All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: kvm-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 2/6] KVM: Add generic support for dirty page logging
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 16:09:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <545A4BCE.40504@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1414017251-5772-3-git-send-email-m.smarduch@samsung.com>



On 01/11/2014 11:12, James Hogan wrote:
> AFAICT all of the arch implementations of kvm_vm_ioctl_get_dirty_log()
> except x86 and ppc hv (i.e. ia60, mips, ppc pv, s390) already make use
> of the existing generic function kvm_get_dirty_log() to help implement
> their kvm_vm_ioctl_get_dirty_log functions, which all look pretty
> similar now except for TLB flushing.
> 
> Would they not be a better base for a generic
> kvm_vm_ioctl_get_dirty_log()?
> 
> It feels a bit wrong to add a generic higher level function which
> doesn't make use of the existing generic lower level abstraction.
> 
> (Appologies if this has already been brought up in previous versions of
> the patchset, I haven't been tracking them).

I agree that we should make the interface look more like
kvm_get_dirty_log().  Here the steps are:

+ *   1. Take a snapshot of the bit and clear it if needed.
+ *   2. Write protect the corresponding page.
+ *   3. Flush TLB's if needed.
+ *   4. Copy the snapshot to the userspace.

and I believe we can swap 3 and 4, since (4) is just a copy of data and
it has no ordering relationship with the action of the guest.  Once we
do that, we can rewrite code to look a lot like kvm_get_dirty_log(),
let's call it kvm_get_dirty_log_protect():

	r = -EINVAL;
	if (log->slot >= KVM_USER_MEM_SLOTS)
		goto out;

	memslot = id_to_memslot(kvm->memslots, log->slot);

	dirty_bitmap = memslot->dirty_bitmap;
	r = -ENOENT;
	if (!dirty_bitmap)
		goto out;

	n = kvm_dirty_bitmap_bytes(memslot);

	dirty_bitmap_buffer = dirty_bitmap + n / sizeof(long);
	memset(dirty_bitmap_buffer, 0, n);

	spin_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);

	*is_dirty = false;
	for (i = 0; i < n / sizeof(long); i++) {
		unsigned long mask;
		gfn_t offset;

		if (!dirty_bitmap[i])
			continue;

		*is_dirty = true;

		mask = xchg(&dirty_bitmap[i], 0);
		dirty_bitmap_buffer[i] = mask;

		offset = i * BITS_PER_LONG;
		kvm_arch_write_protect_pt_masked(kvm, memslot, offset,
						 mask);
	}

	spin_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);

	r = -EFAULT;
	if (copy_to_user(log->dirty_bitmap, dirty_bitmap_buffer, n))
		goto out;

	r = 0;
out:
	return r;

where the TLB flushing is moved to the caller as in kvm_get_dirty_log
callers.  Taking the slots lock would also be kept in the per-arch
kvm_vm_ioctl_get_dirty_log, again similar to PPC/MIPS/S390.

You can add a new Kconfig symbol, or define an implementation of
kvm_arch_write_protect_pt_masked that BUG()s for ia64/PPC/MIPS/S390.

BTW, you can leave the function in kvm_main.c.

Paolo

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>,
	Mario Smarduch <m.smarduch@samsung.com>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, christoffer.dall@linaro.org,
	agraf@suse.de, catalin.marinas@arm.com, cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com,
	borntraeger@de.ibm.com, marc.zyngier@arm.com,
	xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, kvm-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, steve.capper@arm.com,
	peter.maydell@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 2/6] KVM: Add generic support for dirty page logging
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 16:09:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <545A4BCE.40504@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141101101208.GE12801@jhogan-linux.le.imgtec.org>



On 01/11/2014 11:12, James Hogan wrote:
> AFAICT all of the arch implementations of kvm_vm_ioctl_get_dirty_log()
> except x86 and ppc hv (i.e. ia60, mips, ppc pv, s390) already make use
> of the existing generic function kvm_get_dirty_log() to help implement
> their kvm_vm_ioctl_get_dirty_log functions, which all look pretty
> similar now except for TLB flushing.
> 
> Would they not be a better base for a generic
> kvm_vm_ioctl_get_dirty_log()?
> 
> It feels a bit wrong to add a generic higher level function which
> doesn't make use of the existing generic lower level abstraction.
> 
> (Appologies if this has already been brought up in previous versions of
> the patchset, I haven't been tracking them).

I agree that we should make the interface look more like
kvm_get_dirty_log().  Here the steps are:

+ *   1. Take a snapshot of the bit and clear it if needed.
+ *   2. Write protect the corresponding page.
+ *   3. Flush TLB's if needed.
+ *   4. Copy the snapshot to the userspace.

and I believe we can swap 3 and 4, since (4) is just a copy of data and
it has no ordering relationship with the action of the guest.  Once we
do that, we can rewrite code to look a lot like kvm_get_dirty_log(),
let's call it kvm_get_dirty_log_protect():

	r = -EINVAL;
	if (log->slot >= KVM_USER_MEM_SLOTS)
		goto out;

	memslot = id_to_memslot(kvm->memslots, log->slot);

	dirty_bitmap = memslot->dirty_bitmap;
	r = -ENOENT;
	if (!dirty_bitmap)
		goto out;

	n = kvm_dirty_bitmap_bytes(memslot);

	dirty_bitmap_buffer = dirty_bitmap + n / sizeof(long);
	memset(dirty_bitmap_buffer, 0, n);

	spin_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);

	*is_dirty = false;
	for (i = 0; i < n / sizeof(long); i++) {
		unsigned long mask;
		gfn_t offset;

		if (!dirty_bitmap[i])
			continue;

		*is_dirty = true;

		mask = xchg(&dirty_bitmap[i], 0);
		dirty_bitmap_buffer[i] = mask;

		offset = i * BITS_PER_LONG;
		kvm_arch_write_protect_pt_masked(kvm, memslot, offset,
						 mask);
	}

	spin_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);

	r = -EFAULT;
	if (copy_to_user(log->dirty_bitmap, dirty_bitmap_buffer, n))
		goto out;

	r = 0;
out:
	return r;

where the TLB flushing is moved to the caller as in kvm_get_dirty_log
callers.  Taking the slots lock would also be kept in the per-arch
kvm_vm_ioctl_get_dirty_log, again similar to PPC/MIPS/S390.

You can add a new Kconfig symbol, or define an implementation of
kvm_arch_write_protect_pt_masked that BUG()s for ia64/PPC/MIPS/S390.

BTW, you can leave the function in kvm_main.c.

Paolo

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: pbonzini@redhat.com (Paolo Bonzini)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v12 2/6] KVM: Add generic support for dirty page logging
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 17:09:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <545A4BCE.40504@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141101101208.GE12801@jhogan-linux.le.imgtec.org>



On 01/11/2014 11:12, James Hogan wrote:
> AFAICT all of the arch implementations of kvm_vm_ioctl_get_dirty_log()
> except x86 and ppc hv (i.e. ia60, mips, ppc pv, s390) already make use
> of the existing generic function kvm_get_dirty_log() to help implement
> their kvm_vm_ioctl_get_dirty_log functions, which all look pretty
> similar now except for TLB flushing.
> 
> Would they not be a better base for a generic
> kvm_vm_ioctl_get_dirty_log()?
> 
> It feels a bit wrong to add a generic higher level function which
> doesn't make use of the existing generic lower level abstraction.
> 
> (Appologies if this has already been brought up in previous versions of
> the patchset, I haven't been tracking them).

I agree that we should make the interface look more like
kvm_get_dirty_log().  Here the steps are:

+ *   1. Take a snapshot of the bit and clear it if needed.
+ *   2. Write protect the corresponding page.
+ *   3. Flush TLB's if needed.
+ *   4. Copy the snapshot to the userspace.

and I believe we can swap 3 and 4, since (4) is just a copy of data and
it has no ordering relationship with the action of the guest.  Once we
do that, we can rewrite code to look a lot like kvm_get_dirty_log(),
let's call it kvm_get_dirty_log_protect():

	r = -EINVAL;
	if (log->slot >= KVM_USER_MEM_SLOTS)
		goto out;

	memslot = id_to_memslot(kvm->memslots, log->slot);

	dirty_bitmap = memslot->dirty_bitmap;
	r = -ENOENT;
	if (!dirty_bitmap)
		goto out;

	n = kvm_dirty_bitmap_bytes(memslot);

	dirty_bitmap_buffer = dirty_bitmap + n / sizeof(long);
	memset(dirty_bitmap_buffer, 0, n);

	spin_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);

	*is_dirty = false;
	for (i = 0; i < n / sizeof(long); i++) {
		unsigned long mask;
		gfn_t offset;

		if (!dirty_bitmap[i])
			continue;

		*is_dirty = true;

		mask = xchg(&dirty_bitmap[i], 0);
		dirty_bitmap_buffer[i] = mask;

		offset = i * BITS_PER_LONG;
		kvm_arch_write_protect_pt_masked(kvm, memslot, offset,
						 mask);
	}

	spin_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);

	r = -EFAULT;
	if (copy_to_user(log->dirty_bitmap, dirty_bitmap_buffer, n))
		goto out;

	r = 0;
out:
	return r;

where the TLB flushing is moved to the caller as in kvm_get_dirty_log
callers.  Taking the slots lock would also be kept in the per-arch
kvm_vm_ioctl_get_dirty_log, again similar to PPC/MIPS/S390.

You can add a new Kconfig symbol, or define an implementation of
kvm_arch_write_protect_pt_masked that BUG()s for ia64/PPC/MIPS/S390.

BTW, you can leave the function in kvm_main.c.

Paolo

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>,
	Mario Smarduch <m.smarduch@samsung.com>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, christoffer.dall@linaro.org,
	agraf@suse.de, catalin.marinas@arm.com, cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com,
	borntraeger@de.ibm.com, marc.zyngier@arm.com,
	xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, kvm-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, steve.capper@arm.com,
	peter.maydell@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 2/6] KVM: Add generic support for dirty page logging
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 17:09:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <545A4BCE.40504@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141101101208.GE12801@jhogan-linux.le.imgtec.org>



On 01/11/2014 11:12, James Hogan wrote:
> AFAICT all of the arch implementations of kvm_vm_ioctl_get_dirty_log()
> except x86 and ppc hv (i.e. ia60, mips, ppc pv, s390) already make use
> of the existing generic function kvm_get_dirty_log() to help implement
> their kvm_vm_ioctl_get_dirty_log functions, which all look pretty
> similar now except for TLB flushing.
> 
> Would they not be a better base for a generic
> kvm_vm_ioctl_get_dirty_log()?
> 
> It feels a bit wrong to add a generic higher level function which
> doesn't make use of the existing generic lower level abstraction.
> 
> (Appologies if this has already been brought up in previous versions of
> the patchset, I haven't been tracking them).

I agree that we should make the interface look more like
kvm_get_dirty_log().  Here the steps are:

+ *   1. Take a snapshot of the bit and clear it if needed.
+ *   2. Write protect the corresponding page.
+ *   3. Flush TLB's if needed.
+ *   4. Copy the snapshot to the userspace.

and I believe we can swap 3 and 4, since (4) is just a copy of data and
it has no ordering relationship with the action of the guest.  Once we
do that, we can rewrite code to look a lot like kvm_get_dirty_log(),
let's call it kvm_get_dirty_log_protect():

	r = -EINVAL;
	if (log->slot >= KVM_USER_MEM_SLOTS)
		goto out;

	memslot = id_to_memslot(kvm->memslots, log->slot);

	dirty_bitmap = memslot->dirty_bitmap;
	r = -ENOENT;
	if (!dirty_bitmap)
		goto out;

	n = kvm_dirty_bitmap_bytes(memslot);

	dirty_bitmap_buffer = dirty_bitmap + n / sizeof(long);
	memset(dirty_bitmap_buffer, 0, n);

	spin_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);

	*is_dirty = false;
	for (i = 0; i < n / sizeof(long); i++) {
		unsigned long mask;
		gfn_t offset;

		if (!dirty_bitmap[i])
			continue;

		*is_dirty = true;

		mask = xchg(&dirty_bitmap[i], 0);
		dirty_bitmap_buffer[i] = mask;

		offset = i * BITS_PER_LONG;
		kvm_arch_write_protect_pt_masked(kvm, memslot, offset,
						 mask);
	}

	spin_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);

	r = -EFAULT;
	if (copy_to_user(log->dirty_bitmap, dirty_bitmap_buffer, n))
		goto out;

	r = 0;
out:
	return r;

where the TLB flushing is moved to the caller as in kvm_get_dirty_log
callers.  Taking the slots lock would also be kept in the per-arch
kvm_vm_ioctl_get_dirty_log, again similar to PPC/MIPS/S390.

You can add a new Kconfig symbol, or define an implementation of
kvm_arch_write_protect_pt_masked that BUG()s for ia64/PPC/MIPS/S390.

BTW, you can leave the function in kvm_main.c.

Paolo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-11-05 16:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 96+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-22 22:34 [PATCH v12 2/6] KVM: Add generic support for dirty page logging Mario Smarduch
2014-10-22 22:34 ` Mario Smarduch
2014-10-22 22:34 ` Mario Smarduch
2014-10-22 22:34 ` Mario Smarduch
2014-10-30 12:14 ` Cornelia Huck
2014-10-30 12:14   ` Cornelia Huck
2014-10-30 12:14   ` Cornelia Huck
2014-10-30 12:14   ` Cornelia Huck
2014-10-30 19:19 ` Mario Smarduch
2014-10-30 19:19   ` Mario Smarduch
2014-10-30 19:19   ` Mario Smarduch
2014-10-30 19:19   ` Mario Smarduch
2014-11-01 10:12 ` James Hogan
2014-11-01 10:12   ` James Hogan
2014-11-01 10:12   ` James Hogan
2014-11-01 10:12   ` James Hogan
2014-11-03  3:01 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2014-11-03  3:01   ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2014-11-03  3:01   ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2014-11-03  3:01   ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2014-11-03 18:44 ` Mario Smarduch
2014-11-03 18:44   ` Mario Smarduch
2014-11-03 18:44   ` Mario Smarduch
2014-11-03 18:44   ` Mario Smarduch
2014-11-03 19:34 ` Mario Smarduch
2014-11-03 19:34   ` Mario Smarduch
2014-11-03 19:34   ` Mario Smarduch
2014-11-03 19:34   ` Mario Smarduch
2014-11-05 16:09 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2014-11-05 16:09   ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-11-05 16:09   ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-11-05 16:09   ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-11-05 23:05 ` Mario Smarduch
2014-11-05 23:05   ` Mario Smarduch
2014-11-05 23:05   ` Mario Smarduch
2014-11-05 23:05   ` Mario Smarduch
2014-11-06 10:14 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-11-06 10:14   ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-11-06 10:14   ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-11-06 10:14   ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-11-06 18:07 ` Mario Smarduch
2014-11-06 18:07   ` Mario Smarduch
2014-11-06 18:07   ` Mario Smarduch
2014-11-06 18:07   ` Mario Smarduch
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-10-28 16:29 [PATCH v12 0/6] 2nd-request for review comments: arm/KVM: dirty page logging support for ARMv7 ( Mario Smarduch
2014-10-28 16:29 ` [PATCH v12 0/6] 2nd-request for review comments: arm/KVM: dirty page logging support for ARMv7 (3.17.0-rc1) Mario Smarduch
2014-10-28 16:29 ` Mario Smarduch
2014-10-28 16:29 ` [PATCH v12 0/6] 2nd-request for review comments: arm/KVM: dirty page logging support for ARMv7 ( Mario Smarduch
2014-10-22 22:34 [PATCH v12 4/6] arm: KVM: Add initial dirty page locking infrastructure Mario Smarduch
2014-10-22 22:34 ` Mario Smarduch
2014-10-22 22:34 ` Mario Smarduch
2014-10-22 22:34 ` Mario Smarduch
2014-10-22 22:34 [PATCH v12 3/6] arm: KVM: Add ARMv7 API to flush TLBs Mario Smarduch
2014-10-22 22:34 ` Mario Smarduch
2014-10-22 22:34 ` Mario Smarduch
2014-10-22 22:34 ` Mario Smarduch
2014-10-22 22:34 [PATCH v12 1/6] KVM: Add architecture-defined TLB flush support Mario Smarduch
2014-10-22 22:34 ` Mario Smarduch
2014-10-22 22:34 ` Mario Smarduch
2014-10-22 22:34 ` Mario Smarduch
2014-10-30 12:06 ` Cornelia Huck
2014-10-30 12:06   ` Cornelia Huck
2014-10-30 12:06   ` Cornelia Huck
2014-10-30 12:06   ` Cornelia Huck
2014-11-05 16:10 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-11-05 16:10   ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-11-05 16:10   ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-11-05 16:10   ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-10-22 22:34 [PATCH v12 0/6] arm/KVM: dirty page logging support for ARMv7 (3.17.0-rc1) Mario Smarduch
2014-10-22 22:34 ` Mario Smarduch
2014-10-22 22:34 ` Mario Smarduch
2014-10-22 22:34 ` Mario Smarduch
2014-10-27 23:26 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-10-27 23:26   ` Wanpeng Li
2014-10-27 23:26   ` Wanpeng Li
2014-10-27 23:26   ` Wanpeng Li
2014-10-28  0:28 ` Mario Smarduch
2014-10-28  0:28   ` Mario Smarduch
2014-10-28  0:28   ` Mario Smarduch
2014-10-28  0:28   ` Mario Smarduch
2014-10-28  1:24 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-10-28  1:24   ` Wanpeng Li
2014-10-28  1:24   ` Wanpeng Li
2014-10-28  1:24   ` Wanpeng Li
2014-10-28 16:15 ` Mario Smarduch
2014-10-28 16:15   ` Mario Smarduch
2014-10-28 16:15   ` Mario Smarduch
2014-10-28 16:15   ` Mario Smarduch
2014-10-30 12:11 ` Christian Borntraeger
2014-10-30 12:11   ` Christian Borntraeger
2014-10-30 12:11   ` Christian Borntraeger
2014-10-30 12:11   ` Christian Borntraeger
2014-10-30 19:27 ` Mario Smarduch
2014-10-30 19:27   ` Mario Smarduch
2014-10-30 19:27   ` Mario Smarduch
2014-10-30 19:27   ` Mario Smarduch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=545A4BCE.40504@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.