From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
To: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] ARM64: get rid of arch_cpu_idle_prepare()
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 09:23:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52E61793.4020608@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1390802904-28399-3-git-send-email-nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
On 01/27/2014 07:08 AM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> ARM and ARM64 are the only two architectures implementing
> arch_cpu_idle_prepare() simply to call local_fiq_enable().
>
> We have secondary_start_kernel() already calling local_fiq_enable() and
> this is done a second time in arch_cpu_idle_prepare() in that case. And
> enabling FIQs has nothing to do with idling the CPU to start with.
>
> So let's introduce init_fiq_boot_cpu() to take care of FIQs on the boot
> CPU and remove arch_cpu_idle_prepare(). This is now done a bit earlier
> at late_initcall time but this shouldn't make a difference in practice
> given that FIQs are not currently used on ARM64.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/process.c | 5 -----
> arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c | 7 +++++++
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
> index de17c89985..f6c733da67 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
> @@ -84,11 +84,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pm_power_off);
> void (*arm_pm_restart)(enum reboot_mode reboot_mode, const char *cmd);
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(arm_pm_restart);
>
> -void arch_cpu_idle_prepare(void)
> -{
> - local_fiq_enable();
> -}
> -
> /*
> * This is our default idle handler.
> */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
> index bd9bbd0e44..259557983a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -255,6 +255,13 @@ static int __init arm64_device_init(void)
> }
> arch_initcall(arm64_device_init);
>
> +static int __init init_fiq_boot_cpu(void)
> +{
> + local_fiq_enable();
> + return 0;
> +}
> +late_initcall(init_fiq_boot_cpu);
> +
> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpu, cpu_data);
>
> static int __init topology_init(void)
>
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] ARM64: get rid of arch_cpu_idle_prepare()
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 08:23:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52E61793.4020608@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1390802904-28399-3-git-send-email-nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
On 01/27/2014 07:08 AM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> ARM and ARM64 are the only two architectures implementing
> arch_cpu_idle_prepare() simply to call local_fiq_enable().
>
> We have secondary_start_kernel() already calling local_fiq_enable() and
> this is done a second time in arch_cpu_idle_prepare() in that case. And
> enabling FIQs has nothing to do with idling the CPU to start with.
>
> So let's introduce init_fiq_boot_cpu() to take care of FIQs on the boot
> CPU and remove arch_cpu_idle_prepare(). This is now done a bit earlier
> at late_initcall time but this shouldn't make a difference in practice
> given that FIQs are not currently used on ARM64.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/process.c | 5 -----
> arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c | 7 +++++++
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
> index de17c89985..f6c733da67 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
> @@ -84,11 +84,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pm_power_off);
> void (*arm_pm_restart)(enum reboot_mode reboot_mode, const char *cmd);
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(arm_pm_restart);
>
> -void arch_cpu_idle_prepare(void)
> -{
> - local_fiq_enable();
> -}
> -
> /*
> * This is our default idle handler.
> */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
> index bd9bbd0e44..259557983a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -255,6 +255,13 @@ static int __init arm64_device_init(void)
> }
> arch_initcall(arm64_device_init);
>
> +static int __init init_fiq_boot_cpu(void)
> +{
> + local_fiq_enable();
> + return 0;
> +}
> +late_initcall(init_fiq_boot_cpu);
> +
> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpu, cpu_data);
>
> static int __init topology_init(void)
>
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
To: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] ARM64: get rid of arch_cpu_idle_prepare()
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 09:23:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52E61793.4020608@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1390802904-28399-3-git-send-email-nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
On 01/27/2014 07:08 AM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> ARM and ARM64 are the only two architectures implementing
> arch_cpu_idle_prepare() simply to call local_fiq_enable().
>
> We have secondary_start_kernel() already calling local_fiq_enable() and
> this is done a second time in arch_cpu_idle_prepare() in that case. And
> enabling FIQs has nothing to do with idling the CPU to start with.
>
> So let's introduce init_fiq_boot_cpu() to take care of FIQs on the boot
> CPU and remove arch_cpu_idle_prepare(). This is now done a bit earlier
> at late_initcall time but this shouldn't make a difference in practice
> given that FIQs are not currently used on ARM64.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/process.c | 5 -----
> arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c | 7 +++++++
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
> index de17c89985..f6c733da67 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
> @@ -84,11 +84,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pm_power_off);
> void (*arm_pm_restart)(enum reboot_mode reboot_mode, const char *cmd);
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(arm_pm_restart);
>
> -void arch_cpu_idle_prepare(void)
> -{
> - local_fiq_enable();
> -}
> -
> /*
> * This is our default idle handler.
> */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
> index bd9bbd0e44..259557983a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -255,6 +255,13 @@ static int __init arm64_device_init(void)
> }
> arch_initcall(arm64_device_init);
>
> +static int __init init_fiq_boot_cpu(void)
> +{
> + local_fiq_enable();
> + return 0;
> +}
> +late_initcall(init_fiq_boot_cpu);
> +
> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpu, cpu_data);
>
> static int __init topology_init(void)
>
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org (Daniel Lezcano)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/9] ARM64: get rid of arch_cpu_idle_prepare()
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 09:23:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52E61793.4020608@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1390802904-28399-3-git-send-email-nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
On 01/27/2014 07:08 AM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> ARM and ARM64 are the only two architectures implementing
> arch_cpu_idle_prepare() simply to call local_fiq_enable().
>
> We have secondary_start_kernel() already calling local_fiq_enable() and
> this is done a second time in arch_cpu_idle_prepare() in that case. And
> enabling FIQs has nothing to do with idling the CPU to start with.
>
> So let's introduce init_fiq_boot_cpu() to take care of FIQs on the boot
> CPU and remove arch_cpu_idle_prepare(). This is now done a bit earlier
> at late_initcall time but this shouldn't make a difference in practice
> given that FIQs are not currently used on ARM64.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/process.c | 5 -----
> arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c | 7 +++++++
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
> index de17c89985..f6c733da67 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
> @@ -84,11 +84,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pm_power_off);
> void (*arm_pm_restart)(enum reboot_mode reboot_mode, const char *cmd);
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(arm_pm_restart);
>
> -void arch_cpu_idle_prepare(void)
> -{
> - local_fiq_enable();
> -}
> -
> /*
> * This is our default idle handler.
> */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
> index bd9bbd0e44..259557983a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -255,6 +255,13 @@ static int __init arm64_device_init(void)
> }
> arch_initcall(arm64_device_init);
>
> +static int __init init_fiq_boot_cpu(void)
> +{
> + local_fiq_enable();
> + return 0;
> +}
> +late_initcall(init_fiq_boot_cpu);
> +
> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpu, cpu_data);
>
> static int __init topology_init(void)
>
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-27 8:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 132+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-27 6:08 [PATCH 0/9] setting the table for integration of cpuidle with the scheduler Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 6:08 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 6:08 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 6:08 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 6:08 ` [PATCH 1/9] ARM: get rid of arch_cpu_idle_prepare() Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 6:08 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 6:08 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 6:08 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 8:22 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 8:22 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 8:22 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 8:22 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 16:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-27 16:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-27 16:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-27 16:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-27 17:12 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 17:12 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 17:12 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 17:12 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 17:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-27 17:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-27 17:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-27 17:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-27 17:30 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 17:30 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 17:30 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 17:30 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 17:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-27 17:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-27 17:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-27 17:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-27 17:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-27 12:45 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-27 12:45 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-27 12:45 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-27 12:45 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-27 15:45 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 15:45 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 15:45 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 15:45 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 16:06 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-27 16:06 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-27 16:06 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-27 16:06 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-27 17:36 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 17:36 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 17:36 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 17:36 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 6:08 ` [PATCH 2/9] ARM64: " Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 6:08 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 6:08 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 6:08 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 8:23 ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2014-01-27 8:23 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 8:23 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 8:23 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 15:43 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-01-27 15:43 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-01-27 15:43 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-01-27 15:43 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-01-27 15:51 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 15:51 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 15:51 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 15:51 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 15:57 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-01-27 15:57 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-01-27 15:57 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-01-27 15:57 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-01-29 18:00 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-30 11:36 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-01-27 6:08 ` [PATCH 3/9] idle: no more arch_cpu_idle_prepare() users Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 6:08 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 6:08 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 6:08 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 8:24 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 8:24 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 8:24 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 8:24 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 6:08 ` [PATCH 4/9] idle: move the cpuidle entry point to the generic idle loop Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 6:08 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 6:08 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 6:08 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 8:32 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 8:32 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 8:32 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 8:32 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 6:08 ` [PATCH 5/9] ARM: remove redundant cpuidle_idle_call() Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 6:08 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 6:08 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 6:08 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 8:33 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 8:33 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 8:33 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 8:33 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 6:08 ` [PATCH 6/9] PPC: " Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 6:08 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 6:08 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 6:08 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 8:35 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 8:35 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 8:35 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 8:35 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 11:59 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-01-27 12:11 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-01-27 11:59 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-01-27 11:59 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-01-27 6:08 ` [PATCH 7/9] SH: " Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 6:08 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 6:08 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 6:08 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 8:35 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 8:35 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 8:35 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 8:35 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 6:08 ` [PATCH 8/9] X86: " Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 6:08 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 6:08 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 6:08 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 8:43 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 8:43 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 8:43 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 8:43 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 6:08 ` [PATCH 9/9] cpu/idle.c: move to sched/idle.c Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 6:08 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 6:08 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 6:08 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 12:47 ` [PATCH 0/9] setting the table for integration of cpuidle with the scheduler Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-27 12:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-27 12:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-27 12:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-27 12:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52E61793.4020608@linaro.org \
--to=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.