All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@canonical.com>
To: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Cc: list@osuosl.org, Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	open@osuosl.org, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
	HID CORE LAYER <linux-input@vger.kernel.org>,
	devel@linuxdriverproject.org, thomas@m3y3r.de
Subject: Re: [v3.11][Regression] HID: hyperv: convert alloc+memcpy to memdup
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 14:25:09 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5241D905.9030001@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1309241129370.18703@pobox.suse.cz>

On 09/24/2013 05:29 AM, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Sep 2013, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
>
>>>> Can you explain a little further?  Mark commit a4a23f6 as bad?  An
>>>> initial bisect already reported that was the first bad commit, so it
>>>> can't be marked bad.  The oops on memcpy() happens after commit a4a23f6
>>>> is reverted.  The oops on memcpy() did not happen before a4a23f6 was
>>>> committed, so I assume this new oops was introduced by a change later.
>>>>
>>>> Right now I'm bisecting down the oops on memcpy() by updating the bisect
>>>> with good or bad, depending if the test kernel hit the oops.  I then
>>>> revert a4a23f6, so that revert is the HEAD of the tree each time before
>>>> building the kernel again(As long as the commit spit out by bisect is
>>>> after when a4a23f6 was introduced).
>>> Yep.  Please continue bisecting the memcpy() oops.
>>>
>>> kmemdup() is just a kzalloc() followed by a memcpy().  When we split it
>>> apart by reverting the patch then we would expect the oops to move to
>>> the memcpy() part.  Somehow "desc" is a bogus pointer, but I don't
>>> immediately see how that is possible.
>>>
>>> regards,
>>> dan carpenter
>> Thanks for the details.  We'll continue the bisect and let you know how
>> it goes.
> Did this please yield any useful result?
>
> Thanks,
>

We also tested the 3.12-rc2 kernel, but it also produces an oops and
lockup.  In case it's of use, the 3.12-rc2 oops can be seen at:
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/151359441/kern.log

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@canonical.com>
To: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
	thomas@m3y3r.de, list@osuosl.org,
	Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	open@osuosl.org, HID CORE LAYER <linux-input@vger.kernel.org>,
	devel@linuxdriverproject.org
Subject: Re: [v3.11][Regression] HID: hyperv: convert alloc+memcpy to memdup
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 14:25:09 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5241D905.9030001@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1309241129370.18703@pobox.suse.cz>

On 09/24/2013 05:29 AM, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Sep 2013, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
>
>>>> Can you explain a little further?  Mark commit a4a23f6 as bad?  An
>>>> initial bisect already reported that was the first bad commit, so it
>>>> can't be marked bad.  The oops on memcpy() happens after commit a4a23f6
>>>> is reverted.  The oops on memcpy() did not happen before a4a23f6 was
>>>> committed, so I assume this new oops was introduced by a change later.
>>>>
>>>> Right now I'm bisecting down the oops on memcpy() by updating the bisect
>>>> with good or bad, depending if the test kernel hit the oops.  I then
>>>> revert a4a23f6, so that revert is the HEAD of the tree each time before
>>>> building the kernel again(As long as the commit spit out by bisect is
>>>> after when a4a23f6 was introduced).
>>> Yep.  Please continue bisecting the memcpy() oops.
>>>
>>> kmemdup() is just a kzalloc() followed by a memcpy().  When we split it
>>> apart by reverting the patch then we would expect the oops to move to
>>> the memcpy() part.  Somehow "desc" is a bogus pointer, but I don't
>>> immediately see how that is possible.
>>>
>>> regards,
>>> dan carpenter
>> Thanks for the details.  We'll continue the bisect and let you know how
>> it goes.
> Did this please yield any useful result?
>
> Thanks,
>

We also tested the 3.12-rc2 kernel, but it also produces an oops and
lockup.  In case it's of use, the 3.12-rc2 oops can be seen at:
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/151359441/kern.log

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-09-24 18:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-16 17:42 [v3.11][Regression] HID: hyperv: convert alloc+memcpy to memdup Joseph Salisbury
2013-09-16 20:38 ` Dan Carpenter
2013-09-16 20:38   ` Dan Carpenter
2013-09-16 20:49   ` Joseph Salisbury
2013-09-16 20:49     ` Joseph Salisbury
2013-09-16 21:05     ` Dan Carpenter
2013-09-16 21:05       ` Dan Carpenter
2013-09-17  0:44       ` Joseph Salisbury
2013-09-17  0:44         ` Joseph Salisbury
2013-09-24  9:29         ` Jiri Kosina
2013-09-24 13:52           ` Joseph Salisbury
2013-09-24 18:25           ` Joseph Salisbury [this message]
2013-09-24 18:25             ` Joseph Salisbury
2013-09-25 17:45           ` Joseph Salisbury
2013-09-27 10:50             ` Jiri Kosina
2013-09-27 10:50               ` Jiri Kosina
2013-09-27 14:42               ` Joseph Salisbury
2013-09-27 14:42                 ` Joseph Salisbury
2013-09-27 15:24                 ` Dan Carpenter
2013-09-27 15:24                   ` Dan Carpenter
2013-09-27 15:59                   ` Dan Carpenter
2013-09-30 14:35                   ` Jiri Kosina
2013-09-30 14:59                     ` Dan Carpenter
2013-09-30 14:59                       ` Dan Carpenter
2013-12-16 13:01                 ` Jiri Kosina
2013-12-19  9:55                   ` David Herrmann
2013-12-19  9:59                     ` Jiri Kosina
2013-12-19 10:08                       ` David Herrmann
2013-12-19 10:08                         ` David Herrmann
2013-12-19 11:22                         ` David Herrmann
2013-12-19 11:22                           ` David Herrmann
2013-12-19 12:59                           ` Jiri Kosina

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5241D905.9030001@canonical.com \
    --to=joseph.salisbury@canonical.com \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=devel@linuxdriverproject.org \
    --cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
    --cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=list@osuosl.org \
    --cc=open@osuosl.org \
    --cc=thomas@m3y3r.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.