All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleksij Rempel <linux@rempel-privat.de>
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
Subject: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH] ath9k: add phy.c
Date: Sat, 16 May 2015 07:27:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5556D546.6010703@rempel-privat.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1431714904.15709.24.camel@perches.com>

Am 15.05.2015 um 20:35 schrieb Joe Perches:
> On Fri, 2015-05-15 at 14:35 +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
>> ... and move dup code from ar5008_phy.c and ar9002_phy.c to phy.c
> []
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/phy.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/phy.c
> 
>> +void phy_hw_spur_mitigate(struct ath_hw *ah,
>> +			  struct ath9k_channel *chan, int bin)
>> +{
>> +	int cur_bin;
>> +	int upper, lower, cur_vit_mask;
>> +	int i;
>> +	int8_t mask_m[123];
>> +	int8_t mask_p[123];
> 
> Looking at this code, I'm not sure if mask_m and mask_p
> are always completely initialized by the loop below.
> 
> Perhaps use {} on declaration.
> 
>> +	int8_t mask_amt;
> 
> These int8_t could be s8
> 
>> +	int tmp_mask;
>> +	static int pilot_mask_reg[4] = {
>> +		AR_PHY_TIMING7, AR_PHY_TIMING8,
>> +		AR_PHY_PILOT_MASK_01_30, AR_PHY_PILOT_MASK_31_60
>> +	};
>> +	static int chan_mask_reg[4] = {
>> +		AR_PHY_TIMING9, AR_PHY_TIMING10,
>> +		AR_PHY_CHANNEL_MASK_01_30, AR_PHY_CHANNEL_MASK_31_60
>> +	};
>> +	static int inc[4] = { 0, 100, 0, 0 };
> 
> static const
> 
>> +	cur_vit_mask = 6100;
>> +	upper = bin + 120;
>> +	lower = bin - 120;
>> +
> 
> Is this loop guaranteed to always initialize all the
> mask_p and mask_m indexes used in the or statements below it?
> 
> The 123 for -61 and 0 and +61 array indexes is a bit obscure.
> 
>> +	for (i = 0; i < 123; i++) {
>> +		if ((cur_vit_mask > lower) && (cur_vit_mask < upper)) {
>> +			/* workaround for gcc bug #37014 */
>> +			volatile int tmp_v = abs(cur_vit_mask - bin);
>> +
>> +			if (tmp_v < 75)
>> +				mask_amt = 1;
>> +			else
>> +				mask_amt = 0;
>> +			if (cur_vit_mask < 0)
>> +				mask_m[abs(cur_vit_mask / 100)] = mask_amt;
>> +			else
>> +				mask_p[cur_vit_mask / 100] = mask_amt;
>> +		}
>> +		cur_vit_mask -= 100;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	tmp_mask = (mask_m[46] << 30) | (mask_m[47] << 28)
>> +		| (mask_m[48] << 26) | (mask_m[49] << 24)
>> +		| (mask_m[50] << 22) | (mask_m[51] << 20)
>> +		| (mask_m[52] << 18) | (mask_m[53] << 16)
>> +		| (mask_m[54] << 14) | (mask_m[55] << 12)
>> +		| (mask_m[56] << 10) | (mask_m[57] << 8)
>> +		| (mask_m[58] << 6) | (mask_m[59] << 4)
>> +		| (mask_m[60] << 2) | (mask_m[61] << 0);
>> +	REG_WRITE(ah, AR_PHY_BIN_MASK_1, tmp_mask);
>> +	REG_WRITE(ah, AR_PHY_VIT_MASK2_M_46_61, tmp_mask);
>> +
>> +	tmp_mask = (mask_m[31] << 28)
>> +		| (mask_m[32] << 26) | (mask_m[33] << 24)
>> +		| (mask_m[34] << 22) | (mask_m[35] << 20)
>> +		| (mask_m[36] << 18) | (mask_m[37] << 16)
>> +		| (mask_m[48] << 14) | (mask_m[39] << 12)
>> +		| (mask_m[40] << 10) | (mask_m[41] << 8)
>> +		| (mask_m[42] << 6) | (mask_m[43] << 4)
>> +		| (mask_m[44] << 2) | (mask_m[45] << 0);
>> +	REG_WRITE(ah, AR_PHY_BIN_MASK_2, tmp_mask);
>> +	REG_WRITE(ah, AR_PHY_MASK2_M_31_45, tmp_mask);
>> +
>> +	tmp_mask = (mask_m[16] << 30) | (mask_m[16] << 28)
>> +		| (mask_m[18] << 26) | (mask_m[18] << 24)
>> +		| (mask_m[20] << 22) | (mask_m[20] << 20)
>> +		| (mask_m[22] << 18) | (mask_m[22] << 16)
>> +		| (mask_m[24] << 14) | (mask_m[24] << 12)
>> +		| (mask_m[25] << 10) | (mask_m[26] << 8)
>> +		| (mask_m[27] << 6) | (mask_m[28] << 4)
>> +		| (mask_m[29] << 2) | (mask_m[30] << 0);
>> +	REG_WRITE(ah, AR_PHY_BIN_MASK_3, tmp_mask);
>> +	REG_WRITE(ah, AR_PHY_MASK2_M_16_30, tmp_mask);
>> +
>> +	tmp_mask = (mask_m[0] << 30) | (mask_m[1] << 28)
>> +		| (mask_m[2] << 26) | (mask_m[3] << 24)
>> +		| (mask_m[4] << 22) | (mask_m[5] << 20)
>> +		| (mask_m[6] << 18) | (mask_m[7] << 16)
>> +		| (mask_m[8] << 14) | (mask_m[9] << 12)
>> +		| (mask_m[10] << 10) | (mask_m[11] << 8)
>> +		| (mask_m[12] << 6) | (mask_m[13] << 4)
>> +		| (mask_m[14] << 2) | (mask_m[15] << 0);
>> +	REG_WRITE(ah, AR_PHY_MASK_CTL, tmp_mask);
>> +	REG_WRITE(ah, AR_PHY_MASK2_M_00_15, tmp_mask);
>> +
>> +	tmp_mask = (mask_p[15] << 28)
>> +		| (mask_p[14] << 26) | (mask_p[13] << 24)
>> +		| (mask_p[12] << 22) | (mask_p[11] << 20)
>> +		| (mask_p[10] << 18) | (mask_p[9] << 16)
>> +		| (mask_p[8] << 14) | (mask_p[7] << 12)
>> +		| (mask_p[6] << 10) | (mask_p[5] << 8)
>> +		| (mask_p[4] << 6) | (mask_p[3] << 4)
>> +		| (mask_p[2] << 2) | (mask_p[1] << 0);
>> +	REG_WRITE(ah, AR_PHY_BIN_MASK2_1, tmp_mask);
>> +	REG_WRITE(ah, AR_PHY_MASK2_P_15_01, tmp_mask);
>> +
>> +	tmp_mask = (mask_p[30] << 28)
>> +		| (mask_p[29] << 26) | (mask_p[28] << 24)
>> +		| (mask_p[27] << 22) | (mask_p[26] << 20)
>> +		| (mask_p[25] << 18) | (mask_p[24] << 16)
>> +		| (mask_p[23] << 14) | (mask_p[22] << 12)
>> +		| (mask_p[21] << 10) | (mask_p[20] << 8)
>> +		| (mask_p[19] << 6) | (mask_p[18] << 4)
>> +		| (mask_p[17] << 2) | (mask_p[16] << 0);
>> +	REG_WRITE(ah, AR_PHY_BIN_MASK2_2, tmp_mask);
>> +	REG_WRITE(ah, AR_PHY_MASK2_P_30_16, tmp_mask);
>> +
>> +	tmp_mask = (mask_p[45] << 28)
>> +		| (mask_p[44] << 26) | (mask_p[43] << 24)
>> +		| (mask_p[42] << 22) | (mask_p[41] << 20)
>> +		| (mask_p[40] << 18) | (mask_p[39] << 16)
>> +		| (mask_p[38] << 14) | (mask_p[37] << 12)
>> +		| (mask_p[36] << 10) | (mask_p[35] << 8)
>> +		| (mask_p[34] << 6) | (mask_p[33] << 4)
>> +		| (mask_p[32] << 2) | (mask_p[31] << 0);
>> +	REG_WRITE(ah, AR_PHY_BIN_MASK2_3, tmp_mask);
>> +	REG_WRITE(ah, AR_PHY_MASK2_P_45_31, tmp_mask);
>> +
>> +	tmp_mask = (mask_p[61] << 30) | (mask_p[60] << 28)
>> +		| (mask_p[59] << 26) | (mask_p[58] << 24)
>> +		| (mask_p[57] << 22) | (mask_p[56] << 20)
>> +		| (mask_p[55] << 18) | (mask_p[54] << 16)
>> +		| (mask_p[53] << 14) | (mask_p[52] << 12)
>> +		| (mask_p[51] << 10) | (mask_p[50] << 8)
>> +		| (mask_p[49] << 6) | (mask_p[48] << 4)
>> +		| (mask_p[47] << 2) | (mask_p[46] << 0);
>> +	REG_WRITE(ah, AR_PHY_BIN_MASK2_4, tmp_mask);
>> +	REG_WRITE(ah, AR_PHY_MASK2_P_61_45, tmp_mask);
> 
> 

Hi Joe,
Thank you for reviewing. This is cleanup patch, no fixes optimisations
or regressions should be introduced. If you see some problems in this
code, you are welcome to provide a patch on top of this one :)

-- 
Regards,
Oleksij

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 230 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.ath9k.org/pipermail/ath9k-devel/attachments/20150516/dc3f3864/attachment.pgp 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Oleksij Rempel <linux@rempel-privat.de>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: ath9k-devel@qca.qualcomm.com, kvalo@codeaurora.org,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath9k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath9k: add phy.c
Date: Sat, 16 May 2015 07:27:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5556D546.6010703@rempel-privat.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1431714904.15709.24.camel@perches.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6053 bytes --]

Am 15.05.2015 um 20:35 schrieb Joe Perches:
> On Fri, 2015-05-15 at 14:35 +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
>> ... and move dup code from ar5008_phy.c and ar9002_phy.c to phy.c
> []
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/phy.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/phy.c
> 
>> +void phy_hw_spur_mitigate(struct ath_hw *ah,
>> +			  struct ath9k_channel *chan, int bin)
>> +{
>> +	int cur_bin;
>> +	int upper, lower, cur_vit_mask;
>> +	int i;
>> +	int8_t mask_m[123];
>> +	int8_t mask_p[123];
> 
> Looking at this code, I'm not sure if mask_m and mask_p
> are always completely initialized by the loop below.
> 
> Perhaps use {} on declaration.
> 
>> +	int8_t mask_amt;
> 
> These int8_t could be s8
> 
>> +	int tmp_mask;
>> +	static int pilot_mask_reg[4] = {
>> +		AR_PHY_TIMING7, AR_PHY_TIMING8,
>> +		AR_PHY_PILOT_MASK_01_30, AR_PHY_PILOT_MASK_31_60
>> +	};
>> +	static int chan_mask_reg[4] = {
>> +		AR_PHY_TIMING9, AR_PHY_TIMING10,
>> +		AR_PHY_CHANNEL_MASK_01_30, AR_PHY_CHANNEL_MASK_31_60
>> +	};
>> +	static int inc[4] = { 0, 100, 0, 0 };
> 
> static const
> 
>> +	cur_vit_mask = 6100;
>> +	upper = bin + 120;
>> +	lower = bin - 120;
>> +
> 
> Is this loop guaranteed to always initialize all the
> mask_p and mask_m indexes used in the or statements below it?
> 
> The 123 for -61 and 0 and +61 array indexes is a bit obscure.
> 
>> +	for (i = 0; i < 123; i++) {
>> +		if ((cur_vit_mask > lower) && (cur_vit_mask < upper)) {
>> +			/* workaround for gcc bug #37014 */
>> +			volatile int tmp_v = abs(cur_vit_mask - bin);
>> +
>> +			if (tmp_v < 75)
>> +				mask_amt = 1;
>> +			else
>> +				mask_amt = 0;
>> +			if (cur_vit_mask < 0)
>> +				mask_m[abs(cur_vit_mask / 100)] = mask_amt;
>> +			else
>> +				mask_p[cur_vit_mask / 100] = mask_amt;
>> +		}
>> +		cur_vit_mask -= 100;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	tmp_mask = (mask_m[46] << 30) | (mask_m[47] << 28)
>> +		| (mask_m[48] << 26) | (mask_m[49] << 24)
>> +		| (mask_m[50] << 22) | (mask_m[51] << 20)
>> +		| (mask_m[52] << 18) | (mask_m[53] << 16)
>> +		| (mask_m[54] << 14) | (mask_m[55] << 12)
>> +		| (mask_m[56] << 10) | (mask_m[57] << 8)
>> +		| (mask_m[58] << 6) | (mask_m[59] << 4)
>> +		| (mask_m[60] << 2) | (mask_m[61] << 0);
>> +	REG_WRITE(ah, AR_PHY_BIN_MASK_1, tmp_mask);
>> +	REG_WRITE(ah, AR_PHY_VIT_MASK2_M_46_61, tmp_mask);
>> +
>> +	tmp_mask = (mask_m[31] << 28)
>> +		| (mask_m[32] << 26) | (mask_m[33] << 24)
>> +		| (mask_m[34] << 22) | (mask_m[35] << 20)
>> +		| (mask_m[36] << 18) | (mask_m[37] << 16)
>> +		| (mask_m[48] << 14) | (mask_m[39] << 12)
>> +		| (mask_m[40] << 10) | (mask_m[41] << 8)
>> +		| (mask_m[42] << 6) | (mask_m[43] << 4)
>> +		| (mask_m[44] << 2) | (mask_m[45] << 0);
>> +	REG_WRITE(ah, AR_PHY_BIN_MASK_2, tmp_mask);
>> +	REG_WRITE(ah, AR_PHY_MASK2_M_31_45, tmp_mask);
>> +
>> +	tmp_mask = (mask_m[16] << 30) | (mask_m[16] << 28)
>> +		| (mask_m[18] << 26) | (mask_m[18] << 24)
>> +		| (mask_m[20] << 22) | (mask_m[20] << 20)
>> +		| (mask_m[22] << 18) | (mask_m[22] << 16)
>> +		| (mask_m[24] << 14) | (mask_m[24] << 12)
>> +		| (mask_m[25] << 10) | (mask_m[26] << 8)
>> +		| (mask_m[27] << 6) | (mask_m[28] << 4)
>> +		| (mask_m[29] << 2) | (mask_m[30] << 0);
>> +	REG_WRITE(ah, AR_PHY_BIN_MASK_3, tmp_mask);
>> +	REG_WRITE(ah, AR_PHY_MASK2_M_16_30, tmp_mask);
>> +
>> +	tmp_mask = (mask_m[0] << 30) | (mask_m[1] << 28)
>> +		| (mask_m[2] << 26) | (mask_m[3] << 24)
>> +		| (mask_m[4] << 22) | (mask_m[5] << 20)
>> +		| (mask_m[6] << 18) | (mask_m[7] << 16)
>> +		| (mask_m[8] << 14) | (mask_m[9] << 12)
>> +		| (mask_m[10] << 10) | (mask_m[11] << 8)
>> +		| (mask_m[12] << 6) | (mask_m[13] << 4)
>> +		| (mask_m[14] << 2) | (mask_m[15] << 0);
>> +	REG_WRITE(ah, AR_PHY_MASK_CTL, tmp_mask);
>> +	REG_WRITE(ah, AR_PHY_MASK2_M_00_15, tmp_mask);
>> +
>> +	tmp_mask = (mask_p[15] << 28)
>> +		| (mask_p[14] << 26) | (mask_p[13] << 24)
>> +		| (mask_p[12] << 22) | (mask_p[11] << 20)
>> +		| (mask_p[10] << 18) | (mask_p[9] << 16)
>> +		| (mask_p[8] << 14) | (mask_p[7] << 12)
>> +		| (mask_p[6] << 10) | (mask_p[5] << 8)
>> +		| (mask_p[4] << 6) | (mask_p[3] << 4)
>> +		| (mask_p[2] << 2) | (mask_p[1] << 0);
>> +	REG_WRITE(ah, AR_PHY_BIN_MASK2_1, tmp_mask);
>> +	REG_WRITE(ah, AR_PHY_MASK2_P_15_01, tmp_mask);
>> +
>> +	tmp_mask = (mask_p[30] << 28)
>> +		| (mask_p[29] << 26) | (mask_p[28] << 24)
>> +		| (mask_p[27] << 22) | (mask_p[26] << 20)
>> +		| (mask_p[25] << 18) | (mask_p[24] << 16)
>> +		| (mask_p[23] << 14) | (mask_p[22] << 12)
>> +		| (mask_p[21] << 10) | (mask_p[20] << 8)
>> +		| (mask_p[19] << 6) | (mask_p[18] << 4)
>> +		| (mask_p[17] << 2) | (mask_p[16] << 0);
>> +	REG_WRITE(ah, AR_PHY_BIN_MASK2_2, tmp_mask);
>> +	REG_WRITE(ah, AR_PHY_MASK2_P_30_16, tmp_mask);
>> +
>> +	tmp_mask = (mask_p[45] << 28)
>> +		| (mask_p[44] << 26) | (mask_p[43] << 24)
>> +		| (mask_p[42] << 22) | (mask_p[41] << 20)
>> +		| (mask_p[40] << 18) | (mask_p[39] << 16)
>> +		| (mask_p[38] << 14) | (mask_p[37] << 12)
>> +		| (mask_p[36] << 10) | (mask_p[35] << 8)
>> +		| (mask_p[34] << 6) | (mask_p[33] << 4)
>> +		| (mask_p[32] << 2) | (mask_p[31] << 0);
>> +	REG_WRITE(ah, AR_PHY_BIN_MASK2_3, tmp_mask);
>> +	REG_WRITE(ah, AR_PHY_MASK2_P_45_31, tmp_mask);
>> +
>> +	tmp_mask = (mask_p[61] << 30) | (mask_p[60] << 28)
>> +		| (mask_p[59] << 26) | (mask_p[58] << 24)
>> +		| (mask_p[57] << 22) | (mask_p[56] << 20)
>> +		| (mask_p[55] << 18) | (mask_p[54] << 16)
>> +		| (mask_p[53] << 14) | (mask_p[52] << 12)
>> +		| (mask_p[51] << 10) | (mask_p[50] << 8)
>> +		| (mask_p[49] << 6) | (mask_p[48] << 4)
>> +		| (mask_p[47] << 2) | (mask_p[46] << 0);
>> +	REG_WRITE(ah, AR_PHY_BIN_MASK2_4, tmp_mask);
>> +	REG_WRITE(ah, AR_PHY_MASK2_P_61_45, tmp_mask);
> 
> 

Hi Joe,
Thank you for reviewing. This is cleanup patch, no fixes optimisations
or regressions should be introduced. If you see some problems in this
code, you are welcome to provide a patch on top of this one :)

-- 
Regards,
Oleksij


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 230 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-16  5:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-15 12:35 [ath9k-devel] [PATCH] ath9k: add phy.c Oleksij Rempel
2015-05-15 12:35 ` Oleksij Rempel
2015-05-15 14:38 ` [ath9k-devel] " Julian Calaby
2015-05-15 14:38   ` Julian Calaby
2015-05-15 14:44   ` [ath9k-devel] " Sedat Dilek
2015-05-15 14:44     ` Sedat Dilek
2015-05-15 18:35 ` [ath9k-devel] " Joe Perches
2015-05-15 18:35   ` Joe Perches
2015-05-16  5:27   ` Oleksij Rempel [this message]
2015-05-16  5:27     ` Oleksij Rempel
2015-05-16  5:36     ` [ath9k-devel] " Joe Perches
2015-05-16  5:36       ` Joe Perches
2015-05-16  5:43       ` [ath9k-devel] " Oleksij Rempel
2015-05-16  5:43         ` Oleksij Rempel
2015-05-15 19:34 ` [ath9k-devel] " Felix Fietkau
2015-05-15 19:34   ` Felix Fietkau
2015-05-16  5:24   ` [ath9k-devel] " Oleksij Rempel
2015-05-16  5:24     ` Oleksij Rempel
2015-05-16  5:45     ` [ath9k-devel] " Felix Fietkau
2015-05-16  5:45       ` Felix Fietkau
2015-05-17 19:49       ` [PATCH] ath9k: split ar5008_hw_spur_mitigate and reuse common code in ar9002_hw_spur_mitigate Oleksij Rempel
2015-05-26 11:03         ` ath9k: split ar5008_hw_spur_mitigate and reuse common code inar9002_hw_spur_mitigate Kalle Valo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5556D546.6010703@rempel-privat.de \
    --to=linux@rempel-privat.de \
    --cc=ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.