From: Vasily Averin <vvs@parallels.com>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
Saikiran Madugula <hummerbliss@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bridge: Superfluous skb->nfct check in br_nf_dev_queue_xmit
Date: Sun, 04 May 2014 23:04:29 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53668F3D.7080202@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140504125427.GA4344@localhost>
On 05/04/2014 04:54 PM, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 12:54:50PM +0400, Vasily Averin wrote:
>> Currently bridge can silently drop ipv4 fragments.
>> If node have loaded nf_defrag_ipv4 module but have no nf_conntrack_ipv4,
>> br_nf_pre_routing defragments incoming ipv4 fragments
>> but nfct check in br_nf_dev_queue_xmit does not allow re-fragment combined packet back,
>> and therefore it is dropped in br_dev_queue_push_xmit without incrementing of any failcounters
>
> If no further objections, I'll push this original patch appending this comment
> to the description:
>
> [ It seems the only way to hit the ip_fragment code in the bridge xmit
> path is to have a fragment list whose reassembled fragments go over
> the mtu. This only happens if nf_defrag is enabled. Thanks to
> Florian Westphal for providing feedback to clarify this. ]
I have not objections, however I still do not understand why #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_IPV4)
is required in br_dev_queue_push_xmit()?
If ipv4 defragmentation is required not only for conntracks but for TPROXY target and xt_socket match
I think we need to use NF_DEFRAG_IPV4 instead.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-04 19:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-17 11:15 [Bridge] [PATCH 1/1] superfluous skb->nfct check in br_nf_dev_queue_xmit Vasily Averin
2014-04-20 5:33 ` Vasily Averin
2014-04-20 5:33 ` Vasily Averin
2014-04-24 16:32 ` Florian Westphal
2014-04-24 17:05 ` [Bridge] " Florian Westphal
2014-04-28 12:37 ` Vasily Averin
2014-04-28 12:37 ` Vasily Averin
2014-04-28 13:16 ` Florian Westphal
2014-04-28 13:16 ` [Bridge] " Florian Westphal
2014-04-28 14:25 ` Vasily Averin
2014-04-28 14:25 ` Vasily Averin
2014-04-28 14:32 ` [Bridge] " Pablo Neira Ayuso
2014-04-28 14:32 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2014-04-30 9:06 ` [Bridge] " Vasily Averin
2014-04-30 9:06 ` Vasily Averin
2014-04-30 8:54 ` [PATCH] bridge: Superfluous " Vasily Averin
2014-04-30 9:39 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2014-04-30 10:02 ` Florian Westphal
2014-05-04 12:54 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2014-05-04 19:04 ` Vasily Averin [this message]
2014-05-04 19:25 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2014-05-04 20:17 ` [PATCH v2] bridge: superfluous " Vasily Averin
2014-05-05 14:07 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2014-04-29 14:10 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Patrick McHardy
2014-04-29 14:17 ` [Bridge] " Patrick McHardy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53668F3D.7080202@parallels.com \
--to=vvs@parallels.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=hummerbliss@gmail.com \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.