* [PATCH] x86/hvm: Correct hvm_ioreq_server_alloc_rangesets() failure path
@ 2014-06-04 11:00 Andrew Cooper
2014-06-04 11:30 ` Paul Durrant
2014-06-04 12:22 ` Jan Beulich
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cooper @ 2014-06-04 11:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Xen-devel; +Cc: Andrew Cooper, Paul Durrant, Keir Fraser, Jan Beulich
Coverity-ID: 1220092 "Unsigned compare against 0"
Coverity-ID: 1220093 "Out-of-bounds read"
Both of these are cased by the the while() loop in the fail path, which
results in an infinite loop and memory corruption from rangeset_destroy().
Move hvm_ioreq_server_free_rangesets() up and use it for cleanup on the
failure path.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
CC: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
CC: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
CC: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@citrix.com>
---
xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c | 27 +++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
index 4f993f4..1f13329 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
@@ -824,6 +824,18 @@ static void hvm_ioreq_server_unmap_pages(struct hvm_ioreq_server *s,
}
}
+static void hvm_ioreq_server_free_rangesets(struct hvm_ioreq_server *s,
+ bool_t is_default)
+{
+ unsigned int i;
+
+ if ( is_default )
+ return;
+
+ for ( i = 0; i < NR_IO_RANGE_TYPES; i++ )
+ rangeset_destroy(s->range[i]);
+}
+
static int hvm_ioreq_server_alloc_rangesets(struct hvm_ioreq_server *s,
bool_t is_default)
{
@@ -861,24 +873,11 @@ static int hvm_ioreq_server_alloc_rangesets(struct hvm_ioreq_server *s,
return 0;
fail:
- while ( --i >= 0 )
- rangeset_destroy(s->range[i]);
+ hvm_ioreq_server_free_rangesets(s, 0);
return rc;
}
-static void hvm_ioreq_server_free_rangesets(struct hvm_ioreq_server *s,
- bool_t is_default)
-{
- unsigned int i;
-
- if ( is_default )
- return;
-
- for ( i = 0; i < NR_IO_RANGE_TYPES; i++ )
- rangeset_destroy(s->range[i]);
-}
-
static void hvm_ioreq_server_enable(struct hvm_ioreq_server *s,
bool_t is_default)
{
--
1.7.10.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] x86/hvm: Correct hvm_ioreq_server_alloc_rangesets() failure path
2014-06-04 11:00 [PATCH] x86/hvm: Correct hvm_ioreq_server_alloc_rangesets() failure path Andrew Cooper
@ 2014-06-04 11:30 ` Paul Durrant
2014-06-04 12:22 ` Jan Beulich
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Paul Durrant @ 2014-06-04 11:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Xen-devel; +Cc: Andrew Cooper, Keir (Xen.org), Jan Beulich
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Cooper [mailto:andrew.cooper3@citrix.com]
> Sent: 04 June 2014 12:01
> To: Xen-devel
> Cc: Andrew Cooper; Keir (Xen.org); Jan Beulich; Paul Durrant
> Subject: [PATCH] x86/hvm: Correct hvm_ioreq_server_alloc_rangesets()
> failure path
>
> Coverity-ID: 1220092 "Unsigned compare against 0"
> Coverity-ID: 1220093 "Out-of-bounds read"
>
> Both of these are cased by the the while() loop in the fail path, which
> results in an infinite loop and memory corruption from rangeset_destroy().
>
> Move hvm_ioreq_server_free_rangesets() up and use it for cleanup on the
> failure path.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
> CC: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
> CC: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
> CC: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@citrix.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@citrix.com>
> ---
> xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c | 27 +++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
> index 4f993f4..1f13329 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
> @@ -824,6 +824,18 @@ static void hvm_ioreq_server_unmap_pages(struct
> hvm_ioreq_server *s,
> }
> }
>
> +static void hvm_ioreq_server_free_rangesets(struct hvm_ioreq_server *s,
> + bool_t is_default)
> +{
> + unsigned int i;
> +
> + if ( is_default )
> + return;
> +
> + for ( i = 0; i < NR_IO_RANGE_TYPES; i++ )
> + rangeset_destroy(s->range[i]);
> +}
> +
> static int hvm_ioreq_server_alloc_rangesets(struct hvm_ioreq_server *s,
> bool_t is_default)
> {
> @@ -861,24 +873,11 @@ static int hvm_ioreq_server_alloc_rangesets(struct
> hvm_ioreq_server *s,
> return 0;
>
> fail:
> - while ( --i >= 0 )
> - rangeset_destroy(s->range[i]);
> + hvm_ioreq_server_free_rangesets(s, 0);
>
> return rc;
> }
>
> -static void hvm_ioreq_server_free_rangesets(struct hvm_ioreq_server *s,
> - bool_t is_default)
> -{
> - unsigned int i;
> -
> - if ( is_default )
> - return;
> -
> - for ( i = 0; i < NR_IO_RANGE_TYPES; i++ )
> - rangeset_destroy(s->range[i]);
> -}
> -
> static void hvm_ioreq_server_enable(struct hvm_ioreq_server *s,
> bool_t is_default)
> {
> --
> 1.7.10.4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] x86/hvm: Correct hvm_ioreq_server_alloc_rangesets() failure path
2014-06-04 11:00 [PATCH] x86/hvm: Correct hvm_ioreq_server_alloc_rangesets() failure path Andrew Cooper
2014-06-04 11:30 ` Paul Durrant
@ 2014-06-04 12:22 ` Jan Beulich
2014-06-04 12:25 ` Andrew Cooper
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2014-06-04 12:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Cooper; +Cc: Paul Durrant, Keir Fraser, Xen-devel
>>> On 04.06.14 at 13:00, <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
> Coverity-ID: 1220092 "Unsigned compare against 0"
> Coverity-ID: 1220093 "Out-of-bounds read"
>
> Both of these are cased by the the while() loop in the fail path, which
> results in an infinite loop and memory corruption from rangeset_destroy().
>
> Move hvm_ioreq_server_free_rangesets() up and use it for cleanup on the
> failure path.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Since you and Paul appear to agree to fix it that way, it'll go in as is,
but ...
> @@ -861,24 +873,11 @@ static int hvm_ioreq_server_alloc_rangesets(struct hvm_ioreq_server *s,
> return 0;
>
> fail:
> - while ( --i >= 0 )
... the one line equivalent fix would have been to use while ( i-- ).
Jan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] x86/hvm: Correct hvm_ioreq_server_alloc_rangesets() failure path
2014-06-04 12:22 ` Jan Beulich
@ 2014-06-04 12:25 ` Andrew Cooper
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cooper @ 2014-06-04 12:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Beulich; +Cc: Paul Durrant, Keir Fraser, Xen-devel
On 04/06/14 13:22, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
>> @@ -861,24 +873,11 @@ static int hvm_ioreq_server_alloc_rangesets(struct hvm_ioreq_server *s,
>> return 0;
>>
>> fail:
>> - while ( --i >= 0 )
> ... the one line equivalent fix would have been to use while ( i-- ).
>
> Jan
I was considering the possible case where alloc/free_rangesets() gain
further moving parts, although I guess is probably unlikely.
~Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-06-04 12:25 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-06-04 11:00 [PATCH] x86/hvm: Correct hvm_ioreq_server_alloc_rangesets() failure path Andrew Cooper
2014-06-04 11:30 ` Paul Durrant
2014-06-04 12:22 ` Jan Beulich
2014-06-04 12:25 ` Andrew Cooper
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.