All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com>
To: Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>
Cc: "'Bjorn Helgaas'" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"'Pratyush Anand'" <pratyush.anand@gmail.com>,
	"'Arnd Bergmann'" <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"'Liviu Dudau'" <liviu.dudau@arm.com>,
	<linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"'Gabriele Paoloni'" <gabriele.paoloni@huawei.com>,
	"'Zhichang Yuan'" <yuanzhichang@hisilicon.com>,
	<zhudacai@hisilicon.com>, "'Zhang Jukuo'" <zhangjukuo@huawei.com>,
	<qiuzhenfa@hisilicon.com>, "'Liguozhu'" <liguozhu@hisilicon.com>,
	"'Kishon Vijay Abraham I'" <kishon@ti.com>,
	"'Richard Zhu'" <Richard.Zhu@freescale.com>,
	"'Lucas Stach'" <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/3] PCI: designware: Add ARM64 support
Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 17:52:09 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5562F0C9.4090007@hisilicon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000001d096a9$27bf43f0$773dcbd0$@com>

On 2015/5/25 13:10, Jingoo Han wrote:
> On Wed, 20 May 2015 14:21:39 +0800, Zhou Wang wrote:
>>
>> This patch tries to unify ARM32 and ARM64 PCIe in designware driver. Delete
>> function dw_pcie_setup, dw_pcie_scan_bus, dw_pcie_map_irq and struct hw_pci,
>> move related operations to dw_pcie_host_init.
>>
>> I am not very clear about I/O resource management:
>>> 	if (global_io_offset < SZ_1M && pp->io_size > 0) {
>>> 		pci_ioremap_io(global_io_offset, pp->io_base);
>>> 		global_io_offset += SZ_64K;
>>> 		pci_add_resource_offset(&res, &pp->io,
>>> 					global_io_offset - pp->io_bus_addr);
>>> 	}
>> so just move steps in dw_pcie_setup to dw_pcie_host_init.
>>
>> I have compiled the driver with multi_v7_defconfig. However, I don't have
>> ARM32 PCIe related board to do test. It will be appreciated if someone could
>> help to test it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c | 128 +++++++++++++++----------------------
>>  1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 78 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
>> index 2e9f84f..7bad9e5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
>> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
>>  #include <linux/pci_regs.h>
>>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>>  #include <linux/types.h>
>> +#include <asm/hardirq.h>
> 
> +cc Kishon Vijay Abraham I, Richard Zhu, Lucas Stach
> 

Thanks to involve more related guys to this discussion :)

> Please use <linux/hardirq.h> and insert it alphabetically.
> 
> +#include <linux/hardirq.h>
>  #include <linux/irq.h>
>  #include <linux/irqdomain.h>
>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
> 

OK, will do in next version patch.

>>  
>>  #include "pcie-designware.h"
>>  
>> @@ -67,17 +68,10 @@
>>  #define PCIE_ATU_FUNC(x)		(((x) & 0x7) << 16)
>>  #define PCIE_ATU_UPPER_TARGET		0x91C
>>  
>> -static struct hw_pci dw_pci;
>> +static struct pci_ops dw_pcie_ops;
>>  
>>  static unsigned long global_io_offset;
>>  
>> -static inline struct pcie_port *sys_to_pcie(struct pci_sys_data *sys)
>> -{
>> -	BUG_ON(!sys->private_data);
>> -
>> -	return sys->private_data;
>> -}
>> -
>>  int dw_pcie_cfg_read(void __iomem *addr, int where, int size, u32 *val)
>>  {
>>  	*val = readl(addr);
>> @@ -238,7 +232,7 @@ static void dw_pcie_msi_set_irq(struct pcie_port *pp, int irq)
>>  static int assign_irq(int no_irqs, struct msi_desc *desc, int *pos)
>>  {
>>  	int irq, pos0, i;
>> -	struct pcie_port *pp = sys_to_pcie(desc->dev->bus->sysdata);
>> +	struct pcie_port *pp = desc->dev->bus->sysdata;
>>  
>>  	pos0 = bitmap_find_free_region(pp->msi_irq_in_use, MAX_MSI_IRQS,
>>  				       order_base_2(no_irqs));
>> @@ -281,7 +275,7 @@ static int dw_msi_setup_irq(struct msi_controller *chip, struct pci_dev *pdev,
>>  {
>>  	int irq, pos;
>>  	struct msi_msg msg;
>> -	struct pcie_port *pp = sys_to_pcie(pdev->bus->sysdata);
>> +	struct pcie_port *pp = pdev->bus->sysdata;
>>  
>>  	if (desc->msi_attrib.is_msix)
>>  		return -EINVAL;
>> @@ -310,7 +304,7 @@ static void dw_msi_teardown_irq(struct msi_controller *chip, unsigned int irq)
>>  {
>>  	struct irq_data *data = irq_get_irq_data(irq);
>>  	struct msi_desc *msi = irq_data_get_msi(data);
>> -	struct pcie_port *pp = sys_to_pcie(msi->dev->bus->sysdata);
>> +	struct pcie_port *pp = msi->dev->bus->sysdata;
>>  
>>  	clear_irq_range(pp, irq, 1, data->hwirq);
>>  }
>> @@ -342,13 +336,15 @@ static const struct irq_domain_ops msi_domain_ops = {
>>  	.map = dw_pcie_msi_map,
>>  };
>>  
>> -int dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
>> +int __init dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
>>  {
>>  	struct device_node *np = pp->dev->of_node;
>>  	struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(pp->dev);
>>  	struct of_pci_range range;
>>  	struct of_pci_range_parser parser;
>> +	struct pci_bus *bus;
>>  	struct resource *cfg_res;
>> +	LIST_HEAD(res);
>>  	u32 val, na, ns;
>>  	const __be32 *addrp;
>>  	int i, index, ret;
>> @@ -502,15 +498,49 @@ int dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
>>  	val |= PORT_LOGIC_SPEED_CHANGE;
>>  	dw_pcie_wr_own_conf(pp, PCIE_LINK_WIDTH_SPEED_CONTROL, 4, val);
>>  
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI
>> -	dw_pcie_msi_chip.dev = pp->dev;
>> -	dw_pci.msi_ctrl = &dw_pcie_msi_chip;
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM
>> +	/*
>> +	 * FIXME: we should really be able to use
>> +	 * of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources on arm32 as well,
>> +	 * but the conversion needs some more testing
>> +	 */
>> +	if (global_io_offset < SZ_1M && pp->io_size > 0) {
>> +		pci_ioremap_io(global_io_offset, pp->io_base);
>> +		global_io_offset += SZ_64K;
>> +		pci_add_resource_offset(&res, &pp->io,
>> +					global_io_offset - pp->io_bus_addr);
>> +	}
>> +	pci_add_resource_offset(&res, &pp->mem,
>> +				pp->mem.start - pp->mem_bus_addr);
>> +	pci_add_resource(&res, &pp->busn);
>> +#else
>> +	ret = of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(np, 0, 0xff, &res, &pp->io_base);
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		return ret;
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +	bus = pci_create_root_bus(pp->dev, pp->root_bus_nr, &dw_pcie_ops,
>> +			      pp, &res);
>> +	if (!bus)
>> +		return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN
>> +	bus->msi = container_of(&pp->irq_domain, struct msi_controller, domain);
>> +#else
>> +	bus->msi = &dw_pcie_msi_chip;
>>  #endif
>>  
>> -	dw_pci.nr_controllers = 1;
>> -	dw_pci.private_data = (void **)&pp;
>> +	pci_scan_child_bus(bus);
>> +	if (pp->ops->scan_bus)
>> +		pp->ops->scan_bus(pp);
>>  
>> -	pci_common_init_dev(pp->dev, &dw_pci);
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM
>> +	/* support old dtbs that incorrectly describe IRQs */
>> +	pci_fixup_irqs(pci_common_swizzle, of_irq_parse_and_map_pci);
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +	pci_assign_unassigned_bus_resources(bus);
>> +	pci_bus_add_devices(bus);
>>  
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
>> @@ -653,7 +683,7 @@ static int dw_pcie_valid_config(struct pcie_port *pp,
>>  static int dw_pcie_rd_conf(struct pci_bus *bus, u32 devfn, int where,
>>  			int size, u32 *val)
>>  {
>> -	struct pcie_port *pp = sys_to_pcie(bus->sysdata);
>> +	struct pcie_port *pp = bus->sysdata;
>>  	int ret;
>>  
>>  	if (dw_pcie_valid_config(pp, bus, PCI_SLOT(devfn)) == 0) {
>> @@ -677,7 +707,7 @@ static int dw_pcie_rd_conf(struct pci_bus *bus, u32 devfn, int where,
>>  static int dw_pcie_wr_conf(struct pci_bus *bus, u32 devfn,
>>  			int where, int size, u32 val)
>>  {
>> -	struct pcie_port *pp = sys_to_pcie(bus->sysdata);
>> +	struct pcie_port *pp = bus->sysdata;
>>  	int ret;
>>  
>>  	if (dw_pcie_valid_config(pp, bus, PCI_SLOT(devfn)) == 0)
>> @@ -701,64 +731,6 @@ static struct pci_ops dw_pcie_ops = {
>>  	.write = dw_pcie_wr_conf,
>>  };
>>  
>> -static int dw_pcie_setup(int nr, struct pci_sys_data *sys)
>> -{
>> -	struct pcie_port *pp;
>> -
>> -	pp = sys_to_pcie(sys);
>> -
>> -	if (global_io_offset < SZ_1M && pp->io_size > 0) {
>> -		sys->io_offset = global_io_offset - pp->io_bus_addr;
>> -		pci_ioremap_io(global_io_offset, pp->io_base);
>> -		global_io_offset += SZ_64K;
>> -		pci_add_resource_offset(&sys->resources, &pp->io,
>> -					sys->io_offset);
>> -	}
>> -
>> -	sys->mem_offset = pp->mem.start - pp->mem_bus_addr;
>> -	pci_add_resource_offset(&sys->resources, &pp->mem, sys->mem_offset);
>> -	pci_add_resource(&sys->resources, &pp->busn);
>> -
>> -	return 1;
>> -}
>> -
>> -static struct pci_bus *dw_pcie_scan_bus(int nr, struct pci_sys_data *sys)
>> -{
>> -	struct pci_bus *bus;
>> -	struct pcie_port *pp = sys_to_pcie(sys);
>> -
>> -	pp->root_bus_nr = sys->busnr;
> 
> 'pp->root_bus_nr' is initialized as '-1' at some soc-specific drivers
> However, 'sys->busnr' is set as '0, 1, 2 ...' by pcibios_init_hw()
> in arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c. '0, 1, 2 ...' means the number of
> each host controller.
> 
> So, without setting 'pp->root_bus_nr' as '0, 1, 2, ...',
> it makes the problem.
> 

'sys->busnr' is set as "0, busn_res.end + 1 ..." in pcibios_init_hw() I think:

pcibios_init_hw()
	for (nr = busnr = 0; nr < hw->nr_controllers; nr++)
		sys->busnr = busnr;
		...
		busnr = sys->bus->busn_res.end + 1;

and it indicates root bus number of one pcie controller.
so in dw_pcie_scan_bus:
	pp->root_bus_nr = sys->busnr;
	bus = pci_create_root_bus(..., sys->busnr, ...);
we set root bus number as "0, busn_res.end + 1". But in pcie-designware,
nr_controllers is set as 1, so it only comes into the loop in
pcibios_init_hw() one time.

so how about we set 0 as default value of pp->root_bus_nr, then use
pci_create_root_bus(pp->dev, pp->root_bus_nr, &dw_pcie_ops, pp, &res);
to create root bus?

> Thus, we need to come up with the way to resolve this.
> 
> 1. Setting 'pp->root_bus_nr' as '0, 1, 2 ..' by each soc-specific driver.
> 
> e.g)
> 
> ./drivers/pci/host/pci-exynos.c
> @@ -534,7 +534,7 @@ static int __init exynos_add_pcie_port(struct pcie_port *pp,
>                 }
>         }
>  
> -       pp->root_bus_nr = -1;
> +       pp->root_bus_nr++;
>         pp->ops = &exynos_pcie_host_ops;
> 
> ./drivers/pci/host/pci-imx6.c
> @@ -541,7 +541,7 @@ static int __init imx6_add_pcie_port(struct pcie_port *pp,
>                 }
>         }
>  
> -       pp->root_bus_nr = -1;
> +       pp->root_bus_nr++;
>         pp->ops = &imx6_pcie_host_ops;
>  
> ./drivers/pci/host/pci-keystone.c
> @@ -312,7 +312,7 @@ static int __init ks_add_pcie_port(struct keystone_pcie *ks_pcie,
>                         return ret;
>         }
>  
> -       pp->root_bus_nr = -1;
> +       pp->root_bus_nr++;
>         pp->ops = &keystone_pcie_host_ops;
> 
> ./drivers/pci/host/pci-layerscape.c
> @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ static int ls_add_pcie_port(struct ls_pcie *pcie)
>         pp = &pcie->pp;
>         pp->dev = pcie->dev;
>         pp->dbi_base = pcie->dbi;
> -       pp->root_bus_nr = -1;
> +       pp->root_bus_nr++;
>         pp->ops = &ls_pcie_host_ops;
>  
> ./drivers/pci/host/pcie-spear13xx.c
> @@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ static int spear13xx_add_pcie_port(struct pcie_port *pp,
>                 return ret;
>         }
>  
> -       pp->root_bus_nr = -1;
> +       pp->root_bus_nr++;
>         pp->ops = &spear13xx_pcie_host_ops;
> 
> 
> 2. Setting 'pp->root_bus_nr' as '0, 1, 2 ..' by pcie-designware.c
> 
> I believe that someone will give better idea. :-)
> 
>> -	bus = pci_create_root_bus(pp->dev, sys->busnr,
>> -				  &dw_pcie_ops, sys, &sys->resources);
>> -	if (!bus)
>> -		return NULL;
>> -
>> -	pci_scan_child_bus(bus);
>> -
>> -	if (bus && pp->ops->scan_bus)
>> -		pp->ops->scan_bus(pp);
>> -
>> -	return bus;
>> -}
>> -
>> -static int dw_pcie_map_irq(const struct pci_dev *dev, u8 slot, u8 pin)
>> -{
>> -	struct pcie_port *pp = sys_to_pcie(dev->bus->sysdata);
>> -	int irq;
>> -
>> -	irq = of_irq_parse_and_map_pci(dev, slot, pin);
>> -	if (!irq)
>> -		irq = pp->irq;
>> -
>> -	return irq;
>> -}
>> -
>> -static struct hw_pci dw_pci = {
>> -	.setup		= dw_pcie_setup,
>> -	.scan		= dw_pcie_scan_bus,
>> -	.map_irq	= dw_pcie_map_irq,
>> -};
> 
> Right, 'struct hw_pci' should not be used in order to unify ARM32 and
> ARM64. I have no objection to remove 'struct hw_pci' from 'pcie-designware.c'.
> Thank you for your patch.
> 
> Best regards,
> Jingoo Han
> 

Many thanks for your reviewing!
Zhou Wang

>> -
>>  void dw_pcie_setup_rc(struct pcie_port *pp)
>>  {
>>  	u32 val;
>> -- 
>> 1.9.1
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
> .
> 



WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: wangzhou1@hisilicon.com (Zhou Wang)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v1 1/3] PCI: designware: Add ARM64 support
Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 17:52:09 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5562F0C9.4090007@hisilicon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000001d096a9$27bf43f0$773dcbd0$@com>

On 2015/5/25 13:10, Jingoo Han wrote:
> On Wed, 20 May 2015 14:21:39 +0800, Zhou Wang wrote:
>>
>> This patch tries to unify ARM32 and ARM64 PCIe in designware driver. Delete
>> function dw_pcie_setup, dw_pcie_scan_bus, dw_pcie_map_irq and struct hw_pci,
>> move related operations to dw_pcie_host_init.
>>
>> I am not very clear about I/O resource management:
>>> 	if (global_io_offset < SZ_1M && pp->io_size > 0) {
>>> 		pci_ioremap_io(global_io_offset, pp->io_base);
>>> 		global_io_offset += SZ_64K;
>>> 		pci_add_resource_offset(&res, &pp->io,
>>> 					global_io_offset - pp->io_bus_addr);
>>> 	}
>> so just move steps in dw_pcie_setup to dw_pcie_host_init.
>>
>> I have compiled the driver with multi_v7_defconfig. However, I don't have
>> ARM32 PCIe related board to do test. It will be appreciated if someone could
>> help to test it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c | 128 +++++++++++++++----------------------
>>  1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 78 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
>> index 2e9f84f..7bad9e5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
>> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
>>  #include <linux/pci_regs.h>
>>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>>  #include <linux/types.h>
>> +#include <asm/hardirq.h>
> 
> +cc Kishon Vijay Abraham I, Richard Zhu, Lucas Stach
> 

Thanks to involve more related guys to this discussion :)

> Please use <linux/hardirq.h> and insert it alphabetically.
> 
> +#include <linux/hardirq.h>
>  #include <linux/irq.h>
>  #include <linux/irqdomain.h>
>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
> 

OK, will do in next version patch.

>>  
>>  #include "pcie-designware.h"
>>  
>> @@ -67,17 +68,10 @@
>>  #define PCIE_ATU_FUNC(x)		(((x) & 0x7) << 16)
>>  #define PCIE_ATU_UPPER_TARGET		0x91C
>>  
>> -static struct hw_pci dw_pci;
>> +static struct pci_ops dw_pcie_ops;
>>  
>>  static unsigned long global_io_offset;
>>  
>> -static inline struct pcie_port *sys_to_pcie(struct pci_sys_data *sys)
>> -{
>> -	BUG_ON(!sys->private_data);
>> -
>> -	return sys->private_data;
>> -}
>> -
>>  int dw_pcie_cfg_read(void __iomem *addr, int where, int size, u32 *val)
>>  {
>>  	*val = readl(addr);
>> @@ -238,7 +232,7 @@ static void dw_pcie_msi_set_irq(struct pcie_port *pp, int irq)
>>  static int assign_irq(int no_irqs, struct msi_desc *desc, int *pos)
>>  {
>>  	int irq, pos0, i;
>> -	struct pcie_port *pp = sys_to_pcie(desc->dev->bus->sysdata);
>> +	struct pcie_port *pp = desc->dev->bus->sysdata;
>>  
>>  	pos0 = bitmap_find_free_region(pp->msi_irq_in_use, MAX_MSI_IRQS,
>>  				       order_base_2(no_irqs));
>> @@ -281,7 +275,7 @@ static int dw_msi_setup_irq(struct msi_controller *chip, struct pci_dev *pdev,
>>  {
>>  	int irq, pos;
>>  	struct msi_msg msg;
>> -	struct pcie_port *pp = sys_to_pcie(pdev->bus->sysdata);
>> +	struct pcie_port *pp = pdev->bus->sysdata;
>>  
>>  	if (desc->msi_attrib.is_msix)
>>  		return -EINVAL;
>> @@ -310,7 +304,7 @@ static void dw_msi_teardown_irq(struct msi_controller *chip, unsigned int irq)
>>  {
>>  	struct irq_data *data = irq_get_irq_data(irq);
>>  	struct msi_desc *msi = irq_data_get_msi(data);
>> -	struct pcie_port *pp = sys_to_pcie(msi->dev->bus->sysdata);
>> +	struct pcie_port *pp = msi->dev->bus->sysdata;
>>  
>>  	clear_irq_range(pp, irq, 1, data->hwirq);
>>  }
>> @@ -342,13 +336,15 @@ static const struct irq_domain_ops msi_domain_ops = {
>>  	.map = dw_pcie_msi_map,
>>  };
>>  
>> -int dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
>> +int __init dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
>>  {
>>  	struct device_node *np = pp->dev->of_node;
>>  	struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(pp->dev);
>>  	struct of_pci_range range;
>>  	struct of_pci_range_parser parser;
>> +	struct pci_bus *bus;
>>  	struct resource *cfg_res;
>> +	LIST_HEAD(res);
>>  	u32 val, na, ns;
>>  	const __be32 *addrp;
>>  	int i, index, ret;
>> @@ -502,15 +498,49 @@ int dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
>>  	val |= PORT_LOGIC_SPEED_CHANGE;
>>  	dw_pcie_wr_own_conf(pp, PCIE_LINK_WIDTH_SPEED_CONTROL, 4, val);
>>  
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI
>> -	dw_pcie_msi_chip.dev = pp->dev;
>> -	dw_pci.msi_ctrl = &dw_pcie_msi_chip;
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM
>> +	/*
>> +	 * FIXME: we should really be able to use
>> +	 * of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources on arm32 as well,
>> +	 * but the conversion needs some more testing
>> +	 */
>> +	if (global_io_offset < SZ_1M && pp->io_size > 0) {
>> +		pci_ioremap_io(global_io_offset, pp->io_base);
>> +		global_io_offset += SZ_64K;
>> +		pci_add_resource_offset(&res, &pp->io,
>> +					global_io_offset - pp->io_bus_addr);
>> +	}
>> +	pci_add_resource_offset(&res, &pp->mem,
>> +				pp->mem.start - pp->mem_bus_addr);
>> +	pci_add_resource(&res, &pp->busn);
>> +#else
>> +	ret = of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(np, 0, 0xff, &res, &pp->io_base);
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		return ret;
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +	bus = pci_create_root_bus(pp->dev, pp->root_bus_nr, &dw_pcie_ops,
>> +			      pp, &res);
>> +	if (!bus)
>> +		return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN
>> +	bus->msi = container_of(&pp->irq_domain, struct msi_controller, domain);
>> +#else
>> +	bus->msi = &dw_pcie_msi_chip;
>>  #endif
>>  
>> -	dw_pci.nr_controllers = 1;
>> -	dw_pci.private_data = (void **)&pp;
>> +	pci_scan_child_bus(bus);
>> +	if (pp->ops->scan_bus)
>> +		pp->ops->scan_bus(pp);
>>  
>> -	pci_common_init_dev(pp->dev, &dw_pci);
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM
>> +	/* support old dtbs that incorrectly describe IRQs */
>> +	pci_fixup_irqs(pci_common_swizzle, of_irq_parse_and_map_pci);
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +	pci_assign_unassigned_bus_resources(bus);
>> +	pci_bus_add_devices(bus);
>>  
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
>> @@ -653,7 +683,7 @@ static int dw_pcie_valid_config(struct pcie_port *pp,
>>  static int dw_pcie_rd_conf(struct pci_bus *bus, u32 devfn, int where,
>>  			int size, u32 *val)
>>  {
>> -	struct pcie_port *pp = sys_to_pcie(bus->sysdata);
>> +	struct pcie_port *pp = bus->sysdata;
>>  	int ret;
>>  
>>  	if (dw_pcie_valid_config(pp, bus, PCI_SLOT(devfn)) == 0) {
>> @@ -677,7 +707,7 @@ static int dw_pcie_rd_conf(struct pci_bus *bus, u32 devfn, int where,
>>  static int dw_pcie_wr_conf(struct pci_bus *bus, u32 devfn,
>>  			int where, int size, u32 val)
>>  {
>> -	struct pcie_port *pp = sys_to_pcie(bus->sysdata);
>> +	struct pcie_port *pp = bus->sysdata;
>>  	int ret;
>>  
>>  	if (dw_pcie_valid_config(pp, bus, PCI_SLOT(devfn)) == 0)
>> @@ -701,64 +731,6 @@ static struct pci_ops dw_pcie_ops = {
>>  	.write = dw_pcie_wr_conf,
>>  };
>>  
>> -static int dw_pcie_setup(int nr, struct pci_sys_data *sys)
>> -{
>> -	struct pcie_port *pp;
>> -
>> -	pp = sys_to_pcie(sys);
>> -
>> -	if (global_io_offset < SZ_1M && pp->io_size > 0) {
>> -		sys->io_offset = global_io_offset - pp->io_bus_addr;
>> -		pci_ioremap_io(global_io_offset, pp->io_base);
>> -		global_io_offset += SZ_64K;
>> -		pci_add_resource_offset(&sys->resources, &pp->io,
>> -					sys->io_offset);
>> -	}
>> -
>> -	sys->mem_offset = pp->mem.start - pp->mem_bus_addr;
>> -	pci_add_resource_offset(&sys->resources, &pp->mem, sys->mem_offset);
>> -	pci_add_resource(&sys->resources, &pp->busn);
>> -
>> -	return 1;
>> -}
>> -
>> -static struct pci_bus *dw_pcie_scan_bus(int nr, struct pci_sys_data *sys)
>> -{
>> -	struct pci_bus *bus;
>> -	struct pcie_port *pp = sys_to_pcie(sys);
>> -
>> -	pp->root_bus_nr = sys->busnr;
> 
> 'pp->root_bus_nr' is initialized as '-1' at some soc-specific drivers
> However, 'sys->busnr' is set as '0, 1, 2 ...' by pcibios_init_hw()
> in arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c. '0, 1, 2 ...' means the number of
> each host controller.
> 
> So, without setting 'pp->root_bus_nr' as '0, 1, 2, ...',
> it makes the problem.
> 

'sys->busnr' is set as "0, busn_res.end + 1 ..." in pcibios_init_hw() I think:

pcibios_init_hw()
	for (nr = busnr = 0; nr < hw->nr_controllers; nr++)
		sys->busnr = busnr;
		...
		busnr = sys->bus->busn_res.end + 1;

and it indicates root bus number of one pcie controller.
so in dw_pcie_scan_bus:
	pp->root_bus_nr = sys->busnr;
	bus = pci_create_root_bus(..., sys->busnr, ...);
we set root bus number as "0, busn_res.end + 1". But in pcie-designware,
nr_controllers is set as 1, so it only comes into the loop in
pcibios_init_hw() one time.

so how about we set 0 as default value of pp->root_bus_nr, then use
pci_create_root_bus(pp->dev, pp->root_bus_nr, &dw_pcie_ops, pp, &res);
to create root bus?

> Thus, we need to come up with the way to resolve this.
> 
> 1. Setting 'pp->root_bus_nr' as '0, 1, 2 ..' by each soc-specific driver.
> 
> e.g)
> 
> ./drivers/pci/host/pci-exynos.c
> @@ -534,7 +534,7 @@ static int __init exynos_add_pcie_port(struct pcie_port *pp,
>                 }
>         }
>  
> -       pp->root_bus_nr = -1;
> +       pp->root_bus_nr++;
>         pp->ops = &exynos_pcie_host_ops;
> 
> ./drivers/pci/host/pci-imx6.c
> @@ -541,7 +541,7 @@ static int __init imx6_add_pcie_port(struct pcie_port *pp,
>                 }
>         }
>  
> -       pp->root_bus_nr = -1;
> +       pp->root_bus_nr++;
>         pp->ops = &imx6_pcie_host_ops;
>  
> ./drivers/pci/host/pci-keystone.c
> @@ -312,7 +312,7 @@ static int __init ks_add_pcie_port(struct keystone_pcie *ks_pcie,
>                         return ret;
>         }
>  
> -       pp->root_bus_nr = -1;
> +       pp->root_bus_nr++;
>         pp->ops = &keystone_pcie_host_ops;
> 
> ./drivers/pci/host/pci-layerscape.c
> @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ static int ls_add_pcie_port(struct ls_pcie *pcie)
>         pp = &pcie->pp;
>         pp->dev = pcie->dev;
>         pp->dbi_base = pcie->dbi;
> -       pp->root_bus_nr = -1;
> +       pp->root_bus_nr++;
>         pp->ops = &ls_pcie_host_ops;
>  
> ./drivers/pci/host/pcie-spear13xx.c
> @@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ static int spear13xx_add_pcie_port(struct pcie_port *pp,
>                 return ret;
>         }
>  
> -       pp->root_bus_nr = -1;
> +       pp->root_bus_nr++;
>         pp->ops = &spear13xx_pcie_host_ops;
> 
> 
> 2. Setting 'pp->root_bus_nr' as '0, 1, 2 ..' by pcie-designware.c
> 
> I believe that someone will give better idea. :-)
> 
>> -	bus = pci_create_root_bus(pp->dev, sys->busnr,
>> -				  &dw_pcie_ops, sys, &sys->resources);
>> -	if (!bus)
>> -		return NULL;
>> -
>> -	pci_scan_child_bus(bus);
>> -
>> -	if (bus && pp->ops->scan_bus)
>> -		pp->ops->scan_bus(pp);
>> -
>> -	return bus;
>> -}
>> -
>> -static int dw_pcie_map_irq(const struct pci_dev *dev, u8 slot, u8 pin)
>> -{
>> -	struct pcie_port *pp = sys_to_pcie(dev->bus->sysdata);
>> -	int irq;
>> -
>> -	irq = of_irq_parse_and_map_pci(dev, slot, pin);
>> -	if (!irq)
>> -		irq = pp->irq;
>> -
>> -	return irq;
>> -}
>> -
>> -static struct hw_pci dw_pci = {
>> -	.setup		= dw_pcie_setup,
>> -	.scan		= dw_pcie_scan_bus,
>> -	.map_irq	= dw_pcie_map_irq,
>> -};
> 
> Right, 'struct hw_pci' should not be used in order to unify ARM32 and
> ARM64. I have no objection to remove 'struct hw_pci' from 'pcie-designware.c'.
> Thank you for your patch.
> 
> Best regards,
> Jingoo Han
> 

Many thanks for your reviewing!
Zhou Wang

>> -
>>  void dw_pcie_setup_rc(struct pcie_port *pp)
>>  {
>>  	u32 val;
>> -- 
>> 1.9.1
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
> .
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Zhou Wang <wangzhou1-C8/M+/jPZTeaMJb+Lgu22Q@public.gmane.org>
To: Jingoo Han <jingoohan1-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: 'Bjorn Helgaas'
	<bhelgaas-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	'Pratyush Anand'
	<pratyush.anand-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	'Arnd Bergmann' <arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>,
	'Liviu Dudau' <liviu.dudau-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-pci-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
	devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	'Gabriele Paoloni'
	<gabriele.paoloni-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	'Zhichang Yuan'
	<yuanzhichang-C8/M+/jPZTeaMJb+Lgu22Q@public.gmane.org>,
	zhudacai-C8/M+/jPZTeaMJb+Lgu22Q@public.gmane.org,
	'Zhang Jukuo'
	<zhangjukuo-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	qiuzhenfa-C8/M+/jPZTeaMJb+Lgu22Q@public.gmane.org,
	'Liguozhu' <liguozhu-C8/M+/jPZTeaMJb+Lgu22Q@public.gmane.org>,
	'Kishon Vijay Abraham I' <kishon-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>,
	'Richard Zhu'
	<Richard.Zhu-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>,
	'Lucas Stach' <l.stach-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/3] PCI: designware: Add ARM64 support
Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 17:52:09 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5562F0C9.4090007@hisilicon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000001d096a9$27bf43f0$773dcbd0$@com>

On 2015/5/25 13:10, Jingoo Han wrote:
> On Wed, 20 May 2015 14:21:39 +0800, Zhou Wang wrote:
>>
>> This patch tries to unify ARM32 and ARM64 PCIe in designware driver. Delete
>> function dw_pcie_setup, dw_pcie_scan_bus, dw_pcie_map_irq and struct hw_pci,
>> move related operations to dw_pcie_host_init.
>>
>> I am not very clear about I/O resource management:
>>> 	if (global_io_offset < SZ_1M && pp->io_size > 0) {
>>> 		pci_ioremap_io(global_io_offset, pp->io_base);
>>> 		global_io_offset += SZ_64K;
>>> 		pci_add_resource_offset(&res, &pp->io,
>>> 					global_io_offset - pp->io_bus_addr);
>>> 	}
>> so just move steps in dw_pcie_setup to dw_pcie_host_init.
>>
>> I have compiled the driver with multi_v7_defconfig. However, I don't have
>> ARM32 PCIe related board to do test. It will be appreciated if someone could
>> help to test it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhou Wang <wangzhou1-C8/M+/jPZTeaMJb+Lgu22Q@public.gmane.org>
>> ---
>>  drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c | 128 +++++++++++++++----------------------
>>  1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 78 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
>> index 2e9f84f..7bad9e5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
>> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
>>  #include <linux/pci_regs.h>
>>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>>  #include <linux/types.h>
>> +#include <asm/hardirq.h>
> 
> +cc Kishon Vijay Abraham I, Richard Zhu, Lucas Stach
> 

Thanks to involve more related guys to this discussion :)

> Please use <linux/hardirq.h> and insert it alphabetically.
> 
> +#include <linux/hardirq.h>
>  #include <linux/irq.h>
>  #include <linux/irqdomain.h>
>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
> 

OK, will do in next version patch.

>>  
>>  #include "pcie-designware.h"
>>  
>> @@ -67,17 +68,10 @@
>>  #define PCIE_ATU_FUNC(x)		(((x) & 0x7) << 16)
>>  #define PCIE_ATU_UPPER_TARGET		0x91C
>>  
>> -static struct hw_pci dw_pci;
>> +static struct pci_ops dw_pcie_ops;
>>  
>>  static unsigned long global_io_offset;
>>  
>> -static inline struct pcie_port *sys_to_pcie(struct pci_sys_data *sys)
>> -{
>> -	BUG_ON(!sys->private_data);
>> -
>> -	return sys->private_data;
>> -}
>> -
>>  int dw_pcie_cfg_read(void __iomem *addr, int where, int size, u32 *val)
>>  {
>>  	*val = readl(addr);
>> @@ -238,7 +232,7 @@ static void dw_pcie_msi_set_irq(struct pcie_port *pp, int irq)
>>  static int assign_irq(int no_irqs, struct msi_desc *desc, int *pos)
>>  {
>>  	int irq, pos0, i;
>> -	struct pcie_port *pp = sys_to_pcie(desc->dev->bus->sysdata);
>> +	struct pcie_port *pp = desc->dev->bus->sysdata;
>>  
>>  	pos0 = bitmap_find_free_region(pp->msi_irq_in_use, MAX_MSI_IRQS,
>>  				       order_base_2(no_irqs));
>> @@ -281,7 +275,7 @@ static int dw_msi_setup_irq(struct msi_controller *chip, struct pci_dev *pdev,
>>  {
>>  	int irq, pos;
>>  	struct msi_msg msg;
>> -	struct pcie_port *pp = sys_to_pcie(pdev->bus->sysdata);
>> +	struct pcie_port *pp = pdev->bus->sysdata;
>>  
>>  	if (desc->msi_attrib.is_msix)
>>  		return -EINVAL;
>> @@ -310,7 +304,7 @@ static void dw_msi_teardown_irq(struct msi_controller *chip, unsigned int irq)
>>  {
>>  	struct irq_data *data = irq_get_irq_data(irq);
>>  	struct msi_desc *msi = irq_data_get_msi(data);
>> -	struct pcie_port *pp = sys_to_pcie(msi->dev->bus->sysdata);
>> +	struct pcie_port *pp = msi->dev->bus->sysdata;
>>  
>>  	clear_irq_range(pp, irq, 1, data->hwirq);
>>  }
>> @@ -342,13 +336,15 @@ static const struct irq_domain_ops msi_domain_ops = {
>>  	.map = dw_pcie_msi_map,
>>  };
>>  
>> -int dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
>> +int __init dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
>>  {
>>  	struct device_node *np = pp->dev->of_node;
>>  	struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(pp->dev);
>>  	struct of_pci_range range;
>>  	struct of_pci_range_parser parser;
>> +	struct pci_bus *bus;
>>  	struct resource *cfg_res;
>> +	LIST_HEAD(res);
>>  	u32 val, na, ns;
>>  	const __be32 *addrp;
>>  	int i, index, ret;
>> @@ -502,15 +498,49 @@ int dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
>>  	val |= PORT_LOGIC_SPEED_CHANGE;
>>  	dw_pcie_wr_own_conf(pp, PCIE_LINK_WIDTH_SPEED_CONTROL, 4, val);
>>  
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI
>> -	dw_pcie_msi_chip.dev = pp->dev;
>> -	dw_pci.msi_ctrl = &dw_pcie_msi_chip;
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM
>> +	/*
>> +	 * FIXME: we should really be able to use
>> +	 * of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources on arm32 as well,
>> +	 * but the conversion needs some more testing
>> +	 */
>> +	if (global_io_offset < SZ_1M && pp->io_size > 0) {
>> +		pci_ioremap_io(global_io_offset, pp->io_base);
>> +		global_io_offset += SZ_64K;
>> +		pci_add_resource_offset(&res, &pp->io,
>> +					global_io_offset - pp->io_bus_addr);
>> +	}
>> +	pci_add_resource_offset(&res, &pp->mem,
>> +				pp->mem.start - pp->mem_bus_addr);
>> +	pci_add_resource(&res, &pp->busn);
>> +#else
>> +	ret = of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(np, 0, 0xff, &res, &pp->io_base);
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		return ret;
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +	bus = pci_create_root_bus(pp->dev, pp->root_bus_nr, &dw_pcie_ops,
>> +			      pp, &res);
>> +	if (!bus)
>> +		return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN
>> +	bus->msi = container_of(&pp->irq_domain, struct msi_controller, domain);
>> +#else
>> +	bus->msi = &dw_pcie_msi_chip;
>>  #endif
>>  
>> -	dw_pci.nr_controllers = 1;
>> -	dw_pci.private_data = (void **)&pp;
>> +	pci_scan_child_bus(bus);
>> +	if (pp->ops->scan_bus)
>> +		pp->ops->scan_bus(pp);
>>  
>> -	pci_common_init_dev(pp->dev, &dw_pci);
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM
>> +	/* support old dtbs that incorrectly describe IRQs */
>> +	pci_fixup_irqs(pci_common_swizzle, of_irq_parse_and_map_pci);
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +	pci_assign_unassigned_bus_resources(bus);
>> +	pci_bus_add_devices(bus);
>>  
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
>> @@ -653,7 +683,7 @@ static int dw_pcie_valid_config(struct pcie_port *pp,
>>  static int dw_pcie_rd_conf(struct pci_bus *bus, u32 devfn, int where,
>>  			int size, u32 *val)
>>  {
>> -	struct pcie_port *pp = sys_to_pcie(bus->sysdata);
>> +	struct pcie_port *pp = bus->sysdata;
>>  	int ret;
>>  
>>  	if (dw_pcie_valid_config(pp, bus, PCI_SLOT(devfn)) == 0) {
>> @@ -677,7 +707,7 @@ static int dw_pcie_rd_conf(struct pci_bus *bus, u32 devfn, int where,
>>  static int dw_pcie_wr_conf(struct pci_bus *bus, u32 devfn,
>>  			int where, int size, u32 val)
>>  {
>> -	struct pcie_port *pp = sys_to_pcie(bus->sysdata);
>> +	struct pcie_port *pp = bus->sysdata;
>>  	int ret;
>>  
>>  	if (dw_pcie_valid_config(pp, bus, PCI_SLOT(devfn)) == 0)
>> @@ -701,64 +731,6 @@ static struct pci_ops dw_pcie_ops = {
>>  	.write = dw_pcie_wr_conf,
>>  };
>>  
>> -static int dw_pcie_setup(int nr, struct pci_sys_data *sys)
>> -{
>> -	struct pcie_port *pp;
>> -
>> -	pp = sys_to_pcie(sys);
>> -
>> -	if (global_io_offset < SZ_1M && pp->io_size > 0) {
>> -		sys->io_offset = global_io_offset - pp->io_bus_addr;
>> -		pci_ioremap_io(global_io_offset, pp->io_base);
>> -		global_io_offset += SZ_64K;
>> -		pci_add_resource_offset(&sys->resources, &pp->io,
>> -					sys->io_offset);
>> -	}
>> -
>> -	sys->mem_offset = pp->mem.start - pp->mem_bus_addr;
>> -	pci_add_resource_offset(&sys->resources, &pp->mem, sys->mem_offset);
>> -	pci_add_resource(&sys->resources, &pp->busn);
>> -
>> -	return 1;
>> -}
>> -
>> -static struct pci_bus *dw_pcie_scan_bus(int nr, struct pci_sys_data *sys)
>> -{
>> -	struct pci_bus *bus;
>> -	struct pcie_port *pp = sys_to_pcie(sys);
>> -
>> -	pp->root_bus_nr = sys->busnr;
> 
> 'pp->root_bus_nr' is initialized as '-1' at some soc-specific drivers
> However, 'sys->busnr' is set as '0, 1, 2 ...' by pcibios_init_hw()
> in arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c. '0, 1, 2 ...' means the number of
> each host controller.
> 
> So, without setting 'pp->root_bus_nr' as '0, 1, 2, ...',
> it makes the problem.
> 

'sys->busnr' is set as "0, busn_res.end + 1 ..." in pcibios_init_hw() I think:

pcibios_init_hw()
	for (nr = busnr = 0; nr < hw->nr_controllers; nr++)
		sys->busnr = busnr;
		...
		busnr = sys->bus->busn_res.end + 1;

and it indicates root bus number of one pcie controller.
so in dw_pcie_scan_bus:
	pp->root_bus_nr = sys->busnr;
	bus = pci_create_root_bus(..., sys->busnr, ...);
we set root bus number as "0, busn_res.end + 1". But in pcie-designware,
nr_controllers is set as 1, so it only comes into the loop in
pcibios_init_hw() one time.

so how about we set 0 as default value of pp->root_bus_nr, then use
pci_create_root_bus(pp->dev, pp->root_bus_nr, &dw_pcie_ops, pp, &res);
to create root bus?

> Thus, we need to come up with the way to resolve this.
> 
> 1. Setting 'pp->root_bus_nr' as '0, 1, 2 ..' by each soc-specific driver.
> 
> e.g)
> 
> ./drivers/pci/host/pci-exynos.c
> @@ -534,7 +534,7 @@ static int __init exynos_add_pcie_port(struct pcie_port *pp,
>                 }
>         }
>  
> -       pp->root_bus_nr = -1;
> +       pp->root_bus_nr++;
>         pp->ops = &exynos_pcie_host_ops;
> 
> ./drivers/pci/host/pci-imx6.c
> @@ -541,7 +541,7 @@ static int __init imx6_add_pcie_port(struct pcie_port *pp,
>                 }
>         }
>  
> -       pp->root_bus_nr = -1;
> +       pp->root_bus_nr++;
>         pp->ops = &imx6_pcie_host_ops;
>  
> ./drivers/pci/host/pci-keystone.c
> @@ -312,7 +312,7 @@ static int __init ks_add_pcie_port(struct keystone_pcie *ks_pcie,
>                         return ret;
>         }
>  
> -       pp->root_bus_nr = -1;
> +       pp->root_bus_nr++;
>         pp->ops = &keystone_pcie_host_ops;
> 
> ./drivers/pci/host/pci-layerscape.c
> @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ static int ls_add_pcie_port(struct ls_pcie *pcie)
>         pp = &pcie->pp;
>         pp->dev = pcie->dev;
>         pp->dbi_base = pcie->dbi;
> -       pp->root_bus_nr = -1;
> +       pp->root_bus_nr++;
>         pp->ops = &ls_pcie_host_ops;
>  
> ./drivers/pci/host/pcie-spear13xx.c
> @@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ static int spear13xx_add_pcie_port(struct pcie_port *pp,
>                 return ret;
>         }
>  
> -       pp->root_bus_nr = -1;
> +       pp->root_bus_nr++;
>         pp->ops = &spear13xx_pcie_host_ops;
> 
> 
> 2. Setting 'pp->root_bus_nr' as '0, 1, 2 ..' by pcie-designware.c
> 
> I believe that someone will give better idea. :-)
> 
>> -	bus = pci_create_root_bus(pp->dev, sys->busnr,
>> -				  &dw_pcie_ops, sys, &sys->resources);
>> -	if (!bus)
>> -		return NULL;
>> -
>> -	pci_scan_child_bus(bus);
>> -
>> -	if (bus && pp->ops->scan_bus)
>> -		pp->ops->scan_bus(pp);
>> -
>> -	return bus;
>> -}
>> -
>> -static int dw_pcie_map_irq(const struct pci_dev *dev, u8 slot, u8 pin)
>> -{
>> -	struct pcie_port *pp = sys_to_pcie(dev->bus->sysdata);
>> -	int irq;
>> -
>> -	irq = of_irq_parse_and_map_pci(dev, slot, pin);
>> -	if (!irq)
>> -		irq = pp->irq;
>> -
>> -	return irq;
>> -}
>> -
>> -static struct hw_pci dw_pci = {
>> -	.setup		= dw_pcie_setup,
>> -	.scan		= dw_pcie_scan_bus,
>> -	.map_irq	= dw_pcie_map_irq,
>> -};
> 
> Right, 'struct hw_pci' should not be used in order to unify ARM32 and
> ARM64. I have no objection to remove 'struct hw_pci' from 'pcie-designware.c'.
> Thank you for your patch.
> 
> Best regards,
> Jingoo Han
> 

Many thanks for your reviewing!
Zhou Wang

>> -
>>  void dw_pcie_setup_rc(struct pcie_port *pp)
>>  {
>>  	u32 val;
>> -- 
>> 1.9.1
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
> the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
> .
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-25  9:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-25  5:10 [RFC PATCH v1 1/3] PCI: designware: Add ARM64 support Jingoo Han
2015-05-25  5:10 ` Jingoo Han
2015-05-25  9:52 ` Zhou Wang [this message]
2015-05-25  9:52   ` Zhou Wang
2015-05-25  9:52   ` Zhou Wang
2015-05-25 13:48   ` Jingoo Han
2015-05-25 13:48     ` Jingoo Han
2015-05-25 13:48     ` Jingoo Han
2015-05-25 15:51     ` Fabrice Gasnier
2015-05-25 15:51       ` Fabrice Gasnier
2015-05-25 15:51       ` Fabrice Gasnier
2015-05-26  2:49       ` Zhou Wang
2015-05-26  2:49         ` Zhou Wang
2015-05-26  2:49         ` Zhou Wang
2015-05-26  8:02         ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-26  8:02           ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-27 13:56           ` Zhou Wang
2015-05-27 13:56             ` Zhou Wang
2015-05-27 13:56             ` Zhou Wang
2015-05-27 15:31             ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-27 15:31               ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-27 15:31               ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-27 15:43               ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-27 15:43                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-27 16:19                 ` Fabrice Gasnier
2015-05-27 16:19                   ` Fabrice Gasnier
2015-05-27 16:19                   ` Fabrice Gasnier
2015-05-27 19:51                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-27 19:51                     ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-28 11:48                     ` Zhou Wang
2015-05-28 11:48                       ` Zhou Wang
2015-05-28 11:48                       ` Zhou Wang
2015-05-28 12:25                       ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-28 12:25                         ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-28 11:40                   ` Zhou Wang
2015-05-28 11:40                     ` Zhou Wang
2015-05-28 11:40                     ` Zhou Wang
2015-05-28 11:34                 ` Zhou Wang
2015-05-28 11:34                   ` Zhou Wang
2015-05-28 11:34                   ` Zhou Wang
2015-05-28 12:30                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-28 12:30                     ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-28 12:30                     ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-26  8:03         ` Fabrice Gasnier
2015-05-26  8:03           ` Fabrice Gasnier
2015-05-26  8:03           ` Fabrice Gasnier
2015-05-27 13:24           ` Zhou Wang
2015-05-27 13:24             ` Zhou Wang
2015-05-27 13:24             ` Zhou Wang
2015-05-27 13:52             ` Fabrice Gasnier
2015-05-27 13:52               ` Fabrice Gasnier
2015-05-27 13:52               ` Fabrice Gasnier
2015-05-26  2:04     ` Zhou Wang
2015-05-26  2:04       ` Zhou Wang
2015-05-26  2:04       ` Zhou Wang
2015-05-26  8:09 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-26  8:09   ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-27 13:28   ` Zhou Wang
2015-05-27 13:28     ` Zhou Wang
2015-05-27 13:28     ` Zhou Wang
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-05-20  6:21 [RFC PATCH v1 0/3] PCI: hisi: Add PCIe host support for Hisilicon Soc Hip05 Zhou Wang
2015-05-20  6:21 ` [RFC PATCH v1 1/3] PCI: designware: Add ARM64 support Zhou Wang
2015-05-20  6:21   ` Zhou Wang
2015-05-20  6:21   ` Zhou Wang
2015-05-25  1:33   ` Zhou Wang
2015-05-25  1:33     ` Zhou Wang
2015-05-25  1:33     ` Zhou Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5562F0C9.4090007@hisilicon.com \
    --to=wangzhou1@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=Richard.Zhu@freescale.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gabriele.paoloni@huawei.com \
    --cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
    --cc=kishon@ti.com \
    --cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=liguozhu@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liviu.dudau@arm.com \
    --cc=pratyush.anand@gmail.com \
    --cc=qiuzhenfa@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=yuanzhichang@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=zhangjukuo@huawei.com \
    --cc=zhudacai@hisilicon.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.