From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"grant.likely@linaro.org" <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@arm.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
"patches@linaro.org" <patches@linaro.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org>,
"linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org" <linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org>,
Charles Garcia-Tobin <Charles.Garcia-Tobin@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/20] ARM64 / ACPI: Get the enable method for SMP initialization
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 22:57:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52E27F5D.6070302@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140123175031.GJ27520@arm.com>
Hi Catalin,
On 2014年01月24日 01:50, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 12:25:05PM +0000, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
>> @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@
>> #include <asm/sections.h>
>> #include <asm/tlbflush.h>
>> #include <asm/ptrace.h>
>> +#include <asm/acpi.h>
>>
>> /*
>> * as from 2.5, kernels no longer have an init_tasks structure
>> @@ -280,7 +281,7 @@ static void (*smp_cross_call)(const struct cpumask *, unsigned int);
>> * cpu logical map array containing MPIDR values related to logical
>> * cpus. Assumes that cpu_logical_map(0) has already been initialized.
>> */
>> -void __init smp_init_cpus(void)
>> +static int __init of_smp_init_cpus(void)
>> {
>> struct device_node *dn = NULL;
>> unsigned int i, cpu = 1;
>> @@ -364,6 +365,10 @@ next:
>> cpu++;
>> }
>>
>> + /* No device tree or no CPU node in DT */
>> + if (cpu == 1 && !bootcpu_valid)
>> + return -ENODEV;
>> +
>> /* sanity check */
>> if (cpu > NR_CPUS)
>> pr_warning("no. of cores (%d) greater than configured maximum of %d - clipping\n",
>> @@ -371,7 +376,7 @@ next:
>>
>> if (!bootcpu_valid) {
>> pr_err("DT missing boot CPU MPIDR, not enabling secondaries\n");
>> - return;
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> }
>>
>> /*
>> @@ -381,6 +386,39 @@ next:
>> for (i = 0; i < NR_CPUS; i++)
>> if (cpu_logical_map(i) != INVALID_HWID)
>> set_cpu_possible(i, true);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * In ACPI mode, the cpu possible map was enumerated before SMP
>> + * initialization when MADT table was parsed, so we can get the
>> + * possible map here to initialize CPUs.
>> + */
>> +static void __init acpi_smp_init_cpus(void)
>> +{
>> + int cpu;
>> + const char *enable_method;
>> +
>> + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
>> + enable_method = acpi_get_enable_method(cpu);
>> + if (!enable_method)
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + cpu_ops[cpu] = cpu_get_ops(enable_method);
>> + if (!cpu_ops[cpu])
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + cpu_ops[cpu]->cpu_init(NULL, cpu);
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +void __init smp_init_cpus(void)
>> +{
>> + if (!of_smp_init_cpus())
>> + return;
>> +
>> + acpi_smp_init_cpus();
>> }
> With DT we initialise the cpu_ops[0] via cpu_read_bootcpu_ops() called
> from setup_arch(). This is needed because with PSCI we use cpu_ops for
> power management even if it's a UP system. Do you get a some kernel
> warning about device node for the boot cpu not found?
Thanks for pointing this out, actually we didn't find a dts file with
spin-table method for SMP initialization, and this patch is not fully
tested (only spin-table method is supported in ACPI now), we are
working on that and get this patch fully tested.
I will review the code carefully in your comments, and update
the code accordingly.
>
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/plat/arm-core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/plat/arm-core.c
>> @@ -367,6 +367,32 @@ static void __init acpi_process_madt(void)
>> }
>>
>> /*
>> + * To see PCSI is enabled or not.
>> + *
>> + * PSCI is not available for ACPI 5.0, return FALSE for now.
>> + *
>> + * FIXME: should we introduce early_param("psci", func) for test purpose?
>> + */
>> +static bool acpi_psci_smp_available(int cpu)
>> +{
>> + return FALSE;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const char *enable_method[] = {
>> + "psci",
>> + "spin-table",
>> + NULL
>> +};
>> +
>> +const char *acpi_get_enable_method(int cpu)
>> +{
>> + if (acpi_psci_smp_available(cpu))
>> + return enable_method[0];
>> + else
>> + return enable_method[1];
>> +}
> You could just use literal strings here, actually even ignoring PSCI
> until available.
Ok.
Thanks
Hanjun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: hanjun.guo@linaro.org (Hanjun Guo)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 11/20] ARM64 / ACPI: Get the enable method for SMP initialization
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 22:57:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52E27F5D.6070302@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140123175031.GJ27520@arm.com>
Hi Catalin,
On 2014?01?24? 01:50, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 12:25:05PM +0000, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
>> @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@
>> #include <asm/sections.h>
>> #include <asm/tlbflush.h>
>> #include <asm/ptrace.h>
>> +#include <asm/acpi.h>
>>
>> /*
>> * as from 2.5, kernels no longer have an init_tasks structure
>> @@ -280,7 +281,7 @@ static void (*smp_cross_call)(const struct cpumask *, unsigned int);
>> * cpu logical map array containing MPIDR values related to logical
>> * cpus. Assumes that cpu_logical_map(0) has already been initialized.
>> */
>> -void __init smp_init_cpus(void)
>> +static int __init of_smp_init_cpus(void)
>> {
>> struct device_node *dn = NULL;
>> unsigned int i, cpu = 1;
>> @@ -364,6 +365,10 @@ next:
>> cpu++;
>> }
>>
>> + /* No device tree or no CPU node in DT */
>> + if (cpu == 1 && !bootcpu_valid)
>> + return -ENODEV;
>> +
>> /* sanity check */
>> if (cpu > NR_CPUS)
>> pr_warning("no. of cores (%d) greater than configured maximum of %d - clipping\n",
>> @@ -371,7 +376,7 @@ next:
>>
>> if (!bootcpu_valid) {
>> pr_err("DT missing boot CPU MPIDR, not enabling secondaries\n");
>> - return;
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> }
>>
>> /*
>> @@ -381,6 +386,39 @@ next:
>> for (i = 0; i < NR_CPUS; i++)
>> if (cpu_logical_map(i) != INVALID_HWID)
>> set_cpu_possible(i, true);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * In ACPI mode, the cpu possible map was enumerated before SMP
>> + * initialization when MADT table was parsed, so we can get the
>> + * possible map here to initialize CPUs.
>> + */
>> +static void __init acpi_smp_init_cpus(void)
>> +{
>> + int cpu;
>> + const char *enable_method;
>> +
>> + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
>> + enable_method = acpi_get_enable_method(cpu);
>> + if (!enable_method)
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + cpu_ops[cpu] = cpu_get_ops(enable_method);
>> + if (!cpu_ops[cpu])
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + cpu_ops[cpu]->cpu_init(NULL, cpu);
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +void __init smp_init_cpus(void)
>> +{
>> + if (!of_smp_init_cpus())
>> + return;
>> +
>> + acpi_smp_init_cpus();
>> }
> With DT we initialise the cpu_ops[0] via cpu_read_bootcpu_ops() called
> from setup_arch(). This is needed because with PSCI we use cpu_ops for
> power management even if it's a UP system. Do you get a some kernel
> warning about device node for the boot cpu not found?
Thanks for pointing this out, actually we didn't find a dts file with
spin-table method for SMP initialization, and this patch is not fully
tested (only spin-table method is supported in ACPI now), we are
working on that and get this patch fully tested.
I will review the code carefully in your comments, and update
the code accordingly.
>
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/plat/arm-core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/plat/arm-core.c
>> @@ -367,6 +367,32 @@ static void __init acpi_process_madt(void)
>> }
>>
>> /*
>> + * To see PCSI is enabled or not.
>> + *
>> + * PSCI is not available for ACPI 5.0, return FALSE for now.
>> + *
>> + * FIXME: should we introduce early_param("psci", func) for test purpose?
>> + */
>> +static bool acpi_psci_smp_available(int cpu)
>> +{
>> + return FALSE;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const char *enable_method[] = {
>> + "psci",
>> + "spin-table",
>> + NULL
>> +};
>> +
>> +const char *acpi_get_enable_method(int cpu)
>> +{
>> + if (acpi_psci_smp_available(cpu))
>> + return enable_method[0];
>> + else
>> + return enable_method[1];
>> +}
> You could just use literal strings here, actually even ignoring PSCI
> until available.
Ok.
Thanks
Hanjun
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"grant.likely@linaro.org" <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@arm.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
"patches@linaro.org" <patches@linaro.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org>,
"linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org" <linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org>,
Charles Garcia-Tobin <Charles.Garcia-Tobin@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/20] ARM64 / ACPI: Get the enable method for SMP initialization
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 22:57:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52E27F5D.6070302@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140123175031.GJ27520@arm.com>
Hi Catalin,
On 2014年01月24日 01:50, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 12:25:05PM +0000, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
>> @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@
>> #include <asm/sections.h>
>> #include <asm/tlbflush.h>
>> #include <asm/ptrace.h>
>> +#include <asm/acpi.h>
>>
>> /*
>> * as from 2.5, kernels no longer have an init_tasks structure
>> @@ -280,7 +281,7 @@ static void (*smp_cross_call)(const struct cpumask *, unsigned int);
>> * cpu logical map array containing MPIDR values related to logical
>> * cpus. Assumes that cpu_logical_map(0) has already been initialized.
>> */
>> -void __init smp_init_cpus(void)
>> +static int __init of_smp_init_cpus(void)
>> {
>> struct device_node *dn = NULL;
>> unsigned int i, cpu = 1;
>> @@ -364,6 +365,10 @@ next:
>> cpu++;
>> }
>>
>> + /* No device tree or no CPU node in DT */
>> + if (cpu == 1 && !bootcpu_valid)
>> + return -ENODEV;
>> +
>> /* sanity check */
>> if (cpu > NR_CPUS)
>> pr_warning("no. of cores (%d) greater than configured maximum of %d - clipping\n",
>> @@ -371,7 +376,7 @@ next:
>>
>> if (!bootcpu_valid) {
>> pr_err("DT missing boot CPU MPIDR, not enabling secondaries\n");
>> - return;
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> }
>>
>> /*
>> @@ -381,6 +386,39 @@ next:
>> for (i = 0; i < NR_CPUS; i++)
>> if (cpu_logical_map(i) != INVALID_HWID)
>> set_cpu_possible(i, true);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * In ACPI mode, the cpu possible map was enumerated before SMP
>> + * initialization when MADT table was parsed, so we can get the
>> + * possible map here to initialize CPUs.
>> + */
>> +static void __init acpi_smp_init_cpus(void)
>> +{
>> + int cpu;
>> + const char *enable_method;
>> +
>> + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
>> + enable_method = acpi_get_enable_method(cpu);
>> + if (!enable_method)
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + cpu_ops[cpu] = cpu_get_ops(enable_method);
>> + if (!cpu_ops[cpu])
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + cpu_ops[cpu]->cpu_init(NULL, cpu);
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +void __init smp_init_cpus(void)
>> +{
>> + if (!of_smp_init_cpus())
>> + return;
>> +
>> + acpi_smp_init_cpus();
>> }
> With DT we initialise the cpu_ops[0] via cpu_read_bootcpu_ops() called
> from setup_arch(). This is needed because with PSCI we use cpu_ops for
> power management even if it's a UP system. Do you get a some kernel
> warning about device node for the boot cpu not found?
Thanks for pointing this out, actually we didn't find a dts file with
spin-table method for SMP initialization, and this patch is not fully
tested (only spin-table method is supported in ACPI now), we are
working on that and get this patch fully tested.
I will review the code carefully in your comments, and update
the code accordingly.
>
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/plat/arm-core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/plat/arm-core.c
>> @@ -367,6 +367,32 @@ static void __init acpi_process_madt(void)
>> }
>>
>> /*
>> + * To see PCSI is enabled or not.
>> + *
>> + * PSCI is not available for ACPI 5.0, return FALSE for now.
>> + *
>> + * FIXME: should we introduce early_param("psci", func) for test purpose?
>> + */
>> +static bool acpi_psci_smp_available(int cpu)
>> +{
>> + return FALSE;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const char *enable_method[] = {
>> + "psci",
>> + "spin-table",
>> + NULL
>> +};
>> +
>> +const char *acpi_get_enable_method(int cpu)
>> +{
>> + if (acpi_psci_smp_available(cpu))
>> + return enable_method[0];
>> + else
>> + return enable_method[1];
>> +}
> You could just use literal strings here, actually even ignoring PSCI
> until available.
Ok.
Thanks
Hanjun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-24 14:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 213+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-17 12:24 [PATCH 00/20] Make ACPI core running on ARM64 Hanjun Guo
2014-01-17 12:24 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-17 12:24 ` [PATCH 01/20] ARM64 / ACPI: Make PCI optional for ACPI " Hanjun Guo
2014-01-17 12:24 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-17 16:00 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-01-17 16:00 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-01-17 16:00 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-01-20 9:33 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-20 9:33 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-20 9:33 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-17 12:24 ` [PATCH 02/20] ARM64 : Add dummy asm/cpu.h Hanjun Guo
2014-01-17 12:24 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-17 14:22 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-01-17 14:22 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-01-17 14:22 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-01-20 8:58 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-20 8:58 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-20 8:58 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-23 16:15 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-01-23 16:15 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-01-23 16:15 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-01-24 14:41 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-24 14:41 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-24 14:41 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-17 12:24 ` [PATCH 03/20] ARM64 / ACPI: Introduce the skeleton of _PDC related for ARM64 Hanjun Guo
2014-01-17 12:24 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-17 14:25 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-01-17 14:25 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-01-20 9:20 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-20 9:20 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-20 9:20 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-23 16:19 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-01-23 16:19 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-01-23 16:19 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-01-24 14:43 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-24 14:43 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-24 14:43 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-23 18:03 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-01-23 18:03 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-01-23 18:03 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-01-24 15:35 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-24 15:35 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-24 15:35 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-17 12:24 ` [PATCH 04/20] ARM64 / ACPI: Introduce arm_core.c and its related head file Hanjun Guo
2014-01-17 12:24 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-17 14:12 ` Will Deacon
2014-01-17 14:12 ` Will Deacon
2014-01-17 14:12 ` Will Deacon
2014-01-18 4:05 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-18 4:05 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-18 4:05 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-17 16:56 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-01-17 16:56 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-01-20 12:26 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-20 12:26 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-20 12:26 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-22 11:54 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-01-22 11:54 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-01-22 11:54 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-01-23 15:56 ` [Linaro-acpi] " Tomasz Nowicki
2014-01-23 15:56 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2014-01-24 9:09 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-24 9:09 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-24 12:53 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-01-24 12:53 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-01-24 16:44 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2014-01-24 16:44 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2014-01-17 12:24 ` [PATCH 05/20] ARM64 / ACPI: Introduce lowlevel suspend function Hanjun Guo
2014-01-17 12:24 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-17 12:25 ` [PATCH 06/20] ARM64 / ACPI: Introduce some PCI functions when PCI is enabled Hanjun Guo
2014-01-17 12:25 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-17 14:04 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-17 14:04 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-20 8:08 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-20 8:08 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-20 8:20 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-20 8:20 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-20 14:13 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-20 14:13 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-20 18:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-20 18:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-20 18:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-21 3:40 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-21 3:40 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-17 12:25 ` [PATCH 07/20] ARM64 / ACPI: Enable ARM64 in Kconfig Hanjun Guo
2014-01-17 12:25 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-17 14:34 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-01-17 14:34 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-01-20 9:30 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-20 9:30 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-20 9:30 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-23 16:39 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-01-23 16:39 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-01-23 16:39 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-01-24 14:45 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-24 14:45 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-24 14:45 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-17 12:25 ` [PATCH 08/20] ARM64 / ACPI: Select ACPI_REDUCED_HARDWARE_ONLY if ACPI is enabled on ARM64 Hanjun Guo
2014-01-17 12:25 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-17 12:25 ` [PATCH 09/20] ARM64 / ACPI: Implement core functions for parsing MADT table Hanjun Guo
2014-01-17 12:25 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-17 14:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-17 14:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-20 8:49 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-20 8:49 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-23 17:54 ` Marc Zyngier
2014-01-23 17:54 ` Marc Zyngier
2014-01-23 17:54 ` Marc Zyngier
2014-01-24 15:34 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-24 15:34 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-24 15:34 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-24 20:57 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-24 20:57 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-24 20:57 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-17 12:25 ` [PATCH 10/20] ARM64 / ACPI: Enumerate possible/present CPU set and map logical cpu id to APIC id Hanjun Guo
2014-01-17 12:25 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-17 17:37 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-01-17 17:37 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-01-20 14:00 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-20 14:00 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-20 14:00 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-22 15:53 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-01-22 15:53 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-01-22 15:53 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-01-24 14:37 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-24 14:37 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-24 14:37 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-24 15:35 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-01-24 15:35 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-01-24 15:35 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-01-24 16:02 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-24 16:02 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-24 16:02 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-17 12:25 ` [PATCH 11/20] ARM64 / ACPI: Get the enable method for SMP initialization Hanjun Guo
2014-01-17 12:25 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-23 17:50 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-01-23 17:50 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-01-24 14:57 ` Hanjun Guo [this message]
2014-01-24 14:57 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-24 14:57 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-17 12:25 ` [PATCH 12/20] ARM64 / ACPI: Use Parked Address in GIC structure for spin table SMP initialisation Hanjun Guo
2014-01-17 12:25 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-17 14:15 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-17 14:15 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-17 14:35 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2014-01-17 14:35 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2014-01-17 12:25 ` [PATCH 13/20] ARM64 / ACPI: Define ACPI_IRQ_MODEL_GIC needed for arm Hanjun Guo
2014-01-17 12:25 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-17 12:25 ` [PATCH 14/20] Irqchip / gic: Set as default domain so we can access from ACPI Hanjun Guo
2014-01-17 12:25 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-17 12:25 ` [PATCH 15/20] ACPI / ARM64: Update acpi_register_gsi to register with the core IRQ subsystem Hanjun Guo
2014-01-17 12:25 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-17 12:25 ` =?yes?q?=5BPATCH=2016/20=5D=20ACPI=20/=20GIC=3A=20Initialize=20GIC=20using=20the=20information=20in=20MADT?= Hanjun Guo
2014-01-17 12:25 ` =?yes?q?=5BPATCH=2016/20=5D=20ACPI=20/=20GIC=3A=20Initialize=20GIC=20using=20the=20information=20in=20MADT?= Hanjun Guo
2014-01-17 12:25 ` [PATCH 17/20] clocksource / arch_timer: Use ACPI GTDT table to initialize arch timer Hanjun Guo
2014-01-17 12:25 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-27 11:26 ` Mark Rutland
2014-01-27 11:26 ` Mark Rutland
2014-01-27 11:26 ` Mark Rutland
2014-01-17 12:25 ` [PATCH 18/20] clocksource / acpi: Add macro CLOCKSOURCE_ACPI_DECLARE Hanjun Guo
2014-01-17 12:25 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-17 14:21 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-17 14:21 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-20 9:08 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-20 9:08 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-22 11:46 ` Mark Rutland
2014-01-22 11:46 ` Mark Rutland
2014-01-22 11:46 ` Mark Rutland
2014-01-22 14:56 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-22 14:56 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-22 14:56 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-22 15:17 ` Mark Rutland
2014-01-22 15:17 ` Mark Rutland
2014-01-22 15:17 ` Mark Rutland
2014-01-22 15:47 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-22 15:47 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-24 9:19 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-24 9:19 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-24 9:19 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-24 0:46 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-24 0:46 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-24 0:46 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-22 8:26 ` Linus Walleij
2014-01-22 8:26 ` Linus Walleij
2014-01-22 11:45 ` Mark Rutland
2014-01-22 11:45 ` Mark Rutland
2014-01-22 14:38 ` Linus Walleij
2014-01-22 14:38 ` Linus Walleij
2014-01-24 0:20 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-24 0:20 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-24 0:20 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-24 12:08 ` Mark Rutland
2014-01-24 12:08 ` Mark Rutland
2014-01-24 12:08 ` Mark Rutland
2014-01-24 15:15 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-01-24 15:15 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-01-24 15:15 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-01-24 15:44 ` Mark Rutland
2014-01-24 15:44 ` Mark Rutland
2014-01-24 15:53 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-24 15:53 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-24 0:12 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-24 0:12 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-24 0:12 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-24 12:32 ` Mark Rutland
2014-01-24 12:32 ` Mark Rutland
2014-01-24 15:45 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-24 15:45 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-24 15:45 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-17 12:25 ` [PATCH 19/20] clocksource / ACPI: Introduce clocksource_acpi_init() using CLOCKSOURCE_ACPI_DECLARE Hanjun Guo
2014-01-17 12:25 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-01-17 12:25 ` [PATCH 20/20] ARM64 / clocksource: Use clocksource_acpi_init() Hanjun Guo
2014-01-17 12:25 ` Hanjun Guo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52E27F5D.6070302@linaro.org \
--to=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=Charles.Garcia-Tobin@arm.com \
--cc=Mark.Rutland@arm.com \
--cc=Will.Deacon@arm.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=patches@linaro.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.