Re: [PATCH 2/4] x86/mce/amd: Introduce deferred error interrupt handler

[Aravind Gopalakrishnan <aravind.gopalakrishnan@amd.com>]

On 4/30/15 3:41 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 7:49 AM, Aravind Gopalakrishnan
> <Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com> wrote:
>> Changes introduced in the patch-
>>    - Assign vector number 0xf4 for Deferred errors
>>    - Declare deferred_interrupt, allocate gate and bind it
>>      to DEFERRED_APIC_VECTOR.
>>    - Declare smp_deferred_interrupt to be used as the
>>      entry point for the interrupt in mce_amd.c
>>    - Define trace_deferred_interrupt for tracing
>>    - Enable deferred error interrupt selectively upon detection
>>      of 'succor' bitfield
>>    - Setup amd_deferred_error_interrupt() to handle the interrupt
>>      and assign it to def_int_vector if feature is present in HW.
>>      Else, let default handler deal with it.
>>    - Provide Deferred error interrupt stats on
>>      /proc/interrupts by incrementing irq_deferred_count
> You're calling these "deferred interrupts" all over (e.g.
> irq_deferred_count, deferred_int_handler, etc).  That seems like it'll
> be confusing.  They're deferred errors, not deferred interrupts.
>

I used  the term as it is an interrupt due to the deferred error.
Would 'deferred_err_interrupt' be more apt? Maybe 
'irq_deferred_error_count' for the counter?

Thanks,
-Aravind.