From: hdegoede@redhat.com (Hans de Goede)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] ehci-platform: Change compatible string from usb-ehci to ehci-platform
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 16:26:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52FA4118.2030100@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52FA3B2B.7050906@ti.com>
Hi,
On 02/11/2014 04:00 PM, Roger Quadros wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> On 02/11/2014 04:10 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> The initial versions of the devicetree enablement patches for ehci-platform
>> used "ehci-platform" as compatible string. However this was disliked by various
>> reviewers because the platform bus is a Linux invention and devicetree is
>> supposed to be OS agnostic. After much discussion I gave up, added a:
>> "depends on !PPC_OF" to Kconfig to avoid a known conflict with PPC-OF platforms
>> and went with the generic usb-ehci as requested.
>>
>> In retro-spect I should have stuck to my guns, because the dts files for many
>> existing boards already claim to be compatible with "usb-ehci", ie they have:
>>
>> compatible = "ti,ehci-omap", "usb-ehci";
>>
>> In theory this should not be a problem since the "ti,ehci-omap" entry takes
>> presedence, but in practice using a conflicting compatible string is an issue,
>> because it makes which driver gets used depent on driver registration order.
>>
>> This patch changes the compatible string claimed by ehci-platform (back) to
>> "ehci-platform", avoiding the driver registration / module loading ordering
>> problems, and removes the "depends on !PPC_OF" workaround.
>>
>> Note that there already is a precedent for using ?hci-platform, in the form
>> of xhci-platform.c using "xhci-platfrom" as compatible string.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/usb-ehci.txt | 4 ++--
>> drivers/usb/host/Kconfig | 1 -
>> drivers/usb/host/ehci-platform.c | 2 +-
>> 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/usb-ehci.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/usb-ehci.txt
>> index 2c1aeeb..46f428a 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/usb-ehci.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/usb-ehci.txt
>> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
>> USB EHCI controllers
>>
>> Required properties:
>> - - compatible : should be "usb-ehci".
>> + - compatible : should be "ehci-platform".
>
> Won't this break DT binding info for power PC?
The powerpc bindings have never been really properly documented, ie
they rely on both usb-ehci and ibm,usb-ehci-440epx strings being there,
which was never documented. Given the issues surrounding using usb-ehci
as a compatible string I think completely removing it from the bindings
docs is best.
> I'm even OK with removing "usb-ehci" and "usb-ohci" compatibles from all OMAP dts files
> since they aren't really compatible with the original PPC driver.
I don't think that is necessary, as your grep has shown there are a lot
of dts files using compatible = "foo", "usb-?hci"; and some may even have
the dts in firmware, so we should simply make sure not to break such dts.
Regards,
Hans
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Roger Quadros <rogerq-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh-hQyY1W1yCW8ekmWlsbkhG0B+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Alan Stern
<stern-nwvwT67g6+6dFdvTe/nMLpVzexx5G7lz@public.gmane.org>,
Tony Prisk <linux-ci5G2KO2hbZ+pU9mqzGVBQ@public.gmane.org>,
Florian Fainelli
<f.fainelli-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Maxime Ripard
<maxime.ripard-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>,
linux-usb <linux-usb-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
devicetree <devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
Grant Likely
<grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org>,
jwboyer-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ehci-platform: Change compatible string from usb-ehci to ehci-platform
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 16:26:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52FA4118.2030100@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52FA3B2B.7050906-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
Hi,
On 02/11/2014 04:00 PM, Roger Quadros wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> On 02/11/2014 04:10 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> The initial versions of the devicetree enablement patches for ehci-platform
>> used "ehci-platform" as compatible string. However this was disliked by various
>> reviewers because the platform bus is a Linux invention and devicetree is
>> supposed to be OS agnostic. After much discussion I gave up, added a:
>> "depends on !PPC_OF" to Kconfig to avoid a known conflict with PPC-OF platforms
>> and went with the generic usb-ehci as requested.
>>
>> In retro-spect I should have stuck to my guns, because the dts files for many
>> existing boards already claim to be compatible with "usb-ehci", ie they have:
>>
>> compatible = "ti,ehci-omap", "usb-ehci";
>>
>> In theory this should not be a problem since the "ti,ehci-omap" entry takes
>> presedence, but in practice using a conflicting compatible string is an issue,
>> because it makes which driver gets used depent on driver registration order.
>>
>> This patch changes the compatible string claimed by ehci-platform (back) to
>> "ehci-platform", avoiding the driver registration / module loading ordering
>> problems, and removes the "depends on !PPC_OF" workaround.
>>
>> Note that there already is a precedent for using ?hci-platform, in the form
>> of xhci-platform.c using "xhci-platfrom" as compatible string.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/usb-ehci.txt | 4 ++--
>> drivers/usb/host/Kconfig | 1 -
>> drivers/usb/host/ehci-platform.c | 2 +-
>> 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/usb-ehci.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/usb-ehci.txt
>> index 2c1aeeb..46f428a 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/usb-ehci.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/usb-ehci.txt
>> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
>> USB EHCI controllers
>>
>> Required properties:
>> - - compatible : should be "usb-ehci".
>> + - compatible : should be "ehci-platform".
>
> Won't this break DT binding info for power PC?
The powerpc bindings have never been really properly documented, ie
they rely on both usb-ehci and ibm,usb-ehci-440epx strings being there,
which was never documented. Given the issues surrounding using usb-ehci
as a compatible string I think completely removing it from the bindings
docs is best.
> I'm even OK with removing "usb-ehci" and "usb-ohci" compatibles from all OMAP dts files
> since they aren't really compatible with the original PPC driver.
I don't think that is necessary, as your grep has shown there are a lot
of dts files using compatible = "foo", "usb-?hci"; and some may even have
the dts in firmware, so we should simply make sure not to break such dts.
Regards,
Hans
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-11 15:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-11 14:10 ohci-/ehci-platform: Change compatible string to ?hci-platform Hans de Goede
2014-02-11 14:10 ` Hans de Goede
2014-02-11 14:10 ` [PATCH 1/2] ohci-platform: Change compatible string from usb-ohci to ohci-platform Hans de Goede
2014-02-11 14:10 ` Hans de Goede
2014-02-11 15:06 ` Kumar Gala
2014-02-11 15:06 ` Kumar Gala
2014-02-11 15:21 ` Hans de Goede
2014-02-11 15:21 ` Hans de Goede
2014-02-11 15:34 ` Kumar Gala
2014-02-11 15:34 ` Kumar Gala
2014-02-11 14:10 ` [PATCH 2/2] ehci-platform: Change compatible string from usb-ehci to ehci-platform Hans de Goede
2014-02-11 14:10 ` Hans de Goede
2014-02-11 15:00 ` Roger Quadros
2014-02-11 15:00 ` Roger Quadros
2014-02-11 15:26 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2014-02-11 15:26 ` Hans de Goede
2014-02-12 14:56 ` Maxime Ripard
2014-02-12 14:56 ` Maxime Ripard
2014-02-11 15:27 ` ohci-/ehci-platform: Change compatible string to ?hci-platform Alan Stern
2014-02-11 15:27 ` Alan Stern
2014-02-11 15:43 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-02-11 15:43 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-02-11 15:54 ` Hans de Goede
2014-02-11 15:54 ` Hans de Goede
2014-02-11 17:01 ` Florian Fainelli
2014-02-11 17:01 ` Florian Fainelli
2014-02-11 17:04 ` Hans de Goede
2014-02-11 17:04 ` Hans de Goede
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52FA4118.2030100@redhat.com \
--to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.