From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Vasily Averin <vvs@parallels.com>
Cc: bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [Bridge] [PATCH 1/1] superfluous skb->nfct check in br_nf_dev_queue_xmit
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 16:32:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140428143255.GA28793@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <535E64D2.7080700@parallels.com>
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 06:25:22PM +0400, Vasily Averin wrote:
> >> Therefore I believe that my patch is still correct, however now I think we also need
> >> to remove #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_IPV4) in br_nf_dev_queue_xmit().
> >
> > I don't think so, DEFRAG_IPV4 is dependency glue, so it shouldn't be
> > possible to build kernel with CONNTRACK_IPV4=n and DEFRAG_IPV4=(m|y).
>
> Could you please explain, why this #ifdef is required?
>
> I'm going to remove this #ifdef because it was added together with nfct check.
>
> Also I believe you are wrong with dependencies:
> NF_CONNTRACK_IPV4 forces NF_DEFRAG_IPV4, not vice versa
That's fine. Basically nf_conntrack *always* requires defragmentation.
But defragmentation is also required by tproxy, which doesn't force
you to have nf_conntrack.
> net/ipv4/netfilter/Kconfig
> config NF_DEFRAG_IPV4
> tristate
> default n
>
> config NF_CONNTRACK_IPV4
> tristate "IPv4 connection tracking support (required for NAT)"
> depends on NF_CONNTRACK
> default m if NETFILTER_ADVANCED=n
> select NF_DEFRAG_IPV4
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Vasily Averin <vvs@parallels.com>
Cc: bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] superfluous skb->nfct check in br_nf_dev_queue_xmit
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 16:32:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140428143255.GA28793@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <535E64D2.7080700@parallels.com>
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 06:25:22PM +0400, Vasily Averin wrote:
> >> Therefore I believe that my patch is still correct, however now I think we also need
> >> to remove #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_IPV4) in br_nf_dev_queue_xmit().
> >
> > I don't think so, DEFRAG_IPV4 is dependency glue, so it shouldn't be
> > possible to build kernel with CONNTRACK_IPV4=n and DEFRAG_IPV4=(m|y).
>
> Could you please explain, why this #ifdef is required?
>
> I'm going to remove this #ifdef because it was added together with nfct check.
>
> Also I believe you are wrong with dependencies:
> NF_CONNTRACK_IPV4 forces NF_DEFRAG_IPV4, not vice versa
That's fine. Basically nf_conntrack *always* requires defragmentation.
But defragmentation is also required by tproxy, which doesn't force
you to have nf_conntrack.
> net/ipv4/netfilter/Kconfig
> config NF_DEFRAG_IPV4
> tristate
> default n
>
> config NF_CONNTRACK_IPV4
> tristate "IPv4 connection tracking support (required for NAT)"
> depends on NF_CONNTRACK
> default m if NETFILTER_ADVANCED=n
> select NF_DEFRAG_IPV4
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-28 14:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-17 11:15 [Bridge] [PATCH 1/1] superfluous skb->nfct check in br_nf_dev_queue_xmit Vasily Averin
2014-04-20 5:33 ` Vasily Averin
2014-04-20 5:33 ` Vasily Averin
2014-04-24 16:32 ` Florian Westphal
2014-04-24 17:05 ` [Bridge] " Florian Westphal
2014-04-28 12:37 ` Vasily Averin
2014-04-28 12:37 ` Vasily Averin
2014-04-28 13:16 ` Florian Westphal
2014-04-28 13:16 ` [Bridge] " Florian Westphal
2014-04-28 14:25 ` Vasily Averin
2014-04-28 14:25 ` Vasily Averin
2014-04-28 14:32 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2014-04-28 14:32 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2014-04-30 9:06 ` [Bridge] " Vasily Averin
2014-04-30 9:06 ` Vasily Averin
2014-04-30 8:54 ` [PATCH] bridge: Superfluous " Vasily Averin
2014-04-30 9:39 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2014-04-30 10:02 ` Florian Westphal
2014-05-04 12:54 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2014-05-04 19:04 ` Vasily Averin
2014-05-04 19:25 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2014-05-04 20:17 ` [PATCH v2] bridge: superfluous " Vasily Averin
2014-05-05 14:07 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2014-04-29 14:10 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Patrick McHardy
2014-04-29 14:17 ` [Bridge] " Patrick McHardy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140428143255.GA28793@localhost \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=vvs@parallels.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.