All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
To: Mason <mpeg.blue@free.fr>, Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
	cpufreq <cpufreq@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Delays, clocks, timers, hrtimers, etc
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 11:01:10 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54D903F6.3050608@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54D576B1.4000001@free.fr>

On 02/06/15 18:21, Mason wrote:
>
>
> config HAVE_ARM_TWD
>   bool
>   depends on SMP
>   select CLKSRC_OF if OF
>   help
>     This options enables support for the ARM timer and watchdog unit
>
> One problem I see is that HAVE_ARM_TWD depends on SMP...
>
> One of the systems I want to support is UP (single-core Cortex A9).
> Does that mean I should use an SMP kernel even for that system?
> Or is there a different subsystem for UP systems?

I don't see any problem with the TWD dropping the dependency on SMP. The
code should work the same on a UP configuration and if that's the only
timer you have that can deliver interrupts to your processor then it
would be required. You'd still need a clocksource though, which the TWD
doesn't provide.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Delays, clocks, timers, hrtimers, etc
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 11:01:10 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54D903F6.3050608@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54D576B1.4000001@free.fr>

On 02/06/15 18:21, Mason wrote:
>
>
> config HAVE_ARM_TWD
>   bool
>   depends on SMP
>   select CLKSRC_OF if OF
>   help
>     This options enables support for the ARM timer and watchdog unit
>
> One problem I see is that HAVE_ARM_TWD depends on SMP...
>
> One of the systems I want to support is UP (single-core Cortex A9).
> Does that mean I should use an SMP kernel even for that system?
> Or is there a different subsystem for UP systems?

I don't see any problem with the TWD dropping the dependency on SMP. The
code should work the same on a UP configuration and if that's the only
timer you have that can deliver interrupts to your processor then it
would be required. You'd still need a clocksource though, which the TWD
doesn't provide.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-02-09 19:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-28 13:16 Delays, clocks, timers, hrtimers, etc Mason
2015-01-28 13:16 ` Mason
2015-01-29 13:57 ` Mason
2015-01-29 13:57   ` Mason
2015-02-03 12:09 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-03 12:09   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-06 18:37   ` Mason
2015-02-06 18:37     ` Mason
2015-02-06 19:14     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-06 19:14       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-06 21:03       ` Mason
2015-02-06 21:03         ` Mason
2015-02-07 10:42         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-07 10:42           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-09  7:45       ` Michal Simek
2015-02-09  7:45         ` Michal Simek
2015-02-09 16:10         ` Sören Brinkmann
2015-02-09 16:10           ` Sören Brinkmann
2015-02-09 23:27   ` Mason
2015-02-09 23:27     ` Mason
2015-02-06 20:25 ` Stefan Agner
2015-02-06 20:25   ` Stefan Agner
2015-02-06 21:17   ` Mason
2015-02-06 21:17     ` Mason
2015-02-06 21:31     ` Stefan Agner
2015-02-06 21:31       ` Stefan Agner
2015-02-07  2:21       ` Mason
2015-02-07  2:21         ` Mason
2015-02-07  9:51         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-07  9:51           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-09 19:01         ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2015-02-09 19:01           ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-09 22:31           ` Mason
2015-02-09 22:31             ` Mason
2015-02-09 23:17             ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-09 23:17               ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-09 23:50               ` Mason
2015-02-09 23:50                 ` Mason
2015-02-11 17:43                 ` Mason
2015-02-11 17:43                   ` Mason
2015-02-11 18:45                   ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-11 18:45                     ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-11 21:58                     ` Mason
2015-02-11 21:58                       ` Mason
2015-02-11 23:26                       ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-11 23:26                         ` Stephen Boyd

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54D903F6.3050608@codeaurora.org \
    --to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mpeg.blue@free.fr \
    --cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
    --cc=stefan@agner.ch \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.