From: Daniel Mack <zonque@gmail.com>
To: Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm@ti.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bcousson@baylibre.com, nsekhar@ti.com,
sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com, davem@davemloft.net,
ujhelyi.m@gmail.com, vaibhav.bedia@ti.com, d-gerlach@ti.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] cpsw: support for control module register
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 21:41:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5217BAEC.8060602@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5217BA50.6050609@ti.com>
On 23.08.2013 21:38, Mugunthan V N wrote:
> On Saturday 24 August 2013 01:02 AM, Daniel Mack wrote:
>> v5 -> v6:
>> * re-add code to fail if 3rd memory region is given but invalid
>> * added Mugunthan's ack on all patches except the one that adds
>> ti,am3352-cpsw
>> * remove parens around integer constants
> I am also in your favour of adding ti,am3352-cpsw, but lets get other
> comment. You can add my ack to that patch also if you are submitting
> another version.
I don't think I'll have a chance to do that before I'm AFK for a while :)
That's also the only reason why I sent a v6 already. I would have
normally waited for that discussion to settle of course.
But as I said: I'd be fine if anyone adds another patch on top or amends
mine.
Thanks for the reviews again, everyone!
Daniel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: zonque@gmail.com (Daniel Mack)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v6 0/5] cpsw: support for control module register
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 21:41:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5217BAEC.8060602@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5217BA50.6050609@ti.com>
On 23.08.2013 21:38, Mugunthan V N wrote:
> On Saturday 24 August 2013 01:02 AM, Daniel Mack wrote:
>> v5 -> v6:
>> * re-add code to fail if 3rd memory region is given but invalid
>> * added Mugunthan's ack on all patches except the one that adds
>> ti,am3352-cpsw
>> * remove parens around integer constants
> I am also in your favour of adding ti,am3352-cpsw, but lets get other
> comment. You can add my ack to that patch also if you are submitting
> another version.
I don't think I'll have a chance to do that before I'm AFK for a while :)
That's also the only reason why I sent a v6 already. I would have
normally waited for that discussion to settle of course.
But as I said: I'd be fine if anyone adds another patch on top or amends
mine.
Thanks for the reviews again, everyone!
Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-23 19:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-23 19:32 [PATCH v6 0/5] cpsw: support for control module register Daniel Mack
2013-08-23 19:32 ` Daniel Mack
2013-08-23 19:32 ` [PATCH v6 1/5] net: ethernet: cpsw: switch to devres allocations Daniel Mack
2013-08-23 19:32 ` Daniel Mack
2013-08-23 19:32 ` [PATCH v6 2/5] net: ethernet: cpsw: add optional third memory region for CONTROL module Daniel Mack
2013-08-23 19:32 ` Daniel Mack
2013-08-26 9:04 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-08-26 9:04 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-08-26 18:49 ` Mugunthan V N
2013-08-26 18:49 ` Mugunthan V N
2013-08-26 18:49 ` Mugunthan V N
2013-08-23 19:32 ` [PATCH v6 3/5] net: ethernet: cpsw: introduce ti,am3352-cpsw compatible string Daniel Mack
2013-08-23 19:32 ` [PATCH v6 3/5] net: ethernet: cpsw: introduce ti, am3352-cpsw " Daniel Mack
2013-08-23 19:32 ` [PATCH v6 4/5] net: ethernet: cpsw: add support for hardware interface mode config Daniel Mack
2013-08-23 19:32 ` Daniel Mack
2013-08-23 19:32 ` [PATCH v6 5/5] ARM: dts: am33xx: adopt to cpsw changes Daniel Mack
2013-08-23 19:32 ` Daniel Mack
2013-08-23 19:38 ` [PATCH v6 0/5] cpsw: support for control module register Mugunthan V N
2013-08-23 19:38 ` Mugunthan V N
2013-08-23 19:41 ` Daniel Mack [this message]
2013-08-23 19:41 ` Daniel Mack
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5217BAEC.8060602@gmail.com \
--to=zonque@gmail.com \
--cc=bcousson@baylibre.com \
--cc=d-gerlach@ti.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mugunthanvnm@ti.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nsekhar@ti.com \
--cc=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com \
--cc=ujhelyi.m@gmail.com \
--cc=vaibhav.bedia@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.