From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
To: Mason <mpeg.blue@free.fr>
Cc: Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
cpufreq <cpufreq@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
Subject: Re: Delays, clocks, timers, hrtimers, etc
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 15:17:14 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54D93FFA.3090506@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54D93556.9050008@free.fr>
On 02/09/15 14:31, Mason wrote:
>
> My platform provides a 32-bit counter, ticking at a constant 27 MHz.
> Reading this counter has a latency of roughly 70 ns (it has to go
> over the system memory bus). I think this is good enough for both
> the clock source and sched_clock, is it not?
>
> So the plan would be:
> - clocksource and sched_clock : 27 MHz, 32-bit counter, platform
> - clockevents : TWD, standard
Yep, that sounds like a good plan. If your platform has the ARM global
timer (drivers/clocksource/arm_global_timer.c) then you don't need
anything besides that timer because it provides both the clocksource,
sched_clock, and clockevents. Sounds like you don't have that timer
though, so you have to write a driver for your custom platform timer and
at least hook up clocksource and sched_clock to it. If you have
interrupts with your platform timer you can skip out on TWD and also
register a clockevent in your platform timer driver.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Delays, clocks, timers, hrtimers, etc
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 15:17:14 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54D93FFA.3090506@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54D93556.9050008@free.fr>
On 02/09/15 14:31, Mason wrote:
>
> My platform provides a 32-bit counter, ticking at a constant 27 MHz.
> Reading this counter has a latency of roughly 70 ns (it has to go
> over the system memory bus). I think this is good enough for both
> the clock source and sched_clock, is it not?
>
> So the plan would be:
> - clocksource and sched_clock : 27 MHz, 32-bit counter, platform
> - clockevents : TWD, standard
Yep, that sounds like a good plan. If your platform has the ARM global
timer (drivers/clocksource/arm_global_timer.c) then you don't need
anything besides that timer because it provides both the clocksource,
sched_clock, and clockevents. Sounds like you don't have that timer
though, so you have to write a driver for your custom platform timer and
at least hook up clocksource and sched_clock to it. If you have
interrupts with your platform timer you can skip out on TWD and also
register a clockevent in your platform timer driver.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-09 23:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-28 13:16 Delays, clocks, timers, hrtimers, etc Mason
2015-01-28 13:16 ` Mason
2015-01-29 13:57 ` Mason
2015-01-29 13:57 ` Mason
2015-02-03 12:09 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-03 12:09 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-06 18:37 ` Mason
2015-02-06 18:37 ` Mason
2015-02-06 19:14 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-06 19:14 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-06 21:03 ` Mason
2015-02-06 21:03 ` Mason
2015-02-07 10:42 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-07 10:42 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-09 7:45 ` Michal Simek
2015-02-09 7:45 ` Michal Simek
2015-02-09 16:10 ` Sören Brinkmann
2015-02-09 16:10 ` Sören Brinkmann
2015-02-09 23:27 ` Mason
2015-02-09 23:27 ` Mason
2015-02-06 20:25 ` Stefan Agner
2015-02-06 20:25 ` Stefan Agner
2015-02-06 21:17 ` Mason
2015-02-06 21:17 ` Mason
2015-02-06 21:31 ` Stefan Agner
2015-02-06 21:31 ` Stefan Agner
2015-02-07 2:21 ` Mason
2015-02-07 2:21 ` Mason
2015-02-07 9:51 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-07 9:51 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-09 19:01 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-09 19:01 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-09 22:31 ` Mason
2015-02-09 22:31 ` Mason
2015-02-09 23:17 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2015-02-09 23:17 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-09 23:50 ` Mason
2015-02-09 23:50 ` Mason
2015-02-11 17:43 ` Mason
2015-02-11 17:43 ` Mason
2015-02-11 18:45 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-11 18:45 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-11 21:58 ` Mason
2015-02-11 21:58 ` Mason
2015-02-11 23:26 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-11 23:26 ` Stephen Boyd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54D93FFA.3090506@codeaurora.org \
--to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mpeg.blue@free.fr \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
--cc=stefan@agner.ch \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.