unit, this line should probably also go into the "Tooling" header

Thanks for the review so far and spotting issues

Lars

Re: Xen 4.3 related documents - these need review and improvement in the coming weeks

[Dietmar Hahn]

Am Dienstag 30 April 2013, 10:41:55 schrieb Lars Kurth:
> On 30/04/2013 08:00, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > I fixed what was obvious, but I wonder where the OVMF/Tianocore
> > line originates from: This was disabled in 4.2 (as it didn't build except
> > with one specific gcc version iirc), and I didn't see its state change
> > in -unstable. And in any event - afaict - this is at best experimental.
> >
> > Jan
> Thank you Jan. Looking at the logs this line came from Ian Campbell 
> (added this to 4.2 on Sept 10 2012).
> I am happy to mark this as disabled (footnote [4]) and/or experimental. 
> Any views?
> 
> On 30/04/2013 09:02, Dietmar Hahn wrote:
> > The description for vPMU is stated with "Virtual Power Management Unit 
> > for HVM guests". On xen-devel vPMU is normally meant to be "Virtual 
> > Performance Monitoring Unit"
> > So what is meant here?
> > Dietmar. 
> That is a good question. Again, looking at the logs, Ian Campbell added 
> these in the same batch as the item above. Probably just a typo. Please 
> somebody make a call and advise. I guess if it is Virtual Performance 
> Monitoring Unit, this line should probably also go into the "Tooling" header

Then this entry should also be marked with
[ 4 ] Disabled by default (enable with hypervisor command line option)
as the vpmu flag must be specfied to enable the vPMU.

Dietmar.

-- 
Company details: http://ts.fujitsu.com/imprint.html

Re: Xen 4.3 related documents - these need review and improvement in the coming weeks

[Lars Kurth]

On 30/04/2013 10:48, Dietmar Hahn wrote:
> Then this entry should also be marked with [ 4 ] Disabled by default 
> (enable with hypervisor command line option) as the vpmu flag must be 
> specfied to enable the vPMU. Dietmar. 
Fixed

Re: Xen 4.3 related documents - these need review and improvement in the coming weeks

[Jan Beulich]

>>> On 30.04.13 at 11:41, Lars Kurth <lars.kurth@xen.org> wrote:
> On 30/04/2013 08:00, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> I fixed what was obvious, but I wonder where the OVMF/Tianocore
>> line originates from: This was disabled in 4.2 (as it didn't build except
>> with one specific gcc version iirc), and I didn't see its state change
>> in -unstable. And in any event - afaict - this is at best experimental.
>>
> Thank you Jan. Looking at the logs this line came from Ian Campbell 
> (added this to 4.2 on Sept 10 2012).
> I am happy to mark this as disabled (footnote [4]) and/or experimental. 
> Any views?

Ian?

> On 30/04/2013 09:02, Dietmar Hahn wrote:
>> The description for vPMU is stated with "Virtual Power Management Unit 
>> for HVM guests". On xen-devel vPMU is normally meant to be "Virtual 
>> Performance Monitoring Unit"
>> So what is meant here?
>> Dietmar. 
> That is a good question. Again, looking at the logs, Ian Campbell added 
> these in the same batch as the item above. Probably just a typo. Please 
> somebody make a call and advise. I guess if it is Virtual Performance 
> Monitoring Unit, this line should probably also go into the "Tooling" header

I saw your reply to this already, so we seem to be all in agreement
that this is a typo...

Jan

Re: Xen 4.3 related documents - these need review and improvement in the coming weeks

[Ian Campbell]

On Tue, 2013-04-30 at 10:41 +0100, Lars Kurth wrote:
> On 30/04/2013 08:00, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > I fixed what was obvious, but I wonder where the OVMF/Tianocore
> > line originates from: This was disabled in 4.2 (as it didn't build except
> > with one specific gcc version iirc), and I didn't see its state change
> > in -unstable. And in any event - afaict - this is at best experimental.
> >
> > Jan
> Thank you Jan. Looking at the logs this line came from Ian Campbell 
> (added this to 4.2 on Sept 10 2012).

> I am happy to mark this as disabled (footnote [4]) and/or experimental. 
> Any views?

OK with me.

> On 30/04/2013 09:02, Dietmar Hahn wrote:
> > The description for vPMU is stated with "Virtual Power Management Unit 
> > for HVM guests". On xen-devel vPMU is normally meant to be "Virtual 
> > Performance Monitoring Unit"
> > So what is meant here?
> > Dietmar. 
> That is a good question. Again, looking at the logs, Ian Campbell added 
> these in the same batch as the item above. Probably just a typo. Please 
> somebody make a call and advise. I guess if it is Virtual Performance 
> Monitoring Unit, this line should probably also go into the "Tooling" header

I'm inclined to blame my own ignorance about what vPMU is, I seem to
remember someone (Dietmar?) correcting me on this other times too...

Ian.

Re: Xen 4.3 related documents - these need review and improvement in the coming weeks

[Lars Kurth]

All,
all suggested changes / comments are now incorporated
If anything else was missed, let me know
Lars

Re: Xen 4.3 related documents - these need review and improvement in the coming weeks

[Dietmar Hahn]

Am Montag 29 April 2013, 18:08:32 schrieb Lars Kurth:

> http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Xen_Release_Features - has undegone major 
> surgery and will need review. There are also still a few TODO's and in 
> some cases we have to decide whether a feature is experimental or tech 
> preview

The description for vPMU is stated with
"Virtual Power Management Unit for HVM guests".
On xen-devel vPMU is normally meant to be 
"Virtual Performance Monitoring Unit"

So what is meant here?

Dietmar.



-- 
Company details: http://ts.fujitsu.com/imprint.html

Re: Xen 4.3 related documents - these need review and improvement in the coming weeks

[Ian Campbell]

On Tue, 2013-04-30 at 09:02 +0100, Dietmar Hahn wrote:
> Am Montag 29 April 2013, 18:08:32 schrieb Lars Kurth:
> 
> > http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Xen_Release_Features - has undegone major 
> > surgery and will need review. There are also still a few TODO's and in 
> > some cases we have to decide whether a feature is experimental or tech 
> > preview
> 
> The description for vPMU is stated with
> "Virtual Power Management Unit for HVM guests".
> On xen-devel vPMU is normally meant to be 
> "Virtual Performance Monitoring Unit"
> 
> So what is meant here?

Probably the latter.

Ian.