From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>,
linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] ARM: get rid of arch_cpu_idle_prepare()
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 18:35:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140127173557.GE4941@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140127172110.GR15937@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 05:21:10PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> A reviewed-by tag on its own doesn't mean much, as it could mean that
> you've just glanced over the code and decided "yea, it looks okay", or
> it could mean that you've spent all day verifying that the code change
> is indeed correct.
One should use Acked-by for the 'yea, it looks okay' thing.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] ARM: get rid of arch_cpu_idle_prepare()
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 17:35:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140127173557.GE4941@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140127172110.GR15937@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 05:21:10PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> A reviewed-by tag on its own doesn't mean much, as it could mean that
> you've just glanced over the code and decided "yea, it looks okay", or
> it could mean that you've spent all day verifying that the code change
> is indeed correct.
One should use Acked-by for the 'yea, it looks okay' thing.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>,
linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] ARM: get rid of arch_cpu_idle_prepare()
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 18:35:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140127173557.GE4941@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140127172110.GR15937@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 05:21:10PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> A reviewed-by tag on its own doesn't mean much, as it could mean that
> you've just glanced over the code and decided "yea, it looks okay", or
> it could mean that you've spent all day verifying that the code change
> is indeed correct.
One should use Acked-by for the 'yea, it looks okay' thing.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: peterz@infradead.org (Peter Zijlstra)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/9] ARM: get rid of arch_cpu_idle_prepare()
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 18:35:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140127173557.GE4941@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140127172110.GR15937@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 05:21:10PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> A reviewed-by tag on its own doesn't mean much, as it could mean that
> you've just glanced over the code and decided "yea, it looks okay", or
> it could mean that you've spent all day verifying that the code change
> is indeed correct.
One should use Acked-by for the 'yea, it looks okay' thing.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] ARM: get rid of arch_cpu_idle_prepare()
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 18:35:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140127173557.GE4941@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140127172110.GR15937@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 05:21:10PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> A reviewed-by tag on its own doesn't mean much, as it could mean that
> you've just glanced over the code and decided "yea, it looks okay", or
> it could mean that you've spent all day verifying that the code change
> is indeed correct.
One should use Acked-by for the 'yea, it looks okay' thing.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-27 17:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 132+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-27 6:08 [PATCH 0/9] setting the table for integration of cpuidle with the scheduler Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 6:08 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 6:08 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 6:08 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 6:08 ` [PATCH 1/9] ARM: get rid of arch_cpu_idle_prepare() Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 6:08 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 6:08 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 6:08 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 8:22 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 8:22 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 8:22 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 8:22 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 16:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-27 16:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-27 16:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-27 16:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-27 17:12 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 17:12 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 17:12 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 17:12 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 17:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-27 17:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-27 17:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-27 17:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-27 17:30 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 17:30 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 17:30 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 17:30 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 17:35 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2014-01-27 17:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-27 17:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-27 17:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-27 17:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-27 12:45 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-27 12:45 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-27 12:45 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-27 12:45 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-27 15:45 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 15:45 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 15:45 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 15:45 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 16:06 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-27 16:06 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-27 16:06 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-27 16:06 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-27 17:36 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 17:36 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 17:36 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 17:36 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 6:08 ` [PATCH 2/9] ARM64: " Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 6:08 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 6:08 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 6:08 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 8:23 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 8:23 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 8:23 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 8:23 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 15:43 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-01-27 15:43 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-01-27 15:43 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-01-27 15:43 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-01-27 15:51 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 15:51 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 15:51 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 15:51 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 15:57 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-01-27 15:57 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-01-27 15:57 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-01-27 15:57 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-01-29 18:00 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-30 11:36 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-01-27 6:08 ` [PATCH 3/9] idle: no more arch_cpu_idle_prepare() users Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 6:08 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 6:08 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 6:08 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 8:24 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 8:24 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 8:24 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 8:24 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 6:08 ` [PATCH 4/9] idle: move the cpuidle entry point to the generic idle loop Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 6:08 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 6:08 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 6:08 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 8:32 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 8:32 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 8:32 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 8:32 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 6:08 ` [PATCH 5/9] ARM: remove redundant cpuidle_idle_call() Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 6:08 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 6:08 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 6:08 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 8:33 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 8:33 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 8:33 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 8:33 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 6:08 ` [PATCH 6/9] PPC: " Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 6:08 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 6:08 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 6:08 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 8:35 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 8:35 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 8:35 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 8:35 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 11:59 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-01-27 12:11 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-01-27 11:59 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-01-27 11:59 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-01-27 6:08 ` [PATCH 7/9] SH: " Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 6:08 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 6:08 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 6:08 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 8:35 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 8:35 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 8:35 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 8:35 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 6:08 ` [PATCH 8/9] X86: " Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 6:08 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 6:08 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 6:08 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 8:43 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 8:43 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 8:43 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 8:43 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-27 6:08 ` [PATCH 9/9] cpu/idle.c: move to sched/idle.c Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 6:08 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 6:08 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 6:08 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-27 12:47 ` [PATCH 0/9] setting the table for integration of cpuidle with the scheduler Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-27 12:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-27 12:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-27 12:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-27 12:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140127173557.GE4941@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.