From: boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com (Boris BREZILLON)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/7] mfd: add support for sun6i PRCM (Power/Reset/Clock Management) unit
Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 10:28:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <536C91A6.6000500@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <536C8F71.5040604@redhat.com>
On 09/05/2014 10:18, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 05/09/2014 10:08 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
>>>>>>> +static struct platform_driver sun6i_prcm_driver = {
>>>>>>> + .driver = {
>>>>>>> + .name = "sun6i-prcm",
>>>>>>> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>>>>>>> + .of_match_table = sun6i_prcm_dt_ids,
>>>>>>> + },
>>>>>>> + .probe = sun6i_prcm_probe,
>>>>>> You need a .remove() call-back.
>>>>> This driver cannot be compiled as module (see the Kconfig definition)
>>>>> and the devices are not hotpluggable, as a result a probed device will
>>>>> never be removed.
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you still want me to implement the remove function ?
>>>> .remove() also be run on shut down.
>>> That is not true, if your device needs to do anything special at shutdown
>>> you need to add a shutdown callback. Devices are kept as is (not torn down)
>>> on shutdown.
>> Ah okay, I'll bow to your knowledge. So there's no reason for this
>> driver to ever call mfd_remove_devices() then?
> No, this is an integral part of the SOC, which never gets removed in any way.
Lee, I'm about to send a 3rd version of this series, is it okay for you
if I leave the remove function unimplemented ?
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
--
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "Emilio López" <emilio-0Z03zUJReD5OxF6Tv1QG9Q@public.gmane.org>,
"Mike Turquette"
<mturquette-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
"Samuel Ortiz" <sameo-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>,
"Chen-Yu Tsai" <wens-jdAy2FN1RRM@public.gmane.org>,
"Maxime Ripard"
<maxime.ripard-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>,
"Philipp Zabel" <p.zabel-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>,
Shuge <shuge-0TFLnhJekD6UEPyfVivIlAC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org>,
kevin-0TFLnhJekD6UEPyfVivIlAC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org,
"Randy Dunlap" <rdunlap-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>,
devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-doc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
dev-3kdeTeqwOZ9EV1b7eY7vFQ@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] mfd: add support for sun6i PRCM (Power/Reset/Clock Management) unit
Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 10:28:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <536C91A6.6000500@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <536C8F71.5040604-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
On 09/05/2014 10:18, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 05/09/2014 10:08 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
>>>>>>> +static struct platform_driver sun6i_prcm_driver = {
>>>>>>> + .driver = {
>>>>>>> + .name = "sun6i-prcm",
>>>>>>> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>>>>>>> + .of_match_table = sun6i_prcm_dt_ids,
>>>>>>> + },
>>>>>>> + .probe = sun6i_prcm_probe,
>>>>>> You need a .remove() call-back.
>>>>> This driver cannot be compiled as module (see the Kconfig definition)
>>>>> and the devices are not hotpluggable, as a result a probed device will
>>>>> never be removed.
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you still want me to implement the remove function ?
>>>> .remove() also be run on shut down.
>>> That is not true, if your device needs to do anything special at shutdown
>>> you need to add a shutdown callback. Devices are kept as is (not torn down)
>>> on shutdown.
>> Ah okay, I'll bow to your knowledge. So there's no reason for this
>> driver to ever call mfd_remove_devices() then?
> No, this is an integral part of the SOC, which never gets removed in any way.
Lee, I'm about to send a 3rd version of this series, is it okay for you
if I leave the remove function unimplemented ?
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
--
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Cc: "Emilio López" <emilio@elopez.com.ar>,
"Mike Turquette" <mturquette@linaro.org>,
"Samuel Ortiz" <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
"Chen-Yu Tsai" <wens@csie.org>,
"Maxime Ripard" <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>,
"Philipp Zabel" <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
Shuge <shuge@allwinnertech.com>,
kevin@allwinnertech.com, "Randy Dunlap" <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dev@linux-sunxi.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] mfd: add support for sun6i PRCM (Power/Reset/Clock Management) unit
Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 10:28:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <536C91A6.6000500@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <536C8F71.5040604@redhat.com>
On 09/05/2014 10:18, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 05/09/2014 10:08 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
>>>>>>> +static struct platform_driver sun6i_prcm_driver = {
>>>>>>> + .driver = {
>>>>>>> + .name = "sun6i-prcm",
>>>>>>> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>>>>>>> + .of_match_table = sun6i_prcm_dt_ids,
>>>>>>> + },
>>>>>>> + .probe = sun6i_prcm_probe,
>>>>>> You need a .remove() call-back.
>>>>> This driver cannot be compiled as module (see the Kconfig definition)
>>>>> and the devices are not hotpluggable, as a result a probed device will
>>>>> never be removed.
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you still want me to implement the remove function ?
>>>> .remove() also be run on shut down.
>>> That is not true, if your device needs to do anything special at shutdown
>>> you need to add a shutdown callback. Devices are kept as is (not torn down)
>>> on shutdown.
>> Ah okay, I'll bow to your knowledge. So there's no reason for this
>> driver to ever call mfd_remove_devices() then?
> No, this is an integral part of the SOC, which never gets removed in any way.
Lee, I'm about to send a 3rd version of this series, is it okay for you
if I leave the remove function unimplemented ?
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
--
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-09 8:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-07 17:25 [PATCH v2 0/7] mfd: add basic sun6i A31 PRCM support Boris BREZILLON
2014-05-07 17:25 ` Boris BREZILLON
2014-05-07 17:25 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] reset: sunxi: document sunxi's reset controllers bindings Boris BREZILLON
2014-05-07 17:25 ` Boris BREZILLON
2014-05-07 17:25 ` Boris BREZILLON
2014-05-08 3:05 ` Maxime Ripard
2014-05-08 3:05 ` Maxime Ripard
2014-05-07 17:25 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] reset: sunxi: allow MFD subdevices probe Boris BREZILLON
2014-05-07 17:25 ` Boris BREZILLON
2014-05-07 17:25 ` Boris BREZILLON
2014-05-08 3:07 ` Maxime Ripard
2014-05-08 3:07 ` Maxime Ripard
2014-05-08 3:07 ` Maxime Ripard
2014-05-08 20:05 ` Boris BREZILLON
2014-05-08 20:05 ` Boris BREZILLON
2014-05-08 20:05 ` Boris BREZILLON
2014-05-07 17:25 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] mfd: add support for sun6i PRCM (Power/Reset/Clock Management) unit Boris BREZILLON
2014-05-07 17:25 ` Boris BREZILLON
2014-05-07 17:25 ` Boris BREZILLON
2014-05-08 3:09 ` Maxime Ripard
2014-05-08 3:09 ` Maxime Ripard
2014-05-08 11:02 ` Lee Jones
2014-05-08 11:02 ` Lee Jones
2014-05-08 20:04 ` Boris BREZILLON
2014-05-08 20:04 ` Boris BREZILLON
2014-05-09 5:05 ` [linux-sunxi] " Priit Laes
2014-05-09 5:05 ` Priit Laes
2014-05-09 5:05 ` Priit Laes
2014-05-09 7:11 ` [linux-sunxi] " Lee Jones
2014-05-09 7:11 ` Lee Jones
2014-05-09 7:12 ` Lee Jones
2014-05-09 7:12 ` Lee Jones
2014-05-09 7:34 ` Hans de Goede
2014-05-09 7:34 ` Hans de Goede
2014-05-09 7:34 ` Hans de Goede
2014-05-09 8:08 ` Lee Jones
2014-05-09 8:08 ` Lee Jones
2014-05-09 8:08 ` Lee Jones
2014-05-09 8:18 ` Hans de Goede
2014-05-09 8:18 ` Hans de Goede
2014-05-09 8:28 ` Boris BREZILLON [this message]
2014-05-09 8:28 ` Boris BREZILLON
2014-05-09 8:28 ` Boris BREZILLON
2014-05-09 8:59 ` Lee Jones
2014-05-09 8:59 ` Lee Jones
2014-05-07 17:25 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] mfd: sun6i-prcm: document DT bindings Boris BREZILLON
2014-05-07 17:25 ` Boris BREZILLON
2014-05-07 17:25 ` Boris BREZILLON
2014-05-07 17:25 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] clk: sunxi: add PRCM (Power/Reset/Clock Management) clks support Boris BREZILLON
2014-05-07 17:25 ` Boris BREZILLON
2014-05-07 17:25 ` Boris BREZILLON
2014-05-08 3:11 ` Maxime Ripard
2014-05-08 3:11 ` Maxime Ripard
2014-05-08 3:11 ` Maxime Ripard
2014-05-07 17:25 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] clk: sunxi: document PRCM clock compatible strings Boris BREZILLON
2014-05-07 17:25 ` Boris BREZILLON
2014-05-07 17:25 ` Boris BREZILLON
2014-05-07 17:25 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] ARM: sunxi: dt: add PRCM clk and reset controller subdevices Boris BREZILLON
2014-05-07 17:25 ` Boris BREZILLON
2014-05-07 17:25 ` Boris BREZILLON
2014-05-08 3:17 ` Maxime Ripard
2014-05-08 3:17 ` Maxime Ripard
2014-05-08 3:17 ` Maxime Ripard
2014-05-08 3:40 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2014-05-08 3:40 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2014-05-08 3:40 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2014-05-08 14:29 ` Maxime Ripard
2014-05-08 14:29 ` Maxime Ripard
2014-05-08 14:29 ` Maxime Ripard
2014-05-08 20:08 ` Boris BREZILLON
2014-05-08 20:08 ` Boris BREZILLON
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=536C91A6.6000500@free-electrons.com \
--to=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.