All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>,
	Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>, <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	<boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>, <jbeulich@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/3] xen: eliminate scalability issues from initial mapping setup
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 14:02:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <540862FE.7070108@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54086244.7020601@citrix.com>

On 04/09/14 13:59, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 04/09/14 13:38, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> Direct Xen to place the initial P->M table outside of the initial
>> mapping, as otherwise the 1G (implementation) / 2G (theoretical)
>> restriction on the size of the initial mapping limits the amount
>> of memory a domain can be handed initially.
> The three level p2m limits memory to 512 GiB on x86-64 but this patch
> doesn't seem to address this limit and thus seems a bit useless to me.
>
> David

Any increase of the p2m beyond 3 levels will need to come with
substantial libxc changes first.  3 level p2ms are hard coded throughout
all the PV build and migrate code.

~Andrew

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>,
	Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com,
	konrad.wilk@oracle.com, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com,
	jbeulich@suse.com
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/3] xen: eliminate scalability issues from initial mapping setup
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 14:02:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <540862FE.7070108@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54086244.7020601@citrix.com>

On 04/09/14 13:59, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 04/09/14 13:38, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> Direct Xen to place the initial P->M table outside of the initial
>> mapping, as otherwise the 1G (implementation) / 2G (theoretical)
>> restriction on the size of the initial mapping limits the amount
>> of memory a domain can be handed initially.
> The three level p2m limits memory to 512 GiB on x86-64 but this patch
> doesn't seem to address this limit and thus seems a bit useless to me.
>
> David

Any increase of the p2m beyond 3 levels will need to come with
substantial libxc changes first.  3 level p2ms are hard coded throughout
all the PV build and migrate code.

~Andrew

  reply	other threads:[~2014-09-04 13:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-04 12:38 [PATCH 0/3] xen: remove memory limits from pv-domains Juergen Gross
2014-09-04 12:38 ` [PATCH 1/3] xen: sync some headers with xen tree Juergen Gross
2014-09-04 12:52   ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-04 12:52     ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-05  8:06     ` Juergen Gross
2014-09-04 12:38 ` [PATCH 2/3] xen: eliminate scalability issues from initrd handling Juergen Gross
2014-09-04 12:52   ` David Vrabel
2014-09-04 12:52     ` David Vrabel
2014-09-04 14:29     ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-04 14:29       ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-04 14:53       ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2014-09-04 14:53         ` David Vrabel
2014-09-05  8:04         ` Juergen Gross
2014-09-04 12:38 ` [PATCH 3/3] xen: eliminate scalability issues from initial mapping setup Juergen Gross
2014-09-04 12:59   ` David Vrabel
2014-09-04 12:59     ` David Vrabel
2014-09-04 13:02     ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2014-09-04 13:02       ` [Xen-devel] " Andrew Cooper
2014-09-04 14:31       ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-04 14:31         ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-04 14:43         ` Andrew Cooper
2014-09-04 14:43           ` Andrew Cooper
2014-09-05  7:55           ` Juergen Gross
2014-09-05  9:05             ` Andrew Cooper
2014-09-05  9:05               ` Andrew Cooper
2014-09-05  9:44               ` Juergen Gross
2014-09-04 15:13         ` David Vrabel
2014-09-04 15:13           ` David Vrabel
2014-09-05  8:03     ` Juergen Gross

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=540862FE.7070108@citrix.com \
    --to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.