From: "Bryan O'Donoghue" <pure.logic@nexus-software.ie>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
kbuild-all@01.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Andy Shevchenko <andy.schevchenko@gmail.com>,
"Ong, Boon Leong" <boon.leong.ong@intel.com>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/intel/quark: fix simple_return.cocci warnings
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 10:31:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54E5BB87.3020206@nexus-software.ie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150219102509.GA2819@gmail.com>
On 19/02/15 10:25, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>> - ret = iosf_mbi_read(QRK_MBI_UNIT_MM, QRK_MBI_MM_READ,
>>> + return iosf_mbi_read(QRK_MBI_UNIT_MM, QRK_MBI_MM_READ,
>>> reg++, &imr->wmask);
>>> - if (ret)
>>> - return ret;
>>> -
>>> - return 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>> /**
>>>
>>
>> This flow was a change asked for and supplied in review
>> feedback for Andy Shevchenko so NAK to this patch.
>
> But this pattern:
>
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> return 0;
>
> makes very little sense. Why is it done?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ingo
Feedback at review was that it's more consistent with the code that
comes before.
So I changed it from
return iosf_mbi_read
to
ret = iosf_mbi_read
if (ret)
return ret;
return 0;
as a result. I'm OK with the change suggested by the script if Andy (who
requested the change) is.
--
Bryan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-19 10:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <201502191606.pTcFEBOs%fengguang.wu@intel.com>
2015-02-19 8:14 ` [PATCH] x86/intel/quark: fix simple_return.cocci warnings kbuild test robot
2015-02-19 10:11 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2015-02-19 10:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-02-19 10:31 ` Bryan O'Donoghue [this message]
2015-02-19 10:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-02-19 11:01 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2015-02-19 11:31 ` [tip:x86/platform] x86/intel/quark: Fix " tip-bot for Fengguang Wu
2015-02-19 8:14 ` [PATCH] x86/intel/quark: fix ptr_ret.cocci warnings kbuild test robot
2015-02-19 10:12 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2015-02-19 11:31 ` [tip:x86/platform] x86/intel/quark: Fix " tip-bot for Fengguang Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54E5BB87.3020206@nexus-software.ie \
--to=pure.logic@nexus-software.ie \
--cc=andy.schevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=boon.leong.ong@intel.com \
--cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kbuild-all@01.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.