From: "Steven J. Hill" <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com>
To: David Daney <ddaney.cavm@gmail.com>
Cc: <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 1/3] MIPS: Rearrange PTE bits into fixed positions.
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 13:04:48 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54F0BFD0.2050901@imgtec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54F0AECF.5070501@gmail.com>
On 02/27/2015 11:52 AM, David Daney wrote:
>
> I think there is still misunderstanding.
>
> Your patches leave us with definitions for *both* _PAGE_READ *and*
> _PAGE_NO_READ defined in the source code. My suggestion was to
> eliminate all vestiges of _PAGE_READ and _PAGE_READ_SHIFT, and unify
> all variants to use _PAGE_NO_READ
>
Okay, I see what you are after. I think it is worth doing, but I would
really like to get XPA into 4.0 along with this patch as it is. I will
commit to doing a follow up patch for the above. Is that acceptable?
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Steven J. Hill" <Steven.Hill@imgtec.com>
To: David Daney <ddaney.cavm@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 1/3] MIPS: Rearrange PTE bits into fixed positions.
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 13:04:48 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54F0BFD0.2050901@imgtec.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20150227190448.nbUBLt7ggDFek0PJR0-ODA9Bml6XbqEYuEIIslkVDgE@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54F0AECF.5070501@gmail.com>
On 02/27/2015 11:52 AM, David Daney wrote:
>
> I think there is still misunderstanding.
>
> Your patches leave us with definitions for *both* _PAGE_READ *and*
> _PAGE_NO_READ defined in the source code. My suggestion was to
> eliminate all vestiges of _PAGE_READ and _PAGE_READ_SHIFT, and unify
> all variants to use _PAGE_NO_READ
>
Okay, I see what you are after. I think it is worth doing, but I would
really like to get XPA into 4.0 along with this patch as it is. I will
commit to doing a follow up patch for the above. Is that acceptable?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-27 19:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-27 0:16 [PATCH V7 0/3] Add support for eXtended Physical Addressing Steven J. Hill
2015-02-27 0:16 ` [PATCH V7 1/3] MIPS: Rearrange PTE bits into fixed positions Steven J. Hill
2015-02-27 0:51 ` David Daney
2015-02-27 3:38 ` Steven J. Hill
2015-02-27 3:38 ` Steven J. Hill
2015-02-27 17:52 ` David Daney
2015-02-27 19:04 ` Steven J. Hill [this message]
2015-02-27 19:04 ` Steven J. Hill
2015-02-27 19:20 ` David Daney
2015-07-09 4:23 ` Huacai Chen
2015-02-27 0:16 ` [PATCH V7 2/3] MIPS: Add support for XPA Steven J. Hill
2015-02-27 0:16 ` [PATCH V7 3/3] MIPS: XPA: Add new configuration file Steven J. Hill
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54F0BFD0.2050901@imgtec.com \
--to=steven.hill@imgtec.com \
--cc=ddaney.cavm@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.