Odp: Re: patch INP3 for kernel 3.6

Odp: Re: patch INP3 for kernel 3.6

[Waldek]

Ok I have try compile kernel 3.6 with fixed rejected netrom.h and patch don't working with 3.6 kernel

 CC [M]  net/netrom/af_netrom.o
In file included from net/netrom/af_netrom.c:40:0:
include/net/netrom.h:72:27: warning: declaration does not declare anything [enabled by default]
net/netrom/af_netrom.c: In function 'nr_ioctl':
net/netrom/af_netrom.c:1261:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'inp3_set_mnem' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
net/netrom/af_netrom.c:1269:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'inp3_get_mnem' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
net/netrom/af_netrom.c: In function 'nr_proto_init':
net/netrom/af_netrom.c:1481:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'kinp3d_start' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
net/netrom/af_netrom.c: In function 'nr_exit':
net/netrom/af_netrom.c:1512:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'kinp3d_stop' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
make[2]: *** [net/netrom/af_netrom.o] error 1
make[1]: *** [net/netrom] error 2
make: *** [net] error 2


Dnia Czwartek, 26 Wrze¶nia 2013 10:10 Matt Maguire <matt.vk2rq@gmail.com> napisa³(a) 
> I'm not surprised it doesn't apply cleanly -- it is for 2.6 kernel,
> not 3.6. Even if it did apply, I wouldn't use it until the deadlock
> issue is addressed -- that's why I was interested to hear that someone
> else made a patch for 2.6, as I am curious whether they also fixed the
> deadlock issue inherited from the 2.4 patch.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hams" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: Odp: Re: patch INP3 for kernel 3.6

[walter harms]

Am 26.09.2013 10:20, schrieb Waldek:
> Ok I have try compile kernel 3.6 with fixed rejected netrom.h and patch don't working with 3.6 kernel
> 
>  CC [M]  net/netrom/af_netrom.o
> In file included from net/netrom/af_netrom.c:40:0:
> include/net/netrom.h:72:27: warning: declaration does not declare anything [enabled by default]
> net/netrom/af_netrom.c: In function 'nr_ioctl':
> net/netrom/af_netrom.c:1261:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'inp3_set_mnem' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> net/netrom/af_netrom.c:1269:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'inp3_get_mnem' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> net/netrom/af_netrom.c: In function 'nr_proto_init':
> net/netrom/af_netrom.c:1481:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'kinp3d_start' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> net/netrom/af_netrom.c: In function 'nr_exit':
> net/netrom/af_netrom.c:1512:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'kinp3d_stop' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> make[2]: *** [net/netrom/af_netrom.o] error 1
> make[1]: *** [net/netrom] error 2
> make: *** [net] error 2
> 
> 
do not worry,
he is missing the function declaration (inp3_set_mnem,kinp3d_start) only,
create them an this problem is fixed. Normaly this is only a warning but
"some warnings being treated as errors"

re,
 wh


> Dnia Czwartek, 26 Wrze¶nia 2013 10:10 Matt Maguire <matt.vk2rq@gmail.com> napisa³(a) 
>> I'm not surprised it doesn't apply cleanly -- it is for 2.6 kernel,
>> not 3.6. Even if it did apply, I wouldn't use it until the deadlock
>> issue is addressed -- that's why I was interested to hear that someone
>> else made a patch for 2.6, as I am curious whether they also fixed the
>> deadlock issue inherited from the 2.4 patch.
> 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hams" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hams" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html