* [meta-fsl-ppc][PATCH] linux-qoriq: Remove Altivec from T1040 64-bit defconfig @ 2014-10-31 21:05 Bob Cochran 2014-10-31 21:21 ` Bob Cochran 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Bob Cochran @ 2014-10-31 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: meta-freescale T1040 uses an E5500 processor, and E5500 doesn't have an Altivec unit Signed-off-by: Bob Cochran <yocto@mindchasers.com> --- arch/powerpc/configs/t1040_64bit_smp_defconfig | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/configs/t1040_64bit_smp_defconfig b/arch/powerpc/configs/t1040_64bit_smp_defconfig index 1b987d9..c2005f2 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/configs/t1040_64bit_smp_defconfig +++ b/arch/powerpc/configs/t1040_64bit_smp_defconfig @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ CONFIG_PPC64=y CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3E_64=y -CONFIG_ALTIVEC=y +# CONFIG_ALTIVEC is not set CONFIG_SMP=y CONFIG_NR_CPUS=24 CONFIG_SYSVIPC=y -- 1.7.9.5 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [meta-fsl-ppc][PATCH] linux-qoriq: Remove Altivec from T1040 64-bit defconfig 2014-10-31 21:05 [meta-fsl-ppc][PATCH] linux-qoriq: Remove Altivec from T1040 64-bit defconfig Bob Cochran @ 2014-10-31 21:21 ` Bob Cochran 2014-11-05 10:17 ` zhenhua.luo 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Bob Cochran @ 2014-10-31 21:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: meta-freescale Note that I didn't address patching the meta-fsl-ppc metadata (e.g., adding patch to SRC_URI) since there is a meta-data patch from Zongchun still pending regarding the support of scc files. Unless I am directed otherwise, I'll just keep sending up the kernel patches by themselves. Bob On 10/31/2014 05:05 PM, Bob Cochran wrote: > T1040 uses an E5500 processor, and E5500 doesn't have an Altivec unit > > Signed-off-by: Bob Cochran <yocto@mindchasers.com> > --- > arch/powerpc/configs/t1040_64bit_smp_defconfig | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/configs/t1040_64bit_smp_defconfig b/arch/powerpc/configs/t1040_64bit_smp_defconfig > index 1b987d9..c2005f2 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/configs/t1040_64bit_smp_defconfig > +++ b/arch/powerpc/configs/t1040_64bit_smp_defconfig > @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ > CONFIG_PPC64=y > CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3E_64=y > -CONFIG_ALTIVEC=y > +# CONFIG_ALTIVEC is not set > CONFIG_SMP=y > CONFIG_NR_CPUS=24 > CONFIG_SYSVIPC=y > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [meta-fsl-ppc][PATCH] linux-qoriq: Remove Altivec from T1040 64-bit defconfig 2014-10-31 21:21 ` Bob Cochran @ 2014-11-05 10:17 ` zhenhua.luo 2014-11-06 0:57 ` Bob Cochran 2014-11-10 23:44 ` Bob Cochran 0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: zhenhua.luo @ 2014-11-05 10:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bob Cochran, meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org Bob, Since the kernel fragment patch is still under discussion. Please submit patch to append the kernel patch in kernel bb file. Best Regards, Zhenhua > -----Original Message----- > From: meta-freescale-bounces@yoctoproject.org [mailto:meta-freescale- > bounces@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Bob Cochran > Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2014 5:21 AM > To: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org > Subject: Re: [meta-freescale] [meta-fsl-ppc][PATCH] linux-qoriq: Remove > Altivec from T1040 64-bit defconfig > > Note that I didn't address patching the meta-fsl-ppc metadata (e.g., adding > patch to SRC_URI) since there is a meta-data patch from Zongchun still pending > regarding the support of scc files. > > Unless I am directed otherwise, I'll just keep sending up the kernel patches by > themselves. > > Bob > > > On 10/31/2014 05:05 PM, Bob Cochran wrote: > > T1040 uses an E5500 processor, and E5500 doesn't have an Altivec unit > > > > Signed-off-by: Bob Cochran <yocto@mindchasers.com> > > --- > > arch/powerpc/configs/t1040_64bit_smp_defconfig | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/configs/t1040_64bit_smp_defconfig > > b/arch/powerpc/configs/t1040_64bit_smp_defconfig > > index 1b987d9..c2005f2 100644 > > --- a/arch/powerpc/configs/t1040_64bit_smp_defconfig > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/configs/t1040_64bit_smp_defconfig > > @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ > > CONFIG_PPC64=y > > CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3E_64=y > > -CONFIG_ALTIVEC=y > > +# CONFIG_ALTIVEC is not set > > CONFIG_SMP=y > > CONFIG_NR_CPUS=24 > > CONFIG_SYSVIPC=y > > > > -- > _______________________________________________ > meta-freescale mailing list > meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [meta-fsl-ppc][PATCH] linux-qoriq: Remove Altivec from T1040 64-bit defconfig 2014-11-05 10:17 ` zhenhua.luo @ 2014-11-06 0:57 ` Bob Cochran 2014-11-10 23:44 ` Bob Cochran 1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Bob Cochran @ 2014-11-06 0:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: zhenhua.luo@freescale.com, meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org On 11/05/2014 05:17 AM, zhenhua.luo@freescale.com wrote: > Bob, > > Since the kernel fragment patch is still under discussion. > > Please submit patch to append the kernel patch in kernel bb file. Thank you Zhenhua. I will. I also have at least two more patches coming in the FMAN integration area (still testing). I'll try to wrap them up (suitable for review) by the weekend. > > > Best Regards, > > Zhenhua > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: meta-freescale-bounces@yoctoproject.org [mailto:meta-freescale- >> bounces@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Bob Cochran >> Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2014 5:21 AM >> To: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org >> Subject: Re: [meta-freescale] [meta-fsl-ppc][PATCH] linux-qoriq: Remove >> Altivec from T1040 64-bit defconfig >> >> Note that I didn't address patching the meta-fsl-ppc metadata (e.g., adding >> patch to SRC_URI) since there is a meta-data patch from Zongchun still pending >> regarding the support of scc files. >> >> Unless I am directed otherwise, I'll just keep sending up the kernel patches by >> themselves. >> >> Bob >> >> >> On 10/31/2014 05:05 PM, Bob Cochran wrote: >>> T1040 uses an E5500 processor, and E5500 doesn't have an Altivec unit >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Bob Cochran <yocto@mindchasers.com> >>> --- >>> arch/powerpc/configs/t1040_64bit_smp_defconfig | 2 +- >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/configs/t1040_64bit_smp_defconfig >>> b/arch/powerpc/configs/t1040_64bit_smp_defconfig >>> index 1b987d9..c2005f2 100644 >>> --- a/arch/powerpc/configs/t1040_64bit_smp_defconfig >>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/configs/t1040_64bit_smp_defconfig >>> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ >>> CONFIG_PPC64=y >>> CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3E_64=y >>> -CONFIG_ALTIVEC=y >>> +# CONFIG_ALTIVEC is not set >>> CONFIG_SMP=y >>> CONFIG_NR_CPUS=24 >>> CONFIG_SYSVIPC=y >>> >> >> -- >> _______________________________________________ >> meta-freescale mailing list >> meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org >> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [meta-fsl-ppc][PATCH] linux-qoriq: Remove Altivec from T1040 64-bit defconfig 2014-11-05 10:17 ` zhenhua.luo 2014-11-06 0:57 ` Bob Cochran @ 2014-11-10 23:44 ` Bob Cochran 2014-11-11 11:02 ` Otavio Salvador 1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Bob Cochran @ 2014-11-10 23:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: zhenhua.luo@freescale.com, meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org, Otavio Salvador On 11/05/2014 05:17 AM, zhenhua.luo@freescale.com wrote: > Bob, > > Since the kernel fragment patch is still under discussion. > > Please submit patch to append the kernel patch in kernel bb file. > Zhenhua and Otavio, Please guide me on how I should submit multiple kernel patches for linux-qoriq that also require multiple SRC_URI line additions to the same linux-qoriq_3.12.bb file in the meta-fsl-ppc layer. I have a few different kernel patches that I want to submit related to the T1040 (e.g., remove Altivec flag). I'm ready to send a few now, and I expect to have one or two each week going forward. Each patch addresses one problem and is self contained in its own kernel .patch file. Should I send these as one email that contains multiple kernel patches plus a single patch to linux-qoriq_3.12.bb to include the SRC_URI additions? Or maybe I should send each kernel patch out separately in its own email (like I have already done), wait for comments, and then combine them into one email patch submission that then bundles the linux-qoriq_3.12.bb patch. Please let me know what you would like to see. Thanks Bob > > Best Regards, > > Zhenhua > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: meta-freescale-bounces@yoctoproject.org [mailto:meta-freescale- >> bounces@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Bob Cochran >> Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2014 5:21 AM >> To: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org >> Subject: Re: [meta-freescale] [meta-fsl-ppc][PATCH] linux-qoriq: Remove >> Altivec from T1040 64-bit defconfig >> >> Note that I didn't address patching the meta-fsl-ppc metadata (e.g., adding >> patch to SRC_URI) since there is a meta-data patch from Zongchun still pending >> regarding the support of scc files. >> >> Unless I am directed otherwise, I'll just keep sending up the kernel patches by >> themselves. >> >> Bob >> >> >> On 10/31/2014 05:05 PM, Bob Cochran wrote: >>> T1040 uses an E5500 processor, and E5500 doesn't have an Altivec unit >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Bob Cochran <yocto@mindchasers.com> >>> --- >>> arch/powerpc/configs/t1040_64bit_smp_defconfig | 2 +- >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/configs/t1040_64bit_smp_defconfig >>> b/arch/powerpc/configs/t1040_64bit_smp_defconfig >>> index 1b987d9..c2005f2 100644 >>> --- a/arch/powerpc/configs/t1040_64bit_smp_defconfig >>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/configs/t1040_64bit_smp_defconfig >>> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ >>> CONFIG_PPC64=y >>> CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3E_64=y >>> -CONFIG_ALTIVEC=y >>> +# CONFIG_ALTIVEC is not set >>> CONFIG_SMP=y >>> CONFIG_NR_CPUS=24 >>> CONFIG_SYSVIPC=y >>> >> >> -- >> _______________________________________________ >> meta-freescale mailing list >> meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org >> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [meta-fsl-ppc][PATCH] linux-qoriq: Remove Altivec from T1040 64-bit defconfig 2014-11-10 23:44 ` Bob Cochran @ 2014-11-11 11:02 ` Otavio Salvador 2014-11-11 18:53 ` Bob Cochran 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Otavio Salvador @ 2014-11-11 11:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bob Cochran; +Cc: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org Hello Bob, On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 9:44 PM, Bob Cochran <yocto@mindchasers.com> wrote: > Please guide me on how I should submit multiple kernel patches for > linux-qoriq that also require multiple SRC_URI line additions to the same > linux-qoriq_3.12.bb file in the meta-fsl-ppc layer. This is my opinion, so wait Zhenhua to comment on this as well... I think it is better to: * Have one commit for each patch which detailed explain the issue and includes the: . kernel patch file (with Upstream-Status: Pending) . modification for .bb to include it -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [meta-fsl-ppc][PATCH] linux-qoriq: Remove Altivec from T1040 64-bit defconfig 2014-11-11 11:02 ` Otavio Salvador @ 2014-11-11 18:53 ` Bob Cochran 2014-11-12 12:06 ` zhenhua.luo 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Bob Cochran @ 2014-11-11 18:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Otavio Salvador; +Cc: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org On 11/11/2014 06:02 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > Hello Bob, > > On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 9:44 PM, Bob Cochran <yocto@mindchasers.com> wrote: >> Please guide me on how I should submit multiple kernel patches for >> linux-qoriq that also require multiple SRC_URI line additions to the same >> linux-qoriq_3.12.bb file in the meta-fsl-ppc layer. > > This is my opinion, so wait Zhenhua to comment on this as well... > > I think it is better to: > > * Have one commit for each patch which detailed explain the issue and > includes the: > > . kernel patch file (with Upstream-Status: Pending) > . modification for .bb to include it > Thanks for the reply Otavio. So if I want to send multiple patches (each patch is a separate email that includes both the kernel patch & a patch for linux-qoriq_3.12.bb), then each patch of linux-qoriq_3.12.bb will depend on any of my previously submitted patches, right? In other words, the SRC_URI in the linux-qoriq_3.12.bb patch will show my prior kernel patch submissions regardless of whether they have been merged / approved. Example: (assume that "configure-T1040-for-FMAN-3VL.patch" was previously submitted but not yet approved / merged) - ... file://Fix-CVE-2014-5077-sctp-inherit-auth-capable-on-INIT-collisions.patch \ file://Fix-CVE-2014-5471_CVE-2014-5472.patch \ file://configure-T1040-for-FMAN-V3L.patch \ +file://remove-Altivec-from-T1040-64-bit-defconfig.patch \ " SRCREV = "c29fe1a733308cbe592b3af054a97be1b91cf2dd" ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [meta-fsl-ppc][PATCH] linux-qoriq: Remove Altivec from T1040 64-bit defconfig 2014-11-11 18:53 ` Bob Cochran @ 2014-11-12 12:06 ` zhenhua.luo 2014-11-12 17:07 ` Bob Cochran 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: zhenhua.luo @ 2014-11-12 12:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bob Cochran, Otavio Salvador; +Cc: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org Bob, I agree with Otavio's suggestion. Best Regards, Zhenhua > -----Original Message----- > From: Bob Cochran [mailto:yocto@mindchasers.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 2:53 AM > To: Otavio Salvador > Cc: Luo Zhenhua-B19537; meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org > Subject: Re: [meta-freescale] [meta-fsl-ppc][PATCH] linux-qoriq: Remove > Altivec from T1040 64-bit defconfig > > On 11/11/2014 06:02 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > > Hello Bob, > > > > On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 9:44 PM, Bob Cochran <yocto@mindchasers.com> > wrote: > >> Please guide me on how I should submit multiple kernel patches for > >> linux-qoriq that also require multiple SRC_URI line additions to the > >> same linux-qoriq_3.12.bb file in the meta-fsl-ppc layer. > > > > This is my opinion, so wait Zhenhua to comment on this as well... > > > > I think it is better to: > > > > * Have one commit for each patch which detailed explain the issue and > > includes the: > > > > . kernel patch file (with Upstream-Status: Pending) > > . modification for .bb to include it > > > > > Thanks for the reply Otavio. > > So if I want to send multiple patches (each patch is a separate email that > includes both the kernel patch & a patch for linux-qoriq_3.12.bb), then each > patch of linux-qoriq_3.12.bb will depend on any of my previously submitted > patches, right? > > In other words, the SRC_URI in the linux-qoriq_3.12.bb patch will show my > prior kernel patch submissions regardless of whether they have been merged / > approved. > > Example: (assume that "configure-T1040-for-FMAN-3VL.patch" was previously > submitted but not yet approved / merged) - > > > ... > > file://Fix-CVE-2014-5077-sctp-inherit-auth-capable-on-INIT-collisions.patch > \ > file://Fix-CVE-2014-5471_CVE-2014-5472.patch \ > file://configure-T1040-for-FMAN-V3L.patch \ > +file://remove-Altivec-from-T1040-64-bit-defconfig.patch \ > " > SRCREV = "c29fe1a733308cbe592b3af054a97be1b91cf2dd" > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [meta-fsl-ppc][PATCH] linux-qoriq: Remove Altivec from T1040 64-bit defconfig 2014-11-12 12:06 ` zhenhua.luo @ 2014-11-12 17:07 ` Bob Cochran 0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Bob Cochran @ 2014-11-12 17:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: zhenhua.luo@freescale.com, Otavio Salvador Cc: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org On 11/12/2014 07:06 AM, zhenhua.luo@freescale.com wrote: > Bob, > > I agree with Otavio's suggestion. Thank you Otavio and Zhenhua. Look for two patch resends today or tomorrow for what I already sent up but didn't include the linux-qoriq recipe patch. I'm sure you'll let me know if it's not what you're expecting. If they're acceptable, then I'll start submitting new patches. Bob > > > Best Regards, > > Zhenhua > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Bob Cochran [mailto:yocto@mindchasers.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 2:53 AM >> To: Otavio Salvador >> Cc: Luo Zhenhua-B19537; meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org >> Subject: Re: [meta-freescale] [meta-fsl-ppc][PATCH] linux-qoriq: Remove >> Altivec from T1040 64-bit defconfig >> >> On 11/11/2014 06:02 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote: >>> Hello Bob, >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 9:44 PM, Bob Cochran <yocto@mindchasers.com> >> wrote: >>>> Please guide me on how I should submit multiple kernel patches for >>>> linux-qoriq that also require multiple SRC_URI line additions to the >>>> same linux-qoriq_3.12.bb file in the meta-fsl-ppc layer. >>> >>> This is my opinion, so wait Zhenhua to comment on this as well... >>> >>> I think it is better to: >>> >>> * Have one commit for each patch which detailed explain the issue and >>> includes the: >>> >>> . kernel patch file (with Upstream-Status: Pending) >>> . modification for .bb to include it >>> >> >> >> Thanks for the reply Otavio. >> >> So if I want to send multiple patches (each patch is a separate email that >> includes both the kernel patch & a patch for linux-qoriq_3.12.bb), then each >> patch of linux-qoriq_3.12.bb will depend on any of my previously submitted >> patches, right? >> >> In other words, the SRC_URI in the linux-qoriq_3.12.bb patch will show my >> prior kernel patch submissions regardless of whether they have been merged / >> approved. >> >> Example: (assume that "configure-T1040-for-FMAN-3VL.patch" was previously >> submitted but not yet approved / merged) - >> >> >> ... >> >> file://Fix-CVE-2014-5077-sctp-inherit-auth-capable-on-INIT-collisions.patch >> \ >> file://Fix-CVE-2014-5471_CVE-2014-5472.patch \ >> file://configure-T1040-for-FMAN-V3L.patch \ >> +file://remove-Altivec-from-T1040-64-bit-defconfig.patch \ >> " >> SRCREV = "c29fe1a733308cbe592b3af054a97be1b91cf2dd" >> >> > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-11-12 17:07 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2014-10-31 21:05 [meta-fsl-ppc][PATCH] linux-qoriq: Remove Altivec from T1040 64-bit defconfig Bob Cochran 2014-10-31 21:21 ` Bob Cochran 2014-11-05 10:17 ` zhenhua.luo 2014-11-06 0:57 ` Bob Cochran 2014-11-10 23:44 ` Bob Cochran 2014-11-11 11:02 ` Otavio Salvador 2014-11-11 18:53 ` Bob Cochran 2014-11-12 12:06 ` zhenhua.luo 2014-11-12 17:07 ` Bob Cochran
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.