From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Cc: <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>, <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
<konrad.wilk@oracle.com>, Juergen Gross <JGross@suse.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/3] xen: eliminate scalability issues from initial mapping setup
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 16:13:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54088183.7020608@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <540893F00200007800030E4F@mail.emea.novell.com>
On 04/09/14 15:31, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 04.09.14 at 15:02, <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
>> On 04/09/14 13:59, David Vrabel wrote:
>>> On 04/09/14 13:38, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>>> Direct Xen to place the initial P->M table outside of the initial
>>>> mapping, as otherwise the 1G (implementation) / 2G (theoretical)
>>>> restriction on the size of the initial mapping limits the amount
>>>> of memory a domain can be handed initially.
>>> The three level p2m limits memory to 512 GiB on x86-64 but this patch
>>> doesn't seem to address this limit and thus seems a bit useless to me.
>>
>> Any increase of the p2m beyond 3 levels will need to come with
>> substantial libxc changes first. 3 level p2ms are hard coded throughout
>> all the PV build and migrate code.
>
> No, there no such dependency - the kernel could use 4 levels at
> any time (sacrificing being able to get migrated), making sure it
> only exposes the 3 levels hanging off the fourth level (or not
> exposing this information at all) to external entities making this
> wrong assumption.
I don't think we want a kernel that may or may not be saved or migrated
based on how much memory it has.
Nor do we want a kernel that has even more differences between dom0 and
domU.
David
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com,
konrad.wilk@oracle.com, Juergen Gross <JGross@suse.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/3] xen: eliminate scalability issues from initial mapping setup
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 16:13:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54088183.7020608@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <540893F00200007800030E4F@mail.emea.novell.com>
On 04/09/14 15:31, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 04.09.14 at 15:02, <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
>> On 04/09/14 13:59, David Vrabel wrote:
>>> On 04/09/14 13:38, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>>> Direct Xen to place the initial P->M table outside of the initial
>>>> mapping, as otherwise the 1G (implementation) / 2G (theoretical)
>>>> restriction on the size of the initial mapping limits the amount
>>>> of memory a domain can be handed initially.
>>> The three level p2m limits memory to 512 GiB on x86-64 but this patch
>>> doesn't seem to address this limit and thus seems a bit useless to me.
>>
>> Any increase of the p2m beyond 3 levels will need to come with
>> substantial libxc changes first. 3 level p2ms are hard coded throughout
>> all the PV build and migrate code.
>
> No, there no such dependency - the kernel could use 4 levels at
> any time (sacrificing being able to get migrated), making sure it
> only exposes the 3 levels hanging off the fourth level (or not
> exposing this information at all) to external entities making this
> wrong assumption.
I don't think we want a kernel that may or may not be saved or migrated
based on how much memory it has.
Nor do we want a kernel that has even more differences between dom0 and
domU.
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-04 15:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-04 12:38 [PATCH 0/3] xen: remove memory limits from pv-domains Juergen Gross
2014-09-04 12:38 ` [PATCH 1/3] xen: sync some headers with xen tree Juergen Gross
2014-09-04 12:52 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-04 12:52 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-05 8:06 ` Juergen Gross
2014-09-04 12:38 ` [PATCH 2/3] xen: eliminate scalability issues from initrd handling Juergen Gross
2014-09-04 12:52 ` David Vrabel
2014-09-04 12:52 ` David Vrabel
2014-09-04 14:29 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-04 14:29 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-04 14:53 ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2014-09-04 14:53 ` David Vrabel
2014-09-05 8:04 ` Juergen Gross
2014-09-04 12:38 ` [PATCH 3/3] xen: eliminate scalability issues from initial mapping setup Juergen Gross
2014-09-04 12:59 ` David Vrabel
2014-09-04 12:59 ` David Vrabel
2014-09-04 13:02 ` [Xen-devel] " Andrew Cooper
2014-09-04 13:02 ` Andrew Cooper
2014-09-04 14:31 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-04 14:31 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-04 14:43 ` Andrew Cooper
2014-09-04 14:43 ` Andrew Cooper
2014-09-05 7:55 ` Juergen Gross
2014-09-05 9:05 ` Andrew Cooper
2014-09-05 9:05 ` Andrew Cooper
2014-09-05 9:44 ` Juergen Gross
2014-09-04 15:13 ` David Vrabel [this message]
2014-09-04 15:13 ` David Vrabel
2014-09-05 8:03 ` Juergen Gross
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54088183.7020608@citrix.com \
--to=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=JGross@suse.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.